Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds
- Thread starter trannyfucker
- Start date
Borrisokeane
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
Regarding troonery Critical Race Theory guy Ibram X Kendi has gone completely based
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2020
Well, this is some serious shite m8s. Kendi is a vegan anti-racist "academic" BLACK MAN with a very islamic-sounding name, so they won't be able to cancel him.
Borrisokeane
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
Yeah, they can't say "transphobia=racism" now. They'll just piss off the high priest of Anti-Racism. Shit is gonna get good!!
queue-anon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
Article on "olympic" "athlete" Chris Mosier and trans simp supreme Owen Jones:
It's highly entertaining
Mosier is so fucking pathetic, I can't even. She used to do men's relay races IIRC. Imagine being a real man on the team having to wait for her slow ass.
A lot of male athletes are really supportive of female athletes in a sweet bro-y way, but that doesn't mean they want women on their teams ruining their times.
She's also fine with castrated men competing against women.
What the fuck. I like Ibram Kendi now.
Black men tend to get a pass on "transphobia" though even if they're not the high priest of wokeness. Trannies impotently flail whenever Dave Chappelle gets attention, but no one gives a shit.
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2019
Lmao he does not like the taste of that forced teaming the troons always perpetrate to tether their cause to other movements.
squirreltail
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2021
Bit of a Chase Strangio update: Twitter account no longer mentions ACLU, and the only link is to a piece Strangio wrote for Slate.
After the sex-isn't-real and reality-is-white-supremacy ranting, maybe Strangio's employers had finally had enough?
After the sex-isn't-real and reality-is-white-supremacy ranting, maybe Strangio's employers had finally had enough?
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2018
There's no way they would do that though, would they? They've been taken over by the progressives.
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2016
The ACLU had an internal civil war a few years ago between people who genuinely supported civil liberties and people who wanted it to be a leftist organization, and the latter group won. This is why they now put up disclaimers about how they will not necessarily defend armed protestors anymore and think certain forms of "hate speech" either are not or should not be protected.
Glenn Greenwald gave an interview on how this is occurring at many left-leaning companies as the younger generation starts getting hired and moving into management, it's short and thoughtful and I'd recommend reading it.
EDIT:
Strangio's takes are also not that fringe by 2021 troon standards: If we accept that "trans women are women, period" then any concept of biological sex becomes meaningless. As someone who was in university in the early 2010s I can tell you that this underlying idea was already pervasive in troon circles back then; as someone with half a brain I still can't explain how it makes any sense. I know intersex people are real but they are very rare and don't invalidate the idea that men and women have certain parts - it's like saying "some people have six fingers, therefore 'people have five fingers' is wrong".
"Reality is white supremacy" is more out there but not unheard of in these circles. Another "non binary" SocJus grifter, Alok Vaid-Menon (dead thread here) , insisted that "objectivity is one of the most violent words in the English language" back in the early 2010s. Then you have places like Reddit banning FBI crime statistics not because they're doctored but because they make niggers look bad. The worst you can say for "Chase" is that she said what they were all really thinking.
Also I got ninja'd by @Dante Alighieri
Last edited:
squirreltail
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2021
They're also going broke. There's a possibility some donors tried to pull the plug. The blue haired kids in the office still depend on boomers writing checks to get paid.
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2018
Running her account through the Wayback and Kate hasn’t had ACLU as part of her bio as far back as 2019. Still interesting.
In related news, while browsing Kate’s twitter I found her latest screed:
Archive
So Joann Rowling and Abigail Shrier are “closely aligned with white supremacists”. Maybe one of our law kiwis can provide more insight but this seems perilously close to defamation, no?
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2016
Under British law absolutely. Britbong defamation law comes very close to creating a presumption of guilt and truth or plausibility is the minimum necessary to not be convicted. It's so bad that Barack Obama signed a law forbidding US courts from enforcing foreign defamation judgments unless the plaintiff could show s/he would have won under the American standard. It didn't say "fuck the UK" but it might as well have.
Under American law probably not. JK Rowling is certainly a public figure and Abigail Shrier is likely a limited-purpose public figure because she is commenting on a matter of public concern. This means they would have to prove that Kate knowingly lied or acted with reckless disregard - the exact legal term here is "actual malice" as defined in New York Times v Sullivan. There is enough wiggle room provided by saying "aligned with white supremacists in power" (emphasis added) that a conviction is not a certainty.
For perspective, about six and a half years ago "Rolling Stone" published a graphic, detailed accusation of a rape at the University of Virginia which turned out to be a complete fabrication. This was not the first time the author had written a false account of rape and some of the details were outright impossible (one of the people named in the article, "Haven Monahan", does not exist - nobody in the entire US has this name). The magazine even admitted this publicly and that they had ignored their own standards in publishing it. When the inevitable libel suit was resolved, the jury found that all the claims were false but not all of them met the actual malice standard - what did Rolling Stone in was the decision to republish and double down after serious doubts had been raised publicly.
Also that Georgia state legislator she is whining about is doing the right thing and deserves some kind of prize.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
That was literally one of the few good things that darkie did.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2019
Transgender Navy SEAL: Biden order 'going to give a lot of other individuals that chance to finally be themselves'
When Navy SEAL Ashley Nefzger heard rumblings that President Joe Biden could sign an executive order to repeal a Trump-era ban on most transgender Americans joining the military, she was cautiously hopeful.
"I didn't necessarily want to get my hopes up," she told CNN's Anderson Cooper on "Full Circle" Friday. "I was hopeful for it, but I also wanted to keep my expectations at bay on what exactly it was going to mean."
Nefzger has both lived through and written transgender military history since the Supreme Court allowed Trump's ban on transgender people in the military to go into effect in January 2019. The year the ban took effect, Nefzger -- who had already been serving in the military since 2002 -- officially transitioned and became the first active-duty Navy SEAL in history to identify as transgender. Last week, Biden signed an executive order to repeal the ban.
"That's a weight lifted not only off of my shoulders, but off of so many transgender individuals that are serving right now, but also all of those who are not open and who are still unsure if they want to come out or unsure of themselves," she said. "That's allowing everybody to continue to be themselves without having to worry of any adverse effects from their command or being pushed out. And it allows them to serve with freedom in order to do their job."
Nefzger continued, "So I think it's amazing and I'm happy that it happened, so I think it's going to give a lot of other individuals that chance to finally be themselves while not having to worry about anything else, and hiding."
SPART*A, the Service Members, Partners, Allies for Respect and Tolerance for All, estimates there are 15,000 transgender service members, and the organization is in contact with more than 300 other transgender individuals who are ready to enlist.
Speaking from the Oval Office just before signing the executive order last week, Biden said the order "is reinstating a position that the previous commanders and, as well as the secretaries, have supported. And what I'm doing is enabling all qualified Americans to serve their country in uniform."
White House press secretary Jen Psaki said during a White House briefing that "no one will be separated or discharged from the military or denied reenlistment on the basis of gender identity, and for those transgender service members who were discharged or separated because of gender identity, their cases will be reexamined."
Then-President Donald Trump first announced the ban on Twitter in July 2017, which was rebuked by the Democratic-led House of Representatives and condemned by LGBTQ activists as discriminatory. Trump argued that transgender people in the military would lead to "tremendous medical costs and disruption."
The policy, later officially released by then-Secretary of Defense James Mattis in 2018, blocked individuals who have been diagnosed with a condition known as gender dysphoria from serving, with limited exceptions. The policy specified that individuals without the condition can serve, but only if they do so according to the sex they were assigned at birth.
Trump's ban reversed a policy initially approved by the Defense Department under then-President Barack Obama that was still under final review and that would have allowed transgender individuals to serve in the military.
This is going to be their year, boys!
When Navy SEAL Ashley Nefzger heard rumblings that President Joe Biden could sign an executive order to repeal a Trump-era ban on most transgender Americans joining the military, she was cautiously hopeful.
"I didn't necessarily want to get my hopes up," she told CNN's Anderson Cooper on "Full Circle" Friday. "I was hopeful for it, but I also wanted to keep my expectations at bay on what exactly it was going to mean."
