Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

[Whale Spotter]

You're still here, Tony. Why are you so obsessed with this thread and defending yourself?

I am not Tony and I am not defending myself, Pam, I am just telling you the truth about your delusions.
I am here because I am a cunt and I am just curious how far your delusions take you.

Also I want to see what happens in your latest lolsuit.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

I am not Tony and I am not defending myself, Pam, I am just telling you the truth about your delusions.
I am here because I am a cunt and I am just curious how far your delusions take you.

Also I want to see what happens in your latest lolsuit.

*shrugs

 

[Useful_Mistake]

You're misinformed statements are duly noted.

Have a great day.

What am I wrong about? If you are correct, then it should not be much of a problem to defeat my arguments. If you cannot, then it follows that I am right.

This is a hunted up picture of my home and location posted without my consent on this thread.

So? There is no state in US where that is illegal.

Look at the "poster" bragging about interference into a private citizen's personal business.

It might surprise you, but that is not at all a crime.

Isn't that picture taken from a public website? It looks like the house is For sale.
If that is the case, that picture was lawfully obtained. Maybe don't put your crap all over the internet Pam.

This looks to be taken from zillow. The image is a perfect match.

Tony, the more you're still posting, more I have a case.

Lol.

I found the whole post.
God, you're idiots.
View attachment 1875663

The only idiot here is you in your delusions that this is somehow illegal.

View attachment 1875660

Okay, I'll bite, how is this screenshot relevant?

Do you see how easy it is to lie on the internet?

 

[LoverofPi]

You're misinformed statements are duly noted.

Have a great day.

Having no actual response, Pam retreats to "Well, NUH UH" and changes the subject.

@Useful_Mistake
Do you see this?

This is a hunted up picture of my home and location posted without my consent on this thread.

Did you know that your domicile is publicly searchable information, Pam? No law was broken by finding where you lived- especially not based on information you gave out publicly- and making a note of it.

Look at the "poster" bragging about interference into a private citizen's personal business.

You mistake a shitpost and a joke making fun of your delusions for bragging, Pam.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

What am I wrong about? If you are correct, then it should not be much of a problem to defeat my arguments. If you cannot, then it follows that I am right.

So? There is no state in US where that is illegal.

It might surprise you, but that is not at all a crime.

This looks to be taken from zillow. The image is a perfect match.

Lol.

The only idiot here is you in your delusions that this is somehow illegal.

Okay, I'll bite, how is this screenshot relevant?

So you all admit to lying on the internets?
Also, if you're legal representation, I'll need your name and license number.

 

[LoverofPi]

So you all admit to lying on the internets?

No, we point that people lie on the internet and you believe the dumbest bullshit. And lying on the internet isn't illegal.

Also, if you're legal representation, I'll need your name and license number.

Not acting as anyone's legal representation, Pam.

 

[Whale Spotter]

So you all admit to lying on the internets?

No Pam, I was just showing how easy it is to lie on the internet and that is why your screenshots prove nothing.

This looks to be taken from zillow. The image is a perfect match.

Lol yeah I thought it must have been on a site like that.
As usual, her super private information were provided by Russian super hackers her...

 

[Useful_Mistake]

So you all admit to lying on the internets?

I admit nothing.

Also, if you're legal representation, I'll need your name and license number.

Is this a horribly butchered way to ask for my Lawyer ID? Cause, for one, I am not required to give it to strangers, two, I am not required to give it at all.

Regardless, how does my Lawyer status in any way affect the arguments? Ones supported by even SCOTUS caselaw.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

https://youtu.be/F44fT9-7kL8

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

There's no ring on my finger that says I have to listen to a goddamn thing you tell me too.

There isn't indeed. And even if there was you're still your own person with your own free will and can listen to or ignore whatever you like.
If you don't mind I'd like to point out I was mostly talking about myself, expressing sympathy over your situation and the only advice I gave you were movie recommendations.

Lowest idiots of the lowest intelligence still catfishing. At this point, I really question whether or not any of you can function by yourselves.

I'm not sure if it was directed at me, but I would like to clarify a few things:
- I'm probably an average intelligence guy. Not Mensa material, not a drooling idiot.
- I am not and I will not catfish you. What little information I disclose here is factually accurate. I only use this one account and never tried to contact you by any other means of communication than posting here and if someone contacted you claiming to be me - that person was lying.
- I have a roof over my head, food in my fridge and can afford my humble joys - I don't need much more in life so I'd say I function. Somehow.

Apologies, @Illuminati Order Official, Pam's vortex has dragged you in.

It wasn't even close to the worst interaction with a fellow human being in my life... but the thread is not about me and telling the story would be close to powerleveling so let's keep the worst one a secret for now
Only Pamela knows what really happened yesterday. I can suspect what happened but out of respect for her wishes and privacy I'll keep it to myself.

By all means. It is a hell of a rollercoaster at times.

I'm actually more interested in Pamela's books but I never used Amazon to buy ebooks. I'm one of those pretentious assholes who still buy physical books.

My apologies for mentioning them. I was trying to establish Pam's timeline of events and motives. When how and why of initial contact has always been muddled.

You couldn't have known and I can't and don't expect other people to follow my code of conduct in this thread

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Having no actual response, Pam retreats to "Well, NUH UH" and changes the subject.



Did you know that your domicile is publicly searchable information, Pam? No law was broken by finding where you lived- especially not based on information you gave out publicly- and making a note of it.



You mistake a shitpost and a joke making fun of your delusions for bragging, Pam.

You know a judge (who may be reading all this) won't be buying this. And you and I know you're first on the list for being thrown under the bus.

