Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
All of the right things to say (mental health, unregulated access to firearms, the wealthy) but all the suffering is on someone with the wrong gender and the wrong skin color. That and it got more Oscar buzz than Black Panther or Wonder Woman.

The only bit in Joker that seemed forced and fake to me was a trio of violent yuppies on a subway. Yeah, pre-Giuliani New York was just a-crawl with violent white yuppies.

Honestly, it's very similar to Taxi Driver and King of Comedy. And I mean that in a nice way. I'd point to it as a rare, good homage, and I will never stop being amused by the fact they used a superhero coating to sell an actual good film. And, of course, that professional critics are literally too stupid to realize it.
 
He probably does want them to be killed, only he's smart enough to know that saying stuff like that publically is a bad idea.
"It is my mournful duty to inform you that our friend John W. Stephens
is dead. He was foully murdered by the Ku-Klux in the Court House. … He was stabbed
five or six times, and then hanged on a hook in the Grand Jury room, where he was
found on Sunday morning. … Another brave, honest Republican citizen has met his fate
at the hands of these fiends. ...He was accustomed to say that 3,000 poor, colored
Republican voters in that county had stood by him and elected him, at the risk of
persecution and starvation, and that he had no idea of abandoning them to the Ku-Klux
… [whose] crimes have been of every character imaginable. "-source

Democrats always gotta be trying to kill republicans.
 
Lass_Library shows us the answer to the math problem that has some Kiwis racking their brains:
View attachment 1887090

Unlike Bobby, neither conservatives nor the class-conscious "shit libs" got over being bullied at school:
View attachment 1887095

Glenn Greenwald:
View attachment 1887104

View attachment 1887100
That woman speaks my mind. ("How come there is no educational requirement or background checks to be in congress? If you are a felon you lose the right to vote but not the right to be a lawmaker?") But like her I'm not Properly Evolved. I'm glad that Bobby is ready to defend people like me against "dumbfuck bigots".

+ + ++
Today is not great for Bobby's genocidal kindred spirit, a woman with so much promise:
View attachment 1887078

Bobby believes The Daily Beast, and CNN's Jake Tapper.
View attachment 1887084

Intersectionality (n.) - two or more purported oppressed groups competing for attention. See also Oppression Olympics.
View attachment 1887113
Honestly Bobby's is not a bad take at all. But read on...

View attachment 1887112
So Bobby is exactly like the BLM protesters who resented being told to fuck off from a pride parade. Whatever Peter Coffin cares about is not important; the important thing is the grievance of Bob and his pet animals.

Bobby get chastised for clamoring for Disney's queerbaiting.
View attachment 1887107

Joker.
View attachment 1887075
That four tweet non sequitur about school bullies is gold. Dude just brings that shit up totally unprompted. He legit thinks everybody’s ideology is based on hating whoever picked on them in school.
 
"It is my mournful duty to inform you that our friend John W. Stephens
is dead. He was foully murdered by the Ku-Klux in the Court House. … He was stabbed
five or six times, and then hanged on a hook in the Grand Jury room, where he was
found on Sunday morning. … Another brave, honest Republican citizen has met his fate
at the hands of these fiends. ...He was accustomed to say that 3,000 poor, colored
Republican voters in that county had stood by him and elected him, at the risk of
persecution and starvation, and that he had no idea of abandoning them to the Ku-Klux
… [whose] crimes have been of every character imaginable. "-source

Democrats always gotta be trying to kill republicans.
BuT tHe PaRtIeS sWiTcHeD!!1!!1!
"There's nothing wrong with being a communist, even if I disagree with them."
Lol, of course Blob shows compassion and understanding to THAT murderous ideology.
The Nazis killed 11 million in the Holocaust. Communists killed 100 million across the world.

Why, then, is it acceptable for me to call myself a communist but not a Nazi?
 
The Nazis killed 11 million in the Holocaust. Communists killed 100 million across the world.

Why, then, is it acceptable for me to call myself a communist but not a Nazi?
I think it comes down to the fact that Naziism is outwardly cruel when Communism claims to be altruistic, but its true cruelty only becomes apparent once it's instituted.

Naziism saying "this racial group is inherently superior and we should wipe out or enslave the rest" is obviously evil. Communism saying "we need to share everything and make everyone equal" sounds nice on paper until you realize that every time communism has been implemented, it's lead to tyranical dictators, mass murder, and starvation. There are also lots of followers who think that "communism can be done right this time!", but based on all the Soviet iconography used by commies on Twitter, I don't see that happening.
 
