Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

[obliviousbeard]

I can't even believe I'm actually doing this. @Autphag, this is pretty basic, so try to follow up.

Spoiler: Math lesson

First, with trained eye we can see that what @Marshal Mannerheim said is true. We have simple identity, which follows:

(x-a)(x-b) = x^2 - (a+b)x + ab

We can prove this by taking those two terms, and multiplying them with each others.

(x-a)(x-b)
=x(x-b)-a(x-b)
=x^2 + x*-b - a*x + ab
=x^2 + (-a-b)*x + ab
=x^2 - (a+b)x + ab

Hence, if we use that on another direction, we'll get the reduction @Marshall Mannerheim proposed.

Here's also another way to solve that quadratic equation, using yet another formula. (if you'd excuse my writing). We could also prove this formula, but since I don't really have time or interest (and I lack blackboard), so I'll just refer to wikipedia.

Note that there's often two instances where quadratic equation is zero. This is easiest to demonstrate by drawing, since the graph for quadratic equations is parabolic. And we can see
that if there's such a real number that f(x)=0, it can be two of those.

And here's the actual solution, by using the said formula.

Please note that discriminant, aka the b^2 - 4ac part here is zero. This means we'll have dual root, which means that there's only one real value for x where the f(x) = 0. I've also drawn a simple graph to visualize this.

Please, feel free to ask me if you have difficulties to follow this. Class dismissed.

 

[Autphag]

I can't even believe I'm actually doing this. @Autphag, this is pretty basic, so try to follow up.

Spoiler: Math lesson

First, with trained eye we can see that what @Marshal Mannerheim said is true. We have simple identity, which follows:

(x-a)(x-b) = x^2 - (a+b)x + ab

We can prove this by taking those two terms, and multiplying them with each others.

(x-a)(x-b)
=x(x-b)-a(x-b)
=x^2 + x*-b - a*x + ab
=x^2 + (-a-b)*x + ab
=x^2 - (a+b)x + ab

Hence, if we use that on another direction, we'll get the reduction @Marshall Mannerheim proposed.

Here's also another way to solve that quadratic equation, using yet another formula. (if you'd excuse my writing). We could also prove this formula, but since I don't really have time or interest (and I lack blackboard), so I'll just refer to wikipedia.

Note that there's often two instances where quadratic equation is zero. This is easiest to demonstrate by drawing, since the graph for quadratic equations is parabolic. And we can see
that if there's such a real number that f(x)=0, it can be two of those.

And here's the actual solution, by using the said formula.
View attachment 1929962

Please note that discriminant, aka the b^2 - 4ac part here is zero. This means we'll have dual root, which means that there's only one real value for x where the f(x) = 0. I've also drawn a simple graph to visualize this.

View attachment 1929963

Please, feel free to ask me if you have difficulties to follow this. Class dismissed.

The processes in the screenshot supercede GCSE and ceased being S-Grade by about 1995, being bumped into Higher of about a D, maybe a C, typically. But with respect to your process' THEORETICAL DICHOTOMY which was taught supportingly with S-Grade/3rd and 4th or generalised mathematics to a 9th - 12th grade level (non-remedial, non-advanced), it's Malebranchian bullshit from the des Cartes school that transterpolation occurs with the transposition of operanditive terms in the indirectly inverse.

Kim Jong-Il's dead.

Nice rote-literalism. So he deserves to die, therefore his death as literally covered had no symbolic significance. It is a sham. Well, that's fine for some...

Lol maybe this fucking fetal alcohol retard should stick to eating paint chips and vomiting out incomprehensible word salads seeing as how he can't comprehend even the most basic arithmetic.

But hush up guys, he's got honorary degrees in 3,000,000 different fields of study.....or was it 0? I was in remedial math with Chris.

