Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

[Illuminati Order Official]

https://youtu.be/LZn6yOhp9-o

Oh, you like games?
I love this music \ gameplay piece:

https://youtu.be/0luvgSQelsw?t=90

It can make no sense out of context and to avoid spoiling anything I'll just say it's a near endgame segment where you learn origin story of a villain. You get to play as this creepy killer and after a while the music kicks in... Gives me chills every time.
Love the dissonance between the music and what's going on on screen.

 

[Kurple Pecleon]

It actually does sound like someone is propositioning me for sex.

Nowhere in that screenshot is anyone propositioning anything to anybody. You took a screenshot of a random slapfight devoid of any context that would frame it as anything other than two retards slinging shit at each other.

Plus, the messages are timestamped "a day ago" and the computer clock shows it's 3/1/2015, that doesn't add up to February 23rd in any way. I have to give it to you though, you got the year right.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

No, it doesn't. As I said, that person could have been using sarcasm or making a joke.
You should really learn to read, Pam, stupidity is not part of your schizophrenia.



Yes, you. You have had issues with reality for YEARS

No one is trying to sound like a professional Pam. You are the last one who should mention IQ since your reading comprehension is at a 5th grade level.

So all these times I was hacked was just a big funny haha I didn't get?

 

[Whale Spotter]

So all these times I was hacked was just a big funny haha I didn't get?
View attachment 1878670
View attachment 1878671
View attachment 1878672View attachment 1878672
View attachment 1878675
View attachment 1878677
View attachment 1878679

No Pam, the conversation you had in the random JustJared comment section could have been a joke or something that someone said.

That is unrelated to whoever tried to hack you.

HOW are these two events connected?

 

[DocHoliday1977]

No Pam, the conversation you had in the random JustJared comment section could have been a joke or something that someone said.

That is unrelated to whoever tried to hack you.

HOW are these two events connected?

The same person who admitted to doing it did all this.




The message head says stupid hacker.

 

[Whale Spotter]

View attachment 1878709
View attachment 1878710
View attachment 1878711
View attachment 1878717
View attachment 1878712
View attachment 1878720

Pam you can post here all these worthless screenshots but they still prove NOTHING.

How do you connect these random trolls to Harvey?
The guy on the 24th of December screenshot is named James, nowhere he mentioned the JustJared article or Harvey Weinstein.

Side note: Why would you tag Donald Trump in the hacking attempt? What does he have to do with that? Is that because you think the hackers are Russian? Despite having no evidence for that (I saw IPs from Vietnam and Indonesia which could be a VPN but still no mention of Russia)?

The same person who admitted to doing it did all this.

Nope, that person is using sarcasm to make fun of you and, as usual, you failed to pick up on it.

The message head says stupid hacker.

That looks like a reply to something you said. Did you send an email with subject: Stupid hacker?

Also, it sounds like some troll who is making fun of your obsession with Weinstein because you posted that shit all over Twitter.

Once again, this proves nothing, except that you were trolled and fell for it.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Pam you can post here all these worthless screenshots but they still prove NOTHING.

How do you connect these random trolls to Harvey?
The guy on the 24th of December screenshot is named James, nowhere he mentioned the JustJared article or Harvey Weinstein.

Side note: Why would you tag Donald Trump in the hacking attempt? What does he have to do with that? Is that because you think the hackers are Russian? Despite having no evidence for that (I saw IPs from Vietnam and Indonesia which could be a VPN but still no mention of Russia)?


Nope, that person is using sarcasm to make fun of you and, as usual, you failed to pick up on it.


That looks like a reply to something you said. Did you send an email with subject: Stupid hacker?

Also, it sounds like some troll who is making fun of your obsession with Weinstein because you posted that shit all over Twitter.

Once again, this proves nothing, except that you were trolled and fell for it.

Oh so someone hacked me in 2015 back when I had no idea about Harvey Weinstein cause of my obsession with Harvey Weinstein. Good God almighty!

 

[Whale Spotter]

Oh so someone hacked me in 2015 back when I had no idea about Harvey Weinstein cause of my obsession with Harvey Weinstein. Good God almighty!

No Pam, once again you can't read.

The person who sent you the email called "Stupid Hacker" is responding to you because they had obviously read about your obsession with Weinstein and they had read about your hacking issue (because, again, you post that shit everywhere). That screenshot is from 2017.

