Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

[Slappy McGherkin]

I only give recipes to people I like.

But you like me, right? So share up. I'll give you my fresh-picked habanero mango salsa recipe. SPICY!!!!

 

[DocHoliday1977]

How do you know it's "Black Cube"? Screenshots definatly did not show that.

That's not how one uses Occam's Razor.

Yet, somehow we are still elite hackers that are constantly hacking your accounts 24/7. Or so you claim anyway.

I thought we were hacking your email account, not the phone? In that case we'd still get all the relavant info.

You are on Kiwifarms. No one here has the kind of money needed to influence companies, or the contacts needed.

Everyone can TRY to lie their way into access. Doesn't mean it will succeed, for anyone, or for the supposedly rich.

Citacion please.

That's way more complicated than it needs to be. Usually all the info for doxing could be taken from Facebook, Instagram, and whitebooks pages. Sometimes court documents too.

None of whom are here.

From what exactly?

Whining about 2016 on TV. It pays really well.

All of this is both incoherent, and completely retarded.

Did you actually believe that shitposter?

That is neither mindless, nor "long thread" posting. Pick up a dictionary.

No one here(to the best of my knowledge) is doing that.

Proof, please.

Understandable

Nope.

Right back at ya.

Sueing everyone you can frivolously is not either. And, yet, that didn't stop you. Double standards much?

No one here cares about whatever or not you like us.

That screenshot still doesn't prove anything.



So, after tonight it's fine and no longer trackable then? Nice.

Eidson v. Berry, 415 S.E.2d 16, 17 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)

No celebrity ever did and you failed to prove it.

That too.

He meant, IRL, and not on this forum.

None of them have ever contacted you, or even know you exist.

Making threads is in no way related to whatever point you were trying to make.

Assuming, for the sake of the argument, that this is true, that still does not mean that Weinstein created this thread, or has had any influence on its creation, and if he did for some reason, that in itself is not, and cannot, be a crime.

That is completely retarded. No court, or indeed, a normal human being would come to that conclusion.


Nope.

And, yet, you failed to present it to the court, despite it asking you for it many times, and you failed to present it here.

random.txt

Every common usage of the phrase "silenced permenantly" means death.

What are these supposed to prove, exactly?

Hilary Clinton cost the US taxpayer 32 million usd with a single lie that the FBI knew was false. That seems pretty powerful to me.


That's not a career. That's not even a job.

Please, prove any of those statements.

Not true.

Neiher has he. Had he, he would very likely be protected under the Supreme Court case known as brandenburg v ohio.

Not true.

That could count as true if military orders from a president counts as the president himself perfoming the killing action.

Look up the word "guess".

Eidson v. Berry, 415 S.E.2d 16, 17 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992), SMITH et al. v. STEWART, Lucas v. Cranshaw, 289 Ga. App. 510, 659 S.E.2d 612 (2008 )

Not a single constant poster here has created, or worked, to create this thread

United States v. Lee, 790 F.3d 12 (2015).
Benjamin Lee was convicted of two counts of interstate stalking with the intent to harm after violating 18 U.S.C.
§§ 2261(A), 2261(b)(5). The victims were his estranged wife, Tawny Lee and her boyfriend, Timothy Mann. The
relationship between the Defendant and Tawny included an extended pattern of verbal and physical abuse.
After Tawny left the Defendant, he emailed her 300 times and contacted many of her relatives. Tawny
interpreted one of the emails to be a threat. The Defendant claimed that his behavior could be explained by his
medication. Additionally, the Defendant’s sister claimed that between July and August 2012, he made numerous
threats against Tawny and Timothy. In September 2012, a car matching the description of one the Defendant
had borrowed from his brother was spotted driving past the house where Tawny and Timothy Mann lived
multiple times. The Defendant was stopped by a state trooper in Maine and a search of the car revealed five
firearms, two knives, duct tape, plastic bags, handcuffs, and maps of Tawny’s residence. Additionally, the
Defendant claimed that he found the layout of Tawny’s house after searching on his computer and possessed a
camera with pictures of the house. The Defendant was sentenced to 100 months in prison, as well as three years
of supervised release. He appealed his conviction and sentence. The Defendant challenged the admission of
certain evidence, the sufficiency of evidence, and the fairness of his sentence. First, the Defendant challenged
the admission of past abuse of Tawny. However, the District Court allowed it because it helped determine
whether Tawny’s fear of the Defendant at the time of his arrest was reasonable. Secondly, the Defendant
challenged the timing of the trial. Third, the Defendant challenged the fairness of his sentencing. The First Circuit
Court reviewed the District Court’s ruling for abuse of discretion and after finding none, affirmed.


Is this your final answer?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

United States v. Lee, 790 F.3d 12 (2015).
Benjamin Lee was convicted of two counts of interstate stalking with the intent to harm after violating 18 U.S.C.

