Cultcow Marjan Šiklić / Marijan Ciklic / GovernmentsGetGirlfriends / ThatIncelBlogger / CAAMIB - Third Edition: Fear and Loathing of Vagina

@Holden
I still want to know how you think a Republican President is going to influence a change in the Same Sex Marriage Ruling.

I also want to know why a 12 year old can be mature enough for sex, but not mature enough to be a parent.

Horse, rapists are soldiers of Christ to modern Western women. They are knights. They are the holiest of the holy.
Totally read this as Horse rapists are soldiers... (blah blah blah) and was like
Despicable-Me-Minion-Saying-What.gif
 
Marriages still formally exist but they are Marriage 2.0, where a man is enslaved.

Then why do you say "marriage doesn't exist"? Even if the factors of what makes a marriage change, that means marriage still exists. It's just in a different state. It's misstatements such as this that make it hard for anyone to understand what your point is. You can't say one thing "Marriage doesn't exist" but actually mean "marriage is not the same as it was" and expect anyone to understand that.

That's the key issue. When during the last 10 years have I had any stability regarding women? Never, because my every move was immediately wrong. There were no correct moves. Nothing I would have done could have made me date an animal.

Where your reasoning fails is that you have failed to falsify that the common factor in all these situations is the root cause of the trouble. That common factor is you. In all your hyperbole and hubris, you fail to eliminate yourself as the root of all your problems.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Cubanodun - With regard to his language use, I am also concerned about his continued misspelling of your username. It's like he's utterly innocent of the fact that there's an adjective, "Cuban," and the name of a god, "Odun," run together. Possibly the only thing he is innocent of, according to himself:

[6/26/15, 6:26:50 PM] Caamib Caamib: to do what i want? i don't want anything.
[6/26/15, 6:26:58 PM] Caamib Caamib: i already pushed beyond consent
[6/26/15, 6:27:03 PM] Caamib Caamib: i've seen all i can have.
...
[6/26/15, 6:36:02 PM] Rosie Redbike: So how did you choose the women to push past consent with? Were any of them people who could at least be made to continue seeing you by some means?
[6/26/15, 6:36:31 PM] Caamib Caamib: just whoever was passing by that night and looked at least semi-attractive
[6/26/15, 6:38:47 PM] Caamib Caamib: like the experience or not, they're merely to be passed to another man
[6/26/15, 6:39:18 PM] Caamib Caamib: most showed extreme discomfort, but few resisted. there was one i let go.
[6/26/15, 6:39:27 PM] Caamib Caamib: she seemed really freaked out, was a virgin.

So by his own claim, he is a criminal. By legal definition, doing any sexual activity that your partner does not or cannot consent to is a crime. I don't care whether he thinks this definition suits his beliefs or needs. That is part of the FBI definition of a sexual crime, for example. And whether or not we can prove this (I find his sudden desire for citation, with timestamp, of every single post of his over the last few months in which he goofed up his English to be utterly hilarious), it is his own claim about himself and his own activities. Whether or not he thinks these activities are crimes is irrelevant; legal authorities would find them even more upsetting than simply banging a drum nude in front of the courthouse. Consider also TFO:

[6/26/15, 6:11:08 PM] Caamib Caamib: btw, do you know what my plan for 2015 with her is?
[6/26/15, 6:11:15 PM] Rosie Redbike: No, you haven't told me.
[6/26/15, 6:11:15 PM] Caamib Caamib: doing what i always said you women like
[6/26/15, 6:11:20 PM] Rosie Redbike: Hmm.
[6/26/15, 6:11:45 PM] Rosie Redbike: What extent of injury do you plan to cause, or is it just the humiliation factor you believe will be effective?
[6/26/15, 6:12:35 PM] Caamib Caamib: i don't know and would rather not talk about it.
[6/26/15, 6:12:36 PM] Rosie Redbike: I'm not Interpol. I would never qualify for any police force, being just under 5' tall.
[6/26/15, 6:12:49 PM] Caamib Caamib: but it's all i have left
[6/26/15, 6:13:04 PM] Caamib Caamib: all i have
[6/26/15, 6:13:13 PM] Rosie Redbike: What do you hope to accomplish, is more to the point? Do you think you will win her this way?
[6/26/15, 6:13:36 PM] Caamib Caamib: what i should have in 2007. to see what i missed

As out of shape as he is, in all likelihood, harboring this fantasy for someone who was briefly in his life eight years ago? Worrying, if only for its implications about his own psyche.
 
So, there you go Horse. Pushing past consent is a phrase which means nothing at all. I never said I raped anybody.

I never said I'll rape any woman either. I said women like many things here. There is simply nothing you claim there is.

I have no idea who the hell would see any of this as serious.

Also, the idea that she had been briefly in my life is also a lie, by you. We met as late as May 2008 and she had been in my life later as well in various ways.

How nice when somebody finally publishes my own words and makes herself and all of you look like the morons you are.
 