Then you're lying. I was never in Intermediate 2 not was I in General/Credit or below but in a pure Credit class with a one-to-one tutoriand of the old Jarovian/High-Roman era Mr. Wilkinson as was his common name or Mr. Wilkinsonianinistisyx as was his ancestral aristocratic name. He was a God tier curricular of the upper secondary curricular from the prepatory of "how to avoid Int 2 streaming solidly" to things at Undergraduate preparatoriand for old S7 stud/stude/summer/"neo-summer". I was given like 23 preparatoriand lessons at fucking 2nd and 3rd year, why would I be in your inferiority group waeguk bastard nombalbasansahahangda?!?!

 

[obliviousbeard]

calm down lmao

 

[Autphag]

By the way, that was me screwing it up slightly because his Tocharin temnency was actually Mr. Willisistikinisonianarianisticistisyx simply because the "elongation period" had come as an Oriental idea from the evil Nihonites. Gugoryids did this in parts of Anglicised China and exo-Chinese Asia however so it was seen as a filtrated acceptance anti-reprobitically.

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

The processes in the screenshot supercede GCSE and ceased being S-Grade by about 1995, being bumped into Higher of about a D, maybe a C, typically. But with respect to your process' THEORETICAL DICHOTOMY which was taught supportingly with S-Grade/3rd and 4th or generalised mathematics to a 9th - 12th grade level (non-remedial, non-advanced), it's Malebranchian bullshit from the des Cartes school that transterpolation occurs with the transposition of operanditive terms in the indirectly inverse.

However, they work and yours didn't.

 

[Autphag]

However, they work and yours didn't.

To get the other ¹½ marks with my solution, you had negated the 20 to formulate - 61 addendatively and that'd be your full simplification for x you IDIOT.

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

To get the other ¹½ marks with my solution, you had negated the 20 to formulate - 61 addendatively and that'd be your full simplification for x you IDIOT.

If you get the right answer on a GCSE maths question you instantly get full marks. Partial marks for workings only get awarded if you're wrong.

So it doesn't matter whether I answered the question without using your special snowflakey formula, because I answered the question correctly and so I get full marks.

 

[Autphag]

If you get the right answer on a GCSE maths question you instantly get full marks. Partial marks for workings only get awarded if you're wrong.

So it doesn't matter whether I answered the question without using your special snowflakey formula, because I answered the question correctly and so I get full marks.

We had this policy up north too. I was friends with a transsexual woman who as a bicurious boy got the 1 in Maths doing canv. That's what we called that; she was a full synaesthesite. I won't name remotely a single name. Transsexual synaesthesite types were mostly the Guardianista's expertise so I hadn't delved much deeper than an essay into that, really, out of deep respect...

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

We had this policy up north too. I was friends with a transsexual woman who as a bicurious boy got the 1 in Maths doing canv. That's what we called that; she was a full synaesthesite. I won't name remotely a single name. Transsexual synaesthesite types were mostly the Guardianista's expertise so I hadn't delved much deeper than an essay into that, really, out of deep respect...

This is what we call word salad.

 

[Autphag]

This is what we call word salad.

It was thought to make sense within a 7th grade limit of non-remedial B straight with virtually no fog, why give a shit about miscanving it as incomprehensible?

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

It was thought to make sense within a 7th grade limit of non-remedial B straight with virtually no fog, why give a shit about miscanving it as incomprehensible?

Do you want to open a salad bar or what?

 

[Autphag]

So a peculiar thing has just occurred. My stairwell had been greeted a visit by a random Oriental who appeared to open with "Ah, Christopher Gillon, he's thought to be a canviator...,", prior pausing for a few moments in which he finally punctuates sharply to shrill, "What a man." He's obviously a psychopath and an extreme overstimulate of the SSRI and progalinalataturianandulaturiaformulative canvas. I'm intimidated thus by his tongue sharpened signal sigilically of overstimulation but I would hope at any point of the week to be underimpressed by his intellectual canvas by capacity if not so much by the old Jarric (the African ethnotype, not the Roman Caucasoif ethnicity) canvas of contrived global processing speed versatility via. mrdicaments, he can more than slightly fuck himself until coming close to an apology, or else hope iron impurgation doesn't belate his deservingly abusive (no, I meant to his dervingness of the following) psychopathiform ad-negriege...

