Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

[fetid_sewer_rat]

How can he think he has D cups?! I can't say I quite understand face blindness, but I accept that it's a real thing that a small number of people (disproportionately troon) have. But does this person have boob blindness?

he probably has never worn an actual cup bra and doesn't know how they work so he just shat out a guess

 

[Jarolleon]

What is it with troons in tech and being fucking abysmal at coding?
I know like 15 developers who are troons who make games and they are unoptimized pieces of shit with a constant power creep.
Does trooning out deprive you of the ability to test your stuff?

It's like Ashkenazi Jews in intellectual pursuits, but without the history of persecution and pigeon-holing that raised their average IQ and forced them to be good enough at their niche to be indispensable.

 

[Putin Bot]

Troons thinking their manboobs are bigger than they really are is actually quite common. Our horrorcow Kevin Gibes loves to brag that he's a C cup, but it's quite obvious from his sad mantitties that he is probably an A when compared to his band size, and that he loves to stuff his bra.

You see plenty of tranny subs of them stating that it's possible to get D cups or bigger through HRT, because it all depends on how big your female relatives boobs are. Their delusional thinking is really fucking something.

 

[OttoWest]

Troons thinking their manboobs are bigger than they really are is actually quite common. Our horrorcow Kevin Gibes loves to brag that he's a C cup, but it's quite obvious from his sad mantitties that he is probably an A when compared to his band size, and that he loves to stuff his bra.

You see plenty of tranny subs of them stating that it's possible to get D cups or bigger through HRT, because it all depends on how big your female relatives boobs are. Their delusional thinking is really fucking something.

A lot of these men think higher band size automatically equals larger cup size. “Oh I’m a barrel chested 48, must mean I’m a DD!” In part because of fetish, in part because they’ve no clue how to measure for a bra, and finally because, as most women know, it’s difficult to find irregular sizes like a 46 A or a 32 E. If some perv is prowling the racks at Target, he’s not going to see those outsizes represented so coom brain assumes the larger the band, the bigger the cup.

 

[Putin Bot]

A lot of these men think higher band size automatically equals larger cup size. “Oh I’m a barrel chested 48, must mean I’m a DD!” In part because of fetish, in part because they’ve no clue how to measure for a bra, and finally because, as most women know, it’s difficult to find irregular sizes like a 46 A or a 32 E. If some perv is prowling the racks at Target, he’s not going to see those outsizes represented so coom brain assumes the larger the band, the bigger the cup.

Either that or they get a small band size with a bigger cup size, then see if their mantits fits into the cup, and when it does, goes, EUREKA!! I'M ACTUALLY A C/D!! I mean, we are talking about troons. We all know the lengths they go to validate their delusion that they're hot, busty, sexy women.

But honestly, I've never seen a troon with bigger than maybe a B cup (cuz fat), unless they get implants. At most, they might see some growth, but if you see a troon showing off his massive titties, 100% of the time it's implants. Though I see enough troons trying to pass off their boob implants as "OMG HRT REALLY DOES TRANSFORM YOU!!" type shit. Again, what they preach is just magical thinking, and no different than weight loss products that transform a dumpy chubby chick into a curvaceous goddess.

 

[Windows XP Home Edition]

I find a lot of butch females and FTM transgenders tend to look more androgynous than masculine in my honest opinion. Females who usually wear mens' clothes often tend to look more "gender-neutral", especially if they're very waifish and skinny.

For MTF's, there's always something that completely sticks out, no matter how feminine or female they try to look.

I honestly couldn't tell if this was an FTM or MTF at first ngl. I think they're wearing a lot of clothing underneath to cover any features that give away their biological sex. But what gives it away is their facial structure.


I also saw this "nonbinary" dude as well.

View attachment 2tbcpk87imd61.webp

View attachment 21t1zh1t7vc61.webp
I actually thought they were a trans FTM, but it turns out they're visibly male.

 

[NoReturn]

View attachment 1874388

Before, photo taken on the cusp of Trump's presidency.
View attachment 1874389

After:
View attachment 1874390
I can believe the height loss (spinal collapse due to osteoporosis) but I have strong doubt about the D-cup.

View attachment 1874399View attachment 1874400
You can see this man is enjoying it very much.

How can he think he has D cups?! I can't say I quite understand face blindness, but I accept that it's a real thing that a small number of people (disproportionately troon) have. But does this person have boob blindness?

Troons thinking their manboobs are bigger than they really are is actually quite common. Our horrorcow Kevin Gibes loves to brag that he's a C cup, but it's quite obvious from his sad mantitties that he is probably an A when compared to his band size, and that he loves to stuff his bra.

