- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
I'm not going to waste my time finding the post that proves you're lying. You stated otherwise in your legal filings, arguing that it wasn't proper for the court to vacate the entry of default. The judge eviscerated your inane arguments.I never made a prediction about the Default.
I especially liked the part where he said you weren't subject to legal prejudice. I recall you insisting that it would be prejudicial for the court to set aside your hard-won entry of default. Come to think of it, I remember Nick Rekieta trying to explain to you that it wasn't prejudicial. Pearls of wisdom before swine, indeed.