- Joined
- May 21, 2015
TLDR. No one wants to read through thousands of posts of pure autism.
Cultcow Marjan Šiklić / Marijan Ciklic / GovernmentsGetGirlfriends / ThatIncelBlogger / CAAMIB - Third Edition: Fear and Loathing of Vagina
- Thread starter sugoi-chan
- Start date
TLDR. No one wants to read through thousands of posts of pure autism.
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
Nooope. This is a thing you made up. I was there. It did not happen.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
"You were just supposed to..." SUPPOSED TO. I guess I should thank you for proving my point that you just wanted me, Hickory, Flossman, or whoever to bend to your almighty will.
Also, @Humanoid Email Address, watch out for a book by some bloke called Unwin incoming. It's his go-to source for why some societies were wonderful and others terrible, despite the fact that it relies on now-discredited Freudian theory -- among other problems.
Also, @Humanoid Email Address, watch out for a book by some bloke called Unwin incoming. It's his go-to source for why some societies were wonderful and others terrible, despite the fact that it relies on now-discredited Freudian theory -- among other problems.
- Joined
- May 21, 2015
Woah, rude, @Holden was trying to set me on a wild goose chase through 10,000 posts of shitposting.
Though, trying to trick a person into wasting their time by looking through one's posts to find something that doesn't exist is probably a better plan than, say, trying to seriously argue with some sketchy source that he pulled out of his ass.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
Yes, supposed to, like you agreed. Not a single thing I wanted you to c/p had been incorrect.
Many theories of this kind went through various refinements. fschmidt and myself don't agree with some things Unwin says. None of this makes the results of his research, which is that societies can't survive sluts, incorrect.
Cut the crap.
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2013
Seriously, @Holden why 12 years old?
What could possibly be benefited by letting 12 year olds be parents? What good would it do to society to let a 25+ marry/fuck/date a 12 year old?
And if you want 12 year olds to fuck/marry/have kids...what else do you think they are capable of doing? Voting? Driving? Having jobs? Holding loans?
Not to mention that with all the 12 year old parents; welfare needs are going to go through the fucking roof because no one wants to hire an uneducated 12 year old child.
What could possibly be benefited by letting 12 year olds be parents? What good would it do to society to let a 25+ marry/fuck/date a 12 year old?
And if you want 12 year olds to fuck/marry/have kids...what else do you think they are capable of doing? Voting? Driving? Having jobs? Holding loans?
Not to mention that with all the 12 year old parents; welfare needs are going to go through the fucking roof because no one wants to hire an uneducated 12 year old child.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
You're conflating age of consent with parenthood. I never said parenthood by 12 yo's should be encouraged.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
Because 12-year-olds, who have to be told to take showers, are exactly the kind of people who would remember to use condoms and not cause a pregnancy epidemic, or spread diseases in middle school. Right.
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2014
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2013
The hell, Holden? You LITERALLY said that you wanted the age of consent to be 12 because "biology". What did you mean by that if not parenthood?
So 12 year olds aren't mature enough to be parents...is that what I'm hearing from you?
If you aren't mature enough to handle a child, you shouldn't be having sex...the act which begets a child.
Why is this such a hard concept for you people to understand?
I've met 18 year olds that don't know the proper way to put on a condom because they weren't there the ONE DAY their health teacher taught them. I've met 30 year olds that don't remember to take their birth control pills on a regular basis.
No way in fuck a 12 year old is going to remember to take their Pill or to put on a condom. No way in hell.
So; once again, why do you want 12 year old children to be having sex if not to produce children? What's the point? If anything, you'll be pushing more sluts into the world because these young girls won't be looking for a husband (in fact, most 12 year old girls still think boys are jerks and yucky...unless they're in a boy band)
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
Macie, a bunch of European countries have ages of consent 13-16. It doesn't mean that child pregnancies are welcomed or seen as something good in those countries. There is a difference between sex and pregnancy. And it's telling how the age of consent thing doesn't even work because in the UK it's 16 and it still has a very high rate of teen pregnancies.
Today's "people" lack the maturity to raise kids or marry at 18. Or 28. Or 38. Or 68.
They didnt in the 20s in America, when many of these laws first came into being. The reason was puritan bs, not maturity.
And that's why I find liberals so hilarious - they're anything but "liberal". They just support populist leftism.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
You're asking this guy for consistency? I fear that is a doomed endeavor. He just tried to insult me by calling me a "whore," but in this very thread stated that prostitution is a noble profession (and sex work by those who choose it and are not trafficked into it, absolutely, that's a perfectly fine profession), so how is that even an insult? He just mansplained to you that sex and pregnancy are different, but then turned right around and made the correlation/causation fallacy with the UK age of consent. No consistency.
