Vaush / @VaushV / VaushVidya / IrishLaddie / Ian Anthony Kochinski - Horse Cock Enthusiast, Larpy Violent Revolutionary, Sex Pest, in his 100th pedo scandal

America's Hat said:
Vaush has uploaded a debate with some conservative TikTok Star called Tyler Bluntman, and its painful to listen too, but it does show Vaush's style of interupting and refusing to concede arguments when he is in the wrong. He will only ever half agree to points as he already believes he's correct. Thankfully, the TikToker calls hims out for weaseling out of his previous acknowledgments.

It's 2 hours long, and don't have good practice archiving stuff that requires splitting, nor do I know this sites bitrate/filesize limit.

Edit: Also his ears look like they are about to burst.

View attachment 1875709
Click to expand...
Scientists should study this image because it's guaranteed to piss off anyone who sees it. I genuinely can't stand to look at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sade's Pearl
America's Hat said:
Vaush has uploaded a debate with some conservative TikTok Star called Tyler Bluntman, and its painful to listen too, but it does show Vaush's style of interupting and refusing to concede arguments when he is in the wrong. He will only ever half agree to points as he already believes he's correct. Thankfully, the TikToker calls hims out for weaseling out of his previous acknowledgments.

It's 2 hours long, and don't have good practice archiving stuff that requires splitting, nor do I know this sites bitrate/filesize limit.

Edit: Also his ears look like they are about to burst.

View attachment 1875709
Click to expand...
Fantasy:
1611818954874.png


Reality:
1611819385585.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Woke Blue Muttlema, scathefire and 1 other person
Fat faggots like Vaush who get off on discussion of CP and then wave concerns of it off as “playing devil’s advocate” piss me off. I feel like pedophilia really is just one of those things that shouldn’t be debated: they should just be looked down upon. Maybe this is a hot take, idk you let me know.

There’s no reason to debate the ethics of cold-blooded murder, nor rape; same should go with facilitating/causing child abuse. Yet, these neckbeard creeps get on calls with eachother and spend hours upon hours talking about whether or not child pornography should be legalized. “Oh but it’s to rehabilitate sex offenders so they won’t do it again!” Seriously, fuck off. These liberal cunts are as much of unproductive, parasitic leeches as the capitalist bankers and government officials they despise.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Gas the News, Flaming Insignias, Woke Blue Muttlema and 13 others
America's Hat said:
Vaush has uploaded a debate with some conservative TikTok Star called Tyler Bluntman, and its painful to listen too, but it does show Vaush's style of interupting and refusing to concede arguments when he is in the wrong. He will only ever half agree to points as he already believes he's correct. Thankfully, the TikToker calls hims out for weaseling out of his previous acknowledgments.

It's 2 hours long, and don't have good practice archiving stuff that requires splitting, nor do I know this sites bitrate/filesize limit.

Edit: Also his ears look like they are about to burst.

View attachment 1875709
Click to expand...
He needs to get that checked out.
Also has anyone found the study about black fathers visiting their children more than white ones yet.
 
Mr E. Grifter said:
That requires taking part in contact sports over a long period of time.

Vaush doesn't do sports.
Click to expand...
How can anyone see themselves as a sexy hunk while sitting on their ass all day and have zero experience doing sports? There's some exceptional level of delusions there.
 
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, R0-thot, scathefire and 4 others
Gig Bucking Fun said:
Fat faggots like Vaush who get off on discussion of CP and then wave concerns of it off as “playing devil’s advocate” piss me off. I feel like pedophilia really is just one of those things that shouldn’t be debated: they should just be looked down upon. Maybe this is a hot take, idk you let me know.

