World Economic Forum Megathread (The Great Reset)

[Terrifik]

So when are we nuking china to the stone age then? They're the number one polluter on earth. Oh wait, its only white WASP countries that need to change.

After you drink you pee water honey

 

[tehpope]

I need my Horrifyed button.

No William, I'm not drinking poo poo water.

 

[Salubrious]

The thing that pisses me off the most about trans children, well second most after CHILDREN CANNOT CONSENT, is that I feel like every single trans child I've ever seen, there is always an overbearing mother and an absent or weak father. Every single time, with MAYBE D-Wade's kid being the exception.

HBO had a documentary about following four trans children for a year, and the only thing I got out of it was that two of the four weren't even trans, and one of the others was either already sick of being trans or sick of being paraded around. One mother talking to her six year old biological son was, no joke, desparately trying to convince her son to wear a dress and he said that he didn't want to. But I'm supposed to believe this is a transgirl anyway. Ok, sure.

Edit: Skip to 2:14 in this video. It's so clear the mother WANTS her son to be a girl.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

I need my Horrifyed button.

No William, I'm not drinking poo poo water.

Live in your pod, feast upon your cockroaches...DRINK YOUR POO POO.

 

[DeadFish]

Live in your pod, feast upon your cockroaches...DRINK YOUR POO POO.

You do realize the water you drink been around since the dinosaur s? It's dino piss. Plus what do you think water treatment is? Reused water.

 

[JohnDoe]

Live in your pod, feast upon your cockroaches...DRINK YOUR POO POO.

I'd rather sniff cordite fumes and suffer slide bite, thank you.

 

[General Disarray]

The thing that pisses me off the most about trans children, well second most after CHILDREN CANNOT CONSENT, is that I feel like every single trans child I've ever seen, there is always an overbearing mother and an absent or weak father. Every single time, with MAYBE D-Wade's kid being the exception.

HBO had a documentary about following four trans children for a year, and the only thing I got out of it was that two of the four weren't even trans, and one of the others was either already sick of being trans or sick of being paraded around. One mother talking to her six year old biological son was, no joke, desparately trying to convince her son to wear a dress and he said that he didn't want to. But I'm supposed to believe this is a transgirl anyway. Ok, sure.

Edit: Skip to 2:14 in this video. It's so clear the mother WANTS her son to be a girl.

This. Read the Desmond is Amazing thread; there's some great work in there showing the pedos commenting on his Insta. That's the next push: pedo acceptance. Mark my words.

Don't forget the National Geographic issue that caused me to cancel my subscription.

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

View attachment 1933626

The "we have to fix the climate by 2030 or we're all dead" belongs in the list of every other doomsday prediction. How did this meme emerge? It sounds like it's based on a couple of studies and then spun by a PR group attempting to market climate change. It's unequivocally how NOT to convince people climate change is a danger because it smacks of a religious prophecy that like every other attempt to date the end of the world from the Great Disappointment to Heavens Gate to Harold Camping to the 2012 New Age wackos will fail. Raising science to a religion is not how you get the public to believe in science.

Why they would do this I can only suspect evil motives. At first I thought it was an attempt to even further politicize the science so public action on climate change gets done--oil companies get their money, feelgood green stuff gets money, everyone's happy. Maybe it was and still is to a degree. But now I'm convinced the 2030 doomsday prophecy serves that goal, not for the sake of the oil companies but so we can actually make climate change worse. Think of it, the easiest way to make people not give a fuck and oppose anything "green" is to shove it down everyone's throats with a bunch of questionable-sounding moralistic bullshit like the left does. Quite literally the same as with the Chinkflu mask mandates and YOU'RE KILLING GRANDMA propaganda. It just makes me NOT want to do what they say.