[6/26/15, 6:26:50 PM] Caamib Caamib: to do what i want? i don't want anything.
[6/26/15, 6:26:58 PM] Caamib Caamib: i already pushed beyond consent
[6/26/15, 6:27:03 PM] Caamib Caamib: i've seen all i can have.
...
[6/26/15, 6:36:02 PM] Rosie Redbike: So how did you choose the women to push past consent with? Were any of them people who could at least be made to continue seeing you by some means?
[6/26/15, 6:36:31 PM] Caamib Caamib: just whoever was passing by that night and looked at least semi-attractive
[6/26/15, 6:38:47 PM] Caamib Caamib: like the experience or not, they're merely to be passed to another man
[6/26/15, 6:39:18 PM] Caamib Caamib: most showed extreme discomfort, but few resisted. there was one i let go.
[6/26/15, 6:39:27 PM] Caamib Caamib: she seemed really freaked out, was a virgin.

So by his own claim, he is a criminal. By legal definition, doing any sexual activity that your partner does not or cannot consent to is a crime. I don't care whether he thinks this definition suits his beliefs or needs. That is part of the FBI definition of a sexual crime, for example. And whether or not we can prove this (I find his sudden desire for citation, with timestamp, of every single post of his over the last few months in which he goofed up his English to be utterly hilarious), it is his own claim about himself and his own activities. Whether or not he thinks these activities are crimes is irrelevant; legal authorities would find them even more upsetting than simply banging a drum nude in front of the courthouse.

Yep, if what he says is true, he is a criminal and deserves to be in jail.

http://eige.europa.eu/legal-definitions/croatia-sexual-assault-excl-rape

In Croatia, the term "sexual intercourse without consent" is the one most closely related to sexual assault, which means: whoever performs sexual intercourse or an equivalent sexual act with another person, without her consent, or induces another person, without her consent, to perform sexual intercourse or an equivalent sexual act with a third person, or performs a sexual act equivalent to sexual intercourse on herself, without her consent, shall be punished by imprisonment of six months to five years.

 
Anything that is past consent and causing "extreme discomfort"... I mean, I know you think that isn't a crime in the modern world, you've rambled about that enough, but as @supdup points out, the authorities see it that way. Think of your poor old mother. Suppose she suddenly found out you were out there causing "extreme discomfort" to someone else. She, too, would be gravely disappointed (if she's even still alive -- the way you keep dodging the simple question of how she's doing makes me think, sadly, she is currently as fictional as your dog).
 
So, there you go Horse. Pushing past consent is a phrase which means nothing at all. I never said I raped anybody.

okay, what does "pushed past consent" mean then?

Also, the idea that she had been briefly in my life is also a lie, by you. We met as late as May 2008 and she had been in my life later as well in various ways.

That's your fault by not providing the information. You somehow think we can read minds over the internet.

How nice when somebody finally publishes my own words and makes herself and all of you look like the morons you are.

How so? It just makes you look like the creepy emo kid you are.
 
"Met" in 2008? Yeah, they met in court. Because he made what was, according to him, an ambiguous threat on a message board that, again according to him, was incorrectly interpreted as planning a murder-suicide of himself and TFO. But it sounded like probable cause to the authorities.
 
Anything that is past consent and causing "extreme discomfort"...
Past consent of what? Nowhere do I even mention sex. Past consent of us walking my dog?

This is the problem with you nutjobs. You think everyone is as insane as you are.

She, too, would be gravely disappointed (if she's even still alive -- the way you keep dodging the simple question of how she's doing
I said many times that just the fact that lunatics here are so obsessed with a non-event is why I'm dodging it. Plus, as you may know, there are more lunatics than you may think.
 
Except that you're talking about shit I never said.

Horse quoted you directly.

What is actual rape today? Treating a woman civilly.

There you go, making up your own definitions again.

Civil: adhering to the norms of polite social intercourse; not deficient in common courtesy
Rape: unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim.

Those don't sound like the same thing at all.
 
Past consent of what? Nowhere do I even mention sex. Past consent of us walking my dog?

But then you said:

[6/26/15, 6:39:18 PM] Caamib Caamib: most showed extreme discomfort, but few resisted. there was one i let go.
[6/26/15, 6:39:27 PM] Caamib Caamib: she seemed really freaked out, was a virgin.

I'll let everyone use inference to figure out what you mean.
 
Because you don't understand it. America isn't all liberal. That's why we have cops killing blacks at times in dubious circumstances. However, these groups at least don't hate straight white men like liberals do. My point is that liberals have certain sacred groups that can do no wrong and blacks are among them.

As for you citing famous decapitated people, please, this trolling is atrocious even by your standards.
Please quit avoiding the question. Do you have proof of your white nonsense or not? Shit ain't hard.
 
But then you said:

[6/26/15, 6:39:18 PM] Caamib Caamib: most showed extreme discomfort, but few resisted. there was one i let go.
[6/26/15, 6:39:27 PM] Caamib Caamib: she seemed really freaked out, was a virgin.

I'll let everyone use inference to figure out what you mean.
But none of this mentions sex. How would I know she was a virgin anyway? There's no mention of the word sex. No mention of the word rape. Nobody to accuse me. No damaged parties. You just want to see non-liberals destroyed. All you want to do.

Please quit avoiding the question. Do you have proof of your white nonsense or not?
Just read any liberal site. SRS would do well for a start.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back