Cultcow Marjan Šiklić / Marijan Ciklic / GovernmentsGetGirlfriends / ThatIncelBlogger / CAAMIB - Third Edition: Fear and Loathing of Vagina

In the interview Holden granted me, which I'm still editing from the original chatlog, he did explain the incident with the blogger, Jesslyn Nicole, who wanted to move herself and her son to Zagreb so she could pursue a relationship with him. Instead of jumping on this opportunity, he told her to bring only the boy's head.

According to Holden, he was being cruel to be kind. The boy had been homeschooled all his life, and apparently there is no homeschooling allowed in Croatia. He implied the boy had special educational needs in addition to medical ones, and that neither would be properly addressed if the mum dragged her boy to Croatia, which he described as a shithole with few or no jobs available.

So, in scaring her off, he genuinely believes he was being benevolent on the boy's behalf and not subjecting him to a sudden move to a foreign country where neither mum nor kid speaks the language, and where the boy would be miserable.

Is this the kind of thing you mean, @IceCat?
 
  • Informative
  • Feels
Reactions: 4Macie, DuskEngine, DirkBloodStormKing and 3 others
NobleGreyHorse said:
In the interview Holden granted me, which I'm still editing from the original chatlog, he did explain the incident with the blogger, Jesslyn Nicole, who wanted to move herself and her son to Zagreb so she could pursue a relationship with him. Instead of jumping on this opportunity, he told her to bring only the boy's head.

According to Holden, he was being cruel to be kind. The boy had been homeschooled all his life, and apparently there is no homeschooling allowed in Croatia. He implied the boy had special educational needs in addition to medical ones, and that neither would be properly addressed if the mum dragged her boy to Croatia, which he described as a shithole with few or no jobs available.

So, in scaring her off, he genuinely believes he was being benevolent on the boy's behalf and not subjecting him to a sudden move to a foreign country where neither mum nor kid speaks the language, and where the boy would be miserable.

Is this the kind of thing you mean, @IceCat?
Click to expand...
If I recall correctly (and I think I have screenshots from sluthate) he said that she wasn't even real. Maybe he just meant the one on SH or I'm going senile... I'll try and hunt down the screenshot, though.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: DuskEngine, NobleGreyHorse, Emiya Kiwitsugu and 1 other person
NobleGreyHorse said:
In the interview Holden granted me, which I'm still editing from the original chatlog, he did explain the incident with the blogger, Jesslyn Nicole, who wanted to move herself and her son to Zagreb so she could pursue a relationship with him. Instead of jumping on this opportunity, he told her to bring only the boy's head.

According to Holden, he was being cruel to be kind. The boy had been homeschooled all his life, and apparently there is no homeschooling allowed in Croatia. He implied the boy had special educational needs in addition to medical ones, and that neither would be properly addressed if the mum dragged her boy to Croatia, which he described as a shithole with few or no jobs available.

So, in scaring her off, he genuinely believes he was being benevolent on the boy's behalf and not subjecting him to a sudden move to a foreign country where neither mum nor kid speaks the language, and where the boy would be miserable.

Is this the kind of thing you mean, @IceCat?
Click to expand...

actually is because the child would be hidrance in his quest of infinite sex, he hate childrens, he admitted in reddit

of course if the child was a girl THEN IS DIFFERENT
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Scratch This Nut, NobleGreyHorse, DirkBloodStormKing and 1 other person
Saint said:
Don't forget "Pretty boy super seducer" either. He doesn't like when people not only have a wife, but are in basically an open or swinging relationship.

But I agree with @HickoryDickory, I think @Holden has some very real problems and needs some help. I don't think I can pick on him in good consciousness anymore. I will probably still lurk here for a while, but I don't think I will post much other than simply asking him questions from time to time. He needs to find help and find something to love other than being here. I hope he can find it in himself to do so.
Click to expand...

A part of me pities him for the obvious mental illnesses he obviously has, but the other part of me remembers that he's naturally a jerk on his own. It's a pretty common situation with most cows. A bad combination of what tends to be untreated mental illness, in addition to being inherently rude and egotistical. One or the other one their own fails to produce the likes of Chris, Shaner, or Fuckbot. It takes an unfortunate combination of both to create someone worthy of being a cow. Plus, he also raped a woman via blackmail all of those years back. Something as detailed and complicated as utilizing blackmail to rape a woman isn't something sudden or that can easily be blamed on any of the illnesses he seems to express.

So to hell with you, @Holden. I'll gladly yell at you here until you die of terminal inceldom. :alog:
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Scratch This Nut, NobleGreyHorse, DirkBloodStormKing and 2 others
Are horses noble creatures now, Holden?
 
Holden said:
Our country... is a strange country. All this secularism is not good. It's not United States of America but United States of fagia now.We're almost like the protestants believing in Pope.


I mean... religion is my own choice? And meanwhile I can go around and kill ? All that matters is that I believe in God? The church authority is weak because people don't want to listen to the truth. It's horrible. Catholics don't only believe but LIVE like that. It's what makes them different from protestants. But this fag like people would rather live any way it wants while Church should be telling them they live good Christian lives. What are they expecting ?!

Now I got angry

I feel sorry for the naive and innocent people who think we will be free if we let everybody do everything while saying "it doesn't hurt anybody"
I also like those famous words "it doesn't insult anybody"

I GET INSULTED WHEN TWO FAGS ARE FUCKING ON THE STREET AND I AM SICK IF I CALL THEM SICK ?!