Make no mistake, these people WANT climate change and a climate catastrophe just like they wanted a pandemic because "never let a crisis go to waste" is their modus operandi. All of the negative effects of it like wars, refugee crises, they want that because it makes it easy to conduct social engineering on a grand scale and institute and solidify their neofeudal society. It goes without saying a couple of major famines in Africa/Asia or nuclear wars would do wonders in enacting population control. The solutions to fixing climate change already exist or could feasibly be done if we spent the money on that instead of other things the elites love like rigging elections, funding color revolutions, and extreme military spending for forever wars in the sandbox. We don't do that because that's the ace up the sleeve of the global elite, things that will be done right before the chaos they've created with a climate catastrophe gets out of hand and they lose all their money and power. That way they get to save us from the problem they created.

2030 is a convenient date for them too. It gives the sense that we're on the edge of some impending disaster and gives them the legitimacy needed to impose all sorts of restrictions. Remember the talk about climate lockdowns? Exactly. I'd expect this will be used to implement an ever-increasing series of taxes and restrictions on daily life which will be used to decimate anyone but the uppermost classes, destroy businesses, enrich the elite, and break the will of the people to resist by turning us all into a bunch of neurotic, overstressed individuals who will be a great market for Big Pharma.

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

View attachment 1922631

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1361280806652686337

Could the glowniggers following Kiwifarms for every "In Minecraft" joke explain why every person saying he would vote for Trump is on a no-fly list while billionaires that publicly express their desire to harm untold number of people are free to do as they wish?

 

[spinal gas chamber]

You do realize the water you drink been around since the dinosaur s? It's dino piss. Plus what do you think water treatment is? Reused water.

Yeah but it also has Jesus’ piss in it. And probably mine.

 

[FeatherPlucker]

The thing that pisses me off the most about trans children, well second most after CHILDREN CANNOT CONSENT, is that I feel like every single trans child I've ever seen, there is always an overbearing mother and an absent or weak father. Every single time, with MAYBE D-Wade's kid being the exception.

HBO had a documentary about following four trans children for a year, and the only thing I got out of it was that two of the four weren't even trans, and one of the others was either already sick of being trans or sick of being paraded around. One mother talking to her six year old biological son was, no joke, desparately trying to convince her son to wear a dress and he said that he didn't want to. But I'm supposed to believe this is a transgirl anyway. Ok, sure.

Edit: Skip to 2:14 in this video. It's so clear the mother WANTS her son to be a girl.

I think I saw this documentary. It wasn't as pro-trans as I would have thought, which was a relief.
I thought it was really interesting that the one boy who was initially trans decided against it once his mother divorced his father and moved to his grandfather's house. The limp wristed father remarried and had another baby immediately, and he was totally pro-transition for his son.
It was as if exposure to a stable and older male role model made the kid decide he wanted to be male again. Thought it was bizarre that the kid's father wanted his own son to castrate himself as if often seems as if mothers alone push this.
Of course, this guy might have had pedophilic inclinations. I imagine men who find children sexually arousing LOVE the idea of putting boys and girls on puberty blockers, as it keeps their bodies from becoming adult.
There's definitely a huge element of "pedophia is normal" among the gender bender trans brigade. I recently looked up the topic of child harems in antiquity on wikipedia, and already people are putting flags in the articles claiming they're "biased". The Gender Brigade believes little boys "chose" to engage in "sex work" as slaves during the Ottoman Era. It won't be long until stories about the evils of pedophilia are wiped off the internet. The gender bender caste is very active online in terms of pushing their agenda.

I agree that the obsession over "climate change" is a ruse to shove insane legislation and restrictions down people's throats. I think the environment is a "legit issue", just as racism is a legit issue, but that those who are in power will use these issues for nefarious reasons. The whole "climate change" fixation will be used as a means with which to enrich the ultra wealthy. I'm thinking of forcing people into slavery en masse on some level, probably via technology, and the trans ideology plays part in this.... easier to keep angry men docile when they're drugged up with estrogen and testosterone blockers, right? Even better for the ruling class who is afraid of the public to prevent young men from going through puberty at all, because they are usually the ones who fill up militias.