You know what to do. I don't have to tell you anything.

Last post isnt for @LoverofPi

 

[Useful_Mistake]

And you and I know you're first on the list for being thrown under the bus.

Lol, sure. Small warning though, you'll find I am hard to do a service of process on.

You know a judge (who may be reading all this) won't be buying this.

I think the Judge has intelligence enough to understand we are the rational ones here.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Lol, sure. Small warning though, you'll find I am hard to do a service of process on.

I think the Judge has intelligence enough to understand we are the rational ones here.

You chose to try your case on Kiwifarms. It's called discovery now.

Rational people do not create "threads".

Lol, sure. Small warning though, you'll find I am hard to do a service of process on.

Why? Are you in jail?

 

[LoverofPi]

It wasn't even close to the worst interaction with a fellow human being in my life... but the thread is not about me and telling the story would be close to powerleveling so let's keep the worst one a secret for now
Only Pamela knows what really happened yesterday. I can suspect what happened but out of respect for her wishes and privacy I'll keep it to myself.

I mean, staying entirely anonymous isn't a bad idea with the litigious cows around.
As for what happened, I have a suspicion myself, but no sense setting Pam off even more right now.

I'm actually more interested in Pamela's books but I never used Amazon to buy ebooks. I'm one of those pretentious assholes who still buy physical books.

I'm curious too, but I don't want to waste money on the process.

You couldn't have known and I can't and don't expect other people to follow my code of conduct in this thread

Indeed. I tend to let the larpers have their fun as well.

You know a judge (who may be reading all this) won't be buying this. And you and I know you're first on the list for being thrown under the bus.

The judge doesn't have to buy anything, Pam. I'm not selling anything, just repeating simple facts.

You know what to do. I don't have to tell you anything.

Last post isnt for @LoverofPi

You wouldn't have to add little notes like that if you took the time to gather your thoughts, organize them, and post all at once. But then there's that pesky impulse control problem.

Lol, sure. Small warning though, you'll find I am hard to do a service of process on.

I think the Judge has intelligence enough to understand we are the rational ones here.

Almost by default we have to be rational compared to Pam's conduct and filings.

You chose to try your case on Kiwifarms. It's called discovery now.

In that case you might not like who the judge and jury turn out to be.

Rational people do not create "threads".

This is such an odd assertion I have to know, why don't rational people make threads, Pam?

Why? Are you in jail?

Useful Mistake is not Weinstein, Pam.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

I mean, staying entirely anonymous isn't a bad idea with the litigious cows around.

It's not something that would compromise my identity in any way (other than revealing a bit about my education and a job I once had) but could fall under "Avoid revealing intimate, embarrassing details about yourself."

As for what happened, I have a suspicion myself, but no sense setting Pam off even more right now.

No matter what happened lashing out on anonymous poster on the 'net is not the worst thing one can do in stressful situation.

I'm curious too, but I don't want to waste money on the process.

It's not much and I wouldn't feel bad about supporting the creator - as I would if I bought for example Onision's book.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

I mean, staying entirely anonymous isn't a bad idea with the litigious cows around.
As for what happened, I have a suspicion myself, but no sense setting Pam off even more right now.



I'm curious too, but I don't want to waste money on the process.



Indeed. I tend to let the larpers have their fun as well.



The judge doesn't have to buy anything, Pam. I'm not selling anything, just repeating simple facts.



You wouldn't have to add little notes like that if you took the time to gather your thoughts, organize them, and post all at once. But then there's that pesky impulse control problem.



Almost by default we have to be rational compared to Pam's conduct and filings.



In that case you might not like who the judge and jury turn out to be.



This is such an odd assertion I have to know, why don't rational people make threads, Pam?



Useful Mistake is not Weinstein, Pam.

Of course not Alan Dershowitz. @Useful_Mistake is Rudy Guiliani taking over for Kimberly Guilfoyle cause Donald Trump Jr is in jeopardy.

Wonderful theater.

It's not something that would compromise my identity in any way (other than revealing a bit about my education and a job I once had) but could fall under "Avoid revealing intimate, embarrassing details about yourself."

No matter what happened lashing out on anonymous poster on the 'net is not the worst thing one can do in stressful situation.

It's not much and I wouldn't feel bad about supporting the creator - as I would if I bought for example Onision's book.

Shit or get off the pot, Richard.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Shit or get off the pot, Richard.

I'm sorry if you're still upset over something I said, it wasn't my intention.
I'm pretty much sober apart from occasional cig if you want to count nicotine among other stimulants.
My name isn't Richard. As I said my actual name would be rather difficult to pronounce for a native English speakers because it contains sounds absent in English.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

I'm sorry if you're still upset over something I said, it wasn't my intention.
I'm pretty much sober apart from occasional cig if you want to count nicotine among other stimulants.
My name isn't Richard. As I said my actual name would be rather difficult to pronounce for a native English speakers because it contains sounds absent in English.

It's the Old English equivalent to goatfarcker?

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

It's the Old English equivalent to goatfarcker?

No, it's not. It has Hebrew roots but changed a lot during its way to this part of the old continent and sounds nothing like the origin.
I'm not telling the meaning because it'll be too easy to guess

 

[DocHoliday1977]

No, it's not. It has Hebrew roots but changed a lot during its way to this part of the old continent and sounds nothing like the origin.
I'm not telling the meaning because it'll be too easy to guess

No, it's not. It has Hebrew roots but changed a lot during its way to this part of the old continent and sounds nothing like the origin.
I'm not telling the meaning because it'll be too easy to guess

*eyeroll