Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

[Useful_Mistake]

This is bad for you and your side.

I wash my hands.

Pam, you cannot convince me to commit a federal crime, so don't bother.

 

[Viridian]

Only cases I could find:
View attachment 1921587

If it ever happened the it should have been in Swain v. Stewart et al case.

Okay @Useful_Mistake, here's what I could find in the thread about Pammy's previous legal filings against Harvey Weinstein. The reason you didn't find them in your search is because it looks like her previous legal actions were filed in state courts. She sued him first in a New York state court in early 2018 (dismissed), then later that same year filed another suit/restraining order in Georgia Superior Court (also dismissed)

The first lawsuit, from the OP (along with a bunch of her Twitter sperging regarding the suit):

The Georgia Superior Court case is referenced in Swain v. Stewart et al, as Piggy was trying to sue (among others) Judge Jay Stewart for not awarding her millions of dollars for her nonsense lolsuit. I'm still looking for the docket I thought we had, but this at least gives us a time frame.

Going further back in Pammy lore, she tried to sue Colorado Technical University back in 2014, after they kicked her out of their graduate program (allegedly for her accepting money to write papers for other students). You picked that one up in your search. As you can see, this lawsuit failed too, again without ever going to trial:

We have some partial docs from that suit here, but I wouldn't mind seeing the complete story!

Extra fun bonus: Pammy once sent a legal threat to Null pretending to be her own (imaginary) lawyer.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Pam, you cannot convince me to commit a federal crime, so don't bother.

I haven't.

Are you the federal judge presiding over this court case on a hate site and a hate thread wherein the accuser has been violated repeatedly, privacy stolen, issued death threats, and admission to stalking at the accuser's own home?

If you are the judge, then no, I do not need or want you to negotiate anything.

Okay @Useful_Mistake, here's what I could find in the thread about Pammy's previous legal filings against Harvey Weinstein. The reason you didn't find them in your search is because it looks like her previous legal actions were filed in state courts. She sued him first in a New York state court in early 2018 (dismissed), then later that same year filed another suit/restraining order in Georgia Superior Court (also dismissed)

The first lawsuit, from the OP (along with a bunch of her Twitter sperging regarding the suit):

View attachment 1921622

The Georgia Superior Court case is referenced in Swain v. Stewart et al, as Piggy was trying to sue (among others) Judge Jay Stewart for not awarding her millions of dollars for her nonsense lolsuit. I'm still looking for the docket I thought we had, but this at least gives us a time frame.

View attachment 1921621

Going further back in Pammy lore, she tried to sue Colorado Technical University back in 2014, after they kicked her out of their graduate program (allegedly for her accepting money to write papers for other students). You picked that one up in your search. As you can see, this lawsuit failed too, again without ever going to trial:

We have some partial docs from that suit here, but I wouldn't mind seeing the complete story!

Extra fun bonus: Pammy once sent a legal threat to Null pretending to be her own (imaginary) lawyer.

Refiled against them and won.

And it's called pro se. Weirdo.

@Viridian

*eyeroll

Fassbender, can you send this thread to spergatory?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

We have some partial docs from that suit here, but I wouldn't mind seeing the complete story!

You want me to get them?

I haven't.

I am not Rudy. You are asking me to impersonate him so we can come to a deal. That is a federal crime. I will not do so.

Are you the federal judge presiding over this court case

No.

on a hate site and a hate thread wherein the accuser has been violated repeatedly,

Not in any legal sense of the word

privacy stolen,

Not in any legal sense of the word

issued death threats,

Not in any legal sense of the word

and admission to stalking at the accuser's own home?

Not in any legal sense of the word

Extra fun bonus: Pammy once sent a legal threat to Null pretending to be her own (imaginary) lawyer.

Oh, yeah, I remember coming across that, lol.

If you are the judge, then no, I do not need or want you to negotiate anything.

No one here is the judge.

Refiled against them and won.

Against who? What's the case title?

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Ya'll have sucked out almost 10 years of my life, I should be married with kids and even a doctorate graduate already.

Let's send this thread to spergatory.

Negotiate a settlement (Tony and Harvey)

And all of us agree never to speak to each other again. Except for Fassbender, he's my pal.
And maybe Butler.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Ya'll have sucked out almost 10 years of my life, I should be married with kids and even a doctorate graduate already.

That's on you, not us.

Let's send this thread to spergatory.

Nah

Negotiate a settlement (Tony and Harvey)

And all of us agree never to speak to each other again. Except for Fassbender, he's my pal.
And maybe Butler.

Fuck off.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

You want me to get them?

I am not Rudy. You are asking me to impersonate him so we can come to a deal. That is a federal crime. I will not do so.

