I mean, that kind of follows as common sense, doesn't it? Many, if not most, women in committed relationships are having sex, so they are the ones most likely to get pregnant. However, that doesn't mean the woman isn't, say, sleeping around behind their spouse or partner, or engaging in serial monogamy. It doesn't make them less of a thot.
True, but back in the day, doing that carried consequences. Also, birth control itself is ancient, as is abortion. For as long as we have lived on this Earth, mankind has been trying to find a way to have sex, and yet avoid responsibility for it. However, there is no getting around the fact that its easier to avoid the consequences now than ever before, so we are seeing far more out of wedlock pregnancies, single mother homes, and abortions, than at any other time in our history. The existence of easy birth control, along with the deterioration of sexual mores has caused mankind to get collectively sloppy.
Unless you are talking about rape, no pregnancy is forced. If you have sex, getting pregnant is a known consequence of that. If you don't know that, you shouldn't be having sex, period, because you're probably too young for it anyway. If you have sex still knowing that, you are taking what we call a "calculated risk". Unless you are being raped, nobody is forcing you to open your legs and take a dick inside of you, and nobody is forcing that guy to thrust into you. Force doesn't enter into the equation. Pregnancy is a natural consequence of your actions which you either didn't take into account at your peril, or you did, and decided it was worth it. So no ones going to show you sympathy if your actions result in something that was easily foreseeable and avoidable.
All of those are possibilities, as are a million other things. We can't know what will happen because none of us can predict the future. And none of us should be deciding to end a human life based on what could possibly happen over the course of an entire life we can't even foresee. None of us are God, none of us can suddenly make a judgment that this child's life is destined to amount to nothing just because the circumstances of its birth are not ideal.
And that's their decision, one they will have to live with for the rest of their lives. But it is a decision, not an eventuality, and it still doesn't take away from the fact that they are murdering their child.
I would rather have birth control than abortions. Which is why I don't oppose birth control completely. But as has already been said, no birth control is 100% safe, and people shouldn't rely on it. And I oppose universal access to birth control because birth control is a product, and should be paid for like all others. The state shouldn't subsidize things like that. If you need it, buy it. Many forms of it, like condoms, aren't that expensive, and its the choice of the people whether or not to use it, or whether or not they will even need it.
But, at the end of the day, if one wants to avoid pregnancy altogether, one can do one of two things: use forms of sex that don't lead to pregnancy (oral, anal, intercrural, etc.) or just abstain from it until you are absolutely okay with having a child. Seriously, just don't have sex. If you must get off, pull up some porn and wank. Everybody's doing that now, even women. People act like its impossible to just not have sex, but it really isn't. And if you choose to have sex and don't take the proper precautions, whatever happens afterward is on you.