BuT tHe PaRtIeS sWiTcHeD!!1!!1!

The Nazis killed 11 million in the Holocaust. Communists killed 100 million across the world.

Why, then, is it acceptable for me to call myself a communist but not a Nazi?
Because the Nazis killed Jews, Homosexuals, and Neurodivergent individuals. Communists killed farmers and factory workers (people whom Bob considers obsolete, by the way.) Communist horrors such as Stalin's cannibal island were just the stories that people bothered to record (don't click that link unless you're ready.)

The Soviets had a joke: why is Hitler up to his neck in blood? Because he stands on the shoulders of Stalin.

That's a trait I've seen a lot in people who support the modern left, or at least the internet ones I've discussed politics with. Their specific argument was usually a variation of "it's okay to have a morally bad or corrupt person in power as long as they pass laws that encourage the population to be good", their logic being that the laws force a lot of average people to be good while the politician is only one person being bad. It's some really assbackwards logic that completely ignores the long term consequences of corrupt leadership but I think it explains pretty well why Bob and people like him don't care if the people they vote for are openly corrupt as long as they give them their gibs and make it illegal to misgender people or whatever.
"The imagination and spiritual strength of Shakespeare's evildoers stopped short at a dozen corpses. Because they had no ideology. Ideology – that is what gives evildoing its long-sought justification and gives the evildoer the necessary steadfastness and determination. That is the social theory which helps to make his acts seem good instead of bad in his own and others' eyes.... That was how the agents of the Inquisition fortified their wills: by invoking Christianity; the conquerors of foreign lands, by extolling the grandeur of their Motherland; the colonizers, by civilization; the Nazis, by race; and the Jacobins (early and late), by equality, brotherhood, and the happiness of future generations... Without evildoers there would have been no Archipelago."

-Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago
 
I think it comes down to the fact that Naziism is outwardly cruel when Communism claims to be altruistic, but its true cruelty only becomes apparent once it's instituted.

Naziism saying "this racial group is inherently superior and we should wipe out or enslave the rest" is obviously evil. Communism saying "we need to share everything and make everyone equal" sounds nice on paper until you realize that every time communism has been implemented, it's lead to tyranical dictators, mass murder, and starvation. There are also lots of followers who think that "communism can be done right this time!", but based on all the Soviet iconography used by commies on Twitter, I don't see that happening.
Communism is outwardly cruel in the same way Nazism is - the only difference is that communists focus their hatred on classes instead of races.

If you look at any communist propaganda and replace ”bourgeois” with ”Jew” it looks very much like something you'd see in Der Stürmer.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago
Oh dear. Now you've brought up the Gulag Archipelago, prepare for certain angry commies to REEEEEE about how Solzhenitsyn is a ”fat Western leftist faggot”.
 
Last edited:
Flash Fact: Walter Duranty of the New York Times won a Pulitzer Prize for covering up Soviet atrocities in the Ukraine during the Holodomor.
That Prize has still not been rescinded. Wat does it say that college football teams can have entire seasons revoked, but that still stands?
Communism is outwardly cruel in the same way Nazism is - the only difference is that communists focus their hatred on classes instead of races.

If you look at any communist propaganda and replace ”bourgeois” with ”Jew” it looks very much like something you'd see in Der Stürmer.
Bob's hatred of the mayoghouls combines aspects of both ideologies. His belief that they are inferior, incapable of intelligent thought come straight from Nazi talking points. His assessments on them holding back the advancement of society and being outside the proscribed areas of the true working-class come from Communism. Looking at them as parasitic blights honestly could come from either one.

He really is like if Goering and Cultural Revolution era Mao had a morphine fueled love orgy with Pol Pot and Reinhard Heydrich and the results morphed into the glob of elitist Easr Coast cringe that he is.
The Soviets had a joke: why is Hitler up to his neck in blood? Because he stands on the shoulders of Stalin.
Here's a fun fact to keep you up at night: those two actually were in talks through their foreign ministers to make the USSR the fourth pillar of the Axis. It never really came together in part due to Molotov grating Hitler and Ribbentrop, but Stalin was eager to ink it before Barbarossa took that off the table for good. It partially explains why he didn't react rationally to the attack: he couldn't believe Hitler would betray him.
That four tweet non sequitur about school bullies is gold. Dude just brings that shit up totally unprompted. He legit thinks everybody’s ideology is based on hating whoever picked on them in school.
He needs to own up to the fact that he instigated people in school. It's surely comforting for him to think that he was the put upon, misunderstood and gifted kid that society couldn't accept. However, life isn't a fucking X-Men comic. He's let slip that he was "somewhat" of a bully himself, but it's clear that he was as big of a pompous asshole back then as he is now.

