SJW Art and Extremes

Why does Tumblr have an obsession with vitiligo?

  • Suicide Girl model and America's Next Top Model contestant have it, spread on Tumblr, that's why.

    Votes: 669 16.2%

  • Stop fucking asking this this question.

    Votes: 480 11.6%

  • I swear to God I will start deleting these posts.

    Votes: 146 3.5%

  • Goddammit.

    Votes: 393 9.5%

  • ACTUALLY IT'S PART OF A DEEP FALSE-FLAG OPERATION TO TURN ALL BLACK PEOPLE WHITE.

    Votes: 2,442 59.1%
  • Total voters
    4,129
Ad Lib Moaning said:
Genuine question: How come these artists don't know how to draw women? Learning the 'shapes' of them is easy; men are sharp/square-ish, women are curvy/round. There's also the point that drawing your own gender is more easy than the opposite gender, since you have yourself as a easy reference for the fundamentals. (Not counting that most of them are very likely to be fat, but artists can make chubby/fat people look good, and there's still the point of women looking 'round') Yet for most of the art here, when its supposed to be a woman, its drawn with the body as a man and/or have the face of a man. How did you fuck it up so badly? Even if the reason was "I hate pretty women" or whatever, completely neutral women still exist. Ugly but still somewhat good-looking women can be drawn.
Even Ronald Dahl + Quentin Blake is a common example of the latter with their books, with that one page of The Twits used the most as an example.
View attachment 1865044
Click to expand...
The mistake is assuming they "don't know." They do know shape language and body types and everything else, they just don't care. The SJW artist fundamentally believes that what makes art appealing is actually what upholds patriarchal/sexist/racist/transphobic beliefs. Think men and women are fundamentally different, or can be defined at all? Then what about transgender people?? Are you gonna draw a trans person that looks like a man in drag? How transphobic! Is your female character pretty at all? How sexist, how misogynist, how pandering-to-the-male-gaze-y! Every design choice an SJW artist makes is to intentionally be contrary, spiteful, and "progressive," so you get the most grotesque looking characters but with the underlying insistence they're "what people actually look like outside of [the enemy's] beauty standards" and/or truly beautiful.

Which they're not. People are lying to themselves. But good luck convincing someone who doesn't want any help that their art is garbage. Have fun talking to that wall.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: janekop, Akumaten, UnsufficentBoobage and 12 others
Teethie_dan said:
View attachment 1865303
What could I say...
Click to expand...
why do this when there was actually a (more appealing) dark-skinned junko in concept art
junko.png
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Color Computer, Doctor of Autism, Wych Elm and 22 others
Ad Lib Moaning said:
why do this when there was actually a (more appealing) dark-skinned junko in concept art
View attachment 1865909
Click to expand...
Because that isn't woke enough. Especially for that artist. Pcktknife, I think they were Bl4ck-vamps or something for a while but they go for every box they can with their redesigns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Akumaten, UnsufficentBoobage, Pina Colada and 9 others
Chromeo said:
The mistake is assuming they "don't know." They do know shape language and body types and everything else, they just don't care. The SJW artist fundamentally believes that what makes art appealing is actually what upholds patriarchal/sexist/racist/transphobic beliefs. Think men and women are fundamentally different, or can be defined at all? Then what about transgender people?? Are you gonna draw a trans person that looks like a man in drag? How transphobic! Is your female character pretty at all? How sexist, how misogynist, how pandering-to-the-male-gaze-y! Every design choice an SJW artist makes is to intentionally be contrary, spiteful, and "progressive," so you get the most grotesque looking characters but with the underlying insistence they're "what people actually look like outside of [the enemy's] beauty standards" and/or truly beautiful.
Click to expand...
This crap reminds me of some guy i've seen on twitter some time ago who posted constantly about "unlearning beauty" and that the concept of beauty and proportion was inherently white because it held white people as the epitome of beauty or some crap like that. Guy focused on making only asian people on his art and they were borderline racist caricatures.
 
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
Reactions: JimmyHill'sBlarms, Akumaten, UnsufficentBoobage and 4 others
Lapis Lazuli said:
View attachment 1865007
Just from the thumbnail alone, I'm already unimpressed.
Click to expand...
Im more interested in Miraculous/Miraculum rewrite and why the og concept is bad, than a Thumbnail
Opposite Time Nomad said:
Wait a second!! Wait! Is this Cubert?? The one who drew lots of piss/vomit fetish shit with transformers n stuff several years ago?? Id recognize that style anywhere!
Click to expand...
Say it more. Everyone is interested
4ngelbit_20210123_111901_0.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Pina Colada, Devyn and 8 others
Malagor the dank omen said:
This crap reminds me of some guy i've seen on twitter some time ago who posted constantly about "unlearning beauty" and that the concept of beauty and proportion was inherently white because it held white people as the epitome of beauty or some crap like that. Guy focused on making only asian people on his art and they were borderline racist caricatures.
Click to expand...
Damn, I think I remember that guy. My absolute favourite was the one, that resembled Far Cry cover art. I'll try to find it, but it's on my old pc.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Malagor the dank omen
Noebel said:
Damn, I think I remember that guy. My absolute favourite was the one, that resembled Far Cry cover art. I'll try to find it, but it's on my old pc.
Click to expand...
I mean, if i saw his stuff i would recognize it inmediately because his rants about "white beauty standards erasing asian beauty" were fucking ludicrous and he came off as being so bitter that the average Karen would kneel in defeat in front of him. Plus, his artstyle was... special.
 
Chromeo said:
The mistake is assuming they "don't know." They do know shape language and body types and everything else, they just don't care. The SJW artist fundamentally believes that what makes art appealing is actually what upholds patriarchal/sexist/racist/transphobic beliefs. Think men and women are fundamentally different, or can be defined at all? Then what about transgender people?? Are you gonna draw a trans person that looks like a man in drag? How transphobic! Is your female character pretty at all? How sexist, how misogynist, how pandering-to-the-male-gaze-y! Every design choice an SJW artist makes is to intentionally be contrary, spiteful, and "progressive," so you get the most grotesque looking characters but with the underlying insistence they're "what people actually look like outside of [the enemy's] beauty standards" and/or truly beautiful.

Which they're not. People are lying to themselves. But good luck convincing someone who doesn't want any help that their art is garbage. Have fun talking to that wall.
Click to expand...
Maybe it’s a little bit of both?

You gotta admit that hiding behind deflections of racism/sexism probably works wonders for your unwarranted self importance if you’re the kind of lazy motherfucker who wants accolades without putting any work into them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pina Colada and FUGA
Vihainen Suomalainen said:
View attachment 1867077
What in the fresh living fuck am I looking at?
Click to expand...
Oh, that's... a Gijinka. Cosmog, from Pokemon Sun/Moon, but i wouldn't have guessed unless i saw the "Nebby" in the picture along with a semblance of the same color pattern.

I will say the colors are way too bright, even to be Cosmog's Gijinka.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pina Colada and Kuchipatchi
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back