 

[Salubrious]

I think I saw this documentary. It wasn't as pro-trans as I would have thought, which was a relief.
I thought it was really interesting that the one boy who was initially trans decided against it once his mother divorced his father and moved to his grandfather's house. The limp wristed father remarried and had another baby immediately, and he was totally pro-transition for his son.
It was as if exposure to a stable and older male role model made the kid decide he wanted to be male again. Thought it was bizarre that the kid's father wanted his own son to castrate himself as if often seems as if mothers alone push this.
Of course, this guy might have had pedophilic inclinations. I imagine men who find children sexually arousing LOVE the idea of putting boys and girls on puberty blockers, as it keeps their bodies from becoming adult.
There's definitely a huge element of "pedophia is normal" among the gender bender trans brigade. I recently looked up the topic of child harems in antiquity on wikipedia, and already people are putting flags in the articles claiming they're "biased". The Gender Brigade believes little boys "chose" to engage in "sex work" as slaves during the Ottoman Era. It won't be long until stories about the evils of pedophilia are wiped off the internet. The gender bender caste is very active online in terms of pushing their agenda.

I agree that the obsession over "climate change" is a ruse to shove insane legislation and restrictions down people's throats. I think the environment is a "legit issue", just as racism is a legit issue, but that those who are in power will use these issues for nefarious reasons. The whole "climate change" fixation will be used as a means with which to enrich the ultra wealthy. I'm thinking of forcing people into slavery en masse on some level, probably via technology, and the trans ideology plays part in this.... easier to keep angry men docile when they're drugged up with estrogen and testosterone blockers, right? Even better for the ruling class who is afraid of the public to prevent young men from going through puberty at all, because they are usually the ones who fill up militias.

Yeah, basically to sum it up, I've never seen a trans child have a strong father figure in their life with the only possible exception of D-Wade's kid. Every other child has had a weak father at best or a distant/absent one.

I also think that climate change is important and that they are using it to push big business agenda. For example, in California in 2035 it will be illegal to sell a new car unless it has "zero emissions." There's no evidence that these cars will be affordable to the general public by then, but any attempt to argue results in "CLIMATE CHANGE DENIER REEEEEE!" I'm actually shocked that allowed even the courtesy of allowing used cars to continue to be sold.

 

[spinal gas chamber]

Yeah, basically to sum it up, I've never seen a trans child have a strong father figure in their life with the only possible exception of D-Wade's kid. Every other child has had a weak father at best or a distant/absent one.

I also think that climate change is important and that they are using it to push big business agenda. For example, in California in 2035 it will be illegal to sell a new car unless it has "zero emissions." There's no evidence that these cars will be affordable to the general public by then, but any attempt to argue results in "CLIMATE CHANGE DENIER REEEEEE!" I'm actually shocked that allowed even the courtesy of allowing used cars to continue to be sold.

The thing with these dates 15 years in the future is it allows people to say “I’m fixing the problem!” While they don’t actually fix the problem (if there is one), they get to push it off. Then in 5 years someone will change it to 2045 and say “I’m fixing the problem!”

What actually resulted is a lot of people getting paid to say someone else will fix the problem sometime else.

 

[Inventor of the Telephone]

The funny thing is most of this so called conspiracies are not a conspiracy. They are openly talk about plans world leaders wish to enact. Hower its usual so boring nobody pays attention.
So when a raving Conspiracow starts mooing about lizard people and there legit plans it gets the wrong kind of people invested and normies will completely tune out and refuse to believe

They were even openly dog-whistling about the 'new world order' 30 years ago. Its just that they control such a powerful propaganda apparatus that they can force you to ignore reality and suspend all rational thought. Those that didn't kowtow caught the label 'conspiracy theorist', which has been a diminishing humiliating label, one to try to avoid if you want to keep in polite society. They internet has changed that a lot though, with almost every single crazy conspiracy theory being proven true - not only true.