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

So a peculiar thing has just occurred. My stairwell had been greeted a visit by a random Oriental who appeared to open with "Ah, Christopher Gillon, he's thought to be a canviator...,", prior pausing for a few moments in which he finally punctuates sharply to shrill, "What a man." He's obviously a psychopath and an extreme overstimulate of the SSRI and progalinalataturianandulaturiaformulative canvas. I'm intimidated thus by his tongue sharpened signal sigilically of overstimulation but I would hope at any point of the week to be underimpressed by his intellectual canvas by capacity if not so much by the old Jarric (the African ethnotype, not the Roman Caucasoif ethnicity) canvas of contrived global processing speed versatility via. mrdicaments, he can more than slightly fuck himself until coming close to an apology, or else hope iron impurgation doesn't belate his deservingly abusive (no, I meant to his dervingness of the following) psychopathiform ad-negriege...

 

[Autphag]

I should add: 1. he had gone as far as my door without walking and then darted off into the general direction of a randomly aimless walk around before departing, 2. he appears to speak in the same accent as the expected Morgan fare so I wouldn't avoid mentioning mixed Afro-Orientalism, 3. I'm informed as of the last few moments down the feed that he is the actual Ko Pong (allegedly...) who in his latest series just wants to mineogogue mindlessly a shedload of Morganisms vavavavically like a worthless verstiturialite degenerate and reprobate himself regarding the moral recognates or parameters of my ideology he just wants to dartingly shit upon...

I hate him. He's a subhuman from all sound of things.

ARGH

Mineogogue*

Mimeogogue*

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

I should add: 1. he had gone as far as my door without walking and then darted off into the general direction of a randomly aimless walk around before departing, 2. he appears to speak in the same accent as the expected Morgan fare so I wouldn't avoid mentioning mixed Afro-Orientalism, 3. I'm informed as of the last few moments down the feed that he is the actual Ko Pong (allegedly...) who in his latest series just wants to mineogogue mindlessly a shedload of Morganisms vavavavically like a worthless verstiturialite degenerate and reprobate himself regarding the moral recognates or parameters of my ideology he just wants to dartingly shit upon...

I hate him. He's a subhuman from all sound of things.

ARGH

Mineogogue*

Mimeogogue*

Welcome to Kiwifarms.

Don't triple post.

 

[Autphag]

I might renege on two things.

It unfairly reflects on the Morgans when they in fact consider him abortificant their seeming and wholesaledly countered "affinity with this Asiatic Morganite" so to speak. So I won't say there is some link to Morganite personality remotely; I've'd hoped to canvissatoriate the opposite idealistically...

Now also I renege even on my hatred. It was a response panic struck from the moment of euaggression. I'll hold it latently in saleie to resent instead whilst respecting whatever refinemental I might come across...

I should come completely clean about something to my own admission although it may well have been highlighted elsewhere. Although it had been expurgatrd from the record aggressively in the wake of the Elaine Mayisticistiship under the Rennicistically averting cousin or uncle or something, my memory variegatively vagueriates itself, I was born intersexual and had been tested at long last although it had since been impurgated with a return to "legal XY recognition" by imposition (I can't remember if this was resolved) a sufferer of 47.5,XXYy. A.k.a. 48'/47-umulatative',XXY'-recombinatory. It was expurgated by medicine for being too hard to theorise by the cretinous Wikipedians. Although, they do mention it in canvas; intersexology does describe it verbally at least if I recall an article reader.

I had been born with disambiguous phallic genitalia but ambiguous formal genitalia anadiagnostically on the proviso and request of my father with forced closure of a so-called "whorl" a.k.a. remains of a semi-collapsed vaginal wall at the age of 2, I vaguely remember. I've honest-to-God some resentments against the state for thinking it would emerge a human rights victor for allowing this to prevail in historically narativistic expletion owing the chauvanism of some "class ultimatumitalitarian" types even though nobody said that SES0-10 couldn't have 1 supergenius at least, although in the English government's time it was known to spike for that group marginally, if anything, in certain types of boy. Even in Scotland during conservative eras in the purest of dual governance had it been noted that certain SES superdepressives has particular advantage at a post-genius canvas under a disciplinarian system so long as they were approriately streamed by predominance if albeit grade challenged. The predominant idea was "So what? You had gotten your reward."