If you want a really telling sign of his views on consent, I recently (and at great length) learned that his ideal situation is one depicted in the film Pretty Baby, where the daughter of a prostitute (this is where he's getting all this bs about what should be done to feminists, I fear) becomes a prostitute at the house where her mother works, which is the idea of the cokehead madam. She runs away and ends up in the arms of the only man who's ever been kind to her: the man who paid said cokehead madam for the right to photograph prostitutes in the brothel. He accepts a sexual relationship with her while at the same time buying her a doll because "every child should have a doll." This revolting time in US history is exactly what our dear Holden wants to return to.
If you want a really telling sign of his views on consent, I recently (and at great length) learned that his ideal situation is one depicted in the film Pretty Baby, where the daughter of a prostitute (this is where he's getting all this bs about what should be done to feminists, I fear) becomes a prostitute at the house where her mother works, which is the idea of the cokehead madam. She runs away and ends up in the arms of the only man who's ever been kind to her: the man who paid said cokehead madam for the right to photograph prostitutes in the brothel. He accepts a sexual relationship with her while at the same time buying her a doll because "every child should have a doll." This revolting time in US history is exactly what our dear Holden wants to return to.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
I am not. It is all a joke to convince good men to hope for the impossible and meanwhile pay so a woman can be macheted.
It's just an insult. If that's your proof of inconsistency then I can only say...
hahahaahah
this
I merely said that age of consent laws don't work. Not that UK age of consent laws cause pregnancy. Not a fallacy, you idiot !
My point was simply to point out a film about prostitution and how it had been legal once. Her doing shit outside of prostitution had nothing to do with it. Still, it's a scenario better than what you have now with ghetto sluts and white trash.
And, yes, this is a time to which US should return to, if it wants to survive.
Otherwise we have idiots like you.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2014
Holy shit, thread three? Goddamn, been a while since I popped into a Holden thread. How's your mom fuckbot?
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
And, ffs, horse, do you know how stupid you're making yourself look with this "Your views are bad, so I can't say the truth about you" nonsense? You knew about my views since Dec.
I never claimed to have changed them or wanted to make you believe they are correct.
If somebody has a view, which I do, that every policy you support supports rape and decapitation how does that even matter? I still treated you civilly and would never say a lie about you. You, on the other hand, think my views, which you don't like, make you morally superior. Except that this hinges on the fact that you're correct. Which you're not.
I gave you my corrections for review. Told you to fix anything you see as incorrect - not grammar, content was my priority. I never wanted to obfuscate anything.
On the other hand, you are doing a fine job of obfuscating what women did in my life, just so more suckers can pay for women being killed. Because, you know, women can do nothing bad. You must treat them with respect. This is sure to work and not bring a catastrophe. Yeah right.
Nobody must know the truth, that badly hurting a woman will make you 100000 times more respected?
That lighting her face on fire will make you a god?
And hence all the lies.
And remember folks - rape is bad. If done by straight white male designed slaves. And so is them breathing or doing anything else.
I never claimed to have changed them or wanted to make you believe they are correct.
If somebody has a view, which I do, that every policy you support supports rape and decapitation how does that even matter? I still treated you civilly and would never say a lie about you. You, on the other hand, think my views, which you don't like, make you morally superior. Except that this hinges on the fact that you're correct. Which you're not.
I gave you my corrections for review. Told you to fix anything you see as incorrect - not grammar, content was my priority. I never wanted to obfuscate anything.
On the other hand, you are doing a fine job of obfuscating what women did in my life, just so more suckers can pay for women being killed. Because, you know, women can do nothing bad. You must treat them with respect. This is sure to work and not bring a catastrophe. Yeah right.
Nobody must know the truth, that badly hurting a woman will make you 100000 times more respected?
That lighting her face on fire will make you a god?
And hence all the lies.
And remember folks - rape is bad. If done by straight white male designed slaves. And so is them breathing or doing anything else.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2013
Awww...he's learning.
However, I'm interested in this one thing.
You mention in your blog that you are incel if you are actually seeking sex/relationship; and someone not actually seeking it is not incel.
You said you cannot find relationships in the West; as they do not exist.
So either no one is incel, or everyone is. Because we're all looking for something that doesn't exist.
Is this not correct?
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
But finish the sentence.
If done by straight white male designed slaves. And so is them breathing or doing anything else.
You idiot ! The point is that men who "get" women in the West are completely uninterested in relationships anyway. They are de facto aromantic, but not due to some quirk but because they are wild animals. So a relationship is out of the question for them anyway. They're not incel, since they don't even seek out relationships with anybody.
Men like me would have relationships with sane non-feminist women.
Today you are seen as extreme criminal if you want an actual relationship with a woman. A one that isn't just you paying for her whoring.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2013
Yeah. We kinda heard that a million times before and are still not convinced. Do you have anything NEW to add about your ideology?
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2013
Relationships don't exist; so it can't be a crime.
It'd be like slaying unicorns is illegal. There's no such thing so the crime doesn't exist.
Your logic is flawed.