I bet he was the type to push people by calling them inferior, they deserve to get left-behind by civilization, or whatever the fuck he used and then narc on them when they gave it right back. It was probably even as simple as him pestering others with misplaced, questionable references to media no one gives a shit about and then whining when they told him to shut his gaping maw. Let's not forget that he probably got some flak for creeping on girls and keeping their photos.

I'm just speculating because this only just occurred to me mid sentence, but his behavior on Twitter must be a continuation of what he did in high school.
 
Communism is outwardly cruel in the same way Nazism is - the only difference is that communists focus their hatred on classes instead of races.

If you look at any communist propaganda and replace ”bourgeois” with ”Jew” it looks very much like something you'd see in Der Stürmer.

Oh dear. Now you've brought up the Gulag Archipelago, prepare for certain angry commies to REEEEEE about how Solzhenitsyn is a ”fat Western leftist faggot”.
Always funny to me how commies just completely ignore everything Solzhenitsyn did to criticize the West in the way it dealt with the USSR, going from their reluctance to go all in against Hitler, which according to him let the revolutions burn further and wider, right up to how the West dealt with the Russian sphere at the time of his death. None of those opinions exist though, because they need him to be an ethically bankrupt propagandist who sold out his innocent motherland to NATO. There is no other play for them. And that's not even to say that every one of Solzhenitsyn's opinions was correct, but calling him a Western shill means ignoring a whole host of things that a Western shill would never say, and he said them for decades.

But that was part of his whole point; he could spend his whole life shit-talking Western governments while living in the USA, while in his own homeland he would have been dogmeat just for being seen in public decades after writing critically about the state.
 
Last edited:
I think it comes down to the fact that Naziism is outwardly cruel when Communism claims to be altruistic, but its true cruelty only becomes apparent once it's instituted.

Naziism saying "this racial group is inherently superior and we should wipe out or enslave the rest" is obviously evil. Communism saying "we need to share everything and make everyone equal" sounds nice on paper until you realize that every time communism has been implemented, it's lead to tyranical dictators, mass murder, and starvation. There are also lots of followers who think that "communism can be done right this time!", but based on all the Soviet iconography used by commies on Twitter, I don't see that happening.
Fascists tend crack down to bring everything into their order and bring the people in line with their ideology knowing by and large that the can crush resistance but have to trying insanely hard to win the hearts of the people. Communism's subversive roots lead to a phenomenon where because their followers cannot actively take power openly without backlash when they do gain a foothold they purge indiscriminately anyone who would rebel because they know that a well regulated group of decent size will steamroll their power base.
 
Bob's hatred of the mayoghouls combines aspects of both ideologies. His belief that they are inferior, incapable of intelligent thought come straight from Nazi talking points. His assessments on them holding back the advancement of society and being outside the proscribed areas of the true working-class come from Communism. Looking at them as parasitic blights honestly could come from either one.
This is Bob.
It never really came together in part due to Molotov grating Hitler and Ribbentrop
I'd add that the Nazi idea that Slavs and Jews were Üntermenschen made it impossible for Nazi Germany to form a long-term alliance with a country whose leaders were mostly Slavic or Jewish.
And that's not even to say that every one of Solzhenitsyn's opinions was correct, but calling him a Western shill means ignoring a whole host of things that a Western shill would never say, and he said them for decades.
Solzhenitsyn was for Russia - not for the Bolsheviks, but for the Russia of Alexander II and Catherine the Great - and some people can't accept that that Russia existed or that the Western concept of ”peasants in the fields while a few noblemen eat caviar” was untrue.

The way he talks about how we betrayed the White emigres and the Cossack regiments or how we failed to liberate the East is decidedly not what a pro-Western shill would say.
 
Solzhenitsyn was for Russia - not for the Bolsheviks, but for the Russia of Alexander II and Catherine the Great - and some people can't accept that that Russia existed or that the Western concept of ”peasants in the fields while a few noblemen eat caviar” was untrue.

