Cultcow Marjan Šiklić / Marijan Ciklic / GovernmentsGetGirlfriends / ThatIncelBlogger / CAAMIB - Third Edition: Fear and Loathing of Vagina

defamation
Hmm...
In Croatia, the crime of insult prescribes a penalty of up to three months in prison, or a fine of "up to 100 daily incomes" (Criminal Code, Article 199). If the crime is committed in public, penalties are aggravated to up to six months of imprisonment, or a fine of "up to 150 daily incomes" (Article 199-2). Moreover, the crime of defamation occurs when someone affirms or disseminates false facts about other person that can damage his reputation. The maximum penalty is one year in prison, or a fine of up to 150 daily incomes (Article 200-1). If the crime is committed in public, the prison term can reach one year (Article 200-2). On the other hand, according to Article 203, there is an exemption for the application of the aforementioned articles (insult and defamation) when the specific context is that of a scientific work, literary work, work of art, public information conducted by a politician or a government official, journalistic work, or the defense of a right or the protection of justifiable interests, in all cases provided that the conduct was not aimed at damaging someone's reputation.[60]
I don't know, seems like you do an awful lot of it. I mean, you're doing it to @Null right now!
 
So you'll post his public information and then do what with it, exactly? If you can find it, so can others, so it's not exactly like you're doing anything that would make a big difference.
It would on specific blogs/wikis.

You knew what would happen if you shared other's info and claimed it was yours. It's like telling a robber where your friend keeps his house keys.
You can tell a robber that, but unless if you're in some kind of agreement with him it means nothing. I never told anybody to use these. I used them at some point in 2011 and mental patients clung on to them.

apply to other countries again?
Did you read my post? I never said they do.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It would on specific blogs/wikis.
Do you seriously think you're the only one with an axe to grind against Null? Most of the people who would use his information already have access to it. I bet you got it off his ED article or something.
I used them at some point in 2011 and mental patients clung on to them.
So you're saying that you gave out this information, but people should have somehow known it wasn't true?
 
So from what I've gathered after coming back from my smoke break @Holden is claiming that using info without his consent is defamation of character and therefore illegal because the laws in his country say they are even though the ones committing the acts are outside his country and therefore exempt from their effect while he is simultaneously attempting to do the same thing to null and claiming that the same laws he wants to use against us don't count against him even though he is in the country in which they are in affect and bugger me I've gone cross eyed.
 
So from what I've gathered after coming back from my smoke break @Holden is claiming that using info without his consent is defamation of character and therefore illegal because the laws in his country say they are even though the ones committing the acts are outside his country and therefore exempt from their effect while he is simultaneously attempting to do the same thing to null and claiming that the same laws he wants to use against us don't count against him even though he is in the country in which they are in affect and bugger me I've gone cross eyed.

In fairness logic was never his strong point.
 
Yes, since he doesn't want to remove illegal shit though he can. If he doesn't want to all around him are fair game.

And please don't provide me about info on non-existent "cyberbullying" laws. This isn't cyber-bullying, it is an act of attempted defamation.

Oh dear. I am afraid I cannot let this pass without comment, because I am deeply sorry to see you making a fool of yourself in this way.

For five marks, explain the basis of the tort of defamation and illustrate, based on your circumstances, why your claim would not succeed in any EU court.

There will be no need to argue that I do not understand the laws of the European Union, since I teach internet law in more than one European university and am more than qualified to examine your knowledge on this subject.

(I continue to advise you to seek professional help. You are not presently well enough to threaten people on the internet with imaginary lawsuits or ill-considered revenge fantasies. Please, this will only cause trouble for you.)
 
So you're saying that you gave out this information, but people should have somehow known it wasn't true?
I never gave it to be used for illegal purposes. That's the point. If you see the screencaps trolls have you can see that they never contain any names along with a pic, let alone anything else.
 
How about this Kiwi's?

Would you be willing to "Drop the info" you have on Fuckbot if he agrees to an exclusive Lolcast interview with me and flossman?

And no, it won't be any pussy "softball" questions either. You'd have to own up to your shit and answer questions honestly.
 
laws here don't apply to him.
And yet they do to you. You said what he's doing is illegal in Croatia. You're upset so you're tracking down his family and harassing them. If that's, like you said, a crime in Croatia you are currently committing it. Does this register at all? I don't give a damn if they slap you in cuffs, I'm just trying to get your terminally softened brain to understand the blatant idiocy of what you're saying.

Edit: Go to hell, @Lalala, for beating me to that.
 
"So from what I've gathered after coming back from my smoke break @@Holden is claiming that using info without his consent is defamation of character and therefore illegal because the laws in his country say they are even though the ones committing the acts are outside his country and therefore exempt from their effect while he is simultaneously attempting to do the same thing to null and claiming that the same laws he wants to use against us don't count against him even though he is in the country in which they are in affect and bugger me I've gone cross eyed."

No, they'd count against me if Null would somehow come here and report this.
 
I never gave it to be used for illegal purposes. That's the point. If you see the screencaps trolls have you can see that they never contain any names along with a pic, let alone anything else.
What illegal purposes have people used it for? Has someone been sending you pizzas or something? People repeating things you actually said isn't illegal.
 
Back