It insults a lot of people... but they are coerced. They have to stay silent.... or they get sanctioned. Explain that ! Who's bad word who now ??!!
I dunno how can people support gays !!!

Do you have any idea how these secular emasculated fake fags think when they are doing these horrible things ??!!..

It's not a rhetorical question... I want your thoughts and analysis... why?


Ah... But christian's theory says... That these people are shortsighted. Little sugary hedonists who want to have fun. Do they even think about consequences? Only consequence they want to create is to do what will benefit them- for example, making homosexuality normal

And after that?

What will happen after?

They don't think. They read too fairy fairy tales and saw too many cartoons.

No

The consequences will come !

Just like we learned from history. Let me take niggers for example. If we never legalized niggers... We wouldn't be talking about fags now. So let's give fags all the rights and benefits. And it's just a matter of time when the pedophiles will get the same. I will probably be dead by then. But I wouldn't let anybody's kid being licked by a pedophile.. even if I don't know the person. Now what? Well, I'm looking into future... What's next after pedophiles? Zoophiliacs? Necrophiliacs? Restphiliacs?

How can I know what will be approved next and we aren't thinking about it now. It's funny because it is true.... I know. Would you like your grandchildren to be touched by a pedophile?

I don't want to be a part of today's "reality" and supprot such horrible things because I have convictions and think about the future. A term that people underestimate. Until it is too late.

gays,

There you go. You answered your question yourself. They still think they are progressive. The hell they are. My dick is more progressive... though it never saw pussy

Should we go in circles?

Is it nice to say who is bad word who? Even if they are heterosexuals. I DON'T CARE. Is it dignified to reveal what a man is doing in his private time? And show that on streets and in protests? So that small children can look and ask themselves- my god, what are they doing? What would you say to a child who just saw ugly men and women kissing each other while protesting?

Let gays fuck in jail or pay restitution to the state. No, no... You all saw that there is a "show" at the end of the protest. And gays marching is one big pornographic show...because the purpose of it is to show gay turning into a gay. .. their sexual orientation. And sexual orientation is when you can get in hard on something. And gays get it hard on gays. On streets. In front of children. They make parades to show how they can get it up on the street. And if the child would saw that by accident... Who would be to blame? Gays would say right away that it's the child's fault for being on the street in the first place. So, let's ban children going out?

I SAY it's the fault of the liberals because they allowed ass bad word to be glorified while knowing the consequences. As was to be expected because they are only looking after their own interests. Nobody else exists for them. And if somebody says anything against them... They are branded by the liberals right away because liberals are "progressive" and progressive people are AAAAAALWAYS right... so normal people are racists, fundies, homophobic.

...And gays our normal.. to prove it they need their parades

uh... of course - if somebody saw their parades and supported them ... they would be normal right away and everything would be ok

What are they expecting with their parades? Medals? For "bravery"? Yeah right. If you are really brave you would stand up to those liberal gays and told them that they are not healthy. You should get a medal for that... not bad word in your ass in public.

Do I even have to mention how it is in conflict with natural choices. Though I can already imagine gays saying how some animals are gay.

If so, you have two choices

1. if you want to compare yourself to an animal why do you need clothes or human rights?
go live on a street like an animal
but don't come to my porch cause i will shoot you and make mincemeat out of you

2. or you will understand that some animals in heat are jumping everything in despair
take dogs for example
dogs in heat jump at EVERYTHING... does that mean dogs are pansexuals?

so... the argument that animals are doing it too is not right

but i wouldn't be surprised if there were still more liberals who would say it's "genetic"... there are no genes but only our lord jesus christ

dear people, if the problem was genetical gays would die off long ago.
the problem of gays and all the other liberal masses of complexes is their traumatic childhood
and instead of facing it, talking about it, getting cured... what do they do? they turn it into pride to feel less bad

gay pride

but of course nobody will get treatment today. because the gay lobbies are too strong in medical circles. .. and they made the doctors say how homosexuality is not a disease NOW THEY SAY THAT THE ONES CALLING GAYS SICK ARE SICK

They are banning any research to harm to liberals. That's why there are rare independent psychologists who did research and concluded it's a disease, of course
to say that a mental disorder is normal... is just stupid

is pedophilia normal too in that case? or schizophrenia? ufgh.. can't wait for " schizo pride " !!or pero parade !! At least pedophiles have their own action figure.... While gays are too occupied by accusing others of being intolerant so they have nothing to say but how they are "proud" for taking it up the ass

and they wonder about our reaction

huh... i got tired from all this writing
Click to expand...

The advanced vocabulary in this was suspicious enough to warrant an investigation into what Holden has posted here. Since he's posted here fairly recently, I'll share that the investigation yielded this to be another example of Holden's complete lack of originality.

This still doesn't explain why he went batshit at the end of the last thread explaining why the legalization of gay marriage hurts the feelings of straight people in stark contradiction to his prior stances (I stand by this theory of mine), but at least we're a step closer to understanding this.
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: Emiya Kiwitsugu, DogshitTaco and DirkBloodStormKing
4Macie said:
So what's good about Holden? Enlighten us.
Click to expand...
Maybe the fact that I am trying to save intelligent young men from destruction they are sure to endure if they think they can form "relationships" with insane animals like modern Western women? That I am trying to protect them from being jailed and having all their money taken away, and the latter part is if they are not single forever?

You hate consent, you hate any form of civilized behavior. This they have to know.

The backslash is, as seen by what Horse is now bragging about (she's the first person here to really trick me, but oh well), great, but it can't change reality. It only confirms it.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: cromit, Dynamite Ninja, Simplicity111 and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back