Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

[Positron]

View attachment 1877814

Nazi and his real-piece-of-shit friend are happy. The dangerhaired troon who made this drawing, not so much.

 

[AnOminous]

View attachment 1877976View attachment 1877978
www.irishtimes.com/opinion/we-must-ask-obvious-question-over-shooting-of-george-nkencho-1.4469395%3fmode=amp
The Irish woke are still trying to beat the horse on George Nkencho's death and claim it was racially motivated. They're even putting up an investigation of "racial bias".

I love how the article just literally directly accuses you of being a racist. The author has no idea who you are, he just calls you a racist out of nowhere.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

I love how the article just literally directly accuses you of being a racist. The author has no idea who you are, he just calls you a racist out of nowhere.

Well with how the number of racists have gone up after seeing the various chimpouts, are they wrong?

 

[AnOminous]

Well with how the number of racists have gone up after seeing the various chimpouts, are they wrong?

I remember a time when being called a racist meant something. You would feel chastised upon being called that. The term has been seriously diluted lately. Now the response is more like "whatever, nigger."

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

View attachment 1877976View attachment 1877978
www.irishtimes.com/opinion/we-must-ask-obvious-question-over-shooting-of-george-nkencho-1.4469395%3fmode=amp
The Irish woke are still trying to beat the horse on George Nkencho's death and claim it was racially motivated. They're even putting up an investigation of "racial bias". Never the less, this article is by Bashir Otokuya, no surprises there. What the fuck do you expect when you attack a garda with a machete and leave five people in a store, two in the hospital, injured?! And they put a photo of a protest portraying him as an angel. Because somebody who threatened the lives of innocent civilians is such an angel!

If he attacked the cops with a machete and injured people, than shooting him is self-defence.

The fact people like him and George Floyd got made into secular saints is the problem I have with the BLM movement.

I remember a time when being called a racist meant something. You would feel chastised upon being called that. The term has been seriously diluted lately. Now the response is more like "whatever, nigger."

The same is true when it comes to ”Nazi”. I remember when the term Nazi was reserved for actual Nazis, and now it seems like everyone right of Jeremy Corbyn is a Nazi.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

I remember a time when being called a racist meant something. You would feel chastised upon being called that. The term has been seriously diluted lately. Now the response is more like "whatever, nigger."

Over a decade ago here, prime minister Gordon Brown got in trouble for calling a woman "bigoted", because that was a pretty big deal in 2010. He was really ahead of his time.

 

[existencialdispointment]

i feel dumber for having read this. yes this is how all radical act when a movement even vaguely related to there intrests gets any sort of popularity, you all ready see people like Briana wu ans AOC from the left trying to co-op it. Hating the wealthy is something most radical do. The game stop thing fullfills there want to harm them in a very public manner, with out the major hit they would take for just publicly killing them like again both commies and fascists want to do.

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

Or you could just tell kids to sit down and read a book once in a while.

While also teach them about torrent sites.

 

[RealtreeByGod]

Here's your late-night programming block for edgy cartoons bro

 

[The Curmudgeon]

Zealots of all kinds are the absolute worst. I think of myself as an agnostic atheist, because I don't believe in God but that doesn't mean I know he doesn't exist. He could, I could be wrong, there's so much I, we, don't know.

So many people are stuck in the 00s, which is the last time the Christian Right really had strong social influence beyond their Megachurches. They act like they are still this all-encompassing threat, when they are still capable of causing trouble but not nearly on the same scale. Tales of moral crusades and controversies used to always be the purview of the hardcore Christians, now they're actively mocked for any of their outrage while the moral crusades are now entirely from SJWs and their own zealotry.


Zealotry doesn't work with science, at least proper science. It was a thing when Creationism was having its last gasp as being an officially acceptable position, where they constantly pointed out that it was 'Theory of Evolution', not 'Fact of Evolution', and since it was a 'theory', that why not teach their 'theory' as well. It's called a theory because while it lines up with 99.99% of observed reality, and it's the best working hypothesis to interpret much of nature, real scientists are aware that they are exploring and testing and trying to establish the facts, that something like evolution meets all the available evidence but it's not the sole answer to how the world works. There's room, however minute, for there to be another truth; there's certainly room for mistakes or issues to creep in due to extrapolations, or odd isolated examples that seem to go against it, or just that the theory doesn't always fit if you vastly increase or decrease the scale of what you're studying.

It's why SJWs are equally religious zealots as the Christian Fundamentalists, because they have mistaken their feelings for an observable reality. Their theories - critical race theory, gender theory, generational trauma theory - don't fit all available evidence, but that doesn't matter because how they feel the world works trumps in actual evidence. Really, there should be the same outcry over Critical Race Theory becoming a part of school curriculums the same was there was over Creationism, and it's not just disquieting but also extremely telling that there just isn't.