No.

Not in any legal sense of the word

Not in any legal sense of the word


Not in any legal sense of the word


Not in any legal sense of the word


Oh, yeah, I remember coming across that, lol.

No one here is the judge.

Against who? What's the case title?

Then shut the fuck up and fuck off. None of your damn business, that's what.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Then shut the fuck up and fuck off.

Nope.

None of your damn business, that's what.

You post in a public forum, you gonna get told to fuck off every so often

 

[Viridian]

You want me to get them?

If you'd like! I don't know how entertaining that case would be for us to read, but 2014 is about the time Pammy's documented crazy starts.

Against who? What's the case title?

Pammy's lying again. If she'd ever won a suit against Weinstein, Judge Stewart, or anyone else in the world, she'd never stop posting about it. Every legal action on Pammy's part has always resulted in her taking an L.

ETA: to help out, it looks like Judge Stewart is part of the Atlantic Judicial Circuit of Georgia Superior Court, or at least still was as of 2020:

https://allongeorgia.com/tattnall-local-government/tattnall-commissioners-approve-pay-bump-for-superior-court-judges/

So that would be the court system where her Georgia suit against Weinstein would be found.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

That's on you, not us.

Nah

Fuck off.

Yall better get rid of this turd. I won't settle until this account is gone.

If you'd like! I don't know how entertaining that case would be for us to read, but 2014 is about the time Pammy's documented crazy starts.



Pammy's lying again. If she'd ever won a suit against Weinstein, Judge Stewart, or anyone else in the world, she'd never stop posting about it. Every legal action on Pammy's part has always resulted in her taking an L.

Ok, have it your way.

I just know what's being filed next week on both suits.

Nope.

You post in a public forum, you gonna get told to fuck off every so often

I know it's you Tony. I dont respect you at all as a man or as a business man or as an asshole guru. I'm not sleeping with you. I'm not joining your clown car of bullshit.

I'll see this through with criminal charges.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

If you'd like! I don't know how entertaining that case would be for us to read, but 2014 is about the time Pammy's documented crazy starts.

Spoiler: Complaint

Spoiler: Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis

Wages= 0$
Money in cash or savings = 0$
lol

Spoiler: Order

Spoiler: Response to Order

Spoiler: forma pauperis but she stopped trying to defraud the court

Spoiler: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Spoiler: Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis=

Spoiler: Order

Spoiler: ORDER ADOPTING Report and Recommendations

Spoiler: Judgment

Updated Courtlistener link with all the docs from PACER

Pammy's lying again. If she'd ever won a suit against Weinstein, Judge Stewart, or anyone else in the world, she'd never stop posting about it. Every legal action on Pammy's part has always resulted in her taking an L.

True

I won't settle until this account is gone.

You can delete your account.

I just know what's being filed next week on both suits.

"Anon's speech make woman mad! Court do stop!"
I wish the best to you on that.

I know it's you Tony. I

Not Tony.

I'll see this through with criminal charges.

Supreme Court says you can't though

 

[DocHoliday1977]

 

[Useful_Mistake]

View attachment 1921737
View attachment 1921738
View attachment 1921739

So, are you accusing us of these things or did someone 'hack' your account again and made you post these blog screenshots?

 

[DocHoliday1977]

So, are you accusing us of these things or did someone 'hack' your account again and made you post these blog screenshots?

The other post was a mistake and I wasn't posting that case.

Spoiler: Complaint

View attachment 1921657View attachment 1921658View attachment 1921659View attachment 1921660View attachment 1921661View attachment 1921662View attachment 1921663

Spoiler: Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis

View attachment 1921667View attachment 1921668

Wages= 0$
Money in cash or savings = 0$
lol

Spoiler: Order

View attachment 1921671View attachment 1921672View attachment 1921673View attachment 1921674View attachment 1921675View attachment 1921676

Spoiler: Response to Order

View attachment 1921677View attachment 1921678

Spoiler: forma pauperis but she stopped trying to defraud the court

View attachment 1921682View attachment 1921683View attachment 1921684

Spoiler: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

View attachment 1921685View attachment 1921686View attachment 1921687View attachment 1921688View attachment 1921689View attachment 1921690View attachment 1921691

Spoiler: Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis=

View attachment 1921693View attachment 1921694View attachment 1921695View attachment 1921696View attachment 1921697View attachment 1921698View attachment 1921699

Spoiler: Order

View attachment 1921702

Spoiler: ORDER ADOPTING Report and Recommendations

View attachment 1921708

Spoiler: Judgment

View attachment 1921709

Updated Courtlistener link with all the docs from PACER

True

You can delete your account.