Yes, well none of us have done a single thing that lead to Benjamin's conviction.
Some examples of what he did that we didn't do:
1. Cross between to states with intent to murder [his ex]
2. We did not threaten to kill you, contact your relatives to tell them we will kill you or them
3. We did not specify (and the fucking moron did it more than once) that we would find you and kill you.
4. We(or at least I) don't know your location.
5. Upon learning such location (which I had not done), we did not immediately set out to that location to kill you.
6. Upon learning of such location(which I had not done), we did not contact a friend to inform him we would kill you.
7. We did not make graffic threats of murder to you daily.
8. We did not arrive at your house with 7 weapons, rope, and all that other shit. In fact, we never arrived at your house, or even set out to it.

Your example is horrible for anyone with even a basic grasp on English Language.
Also, it was not at all related to the post you were quoting.

Is this your final answer?

Given that you didn't give me one, nor do I know why you decided to post the example of the biggest retard to be convicted, the answer is:

You are stupid.

 

[Whale Spotter]

United States v. Lee, 790 F.3d 12 (2015).
Benjamin Lee was convicted of two counts of interstate stalking with the intent to harm after violating 18 U.S.C.
§§ 2261(A), 2261(b)(5). The victims were his estranged wife, Tawny Lee and her boyfriend, Timothy Mann. The
relationship between the Defendant and Tawny included an extended pattern of verbal and physical abuse.
After Tawny left the Defendant, he emailed her 300 times and contacted many of her relatives. Tawny
interpreted one of the emails to be a threat. The Defendant claimed that his behavior could be explained by his
medication. Additionally, the Defendant’s sister claimed that between July and August 2012, he made numerous
threats against Tawny and Timothy. In September 2012, a car matching the description of one the Defendant
had borrowed from his brother was spotted driving past the house where Tawny and Timothy Mann lived
multiple times. The Defendant was stopped by a state trooper in Maine and a search of the car revealed five
firearms, two knives, duct tape, plastic bags, handcuffs, and maps of Tawny’s residence. Additionally, the
Defendant claimed that he found the layout of Tawny’s house after searching on his computer and possessed a
camera with pictures of the house. The Defendant was sentenced to 100 months in prison, as well as three years
of supervised release. He appealed his conviction and sentence. The Defendant challenged the admission of
certain evidence, the sufficiency of evidence, and the fairness of his sentence. First, the Defendant challenged
the admission of past abuse of Tawny. However, the District Court allowed it because it helped determine
whether Tawny’s fear of the Defendant at the time of his arrest was reasonable. Secondly, the Defendant
challenged the timing of the trial. Third, the Defendant challenged the fairness of his sentencing. The First Circuit
Court reviewed the District Court’s ruling for abuse of discretion and after finding none, affirmed.


Is this your final answer?

I can see the future and I predict that @Useful_Mistake will reply and you will take yet another L.(ninja'd by Useful but I was still right, psychic!)

Pam, what exactly do you think you are reading? I read this case and this does not apply to you, you are not being stalked by anyone. The victims in this case were stalked by some psycho, not being trolled by randos.

None of the celebrities you obsess about have ever come close to your house, emailed you or ever become aware of your existence.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I can see the future and I predict that @Useful_Mistake will reply and you will take yet another L.(ninja'd by Useful but I was still right, psychic!)

You were completely right in your prediction!

Pam, what exactly do you think you are reading? I read this case and this does not apply to you, you are not being stalked by anyone. The victims in this case were stalked by some ps

The victim in that case has received (from Benjamin) daily verbal abuse for 33 straight years, including but not limited to, very graffic death threats.

 

[Whale Spotter]

The victim in that case has received (from Benjamin) daily verbal abuse for 33 straight years, including but not limited to, very graffic death threats.

So exactly like Pam's case? Lol jk

I am waiting for one of us to be Marylin Manson, he has been in the news lately and I am sure he will somehow become part of her delusions.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Yes, well none of us have done a single thing that lead to Benjamin's conviction.
Some examples of what he did that we didn't do:
1. Cross between to states with intent to murder [his ex]
2. We did not threaten to kill you, contact your relatives to tell them we will kill you or them
3. We did not specify (and the fucking moron did it more than once) that we would find you and kill you.
4. We(or at least I) don't know your location.
5. Upon learning such location (which I had not done), we did not immediately set out to that location to kill you.
6. Upon learning of such location(which I had not done), we did not contact a friend to inform him we would kill you.
7. We did not make graffic threats of murder to you daily.
8. We did not arrive at your house with 7 weapons, rope, and all that other shit. In fact, we never arrived at your house, or even set out to it.

Your example is horrible for anyone with even a basic grasp on English Language.
Also, it was not at all related to the post you were quoting.

Given that you didn't give me one, nor do I know why you decided to post the example of the biggest retard to be convicted, the answer is:

You are stupid.