You see plenty of tranny subs of them stating that it's possible to get D cups or bigger through HRT, because it all depends on how big your female relatives boobs are. Their delusional thinking is really fucking something.

I saw someone once, I won't say where, but who concluded he was a D cup because he wrapped some measuring tape around his chest as tight as possible, then around the further point of his moobs, and said "4 inch difference! See? I'm a D cup! Get fucked, TERFS!"

 

[AngryItalianAmerican]

Youtube made Vanessa take this part of her video down. Or at least mute the sound which just made me go looking for it.

I can't imbed bitchute so here's the link.

I didn't think Spoony would come back with this type of content...

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

We didn't see this 20 years ago because kids didn't really have much choice to grin and bear it, until inevitably a few months passed and they realised the whole puberty thing goes pretty slowly, and all their other friends were changing too, and by the time puberty was well underway they'd kind of come to terms with the whole "growing up" thing. Now, you go on the internet as a 13 year old and type in "I'm scared of getting boobs" into google and up pop a slew of people telling you you're really a man, rather than pointing out that literally every other girl you know is feeling/has felt the same.

I'm pretty much sure that stuff like autism, anxiety, and trauma keep the theory of mind narrow enough not to be able to realize this fact. Autisms never get it and traumatized/mentally ill understand this too late in life.

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

There's a lot of things where it isn't advantageous to be a man, but there's a single one which is by far the hardest on women: reproduction. Men don't get pregnant, they don't have their bodies changed (sometimes permanently, as it happens to a lot of women - from stretch marks to fistulae, from the aesthetically unpleasing to the downright painful and/or lethal) and they don't feel any physical inconvenience caused by carrying a fetus inside them. A lot of women don't even have the luxury of feeling any pleasure when conceiving.

Men don't go through the pains of childbirth, they don't risk having their genitals torn and losing their capacity for sexual pleasure when their children are born, there won't be any doctor doing things they didn't consent to in a state of completely helplessness that might not only scar physically and mentally, but their child too. Men can't be victims of obstetric violence.

Men don't have the same level of attachment to their offspring - it's no wonder a lot more men leave for the proverbial pack of smokes to never come back than women. A man who abandons his child is just a deadbeat dad, a mother who does so is a monster. Men don't have their professional lives upended by having to raise children. Men can throw some money every month at their kids and see them only during the weekends and still be seen as a good dad and a desirable partner; women usually don't. If a man has a severely disabled child, there's no expectation he'll abandon his own life completely for decades to take care of the child.

If men don't want children, they can get a minimally-invasive surgery or wrap their penis with a thin layer of latex, which is nearly to no inconvenience compared to what a woman requires to not become pregnant: either complete celibacy, a highly invasive surgery - that might be denied to her even if she never had any desire to have kids for most of her life, sometimes she can't even make this choice without having her husband's formal permission - or taking hormones that might not even work (as there's a lot of trivial things that cancel the effect of contraceptive pills) and even give her something horrible like deep vein trombosis before her fifties.

All of that is terrifying for a lot of women, and I'd wager it's much scarier for women/girls who ARE educated. They know better what to expect in the worst case scenarios. It's no wonder they'd opt out of womanhood if they could.

I wonder if this is why so many straight teenage girls are trooning out. Women don’t have to be celibate to avoid pregnancy if they’re lesbians! (Also, have you never heard of diaphragms?)

At the upper echelons of society — upper/upper middle class, white, socially adept jocks/cheerleaders, being male is advantageous. At a certain level down, though, it is (overall) better to be a woman. (I am a woman, btw). Black women are much more likely to earn a degree and much less likely to be shot by the cops than black men. White men are more likely to die of deaths of despair than white women. Asian guys make money but dating for them is horrible. Dorky autistic girls see the cool popular guys and want to be them but don’t realize if they had been born male they’d still be dorky and autistic and likely struggling even more socially.

 

[Jarolleon]

I wonder if this is why so many straight teenage girls are trooning out. Women don’t have to be celibate to avoid pregnancy if they’re lesbians! (Also, have you never heard of diaphragms?)

At the upper echelons of society — upper/upper middle class, white, socially adept jocks/cheerleaders, being male is advantageous. At a certain level down, though, it is (overall) better to be a woman. (I am a woman, btw). Black women are much more likely to earn a degree and much less likely to be shot by the cops than black men. White men are more likely to die of deaths of despair than white women. Asian guys make money but dating for them is horrible. Dorky autistic girls see the cool popular guys and want to be them but don’t realize if they had been born male they’d still be dorky and autistic and likely struggling even more socially.