"Anon's speech make woman mad! Court do stop!"
I wish the best to you on that.

Not Tony.

Supreme Court says you can't though

Now. Do you want to be added to the suit for witness tampering?

I'm glad you made this trip down memory lane, but you are nowhere fast.

Going further back in Pammy lore, she tried to sue Colorado Technical University back in 2014, after they kicked her out of their graduate program (allegedly for her accepting money to write papers for other students). You picked that one up in your search. As you can see, this lawsuit failed too, again without ever going to trial:

No. I worked for Utlius 3 years after grad work was over to start paying my student loans bacm and you contacted them to get me fired for legally drafting papers, Gerry Butler.... that means you were harassing me from the beginning.
So you were this harassing email.


?????????

 

[Useful_Mistake]

View attachment 1921737
View attachment 1921738
View attachment 1921739

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DEAN HUMPHRIES does not apply because:
1. We didn't violate 18 U.S.C. § 875 (i.e. we did not try to kidnapp, threaten to do so, or seek ransom for someone we had kidnapped)
2. We didn't violate 18 U.S.C. § 2261A (why we didn't I explained here)
United States v. Sayer, No. 12-2489 (1st Cir. 2014) does not apply because:
1. We had not stalked or harassed you (under legal definitions) for any time, much less for four years.
2. We had not "induce[ d ]" anonymous third parties to harass (under legal definitions) you.
3. We did not come to your house, nor have we "induced" anyone to do so, seeking sexual entertainment
4. We did not perform revenge porn
5. We did not advertise you as a hooker.
United States v. Ackell does not apply because:
1. We didn't violate 18 U.S. Code § 2261A. Why explained here.
2. We did not perform revenge porn.
United States v Bennett 2004 is an unpublished opinion which are not binding and have little to no value.

The other post was a mistake and I wasn't posting that case.
View attachment 1921784
View attachment 1921786

United States v Cassidy does not apply:
1. We didn't violate 18 U.S.C. § 2261A (why we didn't I explained here)
United States v Jordan does not apply:
1. We didn't violate 18 U.S.C. § 2261A (why we didn't I explained here)
2. We did not advertise you as a hooker.
3. We did not tamper with witnesses
4. We did not threaten or harass you (under legal definitions)

Next time try to use your brain to come up with arguments instead of mindlessly screenshoting blog posts.

Now. Do you want to be added to the suit for witness tampering?

Pray tell, how did I do that, and who did I do it too?
Also threats make your case look bad faith, which invites sanctions.

No. I worked for Utlius 3 years after grad work was over to start paying my student loans bacm and you contacted them to get me fired for legally drafting papers, Gerry Butler.... that means you were harassing me from the beginning.
So you were this harassing email.

>Picture: Bologna Butler
Pam: It's Gerry

How can you prove that, Pam?

Also, some rando emailing you in russian is neither admitable evidence, nor good faith evidence.

?????????
View attachment 1921839

Same points as before

????????
View attachment 1921850

Stop falling for Russian Spam

 

[Dickens Cider]

Wow spam you really choose bad hills to die on. Arguing on the internet with random people when you are so popular, thinking anyone actually believes a word of your fan fiction life? I really do wish sometimes Gerard Butler or actually anyone you think you know would do a period piece in your locale so we could all laugh at security busting your ass back to the Stone Age. Perhaps that might even help. Oh not you you seem beyond help. But it would some security guy maybe get a raise for saving his principle from a deranged loon.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Wow spam you really choose bad hills to die on. Arguing on the internet with random people when you are so popular, thinking anyone actually believes a word of your fan fiction life? I really do wish sometimes Gerard Butler or actually anyone you think you know would do a period piece in your locale so we could all laugh at security busting your ass back to the Stone Age. Perhaps that might even help. Oh not you you seem beyond help. But it would some security guy maybe get a raise for saving his principle from a deranged loon.

That's not entirely accurate.


????????


2017 kidnapping threat.

Wow spam you really choose bad hills to die on. Arguing on the internet with random people when you are so popular, thinking anyone actually believes a word of your fan fiction life? I really do wish sometimes Gerard Butler or actually anyone you think you know would do a period piece in your locale so we could all laugh at security busting your ass back to the Stone Age. Perhaps that might even help. Oh not you you seem beyond help. But it would some security guy maybe get a raise for saving his principle from a deranged loon.

Makes no sense.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

2017 kidnapping threat.
View attachment 1921857

That is not a threat, much less a kidnapping one, by any legal standard or definition.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

We did not perform revenge porn.
United States v Bennett 2004 is an unpublished opinion which are not binding and have little to no value.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

View attachment 1921874

This literally shows me nothing bar that you reported some pic on facebook for "harassment".