The hacking could have been coincidental, it happens to everyone to have some douche trying to hack their accounts.

You have NOT proven a connection between whoever hacked you, Harvey Weinstein and the rando in the JustJared article. HOW are these connected?

 

[DocHoliday1977]

No Pam, once again you can't read.

The person who sent you the email called "Stupid Hacker" is responding to you because they had obviously read about your obsession with Weinstein and they had read about your hacking issue (because, again, you post that shit everywhere). That screenshot is from 2017.

The hacking could have been coincidental, it happens to everyone to have some douche trying to hack their accounts.

You have NOT proven a connection between whoever hacked you, Harvey Weinstein and the rando in the JustJared article. HOW are these connected?

I never knew anything about Harvey Weinstein before 2016. Sorry, Harvey. You gave your name to let me know you had the freedom to do any crime to anyone.

Once again, you are an idiot.

You created this thread and you've have done nothing but brag about stalking and harassing me.

Nowhere in that screenshot is anyone propositioning anything to anybody. You took a screenshot of a random slapfight devoid of any context that would frame it as anything other than two retards slinging shit at each other.

Plus, the messages are timestamped "a day ago" and the computer clock shows it's 3/1/2015, that doesn't add up to February 23rd in any way. I have to give it to you though, you got the year right.

Oh really? Cause the revenge porn came in May 2015.

Oh and it did happen on February 23, 2015, cause March 2015 was the day I screenshot it. I know you're trying to outsmart but seriously, not this time.

Clear retaliation for rejection of sexual advances.

 

[Kurple Pecleon]

Oh really? Cause the revenge porn came in May 2015.

I don't even know what you're talking about, I'm just saying those comments lack any conext connecting them to anything you said so far.

Oh and it did happen on February 23, 2015

Not according to your own "proof". You took the screenshot on march 1st, the messages were posted "a day ago". That is: february 28th. I don't really care, but you were the one egging us to check the timestamps.

I know you're trying to outsmart but seriously, not this time.

I'm not trying to outsmart you. It just looks like that because anyone who's not delusional outsmarts you by default.

 

[Whale Spotter]

I never knew anything about Harvey Weinstein before 2016. Sorry, Harvey. You gave your name to let me know you had the freedom to do any crime to anyone.

Once again, you are an idiot.

Your reading comprehension is really at 5th grade level.

THIS worthless screenshot says 2017. That was already past the date when you learned about Harvey and these trolls knew it. Is this a little more clear Pam? Do I need to spell it further for you?

How is the troll who sent you the message above connected to the rando who sent you this

OR to the rando who sent you this?

They are not connected. They are all random trolls. You have no proof that these people are connected to Harvey and your case is pathetic.

You sent your nudes to someone and they posted it and you want us to believe that it was retaliation? Lol no. Again, prove these people are connected.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

I don't even know what you're talking about, I'm just saying those comments lack any conext connecting them to anything you said so far.

Not according to your own "proof". You took the screenshot on march 1st, the messages were posted "a day ago". That is: february 28th. I don't really care, but you were the one egging us to check the timestamps.

I'm not trying to outsmart you. It just looks like that because anyone who's not delusional outsmarts you by default.

Hillary.

I saved all this so that I could shove all this down a big mouthed victim blaming tard cum ex lawyers throat. It's complete with Harvey's admission.

Outsmart by default? Whatever ho.

Your reading comprehension is really at 5th grade level.

THIS worthless screenshot says 2017. That was already past the date when you learned about Harvey and these trolls knew it. Is this a little more clear Pam? Do I need to spell it further for you?

View attachment 1878812


How is the troll who sent you the message above connected to the rando who sent you this

View attachment 1878817

OR to the rando who sent you this?

View attachment 1878821

They are not connected. They are all random trolls. You have no proof that these people are connected to Harvey and your case is pathetic.

You sent your nudes to someone and they posted it and you want us to believe that it was retaliation? Lol no. Again, prove these people are connected.

View attachment 1878828

They are connected and match Weinstein's behavior that he's been convicted previously.

These are the same message thread. One screenshot, the other html for date time stamp and death threat.

 

[Whale Spotter]

They are connected and match Weinstein's behavior that he's been convicted previously.

How are they connected? Weinstein did not harass women online he assaulted and harassed actresses when they went to him. You never met him, he doesn't know you exist and he did not harass you.