There’s no reason to debate the ethics of cold-blooded murder, nor rape; same should go with facilitating/causing child abuse. Yet, these neckbeard creeps get on calls with eachother and spend hours upon hours talking about whether or not child pornography should be legalized. “Oh but it’s to rehabilitate sex offenders so they won’t do it again!” Seriously, fuck off. These liberal cunts are as much of unproductive, parasitic leeches as the capitalist bankers and government officials they despise.
Click to expand...
It can be debated but the pro-CP side of the argument shouldn't be taken seriously. Free speech is an inherent right so CWC can claim he's a goddess and is about to bring about the dimensional merge all he wants but that doesn't mean anyone has to believe him. Vaush and his ilk are on that level of nonsense and deserve that level of respect.

Pro-CP arguments all fall flat from a liberal position of individual rights anyway because children have a negative liberty not to be abused and have dirty pictures of them circulated for people to jack off to, since that's a clear violation of right to privacy; this also applies to revenge porn of adults. The only way you could end up arguing in favour of it is from some wacky utilitarianism where it somehow benefits society for that shit to be legal (which is what Vaush and friends do), which it obviously doesn't unless you're a paedophile yourself.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Woke Blue Muttlema, Brain Problems, Kheapathic and 4 others
Marche said:
He had no understanding on what was happening yesterday and asked for an idiots explantion but now he is totally a freedom fighter.
Click to expand...
Isn't that how he approaches all things in life? If you don't understand it, just ask you audience or look it up on Wikipedia. Once you skim through the explanation act like an expert and people will reward your hard work with praise and donations. Vaush only proves that he's a grifter who will jump on any bandwagon that's currently popular.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Gas the News, Flaming Insignias, Gig Bucking Fun and 6 others
So fresh day with many new Vaush videos, one commenting on the federal minimum wage.
This retard needs to start citing his sources cause a simple google search refutes his numbers. Vaush claims that the minimum wage can not exceed 60% of the median wage, his explanation of what 60% of a median is awful and confusing, but there are search results for this value. Its technically the relative poverty line. Now this is where he goes off the deep end, while arguing for a 15$/hr minimum wage he claims that the minimum wage should be as high as possible without exceeding this 60% of the median wage, which he claims is 14.89$ (one off from the golden number, timestamp is 25:12).
The issue with this, is as always, this communist can't cite anything nor give a single piece of evidence towards his numbers, but there are reports, such as: https://www.epi.org/publication/swa-wages-2019/, which give a median wage of 19.33$/hr. But what is 60% of 19.33? It's 11.60$ not 14.89$, so by his own logic the federal minimum wage should be limited to a lower number. If he was consistent (we all know the only thing he is consistent on is defending child porn), he would argue against the minimum wage being raised to 15$/hr, as "he follows the science."
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Kheapathic, albert chan and 5 others
America's Hat said:
So fresh day with many new Vaush videos, one commenting on the federal minimum wage.
This retard needs to start citing his sources cause a simple google search refutes his numbers. Vaush claims that the minimum wage can not exceed 60% of the median wage, his explanation of what 60% of a median is awful and confusing, but there are search results for this value. Its technically the relative poverty line. Now this is where he goes off the deep end, while arguing for a 15$/hr minimum wage he claims that the minimum wage should be as high as possible without exceeding this 60% of the median wage, which he claims is 14.89$ (one off from the golden number, timestamp is 25:12).
The issue with this, is as always, this communist can't cite anything nor give a single piece of evidence towards his numbers, but there are reports, such as: https://www.epi.org/publication/swa-wages-2019/, which give a median wage of 19.33$/hr. But what is 60% of 19.33? It's 11.60$ not 14.89$, so by his own logic the federal minimum wage should be limited to a lower number. If he was consistent (we all know the only thing he is consistent on is defending child porn), he would argue against the minimum wage being raised to 15$/hr, as "he follows the science."
Click to expand...
He also said this minimum wage should be calculated individually by state/region. But because the minimums would be different due to different costs of living it would encourage people to move to places with the highest cost of living. For example, he said Washington should have $28 (!!!) minimum wage. That seemed to basic to me I couldn't believe he didn't notice how stupid that would be.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Brain Problems, AltisticRight and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back