In the Name of Jesus, you will lose.
Nope. There was no lie. In the Name of Jesus, you're the one lying.
Invoking Jesus doesn't make you any more correct or any less delusional?
Can you pinpoint the perjury? Cause that's the problem with no trials, no evidence can be admitted which is why you don't want a trial. And a claim of perjury needs to be substantiated.
Apart from your ever shifting allegations, your filing in forma pauperis is one.
@Viridian Are you a cursed lawless antichrist? Or misunderstanding sexual cursed devil?
Viridian is neither.
I'm up late, but it's morning. They say God comes down this early morning to hear people praying.
Some get up early. Some stay up late.
I'm going be to be praying about you and your daddy and the rest of you evil lawbreakers. That you get what's coming to you.
And nothing will happen to us.
@Viridian
The court ignored this which is why you illegally sought out Judge Randall Hall and had him post on kiwifarms. That is against fair judicial and legal procedure, isn't this right,
@LoverofPi?
I am not Judge Randall Hall. I have not and never will be Judge Randall Hall.
I am not and have never been any judge on any of your lolsuits.
The problem with this recent legal scam is that Hillary and Alan bragged and told on themselves before I received any notice in the mail and asserted that the judge was on here.
No one has asserted any of your judges were on the farms, Pam.
This is why they asked for new judge, corruption from Dershowitz and Clinton who we can now state is actively working as lawyers for Harvey Weinstein. I think there needs to be a new that forces any legal counsel compulsory disclosure.
Have a great sleepless night.
I think there needs to be a new *law* that forces any legal counsel compulsory disclosure.
Compulsory disclosure of what, Pam?
Wouldn't a forum count as a social media, technically?
Maybe? I've always viewed forums as distinct from social media.
Wait, so I influenced the judge to dismiss your case, you allege, and at the same time you allege that I didn't? Make up your mind, woman.
Also, not Alan.
Pam's enemies are simultaneously too strong and too weak. A key element of all imaginary foes.
No.
Yes you have. Every time Alan Dershowitz, Hillary Clinton, tony Robbins, Harvey Weinstein, Donald Trump Jr has questioned my mental health, they have made a false statement of fact. Not only that, they've built a case on that false statement of fact and have devised personal harm and injury to me, my personal life, and ability to secure gainful employment.
Your blathering of caselaw doesn't negate the harmful often th of your actions and evidence against you in this particular case with me.
What case, Pam?
Then you haven't been reading this thread and you're perjuring yourself.
This is not a legal case, we have not perjured ourselves by telling you the celebrities you obsess over are not here and don't read the thread.
First off.
1. It is a false statement of fact to question my mental health when you clearly do not know me. And it is not protected speech.
It's not a statement of fact at all, and is protected.
Second,
2. If you are a lawyer, politician, judge, or a US attorney hiding behind multiple accounts created by Tony Robbins on a hate social media site (to wit, the very one where the January 6 insurrection was planned),
Capitol fuckwittery was not planned here.
I'm going to have to ask you to cease your communications with me in this thread since this violates my civil rights to fair judicial and legal procedure and due process.
No, it does not violate them at all.
Third
3. I am not required by law to take your opinion or point of view as validation for any legal or judicial decision for law, caselaw, or even criminal/civil law.
No one said you were. Useful can still offer commentary.
Inference. Based on false statements of fact.
You don't know what either of those terms means, do you, Pam?
You clearly don't understand cease and desist.
Telling us "cease and desist" is meaningless, Pam. Even a letter is powerless on its own.