Those wacky conspiracy theorists, religious extremists, and racist nazis of yore have turned out to be the most astutely accurate voices in modern history- and still continue to be.

View attachment 1933626

So we've been given another decade until doom? The do this every single year, always doom a spectre just a decade out. I hate these people so much.

 

[NyQuilninja]

They were even openly dog-whistling about the 'new world order' 30 years ago. Its just that they control such a powerful propaganda apparatus that they can force you to ignore reality and suspend all rational thought. Those that didn't kowtow caught the label 'conspiracy theorist', which has been a diminishing humiliating label, one to try to avoid if you want to keep in polite society. They internet has changed that a lot though, with almost every single crazy conspiracy theory being proven true - not only true.

Those wacky conspiracy theorists, religious extremists, and racist nazis of yore have turned out to be the most astutely accurate voices in modern history- and still continue to be.


So we've been given another decade until doom? The do this every single year, always doom a spectre just a decade out. I hate these people so much.

Again conspiracy theorist are not always wrong however they are not always right. There's just a whole lot of crazy to dig though to find a nugget of truth

 

[Drain Todger]

I've gone a bit deeper into my analysis of the whole Charles Lieber nanowire mind control situation and schizoposted about it over on the COVID thread. Let's look at the facts.

1. Charles Lieber was indeed arrested for his undisclosed connections to the Wuhan University of Technology and China’s Thousand Talents plan.
2. Charles Lieber was the recipient of grants from DARPA, NIH, AFOSR, ONR, and MITRE. Over half of those are military. What part of his research were they interested in?
3. Charles Lieber’s manuscripts consistently describe the use of nanotechnology in brain-machine interfaces and incorporating nanotechnology into human or animal tissue, and his nanowire electrodes have been used to examine the brain activity of mice in months-long experiments.
4. Charles Lieber has co-written a paper with Robert Langer. Robert Langer is one of the co-founders of Moderna, the mRNA vaccine manufacturer, and has recently become a billionaire from the sales of their mRNA vaccine. The paper was on the topic of creating 'cyborg' tissue scaffolds based around nanowires. This can be easily confirmed by looking over his sizable body of work.
5. Charles Lieber’s work at the Wuhan University of Technology is a bizarre smokescreen. Allegedly, he was working on silicon nanowire batteries for the Chinese, but none of his colleagues have ever heard of him doing any research with batteries, and all of his nanotech research pertains to bionanotechnology; the blending of living cells with artificial components.
6. Silicon nanowires are biologically inert but electrically conductive, and if coated in cell-penetrating peptides like HIV TAT, they can pass right inside cells and take up residence inside them.
7. An electrically conductive wire can act as an antenna. If it can act as an antenna, it can receive RF induction power. There are papers that describe nanowire inductors and even nanowire back diodes that can harvest RF and turn it into electrical power.
8. 5G base stations are phased-array antennas and they are directional, capable of beaming RF at a single point. They also have a 600 MHz frequency in the bandplan that would allow them to deeply penetrate tissue.
9. Klaus Schwab's books do make mention of transhumanism, of blending man and machine.

There are a lot of problems with the theory, however.

1. If vaccines are indeed to be used as a vector for mind control devices, then how does one taint the vaccines with the nanowires—or any other nanotech—without getting caught? What's to stop someone from placing samples under a scanning electron microscope and seeing for themselves?
2. How can such large quantities of silicon nanowires be produced with the requisite ease? Nanowires are expensive and difficult to make in large quantities and at high purities.
3. How can they achieve the desired effect without triggering unwanted side effects, like seizures?
4. With a project so vast, how does one maintain any level of secrecy?

 

[Lichen Bark]

I've gone a bit deeper into my analysis of the whole Charles Lieber nanowire mind control situation and schizoposted about it over on the COVID thread. Let's look at the facts.

