Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

[DocHoliday1977]

lol calm down Pam, I am not Hilary so that thread is pointless spergery (typical of you).

Then you should enjoy it. I mean, it's a thread, isnt it?

That's a bit silly, just because it's a thread, it doesn't mean I will enjoy it. There are a lot of threads that don't interest me (the political ones are especially boring).
I prefer threads on fat idiots who do stupid shit online (I follow a few other threads I find funny, you are not the only one I laugh at).

Also, I can't seem to access it.

Well, hillary is pudgy fat lolcow that many laugh at.

 

[Whale Spotter]

Well, hillary is pudgy fat lolcow that many laugh at.

She is, but she doesn't put her spergery online like you do, Pam or like some of the other cows I follow.

Again, just because some people find it funny it doesn't mean I do, the political threads are boring (as mentioned before).

Reading boomer memes on onion farms does not appeal to me, also, I can't access (as I mentioned).

 

[Useful_Mistake]

????????

Oh the arrogance.

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/humour_1

Let's dance, cow. Your God with my God.

And let's make it interesting, shall we?

https://www.onionfarms.com/threads/hillary-clinton-former-secretary-of-state-former-presidential-candidate-former-everything-cause-no-one-wants-her-around-helps-support-kiwifarms.882/

None of the three things you just posted are related in any way to one another.

Also, I can't seem to access it.

Tldr: hilary evil, kiwi evil, that means hilary gives money to kiwi.
No sources at all, bar one picture of hilary's face.

Spoiler: Image

 

[Whale Spotter]

Tldr: hilary evil, kiwi evil, that means hilary give money to kiwi.
No sources at all, bar one picture of hilary's face.

Ah thank you, as I thought, nothing I would care to read.
I love Pam's attempt at a "gotcha"...

 

[DocHoliday1977]

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/humour_1

None of the three things you just posted are related in any way to one another.

Tldr: hilary evil, kiwi evil, that means hilary gives money to kiwi.
No sources at all, bar one picture of hilary's face.

Spoiler: Image

View attachment 1915845

So what, it's free speech, isnt it? By your definition?

 

[Whale Spotter]

So what, it's free speech, isnt it? By your definition?

It is, Pam, but without any proof that she has paid for kiwifarms, it's all just the insane ramblings of some idiot on the internet.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

So what, it's free speech, isnt it? By your definition?

You are free to post whatever you want, and I am free to mock or criticize it.
In regards to the Hilary post, I hope you don't intend to use it, because St. Amant v. Thompson, 390 U.S. 727 (1968 ) states that this would not be any sort of Good Faith evidence.

 

[Begemot]

Let's dance, cow. Your God with my God.

And let's make it interesting, shall we?

https://www.onionfarms.com/threads/hillary-clinton-former-secretary-of-state-former-presidential-candidate-former-everything-cause-no-one-wants-her-around-helps-support-kiwifarms.882/

You going to join onion farms? I think Kengle, the site's owner, would make an interesting paramour.

 

[byuu]

Hillary funds KF?
Based.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

You are free to post whatever you want, and I am free to mock or criticize it.
In regards to the Hilary post, I hope you don't intend to use it, because St. Amant v. Thompson, 390 U.S. 727 (1968 ) states that this would not be any sort of Good Faith evidence.

I hope you don't intend to post here again either by your own case.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I hope you don't intend to post here again either by your own case.

What part of the cited SCOTUS case would prevent me from posting here?

 

[DocHoliday1977]

What part of the cited SCOTUS case would prevent me from posting here?

The fact that you are a regular American nobody? Alan fag?

Alan Dershowitz. The freedom of speech clause isnt only for you and Hillary.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

The fact that you are a regular American nobody? Alan fag?

Oh, so you have nothing and were just spitting random words then. Not a fag, and not Alan either.

Alan Dershowitz.

Rudy Guiliani. Final answer

Try to keep up with your own lore.

The freedom of speech clause isnt only for

No, but it has limits imposed by the Supreme Court of the United States. Learn law, maybe you'll be able to make better legal arguments/filings

you and Hillary.

Try to keep up with your own lore.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Oh, so you have nothing and were just spitting random words then. Not a fag, and not Alan either.


Try to keep up with your own lore.

No, but it has limits imposed by the Supreme Court of the United States. Learn law, maybe you'll be able to make better legal arguments/filings

Try to keep up with your own lore.

Oh but you can just do whatever you want tho, can you?

 

[Whale Spotter]

Try to keep up with your own lore.

Am I Hilary and you are Alan tonight?

This is the strangest role-playing fantasy I have ever seen, Pam.

The fact that you are a regular American nobody? Alan fag?

This is starting to make even less sense than usual.
Pam's 312th tactic to avoid admitting that she doesn't know what she is talking about: Type random shit and see what sticks (nothing does)

Oh but you can just do whatever you want tho, can you?

It depends on what one wants to do Pam. There are laws that put limits to doing "whatever" you want.

For example: Laughing at stupid people is a yes, stalking celebrities is a no.

People shouldn't have to explain this to you.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Am I Hilary and you are Alan tonight?

This is the strangest role-playing fantasy I have ever seen, Pam.


This is starting to make even less sense than usual.
Pam's 312th tactic to avoid admitting that she doesn't know what she is talking about: Type random shit and see what sticks (nothing does)



It depends on what one wants to do Pam. There are laws that put limits to doing "whatever" you want.

For example: Laughing at stupid people is a yes, stalking celebrities is a no.

People shouldn't have to explain this to you.

Ok just want to make sure you understand that what you are saying that the US law is at your liberty to use but for us lay people we have no rights.
Got it.

Richard Grannon, stop talking like an existential jackass. "Lore"...*eyeroll.

This isn't Middle Earth.

 

[Whale Spotter]

Ok just want to make sure you understand that what you are saying that the US law is at your liberty to use but for us lay people we have no rights.
Got it.

Where did you read any of that?
I said the exact opposite, your reading comprehension is worst than usual. This is why we "insult" your ability to read, Pam.

Richard Grannon, stop talking like an existential jackass. "Lore"...*eyeroll.

Oh now @Useful_Mistake is Richard Grannon?

It's hard for us to keep up with your delusions, Pam.

Also it is "lore" because it is a story created by your own brain. What else would you call you imagining that we are different celebrities who never heard of you?

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Where did you read any of that?
I said the exact opposite, your reading comprehension is worst than usual. This is why we "insult" your ability to read, Pam.



Oh now @Useful_Mistake is Richard Grannon?

It's hard for us to keep up with your delusions, Pam.

Also it is "lore" because it is a story created by your own brain. What else would you call you imagining that we are different celebrities who never heard of you?

I just don't care to read your rambling.
I believe American law is fair across the board. And Hillary Clinton is not a celebrity.

 

[Whale Spotter]

I just don't care to read your rambling.
I believe American law is fair across the board. And Hillary Clinton is not a celebrity.

So why even bother to reply Pam? You just love showing your ignorance, I guess.

Celebrities are famous people and, even though that bothers you, she is famous. And she still doesn't know you exist (none of the famous people you obsess about know you exist).

 

[LoverofPi]

Then you should enjoy it. I mean, it's a thread, isnt it?

It's a thread, but it's not a -good- thread, Pam.
For an example of an excellent thread about a lolcow, may I recommend this one.

So what, it's free speech, isnt it? By your definition?

You are allowed to make the thread, sure. But that doesn't make your delusional ramblings any more real. You need to provide evidence, sources, that sort of thing. I know you're not very good at that, but it's worth a try at least.