And you are wasting energy.

So exactly like Pam's case? Lol jk

I am waiting for one of us to be Marylin Manson, he has been in the news lately and I am sure he will somehow become part of her delusions.

Hillary stop being pathetic.

 

[Whale Spotter]

And you are wasting energy.

So you know Useful is right, noted.
Your next L will come from the court (another psychic prediction).

Hillary stop being pathetic.

I am not Hilary, she doesn't know you exist. You have 0 evidence that any of these celebrities stalked you so your case is nothing like the one you cited.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

And you are wasting energy.

The comment I replied to was almost twice as long as mine, and quite a bit less informative. My post achieved all I wanted it to. And yours fell flat on it's face.
You typed twice as much, only to get mocked for the sheer stupidity.
Who's wasting energy again?

Hillary stop being pat

Hillary is not here, and will never be here.

So you know Useful is right, noted.
Your next L will come from the court (another psychic prediction).

I hope the court makes a ruling soon.

You have 0 evidence that any of these celebrities stalked you so your case is nothing like the one you cited

Even if she did, that federal law requires quite a bit more than just mere stalking. She'd have better luck with state laws.

 

[LoverofPi]

The comment I replied to was almost twice as long as mine, and quite a bit less informative. My post achieved all I wanted it to. And yours fell flat on it's face.
You typed twice as much, only to get mocked for the sheer stupidity.
Who's wasting energy again?


Hillary is not here, and will never be here.

She'll always be in Pam's head, though. Rent free.

I hope the court makes a ruling soon.

I can't wait to see the meltdown afterwards.

Even if she did, that federal law requires quite a bit more than just mere stalking. She'd have better luck with state laws.

Not that that would help her since all the people she's obsessing over are not in Georgia. I mean, none of them nor any of us have done anything illegal, but we're not doing anything in Georgia either.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Not that that would help her since all the people she's obsessing over are not in Georgia. I mean, none of them nor any of us have done anything illegal, but we're not doing anything in Georgia either.

It is possible, but not easy, and requires great amounts of monetary damages to have been done.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

The comment I replied to was almost twice as long as mine, and quite a bit less informative. My post achieved all I wanted it to. And yours fell flat on it's face.
You typed twice as much, only to get mocked for the sheer stupidity.
Who's wasting energy again?


Hillary is not here, and will never be here.

I hope the court makes a ruling soon.


Even if she did, that federal law requires quite a bit more than just mere stalking. She'd have better luck with state laws.

I didn't cite a case. How do you know I cited a case? What are you reading? I didn't give you permission to read anything?

It is possible, but not easy, and requires great amounts of monetary damages to have been done.

Hm.

Are you reading my microsoft word documents online? Meaning, you've hacked into them illegally?

Keep posting. You're helping me out a lot.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I didn't cite a case

You did:

United States v. Lee, 790 F.3d 12 (2015).

How do you know I cited a case?

I can read.

What are you reading?

Your posts.

I didn't give you permission to read anything?

There is no law, federal or not, that forbids me to read your posts.

Are you reading my microsoft word documents online? Meaning, you've hacked into them illegally?

I'm reading the posts you post here, you moron.

 

[Viridian]

I didn't cite a case. How do you know I cited a case? What are you reading? I didn't give you permission to read anything?

Except you did. On this page of the thread even. Here, I'll help your rotten brain out:

Are you reading my microsoft word documents online? Meaning, you've hacked into them illegally?

Keep posting. You're helping me out a lot.

No one is reading whatever nonsense screeds you're typing in Microsoft Word. That is what's called having paranoid delusions, Porky Pammy. It's a hallmark of schizophrenia, as well as several other serious mental illnesses. We're only reading your public posts that you make here.

Thanks for proving both how crazy and how stupid you are, since you can't remember what you posted less than six hours ago and you are incapable of rationally comprehending what other people post.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

You did:


I can read.

Your posts.

There is no law, federal or not, that forbids me to read your posts.

I'm reading the posts you post here, you moron.

I didnt post that you piece of shit.

I actually don't know where that came from.

I have *other* cases. Not that one. Sorry. Someone else posted that in my account.

Except you did. On this page of the thread even. Here, I'll help your rotten brain out:

View attachment 1911280



No one is reading whatever nonsense screeds you're typing in Microsoft Word. That is what's called having paranoid delusions, Porky Pammy. It's a hallmark of schizophrenia, as well as several other serious mental illnesses. We're only reading your public posts that you make here.

Thanks for proving both how crazy and how stupid you are, since you can't remember what you posted less than six hours ago and you are incapable of rationally comprehending what other people post.

One of these days someone's going to hurt you and everyone will be happy to see you get what's coming to you.

Let me give you some truth.
No one likes you. Everyone hates you.

@Viridian

 

[Viridian]

I didnt post that you piece of shit.

