- Joined
- Feb 4, 2020
Imagine thinking that what makes a good limit on the minimum wage is just an arbitrary percentage of the median wage. The idea that such a heated topic of discussion in economics - the study of human interaction - can be summarised so easily is just fucking dumb. Like as if all these highly intelligent economists never noticed it was such a simple relationship to understand the issue!!!So fresh day with many new Vaush videos, one commenting on the federal minimum wage.
This retard needs to start citing his sources cause a simple google search refutes his numbers. Vaush claims that the minimum wage can not exceed 60% of the median wage, his explanation of what 60% of a median is awful and confusing, but there are search results for this value. Its technically the relative poverty line. Now this is where he goes off the deep end, while arguing for a 15$/hr minimum wage he claims that the minimum wage should be as high as possible without exceeding this 60% of the median wage, which he claims is 14.89$ (one off from the golden number, timestamp is 25:12).
The issue with this, is as always, this communist can't cite anything nor give a single piece of evidence towards his numbers, but there are reports, such as: https://www.epi.org/publication/swa-wages-2019/, which give a median wage of 19.33$/hr. But what is 60% of 19.33? It's 11.60$ not 14.89$, so by his own logic the federal minimum wage should be limited to a lower number. If he was consistent (we all know the only thing he is consistent on is defending child porn), he would argue against the minimum wage being raised to 15$/hr, as "he follows the science."
The low pay commission in the UK basically reviews the best data globally to come to a recommendation on how to raise minimum wages.
Their recommendations amount to this:
You should raise minimum wage rates, but do so slowly. This is because whilst for the most part minimum wages don't have a noticeble negative effect on unemployment, there is a "biting point" wherein if you go above, it will begin to have more drastic effects on employment. Additionally, even if there is some negative effects from the rise prior to this "biting point" they are largely outweighed by the benefits of there being less in-work poverty.
There is no magic formula, it's test and adjust. Raising the wage is generally better, as it has a beneficial effects on those poor fucks stuck at the bottom. Equally, the lolberts who think it should be acceptable to pay people 20¢ an hour because it's an agreement are out of their fucking minds.
As for people moving for a higher minimum wage - oh sure, I'll move somewhere with a higher cost of living to take advantage of the higher minimum wage. Except it won't work, because the increased cost of living will negate any benefit.
Last edited: