- Joined
- Feb 7, 2021
oh my fucking god its like every stereotypical demon phenotype
Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
- Thread starter Real Mayun
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
Pussys are cute but NOT when they are soaked in steroids. Then they look horrifying (at least to me). Since gay men are...G A Y they aren't attracted to pussy on roids.
It's absolutely insane that troons think their gender identity should be able to influence other peoples sexual attraction. Just because they change their lives because of an opposite sex fantasy doesn't mean other people have change their lives for this madness too.
This is cult thinking mixed with narcissism.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
FTM names amuse me to no end and combined with that picture, wow
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2019
They always sound like porn star names... Jackson Bird, Noah Hella, Jamie Dodger, Laith Ashley, River Eastwood... on and on
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2018
Could not resist
DoTheDrew
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2020
Oh God, what drivel. I just scanned the paper and it's filled to the brim with buzzwords about identities and other such nonsense. She conflates sex and gender at will and throws around words "queer" and "LGBT" with little to no definition.Hey, this reminds of some mindblowing tranni happenings I came across.
The first was a reddit post, detailing how gay men are too immature to eat pussy, and have "vagina panic", mentioning a paper about this topic
View attachment 1906288
The second was the mentioned paper by, get this,
THATCHER PHOENIX COMBS
View attachment 1906302
Here's her 90+ page thesis about gay men not wanting boi pucci: https://www.academia.edu/38121700/Transcending_the_Binary_Gay_Mens_Perspectives_on_Trans_Men
She thanks her... wife
You can almost hear her clutch her pearls at statements like "Henry and George understood themselves as male because they have male genitalia. For these men, their possession of a penis is how they know that they are male" and "A gay person is someone who is attracted to their own sex." This is immediately followed up by statements about essentialism, which I guess is meant to convey to the reader that these gay men are bad and limited in their understanding of gender.
So with some approval, she presents the following quote a bit later: "Patrick's and Oscar's perspectives on manhood differ from the overarching narrative of mainstream LGBT movement discourse. By going beyond a biologically-based argument for gender identity and community membership, these cisgender gay men provide an opening that contemporary "born this way" discourse does not; an avenue that welcomes transgender men as valid members of gay male social, sexual, and political networks. "
Again, this only works because she conflates sex and gender at will as any good SJW would. A transgender man is not a male in any meaningful sense of the word, and trying to fold those two concepts together like this is double-speak.
There's a lot more bla-di-bla word salat stuff, so I'd be stuck here all day picking it apart, but suffice to say, we gays have to change our bigoted sexualities to validate transmen. I bet no-one saw _that one_ coming a mile away.
And this fucking endless talk of "identities" - goddamn it's tedious. Really, we do not "identify" as gay, we _are_ gay - that's an important distinction that's very in the way of her analysis, so obviously, we are just evil essentialists. No thought or consideration for the fact that gay men and women struggle with their sexuality in their formative years, even in the most socially liberal societies.
Another choice quote: Douglas clarified further, "A lot of the gay male community see trans men as part of the lesbian community and trans women certainly as part of the gay male community within certain limited contexts, but that's it. And ... I don't see yet the conversations happening that allow that to change."
Nope and no number of entitled, spoiled little Aidens are going to change that. If anything, their actions are galvanizing a new homosexual resistance as we've seen with the dykes. And seeing as gay men hold all the social capital, I expect the March of the Aidens to be brief.
Funnily enough, the author of this paper fits the description of a butch dyke transitioning for ... reasons perfectly, what with the wife and all. What to make of that... because it's not something she would herself acknowledge, but I guess that's what happens when your brain is on gender-woo.
Also a lot of talk about hegemonic masculinity and vagina panic.... thanks, gurl, appreciate it.
She concludes that basically, we need to make transmen's mutilated and scarred bodies attractive. Yeah, good luck with that.
So with some approval, she presents the following quote a bit later: "Patrick's and Oscar's perspectives on manhood differ from the overarching narrative of mainstream LGBT movement discourse. By going beyond a biologically-based argument for gender identity and community membership, these cisgender gay men provide an opening that contemporary "born this way" discourse does not; an avenue that welcomes transgender men as valid members of gay male social, sexual, and political networks. "
Again, this only works because she conflates sex and gender at will as any good SJW would. A transgender man is not a male in any meaningful sense of the word, and trying to fold those two concepts together like this is double-speak.
There's a lot more bla-di-bla word salat stuff, so I'd be stuck here all day picking it apart, but suffice to say, we gays have to change our bigoted sexualities to validate transmen. I bet no-one saw _that one_ coming a mile away.
And this fucking endless talk of "identities" - goddamn it's tedious. Really, we do not "identify" as gay, we _are_ gay - that's an important distinction that's very in the way of her analysis, so obviously, we are just evil essentialists. No thought or consideration for the fact that gay men and women struggle with their sexuality in their formative years, even in the most socially liberal societies.
Another choice quote: Douglas clarified further, "A lot of the gay male community see trans men as part of the lesbian community and trans women certainly as part of the gay male community within certain limited contexts, but that's it. And ... I don't see yet the conversations happening that allow that to change."
Nope and no number of entitled, spoiled little Aidens are going to change that. If anything, their actions are galvanizing a new homosexual resistance as we've seen with the dykes. And seeing as gay men hold all the social capital, I expect the March of the Aidens to be brief.
Funnily enough, the author of this paper fits the description of a butch dyke transitioning for ... reasons perfectly, what with the wife and all. What to make of that... because it's not something she would herself acknowledge, but I guess that's what happens when your brain is on gender-woo.
Also a lot of talk about hegemonic masculinity and vagina panic.... thanks, gurl, appreciate it.
She concludes that basically, we need to make transmen's mutilated and scarred bodies attractive. Yeah, good luck with that.
So, nothing really out of the ordinary in that paper - once again, any and all bystanders are expected to do the heavy lifting in terms of validation of trans-identities. Whereas the trans-people in question, as is richly documented in this thread, just expect inclusion and compliance without doing anything for it. But seeing as an Aiden will never be a man, they will continue to exist in their Pinocchio-like state of self-hatred and loathing forever.
Puddleduck
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2017
I don't know much about lesbians, why would to Top or Bottom be a question for lesbian dating apps? Is it just there for the men?
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
I guess there are studs and pillow queens for lesbians.
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
Reddit dump:
r/thathappened:
https://www.reddit.com/r/MtF/comments/lfx2w4/i_almost_walked_out_of_work_today/ (Archive)
The struggles and failures of FTMs will never not be funny:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ftm/comments/lfram0/constantly_misgendered_by_delivery_drivers/ (Archive)
https://www.reddit.com/r/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns/comments/lfqfm4/ill_get_my_beard_someday/ (Archive)
Killing people for mean words:
https://www.reddit.com/r/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns/comments/lg0dw1/i_like_billy/ (Archive)
r/thathappened:
https://www.reddit.com/r/MtF/comments/lfx2w4/i_almost_walked_out_of_work_today/ (Archive)
The struggles and failures of FTMs will never not be funny:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ftm/comments/lfram0/constantly_misgendered_by_delivery_drivers/ (Archive)
https://www.reddit.com/r/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns/comments/lfqfm4/ill_get_my_beard_someday/ (Archive)
Killing people for mean words:
https://www.reddit.com/r/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns/comments/lg0dw1/i_like_billy/ (Archive)
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2020
According to two lesbians I know, there are sub/dom undertones in a lot of lesbian relationships, which start at top/bottom and go from there.
Doesn't surprise me, to be honest. A lot of straight relationships have a similar thing going on.
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2019
Holy shit, Felicia. You threaten women who find you unattractive with a doxin', you have stereotypical male autist interests, and you are into polyamorous relationships because you take whatever you can get? How are you not swimmin' in women? Troons mad.
Puerto Pollo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2020
I knew that reading particularly horny gay men's forums would turn out useful someday. Here's what happens when a troon invades the sanctity a popular cruising area, the cathedral of a gay man.
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2017
This must be a particularly badly passing FTM. I think most of them can pass as ‘damn hahah what an ugly manlet’ at 11 pm.
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2020
Hang on...
There we go, everybody. Now we know the solution to troons: an unceasing barrage of verbal abuse.
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2018
"even when they see someone with short hair, PACKER, dressed masculine, binder, etc they still call me 'mam."
holy fuck do these women actually think a plastic lump in their pants that might vaguely resemble a penis in the best of light helps anyone read them as male? Are these also not the people constantly screeching about "what's in your pant's doesn't determine your gender!!!!!". No Linda no one is staring at your crotch just because dudes stare at your tits doesn't mean when you start larping as a man they're gonna start staring at your crotch.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2018
That might work with an Aiden but there's like a 50% chance a Zoey will come back with an assault rifle and a 25 page manifesto.
- Joined
- May 22, 2016
That's because they are still women and men inherently, and Aiden was socialized to walk away and be afraid of verbal abuse while trying to diffuse the situation while Zoey was socialized to lash out, get angry, and fight back when he doesn't get what he wants.
Puerto Pollo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2020
crab hole
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
It never used to be a thing, but has spread virally through memes from shared 'queer' spaces. The only people I see using it are teenage virgins, most of whom are deep in the gender fandom - which makes sense, because 'top' and 'bottom' for women are basically synonymous with gendered personality traits and toxic as fuck.
And yes, as far as I can tell, it's very much just there for the men so they can say, "uwu I'm just a widdul bottom
" and jerk off at how pwecious they are.Actual sex-having, adult lesbians have different words to convey whether they prefer being active or passive in bed, but the vast majority are 'verse'.
At least it's a handy red flag, like calling yourself sapphic or using the "Progress" pride flag with the trans wedge.
DoTheDrew
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2020
Been saying that for a while. "No" is a complete sentence, and Aidens need to hear it every day.