If AGP exists, does Autoandrophilia (sp?) also exist?

 

[Hongourable Madisha]

If AGP exists, does Autoandrophilia (sp?) also exist?

You do get fujoshis, straight girls who fetishise gay men. The sort of people who read slash fiction and yaoi manga. They want to have relationships with men but don't feel they can be equal partners in a sexist society, or they're still too young for dating and are a bit scared of men, so they imagine themselves as gay men. They have zero understanding of gay men's lives and relationships though, and don't realise that yaoi is made for straight girls, it's nothing like bara or other media aimed at gay men.

 

[Icecream]

Something a little bit different this time, a pretty based thread in r/MTF

https://www.reddit.com/r/MtF/comments/l5lf18/anyone_else_sort_of_tired_of_the_cishet_male/

The comments are actually pretty reasonable and people calling him a transphobe are being downvoted

Only a few other posts from 3 yrs ago

 

[Ceci]

What are these retarded ass troons talking about? Do they not realize children go for wellness checks every year? Oh my god, a doctor exam, the horror! Do they think some guy is going to be standing outside the restroom saying, "Alright kids, dicks out if ya got 'em."

View attachment 1873550
https://twitter.com/catgraffam/status/1353756375118196736(Archive)

I was curious if he was actually introducing a gential-exam bill, and surprise surprise, it's all tranny fearmongering.

I have simply no idea how schools would determine children's sexes without pulling down their pants and checking out their junk. It's not like your sex is recorded at birth or anything, it's sadly a mystery and there's no way to learn it that would not violate the child.

 

[Father Brown]

I wonder if this is why so many straight teenage girls are trooning out. Women don’t have to be celibate to avoid pregnancy if they’re lesbians! (Also, have you never heard of diaphragms?)

At the upper echelons of society — upper/upper middle class, white, socially adept jocks/cheerleaders, being male is advantageous. At a certain level down, though, it is (overall) better to be a woman. (I am a woman, btw). Black women are much more likely to earn a degree and much less likely to be shot by the cops than black men. White men are more likely to die of deaths of despair than white women. Asian guys make money but dating for them is horrible. Dorky autistic girls see the cool popular guys and want to be them but don’t realize if they had been born male they’d still be dorky and autistic and likely struggling even more socially.

I think this is fairly true. It's true both at a micro-level; being a dork as a boy is worse than being a dork as a girl, but being Chad incarnate as a man is simply the best with no downsides. As well as at a macro level, in fact it's truer at the societal level. If you think of any stat where men do poorly relative to women, it always exhibits a huge class relationship. Examples:

Spoiler

• Risk of being assaulted/murdered: upper class men are quite possibly the least murdered demographic and maybe even the least assaulted, poor men are the most in both cases.
• Education: gaps are big in poor kids, but relatively small in wealthier or at least more successful cohorts. For example, in east Asians sex gaps are small, in Af-Ams they are huge.
• Probability of imprisonment: I don't know about how ratios evolve vs. SES, but higher imprisonment rates for men matter a lot less when you are very unlikely to be imprisoned.
• Life expectancy: The 'natural' life expectancy gap is something 2 years driven mostly by cardiovascular diffs and superior female immune function. Actual life expectancy gap in the US is ~5 years. Lifestyle factors concentrated within the lower classes explain the difference.

One reason, I'd also throw out there for why you'd get feminists saying "Oh, I'd rather be a man," but not the reverse is simply just societal dogma, unmoored from any particular set of facts. There's no definitively correct way to answer whether being a man is "better" than being a woman. The 'benefits' of being one sex or the other can only be made commensurable by interpreting using some value system. Moreover, you need to apply interpretation in the mere selection in what you consider.

However, it gets worse still, when we try to answer any essentially open question, we always begin by adopting a hypothesis. But by adopting a hypothesis we then proceed to search for justifications for that hypothesis, not refutations, and because there is no definitive way to answer the question then we are sure to find some fairly convincing sounding reasons to justify our hypothesis. The result therefore is that almost everyone is just going to end up believing whatever their initial hypothesis was, and in most cases that will be some default received belief. A belief that need not have any particular justification or even make much sense in the first place.

Feminists (and sympathetic men) often believe that women are oppressed, but what does that mean? Whatever you want it to mean usually. Unsympathetic men often (or at least used to) believe that men are better than women, but "better" in what sense? Again, in whatever sense makes it true. The result is thus that everyone wants to be a man.