Anyway enough about that aspect, it has caused indubitable damage but I don't know if I can legitimately say this is a transgender matter anymore and possibly, then, a quasi-verstitulitarian of albeit quasi-verstiturialite intersexual matter... I do consider it this that I'd spent some of my life deeply convinced in the presumptively recorded sex so maybe it is. I say 75% yes, 25% no, on these aforereasoned bases...

Anyway fellows, discuss... These were the findings of the clinic on blood test assay...

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

I should come completely clean about something to my own admission although it may well have been highlighted elsewhere. Although it had been expurgatrd from the record aggressively in the wake of the Elaine Mayisticistiship under the Rennicistically averting cousin or uncle or something, my memory variegatively vagueriates itself, I was born intersexual and had been tested at long last although it had since been impurgated with a return to "legal XY recognition" by imposition (I can't remember if this was resolved) a sufferer of 47.5,XXYy. A.k.a. 48'/47-umulatative',XXY'-recombinatory. It was expurgated by medicine for being too hard to theorise by the cretinous Wikipedians. Although, they do mention it in canvas; intersexology does describe it verbally at least if I recall an article reader.

I had been born with disambiguous phallic genitalia but ambiguous formal genitalia anadiagnostically on the proviso and request of my father with forced closure of a so-called "whorl" a.k.a. remains of a semi-collapsed vaginal wall at the age of 2, I vaguely remember. I've honest-to-God some resentments against the state for thinking it would emerge a human rights victor for allowing this to prevail in historically narativistic expletion owing the chauvanism of some "class ultimatumitalitarian" types even though nobody said that SES0-10 couldn't have 1 supergenius at least, although in the English government's time it was known to spike for that group marginally, if anything, in certain types of boy. Even in Scotland during conservative eras in the purest of dual governance had it been noted that certain SES superdepressives has particular advantage at a post-genius canvas under a disciplinarian system so long as they were approriately streamed by predominance if albeit grade challenged. The predominant idea was "So what? You had gotten your reward."

Anyway enough about that aspect, it has caused indubitable damage but I don't know if I can legitimately say this is a transgender matter anymore and possibly, then, a quasi-verstitulitarian of albeit quasi-verstiturialite intersexual matter... I do consider it this that I'd spent some of my life deeply convinced in the presumptively recorded sex so maybe it is. I say 75% yes, 25% no, on these aforereasoned bases...

Anyway fellows, discuss... These were the findings of the clinic on blood test assay...

You can't prove that you're intersex from a blood test.

 

[Autphag]

You can't prove that you're intersex from a blood test.

Legally, correct; anti-impurgation is an honest clusterfuck. However, biologically, not that correct; haemoglobinulands of lymph are nucleal even if blood cells are not...

So to summarize I was wrong even about that as I had something of a square root accounting disability.

Not unsimple neither straightforward:

Firstly square rooting occurs to the left side:
Sqrt(Z^2 - 16z + 61) = sqrt(2z - 20)
Prostratium ("therefore ad-constelled; therefore as 'splain"):
Z - sqrt(16z + 61) = sqrt(2z - 20)
Z - sqrt(16z + 81) = sqrt(2z)
//lel immediate realisation squarerooting the term and the coefficient is current in germandiative...
:. Z - sqrt(16z + 81) = 2sqrt(z)
ERGO
Z = sqrt(16z + 81) = 2sqrt(z)
Q.E.D.

 

[Trombonista]

"I'm not stupid! I'm not stupid!" Autphag continues to insist as he slowly expands and eats the sides first.

 

[obliviousbeard]

"I'm not stupid! I'm not stupid!" Autphag continues to insist as he slowly expands and eats the sides first.

Hey, at least this gives us a look into his thought process. For what it's worth.