Yes! Thank you! I wholeheartedly agree that it's disturbing that critical race theory isn't getting the same challenge as creationism. I hate that it uses the word theory in its name because, like you said, it's not a collection of facts and evidence. It's just opinions and make-believe.

We really should have seen those late-00's-early-10's "atheists" and "skeptics" turning into SJWs, to be honest. A scientific mindset requires you to be humble with not only the things you don't know, but also the things you do know. Even the things you consider cold, hard facts may very well change as mankind's collective understanding of the universe evolves.

But these people didn't have any of that. They always had that smugly superior expression to them, as if anyone who disagreed with them wasn't just wrong, they were stupid for not seeing the Light of Science. And I thought it was cool because I was younger, dumber and idealistic, and even though the smugness always rubbed me the wrong way it was directed at people I didn't like (PW: I went to catholic schools growing up) so I overlooked it until I got tired of the infighting (this was around the time Atheism+ was being pushed hard into that community) and moved on to other things. But when I looked back guess what? Once these people gained power, their "science" fossilized entirely. The scientific method should be all about challenging the consensus, if for no other reason that even if your theory isn't right, at least we know what's wrong. But these people take their sacred ideological cows being targeted about as well as The Religion of Peace takes cartoons featuring Mohammed.


That's the thing that's guaranteed to make you a jaded motherfucker: the realization that no one is looking for the truth.

Everybody is just trying to get their own side to win and fuck the consequences. So what 7-year olds have to be traumatized and develop lifelong inferiority complexes and crippling insecurity because their teachers told them they're evil, they'll always be evil, and everything they do must be done in favor of the people who call them evil? Their team wins, that's all they care about.

(Holy shit, so many typos. I really need to stop posting before the coffee kicks in.)

Exactly. They don't ask questions. They don't investigate. They don't think in any capacity. It's scary that some of these people unironically consider themselves to be free thinkers.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

Critical race theory is only popular in a few countries. It's not really a thing in most of Europe or Asia, pretty much anywhere east of Germany. It's just more accepted in America and a few other countries like Canada than creationism is now.

If you went around Turkey saying that Turkish people were bad because of the Ottoman empire and they all have to apologise for slavery you'd probably just get beaten up, but you won't see that on English language Twitter that mostly leans pretty far left. Even in France Macron said he wouldn't apologise for French war crimes in Algeria that happened before he was born.

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

Here's your late-night programming block for edgy cartoons bro
View attachment 1878597

What is that even supposed to be and why does the lady at the bottom have green skin?

Even in France Macron said he wouldn't apologise for French war crimes in Algeria that happened before he was born.

Not to mention that any discussion of the Algerian War can't just be simplified to ”pieds-noirs bad, FLN good” because of stuff like the Oran massacre, the way Arab soldiers who fought for France were treated and the fact that many of the pieds-noirs had been born in Algeria and had no other home.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

What is that even supposed to be and why does the lady at the bottom have green skin?

Not to mention that any discussion of the Algerian War can't just be simplified to ”pieds-noirs bad, FLN good” because of stuff like the Oran massacre, the way Arab soldiers who fought for France were treated and the fact that many of the pieds-noirs had been born in Algeria and had no other home.

Everyone was bad in Algeria but the fact France did absolutely nothing to improve conditions for most of the population made the situation completely untenable. At the time Algeria got independence in 1962 life expectancy was only 47 compared to 70 on the French mainland. It was basically the attitude the elitists in America like MovieBob have towards flyover country, but far worse. The fact it has improved to 77 in Algeria now (only a few years lower than France) despite a second civil war and a corrupt government shows just how callous French rule was even compared to their current shabby state.

Of course in a war fought by one group of war criminals against another there's no reason for any 1 party to take all responsibility, especially over half a century later.

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

Everyone was bad in Algeria

Which is exactly my point.

Of course French rule fucked ordinary Algerians over (although I wonder what those life expectancy figures look like once you remove infant mortality), and of course France did commit war crimes, but attempting to reduce a complex war to a simplistic ”France bad because white” is as stupid as defending the IRA's atrocities because Ulster Protestants weren't the original inhabitants of NI.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

Which is exactly my point.

Of course French rule fucked ordinary Algerians over (although I wonder what those life expectancy figures look like once you remove infant mortality), and of course France did commit war crimes, but attempting to reduce a complex war to a simplistic ”France bad because white” is as stupid as defending the IRA's atrocities because Ulster Protestants weren't the original inhabitants of NI.

Northern Ireland is another great example of an "everyone was bad in some ways" conflict, although I wouldn't say either the IRA or the UVF paramilitaries were anywhere near as bad as the combatants in Algeria. The problem for the kind of people we're discussing here is a lack of nuance, where whites are bad and everyone else is good unless they're on the right and then they're uncle Toms or whatever.