I wish someone could tell her it's OK to not liking your chest and TONS of women want hysterectomy/hate their chest too, I almost want to make an account to talk to her.

Spoiler: Story sperging

Years ago a young girl on internet make a thread asking about transition because she wasn't sure if she was a man or not, when I asked her why, she said it's because her mother treat her badly and told her she is "too ugly and not feminine enough to be a woman", so for her it means she must be a man and maybe her mother will treat her better after a transition, nobody point out how absurd it is and answer her to see gender therapist to get hormones, I was the only one who told her she just has a shitty mom, that it's ok to be a masculine woman and there's nothing wrong with it, she started to see a therapist to help her dealing with her mother and how it impacts her womanhood, she never mention transiton anymore and told me she misinterpreted her emotion.

I think it's not even just that disliking your chest and being painfully conscious of it doesn't imply that you are a man due to some hard-wired 'gender identity.' In fact, she might find it easier to not even think about it when thinking about the possibility (high probability) that she has ASD. Disconnect it from gender dysphoria, don't think about it as an alternative explanation for everything in a strict sense. That might be a much easier hurdle for her to clear and allow her to not feel guilt or negative emotions in perhaps seeing an autism specialist (one who has experience with girls/women - this is v. important). Instead just consider it part of her trying to generally understand both who she is and what she feels as well as allow her to get the best possible support.

Even if she couldn't overcome the 'gender dysphoria' and still ended up wanting top surgery or even to go on T, she would still be better off for having found out about her ASD beforehand. That way even if she does end up going down that path then at least she does so with a fuller knowledge of herself, and in my view would reduce the likelihood of detransition or later mental crisis.

Now, I don't think trooning out is ever wise, especially not for her cohort, but if you end up doing it then you best make sure that you are prepared for everything that might come at you.

 

[DoTheDrew]

I was curious if he was actually introducing a gential-exam bill, and surprise surprise, it's all tranny fearmongering.
View attachment 1874798
I have simply no idea how schools would determine children's sexes without pulling down their pants and checking out their junk. It's not like your sex is recorded at birth or anything, it's sadly a mystery and there's no way to learn it that would not violate the child.

Like all this other crap, it presupposes that we're all aboard with the myth of the passing tranny. And as we all know here, there's no such thing. Pictures and filters might make it difficult to tell online, but in real life, a tranny sticks out like a sore thumb. Just look at that Levine character Biden made Sec of Health. And that goes for both sexes - I saw a TiF this summer in the street and immediately clocked her - and she saw me doing it to, so I imagine there's some weepy livejournal entry somewhere about it. In other words, "genital inspections" is just another one for troonery bingo. Goddamn I'm tired of these wasters.

 

[Deepland Bystander]

I think it's not even just that disliking your chest and being painfully conscious of it doesn't imply that you are a man due to some hard-wired 'gender identity.' In fact, she might find it easier to not even think about it when thinking about the possibility (high probability) that she has ASD. Disconnect it from gender dysphoria, don't think about it as an alternative explanation for everything in a strict sense. That might be a much easier hurdle for her to clear and allow her to not feel guilt or negative emotions in perhaps seeing an autism specialist (one who has experience with girls/women - this is v. important). Instead just consider it part of her trying to generally understand both who she is and what she feels as well as allow her to get the best possible support.

A little off-topic, and also a tangential reply to @Crunchy Leaf post about social hierarchy, it's a little of my personal pet peeves here.

I largely agree with you here in general - and based on that girl we're currently talking about here in particular, she has a strong autistic vibe based on her description of the confusion of social expectations and sensory issues seem spot on. But seeing how a lot of people act towards this topic right now, We should be wary of seeing things in ASD lenses too much, and inadvertently cause a 'symptom pool' phenomenon just like how everything is written off as gender dysphoria today where people are not getting adequate help. Sometimes people are just weird or dorky, or having a lot of emotional baggage that they couldn't become socially adept in their youth.