View attachment 1935119

1. Charles Lieber was indeed arrested for his undisclosed connections to the Wuhan University of Technology and China’s Thousand Talents plan.
2. Charles Lieber was the recipient of grants from DARPA, NIH, AFOSR, ONR, and MITRE. Over half of those are military. What part of his research were they interested in?
3. Charles Lieber’s manuscripts consistently describe the use of nanotechnology in brain-machine interfaces and incorporating nanotechnology into human or animal tissue, and his nanowire electrodes have been used to examine the brain activity of mice in months-long experiments.
4. Charles Lieber has co-written a paper with Robert Langer. Robert Langer is one of the co-founders of Moderna, the mRNA vaccine manufacturer, and has recently become a billionaire from the sales of their mRNA vaccine. The paper was on the topic of creating 'cyborg' tissue scaffolds based around nanowires. This can be easily confirmed by looking over his sizable body of work.
5. Charles Lieber’s work at the Wuhan University of Technology is a bizarre smokescreen. Allegedly, he was working on silicon nanowire batteries for the Chinese, but none of his colleagues have ever heard of him doing any research with batteries, and all of his nanotech research pertains to bionanotechnology; the blending of living cells with artificial components.
6. Silicon nanowires are biologically inert but electrically conductive, and if coated in cell-penetrating peptides like HIV TAT, they can pass right inside cells and take up residence inside them.
7. An electrically conductive wire can act as an antenna. If it can act as an antenna, it can receive RF induction power. There are papers that describe nanowire inductors and even nanowire back diodes that can harvest RF and turn it into electrical power.
8. 5G base stations are phased-array antennas and they are directional, capable of beaming RF at a single point. They also have a 600 MHz frequency in the bandplan that would allow them to deeply penetrate tissue.
9. Klaus Schwab's books do make mention of transhumanism, of blending man and machine.

There are a lot of problems with the theory, however.

1. If vaccines are indeed to be used as a vector for mind control devices, then how does one taint the vaccines with the nanowires—or any other nanotech—without getting caught? What's to stop someone from placing samples under a scanning electron microscope and seeing for themselves?
2. How can such large quantities of silicon nanowires be produced with the requisite ease? Nanowires are expensive and difficult to make in large quantities and at high purities.
3. How can they achieve the desired effect without triggering unwanted side effects, like seizures?
4. With a project so vast, how does one maintain any level of secrecy?

If it was a simple matter of injecting people with nanowires, I don't think Elon Musk would be spending so much time developing a machine that bores a hole into your skull and carefully implants electrodes. How the hell would the wires even make it to your brain, the right location, the right neurons..... The real conspiracy to me is how you managed to get a Nvidia 3090 founders edition when you would have better luck finding water in a desert. It's not easy getting things across the blood brain barrier. If you put wires randomly in a persons head then inductively heated them, well, i think there are easier ways of scrambling brains.

So when are we nuking china to the stone age then? They're the number one polluter on earth. Oh wait, its only white WASP countries that need to change.

Until the nations of the world start to dogpile China about their ways, I refuse to listen to any Global Warming talk anyone puts out.

But where to start? Well, in fact, that might be an easier decision to make than one would think. It turns out that about 90 percent of all the plastic that reaches the world's oceans gets flushed through just 10 rivers: The Yangtze, the Indus, Yellow River, Hai River, the Nile, the Ganges, Pearl River, Amur River, the Niger, and the Mekong (in that order).

But yet we banned straws, we saved the planet guys! Source: https://www.dw.com/en/almost-all-plastic-in-the-ocean-comes-from-just-10-rivers/a-41581484 They reference a study in the article. Ninety percent....NINTY. One river dumps 1.5 million metric tons a year into the ocean.