Taking out infant mortality would probably make 1962 Algeria look a bit better but I doubt things like cancer treatment really existed whatsoever so it probably still wasn't that great.

 

[Windows XP Home Edition]

The fact people like him and George Floyd got made into secular saints is the problem I have with the BLM movement.

I stopped sympathizing with the BLM movement after their statements on the Orlando nightclub killings during the memorial and their past behaviour at pride parades. Not to mention, their temper tantrums during the Paris attacks with the #fuckparis hashtag because they weren't in the limelight. They showed their true colours as dangerously entitled narcissists.

Which is exactly my point.

Of course French rule fucked ordinary Algerians over (although I wonder what those life expectancy figures look like once you remove infant mortality), and of course France did commit war crimes, but attempting to reduce a complex war to a simplistic ”France bad because white” is as stupid as defending the IRA's atrocities because Ulster Protestants weren't the original inhabitants of NI.

The UVF and IRA and the other paramilitary wings were killing Protestants and Catholics left and right out of retaliation and sectarianism. It's incredibly sad, considering the fact that many Protestants who were Ulster Scots and Anglo Irish helped sow the roots of Irish nationalism alongside the Irish Catholic Gaels against oppression. So many innocent lives lost all because of poor management and simmering tensions for centuries and decades.

In almost every war, all sides committed atrocities to each other. In Yugoslavia, even though Bosniaks were mostly victims, the Mujahideen and some of the Bosniak soldiers massacred Serbs and Croats just like the Serb and Croat armies did. However, Slovenia just got the hell out right before shit hit the fan and it wasn't as bad in Macedonia.

 

[existencialdispointment]

context: the woman that disney was defending said plainly racist shit. and disney recived backlash for it for obvious reasons.
he is only defending her actions because she was racist to whites. in summery he is excusing racism.

yeah no kiddos, you can't just point to someone elses shitty behavior to excuse your own. especially when it come to things like racism. theirs no self defense exception there

 

[NoReturn]

Here's your late-night programming block for edgy cartoons bro
View attachment 1878597

This mural is ugly and I wouldn't fuck anyone in it.

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

I stopped having any sympathy for the BLM movement after their statements on the Orlando nightclub killings during the memorial and their past behaviour at pride parades. Not to mention, their temper tantrums during the Paris attacks with the #fuckparis hashtag because they weren't in the limelight. They showed their true colours as dangerously entitled narcissists.

I didn’t even know BLM did this back then. Trying to gain oppression points off gay and French people who were killed in nightclubs because of how easy it was to do a kill count?

Wish there were counter protestors who argued about why gun control does more harm to black people, especially in crime riddled neighborhoods.

 

[Next Task]

What would happen if Sally was friends with both a Nazi and an antifascist? Would she A S C E N D or explode?

She'd still be evil, because no matter how many 'good' friends you have, if you associate with even one person designated evil then you are forever tainted by the association unless you completely disavow them. It's purity or nothing.

The same is true when it comes to ”Nazi”. I remember when the term Nazi was reserved for actual Nazis, and now it seems like everyone right of Jeremy Corbyn is a Nazi.

This is something I've been pointing out to IRL friends, though I don't think to much success. Oh, you're sharing memes about punching Nazis, how it's our moral duty to fight back against the evil Nazi fascists, etc. Great. People agree with you, unless they stop to think about who actually is getting called a Nazi these days.

I don't know a single person who wouldn't be called a Nazi by someone, and that's not because I make sure to only associate with anti-Semites. But the friends who share these 'punch a Nazi' memes have been motte and bailey'd, because I guarantee to them that, no matter what, there are people who would call them Nazis. Which means they're advocating for violence against themselves, though they don't realise it.

SJWs in particular love a motte and bailey, and diluting every negative word helps them tremendously in this effort. Take a thought-terminating cliché and then apply it to everyone you don't like no matter how ill-fitting, and bam, you're an average NPC idiot. Just don't acknowledge that your definition of 'Nazi' now includes 'anyone who disagrees with me about any culture war issue' and you've covered the main argumentation style of the basic SJW unit. To repeat my last post, it's why it's a religion - the point is to get you to unquestioningly accept what you're told, rather than to think about whether everyone called a Nazi should be considered one, or whether just because an organisation says it's against bad things (eg. Antifa) that means it can only be doing good things.

Nowadays, if someone calls you any of those standard terms - Nazi, fascist, bigot, racist, transphobe, misogynist, incel, just to name a few - the increasingly standard response isn't to do a quick self-examination, to think if there's something that you've actually done to be called that. Why would you? The likelihood it's based on you actually doing something to earn it is ever-shrinking, and if something that used to only be said about people like Fred Phelps is now being said about Fred Rogers, then I'm not going to give a shit about your opinion.