A lot of talk about autism today does feel like egg_irl to me at times. We've got evangelical autists who seem to want to groom people into thinking that any nerdiness or social awkwardness are always a result of autism (Neurodiversity movement) - Eg. the reddit hellhole of r/aspergers, you'll see how people there think that any inconveniences are seen as autistic traits/DAE threads. I believe this is likely because they have limited theory of mind and thus less likely to understand that there are many different reasons why someone is socially awkward, troubled, and not a 'stereotypically chad' that isn't just autism.
I recently argued with an autistic guy who thought that having low self-esteem from rough upbringing, abusive parents and having conflicted rebelling-pleasing tedencies to authority figures means you're an autist... even if you don't have any other ASD traits... I wish I could make this up

Spoiler: Powerlevel explanation of the issue

This is largely based on my experiences, I've known a lot of people who were misdiagnosed with autism as children as well as psychologists who are concerned with this issue. It can limit a lot of people opportunities and make things worse

These children were misdiagnosed because they're difficult to deal with in school and struggled socially but they barely fit into the 'thought process' profile of ASD to begin with. Tend to be seen as paradoxically very high-functioning but does not respond well to autism-based treatments when theyre placed in special education, and their behaviours tend to deviate a lot from autism profile more and more as they grew older, and tend to not be qualified for autism diagnosis if assessed at older age if assessed again.
Many of these children were severely abused and traumatised and their inappropriate ASD diagnoses were a reflection of their parents purposefully covering abuses so it has never slipped into the factor of assessment, the diagnosis were 'forced' on them because it is an easy way to get extra education services or benefits or it is simply because the assessors were inexperienced and made a genuine mistake. (eg. https://www.reddit.com/r/LifeAdvice/comments/k9ihh9/parents_finally_told_me_i_wasnt_autistic_after/)

As with my old post - I see current autism label as simply a 'working model' for treatment that isn't yet precise. Though I entertain the idea that there might be a certain mental process that is characteristics of 'true autism'. My opinion is that it is stemmed from inborn sensory process, a certain type of rigid/'algorithmic' thinking, a deficit in context-understanding and nuance which results in a lot of social issues. This can present in the way that doesn't cause visibly enough problems, and they can adapt enough to be a useful member in society. But at the same time there can be many other ways people can be weird and socially maladjusted without the autistic thought-process at all. It's also very common for people to have a few low-level autistic traits but not enough to warrant a diagnosis.

 

[ロボ﹏§¤r﹏h¶rœ]

A lot of talk about autism today does feel like egg_irl to me at times. We've got evangelical autists who seem to want to groom people into thinking that any nerdiness or social awkwardness are always a result of autism (Neurodiversity movement) - Eg. the reddit hellhole of r/aspergers, you'll see how people there think that any inconveniences are seen as autistic traits/DAE threads.

But it's not really harmful, is it? It can actually make more people seek a proper medical diagnosis and access therapeutic services.

 

[tiggles]

Let me check that one source real quick, ah yes, a review article about the symptoms and common characteristics of Autism from the prestigious... optometrists network?
Not only it's a review article that casually mentions a study, so a second-hand source, but the article doesn't cite anything for its claim that 21-50 percent of kids with ASD have strabismus, it directly leads to recommend some shit called "visual therapy", no assertion of sample size, no statement of p-value, no disclosures, NOTHING, because there's no citation, the only link it has leads to a strabismus surgery and symptoms Q&A, by the way, such a huge range is hot trash from a statistical viewpoint, regardless of how well you're doing it.
Do you know what's also a sympton of ASD? Higher than average IQ, half a standard deviation above the mean is the consensus.
And furthermore, if you're so interested in armchair psychology and internet pseudoscience perhaps you should look into the correlation between having a room temperature IQ and having the picture of a cat as your avatar, we got some fine first subjects around here.
Kiwifarms today, Nature tomorrow.

of all the inflammatory shit I’ve said about troons on this site, it was the correlation between wonk eye and autism that finally pissed somebody off enough to use a fresh sock account and fly off the handle.

More reading for you, my wonk-eyed, tranny liege: https://doi.org/10.3109/09273972.2013.786733

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10803-012-1475-2.pdf

 

[Popoto]

Could you elaborate on why that might be? Is it men treating women badly and sexualising them. Is it mostly lesbians who feel like this? Twenty years ago we didn't see this stuff where girls could just have their breasts removed if they wanted to. To me it looks like eating disorder 2.0.

For a significant number of girls, breast development is literally painful. The area becomes so sensitive, even the wind blowing the wrong way or clothing brushing up feels painful.

Getting leered at or teased because of the breasts is bad enough, sometimes gross people make a grab for the already incredibly painful breasts.

Some women revisit this pain (thankfully on a much lesser scale) with the hormonal flux that accompanies their menstrual cycles.

View attachment 1874388

I can believe the height loss (spinal collapse due to osteoporosis) but I have strong doubt about the D-cup.

Cup sizes are simply a function of "how far do the nipples stick out from chest". Due to the tendency for male gynaecosmastia to develop pointy/pendulous breasts, a surprising number of men "fit" E, F and G cups.

Since they have no actual breast fat tissue, the bra cups do not fill out completely though.