The way he talks about how we betrayed the White emigres and the Cossack regiments or how we failed to liberate the East is decidedly not what a pro-Western shill would say.
He has also been very critical of the new Russian oligarchy and was eager to point out where it fails even worse than the Soviets. He's also questioned exactly how deliberate the Holodomor was vis-a-vis deliberate targeted genocide versus dramatic failure of economic policy with some extremely convenient effects on undesirable classes and political groups. Regardless of your own opinions on that debate, no Western propagandist would ever even pose the question.
 
Lass_Library shows us the answer to the math problem that has some Kiwis racking their brains:
View attachment 1887090

Unlike Bobby, neither conservatives nor the class-conscious "shit libs" got over being bullied at school:
View attachment 1887095

Glenn Greenwald:
View attachment 1887104

View attachment 1887100
That woman speaks my mind. ("How come there is no educational requirement or background checks to be in congress? If you are a felon you lose the right to vote but not the right to be a lawmaker?") But like her I'm not Properly Evolved. I'm glad that Bobby is ready to defend people like me against "dumbfuck bigots".

+ + ++
Today is not great for Bobby's genocidal kindred spirit, a woman with so much promise:
View attachment 1887078

Bobby believes The Daily Beast, and CNN's Jake Tapper.
View attachment 1887084

Intersectionality (n.) - two or more purported oppressed groups competing for attention. See also Oppression Olympics.
View attachment 1887113
Honestly Bobby's is not a bad take at all. But read on...

View attachment 1887112
So Bobby is exactly like the BLM protesters who resented being told to fuck off from a pride parade. Whatever Peter Coffin cares about is not important; the important thing is the grievance of Bob and his pet animals.

Bobby get chastised for clamoring for Disney's queerbaiting.
View attachment 1887107

Joker.
View attachment 1887075
There's no way in hell Bob knows any vets on a serious level. This is another one of those false expert things he likes to spew as he projects his assache to the world. Also amusing that he's very desperate to claim to be a liberal, which the definition has changed a lot since the early 20th century to more encompass social values than economic ones.

Not with that support of the rich arrogant jackasses Bob. Not with that fascismo you spout without realizing it.
 
Fascists tend crack down to bring everything into their order and bring the people in line with their ideology knowing by and large that the can crush resistance but have to trying insanely hard to win the hearts of the people. Communism's subversive roots lead to a phenomenon where because their followers cannot actively take power openly without backlash when they do gain a foothold they purge indiscriminately anyone who would rebel because they know that a well regulated group of decent size will steamroll their power base.
There's a reason we refer to the Maoist insurgency model in the post-WWII period.

It's also a reason US urban elites have good reason to fear and hate the rural conservatives. They are the only ones who could realistically mount a resistance to extreme authoritarian measures like those being threatened by Robert's ilk.

PL - I kept a 1966 printing of the US Special Operations Research Office study Human Factors Considerations of Undergrounds in Insurgencies on my desk in Afghanistan and would routinely quote it side-by-side with the "new" US Counterinsurgency manual.

The point was, nothing is new. The lessons have been learned over and over -- you can take your pick -- Nagl, Galula, Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, Cyrus.

The biggest mistake we can make is look at a trend and think "it's going to be different this time because we're not like [X precedent]."

Which is what makes Robert's rhetoric so chilling, I think. He's not a great nor original thinker so you know he is parroting something he got from somewhere else. There's plenty of people who think like he does and they're just waiting for their opportunity to carry out their agenda.

Insh'allah, they'll also play their hand like Robert so we can take measures to protect society from them, but if history is any indicator (AS IT ALWAYS IS) his views will escape the safety of Twitter and start playing out like we've seen them start slipping out and real human beings will suffer as a result.
 
I'm just speculating because this only just occurred to me mid sentence, but his behavior on Twitter must be a continuation of what he did in high school.
Undoubtedly. He has shown zero ability to grow, learn, or mature in any fashion the whole time he has been on Twitter. There is no reason to believe that he has changed since high school. The only difference is he's even fatter now.
 
Last edited:
There's plenty of people who think like he does and they're just waiting for their opportunity to carry out their agenda.
And as I'm fond of saying, those people have very helpfully concentrated themselves in cities. As Chiang Kai-Shek learnt the hard way, fighting a civil war when you only control the cities and when you don't have the hearts and minds of your country's citizenry is not fun.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back