Nefzger has both lived through and written transgender military history since the Supreme Court allowed Trump's ban on transgender people in the military to go into effect in January 2019. The year the ban took effect, Nefzger -- who had already been serving in the military since 2002 -- officially transitioned and became the first active-duty Navy SEAL in history to identify as transgender. Last week, Biden signed an executive order to repeal the ban.
"That's a weight lifted not only off of my shoulders, but off of so many transgender individuals that are serving right now, but also all of those who are not open and who are still unsure if they want to come out or unsure of themselves," she said. "That's allowing everybody to continue to be themselves without having to worry of any adverse effects from their command or being pushed out. And it allows them to serve with freedom in order to do their job."
Nefzger continued, "So I think it's amazing and I'm happy that it happened, so I think it's going to give a lot of other individuals that chance to finally be themselves while not having to worry about anything else, and hiding."
SPART*A, the Service Members, Partners, Allies for Respect and Tolerance for All, estimates there are 15,000 transgender service members, and the organization is in contact with more than 300 other transgender individuals who are ready to enlist.
Speaking from the Oval Office just before signing the executive order last week, Biden said the order "is reinstating a position that the previous commanders and, as well as the secretaries, have supported. And what I'm doing is enabling all qualified Americans to serve their country in uniform."
White House press secretary Jen Psaki said during a White House briefing that "no one will be separated or discharged from the military or denied reenlistment on the basis of gender identity, and for those transgender service members who were discharged or separated because of gender identity, their cases will be reexamined."
Then-President Donald Trump first announced the ban on Twitter in July 2017, which was rebuked by the Democratic-led House of Representatives and condemned by LGBTQ activists as discriminatory. Trump argued that transgender people in the military would lead to "tremendous medical costs and disruption."
The policy, later officially released by then-Secretary of Defense James Mattis in 2018, blocked individuals who have been diagnosed with a condition known as gender dysphoria from serving, with limited exceptions. The policy specified that individuals without the condition can serve, but only if they do so according to the sex they were assigned at birth.
Trump's ban reversed a policy initially approved by the Defense Department under then-President Barack Obama that was still under final review and that would have allowed transgender individuals to serve in the military.
This is going to be their year, boys!
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2020
I have questions.
Is this dude still in the military? Does he just wear bad pink make-up now and call himself a lady name and that's his 'transition'? If there was a ban, how come he wasn't discharged? Is Biden paying for his stink-ditch? Can you be a Navy-SEAL with a stink ditch these days?
I need more hard-hitting journalism than these tranny-panderers, honestly.
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2020
Most people can't afford them, unfortunately.
Shrier is Jewish, which makes this accusation by Strangio a little more inflammatory than it already is.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
(( Clears throat ))
What has happened to the Green Berets?
All I see are troons and gheys
Men who are triggered by mere words
Are proud perverted herds
Stunning and brave they take HRT
These are men who want to pee
100 men in the girl's bathroom
But only 3 will get to coom
Trained to bully America's sane
Trained to consoom trained to act ghey
Men who talk over women all night and day
All I see are troons and gheys
With Rot Pockets between their legs
These neckbeards are tomorrow's eggs
100 men will troon today
And all of them wrecked the Green Berets
Last edited:
Screamer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2021
So a little over 1% of service members are Trans.
I wonder how they determined that? What's the bet it is just going going, well 0.42% of people are trans. We can extrapolate that there are 5460 trans servicemen. Hmmm, that doesn't sound that many. Let's try 1%. 13,000... lets just round it up to 15,000.
EDIT: So I just googled to find out. The 15,000 figure is from 2009. Taken from surveys that were sent out. So non-compulsory. Only about 6000 valid responses and they extrapolated out. So that usual problem of a self-selecting group responding. Maybe trans were more likely to respond.
Other studies based on previous research suggest around 7000.
Of course all terribly unreliable.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
The good news is the next war will be won without any bloodshed. Whoever the US is fighting will just need to put up signs "Transwomen are Men" and "JK Rowling was right" and our troops will just start crying to go home.
Pentex
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2020
Puberty blockers are good for the environment. They control the breeding population. Save Mother Gaia and take the horse piss, desu.
Greens fury as trans activist is made head of women's section
The exodus, involving at least 40 women, follows the appointment in December of Kathryn Bristow (pictured), who was born a man but now identifies as a transwoman.