So algorythmising it:
TC // 0.5-typological equivalency definitively
TVF // defaultatively denullative if "purged" more than 5 times with no "hidden non-fleetingness" otherwise purged can be unlimited so long as there's "obvious hidden unfleetingness" i.e. you're bitching about it to your wife, husband (this would be seen as a "gay reprobancy warning" only if it was obvious there wasn't even a submissive and/or latently feminine one at all), colleagues, kids, classmates, if you're deranged, [insert_disorder_here]wranglers, mother, family, etc. When non-denullative, type-0.75 to greater purgers (non-judgemented it's just that everyone knows he's unserious, sexually aggressive, even directly piss taking so to speak in every manner apart from the indirect projective aggression of "look at these transwomen as they proclaim and how hypocritically degenerate they are rawarwwraeraww", presumed type-1.5 if lesser or greater purgers under judgemented duress, presumed "redirect to type 3 minimum" if homosexual voyeurism was transversive i.e. the fantasies of one as gay was in even so little as feminine in role, let alone feminine in vague or oblique appearance: AGP is illegal except in one clinic in Scotland to diagnose and even on that clinic and it's proviso it is seen as "redirect to a 3.5-like equivalency with surgery withhold for nothing really but the GRS"; I thankfully did have transversive and quite beyond that ultimately fantasies so no danger here, there'd be no need for a type-1 process or variable triggering
TVD // basically a non-category theoretically in my mind and something I admit to understanding theoretically poorly enough as I can argue dichotomically, I can argue contradictorially, I can argue counterassertatively and recursively until abstrusing something into dispersion, but I can never understand "contrarietous existence when encapsulated" except in simplistic and direct terms which I suppose makes me a bit "negroidal". To put it to my limited-ish understanding it is essentially a state in which you are, to use Korean cartoon terms, "Racoon Dog" to some and "Chipmunk Squirrel" to others. "Racoon Dog" predominancy is usually how it starts out in youth and "rabid Racoon Dogging" is typically how it manifests in adolescence, they become so resentful of "intra-Squirrelicisms" that they rabidify spiritually; many immerse in military culture, military ballad and chorus, many engage in adhering to militant political philosophies of either wing, many even join the military, or close equivalents upon inapplicability like police, security, "ancestral honour gang" or paramil. Some become a bit veiner: Brenner types, etc. Now, it is unfortunate that people don't see Manning as a purgerially subhuman retardation-tier hack for continuously denigrating without considerate correction to the purgis-protected, food-buoyed, and co-pharmaceuticalisation (his medicaments were always progesterone reinforced to disguise his limitations of intelligence) of his medicaments whilst attributing to him everything above my standard of transition which had by my inspection of the category fails whereas passing for Manning on 3 traits: deliberate entertaining of contrarietances, "varsity nodding/bowing/courtseying fetiahistically even in private intention" -- mine is "ethnic honour linkative" and so exceeds the 2% Mongoloid ethnicity minimum, which even with considerations to increase it to 5% protects me and not in a million years him unless his powwow genes become so considered, and aggression preservation linked hiding -- he had a lesser one, masculinity; I had a greater and disclusive one owing to "ethnic psychodynamy for two out of three minor or major groups", Eastern European and Mongoloid individuals when in primacy of intermix, not, or this alone typically respond angrily to exposure on "intelligence denigration fear" grounds, although masculinity would be implied as a "strong secondary" for the Eastern European ones; lying Manning says he was a non-emphasiser, no, I was
For Eastern European in which second grouping is a problem, usually a Central-Eastern or Nordic-like/Eastern works well enough... Sometimes though in Scottish practice for Eastern coaster ones your Celtic ethnicity protects if your clan can be connected to a Lowland Scot's ethnicid one as well as a Highland Scot's one
Type 4 redirection in those cases described of a typifiable exposure anxiety/anger regardless of presentable emphasis thereof based on honour with no Racoonaicism hiding or otherwise untypifiable but invertesly as to so post-sufficiency higher GD threshold, alternatively typifiable in the Racoon-hiding exposure anxieties type-3/>5 differentiation should begin in assessment
TT // doesn't really entail much more than diffusive borderline connected to either, in prejudice enforced hiding conditions, an absolute desire, or otherwise, absolute requirement, to present, along with two traits in practice here is subsumed to the GD model: a need to exhibit post-courtesied behaviour superegotistically to an egotistically-interlinked extent that has sans-id or "exocentric" characteristics
I'm being attacked impurgatively to my own tiredness' superficial (I use this term to mean "those things so egregious that they are ought not to have happened and so outrageous therefore are they that resentment over their occurence is far more than requited") induction so I'll complete more on processes of how to properly weed out TVF-reductionist categorical presumptions in some due course of the upcoming period whenever it is I wake up...