You got trolled

DocHoliday1977 said:
These are the same message thread. One screenshot, the other html for date time stamp and death threat.
View attachment 1878836
View attachment 1878839
View attachment 1878840

Those look like completely different conversations. Also 2016 is when you said you already knew about Weinstein so still proves nothing.

HOW did Harvey find out about you? You were not an actress. These are nothing but ridiculous associations created by your schizophrenic brain.

 

[Kurple Pecleon]

Hillary.

I saved all this so that I could shove all this down a big mouthed victim blaming tard cum ex lawyers throat. It's complete with Harvey's admission.

Outsmart by default? Whatever ho.

Yeah, sure, I'm Hillary, whatever. Still doesn't make the day before March 1st be February 23rd.
Whether the actual date was feb 23 or feb 28 is irrelevant anyways. What's important is how you're so fixated on it being the former that you can't even accept that your own so-called "proof" says otherwise.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

How are they connected? Weinstein did not harass women online he assaulted and harassed actresses when they went to him. You never met him, he doesn't know you exist and he did not harass you.

You got trolled


Those look like completely different conversations. Also 2016 is when you said you already knew about Weinstein so still proves nothing.

HOW did Harvey find out about you? You were not an actress. These are nothing but ridiculous associations created by your schizophrenic brain.

Let me give you some advice. If you're going "troll" dont mention your name or send your picture with a death threat, rape threat, or kidnapping threat. And dont create a "thread" where you readmit everything several times over for over a period of years.

Yeah, sure, I'm Hillary, whatever. Still doesn't make the day before March 1st be February 23rd.
Whether the actual date was feb 23 or feb 28 is irrelevant anyways. What's important is how you're so fixated on it being the former that you can't even accept that your own so-called "proof" says otherwise.

It backs up my testimony. Sorry.

 

[Kurple Pecleon]

It backs up my testimony. Sorry.

Which testimony?

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Which testimony?

Figure it out.

 

[LoverofPi]

It actually does sound like someone is propositioning me for sex. I didn't know the tard was Harvey until her outed himself December 24, 2016.

Anyone one else having a hard time with reality?

I daily keep getting reminded on the low IQs trying to sound like professionals on this thread.

Okay, as pointed out, your screenshot places those comments at February 28th, but even then, that's not the big problem here.

The big problem here is that you say you were discussing Ambra's accusations. Those happened mid march. You cannot be discussing them yet.
Further, you allege in your lawsuit that the first contact was in 2013, with serious action taking place in 2014, but if Weinstein didn't learn of your existence until 2015, he can't be the one responsible for that.

Nowhere in that screenshot is anyone propositioning anything to anybody. You took a screenshot of a random slapfight devoid of any context that would frame it as anything other than two retards slinging shit at each other.

Plus, the messages are timestamped "a day ago" and the computer clock shows it's 3/1/2015, that doesn't add up to February 23rd in any way. I have to give it to you though, you got the year right.

Not that getting the year correct helps her. Pam is now asserting yet another version of events, now in direct contradiction with her allegations in her lawsuit.

Oh so someone hacked me in 2015 back when I had no idea about Harvey Weinstein cause of my obsession with Harvey Weinstein. Good God almighty!

Pam, Yahoo security was a joke and you have nothing tying the hacking to any motive. You know why most people get hacked? Because people find vulnerabilities in securities and decide to root around looking for information to profit off of.

Figure it out.

How can we when you still haven't?

I never knew anything about Harvey Weinstein before 2016. Sorry, Harvey. You gave your name to let me know you had the freedom to do any crime to anyone.

Yet you were discussing him in 2015?

Oh really? Cause the revenge porn came in May 2015.

Oh and it did happen on February 23, 2015, cause March 2015 was the day I screenshot it. I know you're trying to outsmart but seriously, not this time.

Clear retaliation for rejection of sexual advances.
View attachment 1878798

According to your lawsuit it happened in 2014. Which is it, Pam?

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Oh, you like games?
I love this music \ gameplay piece:

https://youtu.be/0luvgSQelsw?t=90

It can make no sense out of context and to avoid spoiling anything I'll just say it's a near endgame segment where you learn origin story of a villain. You get to play as this creepy killer and after a while the music kicks in... Gives me chills every time.
Love the dissonance between the music and what's going on on screen.

Lol

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Lol

"It's funny" kind of lol or "You're stupid, Illuminati" kind of lol?