/r/wsb autists taking on a wallstreet hedgefund. Elon musk involved as always / wallstreetbets / gamestop - Gamergate 2: financial boogaloo

world of shit said:
There once was an Emperor Titus, and there was a riot in Jerusalem, and a very special Temple was burned and destroyed.....
Click to expand...
fcc7c57bd34770760a7939fc84728e55.jpg


me find out hedge fund may fall down go boom
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • DRINK!
Reactions: GloJojo, FunPosting101, Bond Burger and 15 others
HumanHive said:
View attachment 1877008
YOU CAN'T BAN SHORTING
THAT CAUSED HITLER
Click to expand...
That Twitter fuckface doesn't understand that there were an extra 30% of the short orders that didn't correspond to a unit of stock on top of the 100% that did correspond to an actual unit of stock someone owned on the other side of the trade. If you make a contract to buy more of something than exists, the people who own that thing can make up whatever fucking price they want when the order comes due. If these hedge funds don't want even basic rules like "it's not possible to buy more than 100% of a stock" enforced, things like this happening are their own fucking fault

Nobody who understands the situation is calling for short sales to be banned. They're rightfully calling for naked shorts to be banned
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Uranus Pink, Fomo Hoire, GloJojo and 25 others
Titos said:
I find it funny how Melvin Capital are the ones being shit on, who the fuck names their kid or business Melvin? Might as well name your business Faggot Industries. These are the only good Melvins.
Click to expand...
What about Melvin Udall?

Also, lol:
 

Attachments

  • he keeps improving the argument for the short squeeze.png
    he keeps improving the argument for the short squeeze.png
    673.8 KB · Views: 79
  • Late
  • Like
Reactions: karz and NJBear
instythot said:
That Twitter fuckface doesn't understand that there were an extra 30% of the short orders that didn't correspond to a unit of stock on top of the 100% that did correspond to an actual unit of stock someone owned on the other side of the trade. If you make a contract to buy more of something than exists, the people who own that thing can make up whatever fucking price they want when the order comes due. If these hedge funds don't want even basic rules like "it's not possible to buy more than 100% of a stock" enforced, things like this happening are their own fucking fault

Nobody who understands the situation is calling for short sales to be banned. They're rightfully calling for naked shorts to be banned
Click to expand...
We can add more shit to this turd sandwich.
What laws can average voters can pressure their local officials into doing that fuck shit up more?

Its gotta be baited where it looks good for them but really Isnt.

Stop the hack, ban shorts?

What would really put a wrench in the works?
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: not william stenchever, Christ on a crutch, Operator of the Wired and 3 others
I'm just waiting for the inevitable battered-wife-syndrome faggots to come rushing in and crying about this like they did about Capitol Hill:
"NOOO Now the government will institute [bad thing] because of what they did! Things wouldn't have gotten so bad if we never did anything and kept in our wagey cage eating our bug-mead oats! It's all your/our fault!!"
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: GloJojo, Rakdos92, Iwasamwillbe and 23 others
DeadFish said:
We can add more shit to this turd sandwich.
What laws can average voters can pressure their local officials into doing that fuck shit up more?

Its gotta be baited where it looks good for them but really Isnt.

Stop the hack, ban shorts?

What would really put a wrench in the works?
Click to expand...
Obviously by making the finance sector a tolerant safe space free of bigotry. Suck that troon cock or be drummed out for transmisogyny , trader
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: FunPosting101, thx1138 and axfaxf
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back