Nah, I get the point. The point is obvious and it's just being used as a cudgel to try to embarrass people who don't give a shit (Amazon's leadership) and harvest sympathy points from people who can't do anything to help (random twitter losers).
Like it or not, you do have a few options if you're working in a "sweatshop" in a first-world country, but they all require work and effort to achieve anything meaningful ... except of course the "whine impotently about it and do nothing else" option, which is super-easy, cathartic and wins you some juicy victimhood points. Your other options include trying to unionize, suing your employer over the conditions, getting political about it (beyond posting on twitter), finding a new job, sabotaging things from the inside, torching the warehouse (in minecraft), etc. But those are hard and potentially very risky, and there's no guarantee of success, so nobody ever really does any of that. So they just whine instead. I get not wanting to risk your income, family, livelihood and assets if you're just barely hanging on, but I've always found the "I'm totes stuck and this job sucks and I have no agency in this at all so I'm going to whine online for sympathy and do literally nothing else" attitude irritating.
To illustrate my point, what have you two (
@Montalbane and
@Toolbox) specifically done to help improve conditions at the Amazon "sweatshops"? Hell, what has
anyone here done? The only demonstrable action I've seen so far is posting a screencap of a reddit post of a "yeah! Take
that Amazon!" photograph. Finger-waggling by proxy. Sure, it may feel good, but it's no skin off Amazon's back.
So you can scold the "retarded take" if you really want to, but that's not going to help improve working conditions at Amazon's warehouses.