I actually don't know where that came from.

I have *other* cases. Not that one. Sorry. Someone else posted that in my account.



One of these days someone's going to hurt you and everyone will be happy to see you get what's coming to you.

Wow, your crazy has escalated to new heights if you can't even acknowledge one of your own posts! That's a screenshot of what you posted, Spamela. You can also simply scroll up the page on this thread and see your post for yourself. It's right there, dimwit. No one hacked your account to cite case law that you delusionally believe applies to your fantasies about celebrities.

Or are you simply lying about posting that because @Useful_Mistake so thoroughly schooled you on how your citation didn't apply to your case? Your ego is pretty fragile after all; that's why you keep having to try to reinforce with your delusions about rich and powerful people wanting to fuck you. It wouldn't be first time you tried to (incompetently) gaslight us to cope about having to admit to yourself you took an L. Just recently you did the same thing when you lied about Judge Ray not being a magistrate judge. When evidence was posted proving that you were, in fact, clearly lying out your ass, you promptly pretended it never happened and you never said that.

No one's going to hurt me Porky Pammy, not for your sake especially. Jesus isn't your personal army, and you have no power over me or anyone else on this thread. Your threats are as worthless and pointless as your frivolous lawsuits that keep getting thrown of court.

Let me give you some truth.
No one likes you. Everyone hates you.

@Viridian

Lots of people like me, Porky Pammy. I have friends, family, and loved ones all around me. I live a very blessed life. You're simply projecting again. You're the one who has no one who likes you. Even your mom wants nothing to do with you and wants you out of her house.

You're all alone and it's all your own fault. No one is ruining your life but you.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I didnt post that you piece of shit.

It literally has your name on it. You quite literally did.

I actually don't know where that came from.

It came from you posting it. Simple.

I have *other* cases.

Feel free to cite. I'll be happy to show how none of them apply to us.

Not that one. Sorry. Someone else posted that in my account.

Are you implying someone hacked into your account and did nothing but post a caselaw on a topic you have been posting for weeks now?

One of these days someone's going to hurt you and everyone will be happy to see you get what's coming to you.

You seem really happy at his alleged comming harm.

Let me give you some truth.
No one likes you. Everyone hates you.

@Viridian

I quite like Viridian.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

It literally has your name on it. You quite literally did.

It came from you posting it. Simple.

Feel free to cite. I'll be happy to show how none of them apply to us.

Are you implying someone hacked into your account and did nothing but post a caselaw on a topic you have been posting for weeks now?

You seem really happy at his alleged comming harm.

I quite like Viridian.

You would Rudy, you're a sleezebum like him.

No one likes any of you. You all lay up on here taking this hell site seriously. You're dysfunctional in life. You all continue to post and compromise yourselves.

I would share my real cases or my real arguments. I'm not as dumb as you all.

 

[Viridian]

You would Rudy, you're a sleezebum like him.

No one likes any of you. You all lay up on here taking this hell site seriously. You're dysfunctional in life. You all continue to post and compromise yourselves.

I would share my real cases or my real arguments. I'm not as dumb as you all.

100% pure projection on your part again, Spamela. No one likes you. Not even your mother. You told us that yourself. You take the Farms extremely seriously and spend all day every day on here seething and lashing out. You're dysfunctional in every aspect of adult life--unkempt, unhealthy, unemployable, unloved. You continue to repeat easily disproved lies rather than admit you are factually wrong about something, because your fragile narc ego won't allow otherwise. With every post you show yourself to be both crazy and retarded.

Yet you could fix all of that by getting off of here, going to a doctor, and getting treatment for your mental illness. You can still have some decent years of life left to live. I'd honestly be happy for you if you got help. But you won't, because you refuse to admit the source of all your problems is you.

 

[LoverofPi]

It is possible, but not easy, and requires great amounts of monetary damages to have been done.

Which, again, have not happened, though Pam believes they have.

I didn't cite a case. How do you know I cited a case? What are you reading? I didn't give you permission to read anything?

Are you in a fugue state, Pam?

Hm.

Welp, the start of Pam's next failure of a case has just been planted.

Are you reading my microsoft word documents online? Meaning, you've hacked into them illegally?

Keep posting. You're helping me out a lot.

No one is reading your word documents. We're posting what you make public in this thread and nothing else.

I didnt post that you piece of shit.

Yes you did.

I actually don't know where that came from

Sounding more and more like a fugue state.

have *other* cases. Not that one. Sorry. Someone else posted that in my account.

Or a Dissasociative episode... Perhaps my joke about Hillary living in her head was more than colloquialism.

One of these days someone's going to hurt you and everyone will be happy to see you get what's coming to you.

Who is "you" in this case, Pam?

Let me give you some truth.
No one likes you. Everyone hates you.

@Viridian

I also quite like Viridian.