The thing that blows my mind about environmentalism, is that we export most of the manufacturing to other nations with lax regulations, whereas if we kept things here we could have less polluting factories. I hate the "per capita" thing the WEF always throws in your face. The west has a declining population, we don't have a bagillion rural serfs to pad our per capita pollution numbers. What disingenuous cunts. There was a really good comic I saw with Woodsy the Owl (the environmental owl - paraphrasing here) and in the first panes of the comic he's telling the kids "great job kid's we've cleaned up all we can here" and in the next panes he has donned a skull bandana on his mouth and he's holding an AK-47, and he's like "now to clean up the rest". There is an elephant in the room that needs addressing, and nice words probably won't have much effect. If anyone can find that comic, ill give you a sticker, pwomise. It was so good.

 

[DeadFish]

That river of waste. You're willfully ignorant If you look at that and don't realize our technological society is not sustainable.

 

[ArthuriusMartyrius]

The "we have to fix the climate by 2030 or we're all dead" belongs in the list of every other doomsday prediction. How did this meme emerge? It sounds like it's based on a couple of studies and then spun by a PR group attempting to market climate change. It's unequivocally how NOT to convince people climate change is a danger because it smacks of a religious prophecy that like every other attempt to date the end of the world from the Great Disappointment to Heavens Gate to Harold Camping to the 2012 New Age wackos will fail. Raising science to a religion is not how you get the public to believe in science.

Why they would do this I can only suspect evil motives. At first I thought it was an attempt to even further politicize the science so public action on climate change gets done--oil companies get their money, feelgood green stuff gets money, everyone's happy. Maybe it was and still is to a degree. But now I'm convinced the 2030 doomsday prophecy serves that goal, not for the sake of the oil companies but so we can actually make climate change worse. Think of it, the easiest way to make people not give a fuck and oppose anything "green" is to shove it down everyone's throats with a bunch of questionable-sounding moralistic bullshit like the left does. Quite literally the same as with the Chinkflu mask mandates and YOU'RE KILLING GRANDMA propaganda. It just makes me NOT want to do what they say.

Make no mistake, these people WANT climate change and a climate catastrophe just like they wanted a pandemic because "never let a crisis go to waste" is their modus operandi. All of the negative effects of it like wars, refugee crises, they want that because it makes it easy to conduct social engineering on a grand scale and institute and solidify their neofeudal society. It goes without saying a couple of major famines in Africa/Asia or nuclear wars would do wonders in enacting population control. The solutions to fixing climate change already exist or could feasibly be done if we spent the money on that instead of other things the elites love like rigging elections, funding color revolutions, and extreme military spending for forever wars in the sandbox. We don't do that because that's the ace up the sleeve of the global elite, things that will be done right before the chaos they've created with a climate catastrophe gets out of hand and they lose all their money and power. That way they get to save us from the problem they created.

2030 is a convenient date for them too. It gives the sense that we're on the edge of some impending disaster and gives them the legitimacy needed to impose all sorts of restrictions. Remember the talk about climate lockdowns? Exactly. I'd expect this will be used to implement an ever-increasing series of taxes and restrictions on daily life which will be used to decimate anyone but the uppermost classes, destroy businesses, enrich the elite, and break the will of the people to resist by turning us all into a bunch of neurotic, overstressed individuals who will be a great market for Big Pharma.

It's funny 'cause I remember seeing some rando anon on 4chan /x/ once claiming that WW3 will start in 2030. At this point, I'll take it as gospel because 4chan is infested to the brim with glowies pulling predictive programming bullshit on people.

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

Environmentalists are the greatest threat in the world to the environment, and they are all retards.

So many times I have been reading books on environmental economics and it comes up again and again. They are driven entirely by emotion and their half-brained attempts to fix things invariably backfire and make them worse, especially when it comes to land usage. Save the rainforest? Not when we're cutting down acre upon acre of it to grow your fucking ethanol corn and your fucking organic crops.

Environmentalists should be necklaced in Minecraft. The only valuable kind of environmentalism is environmental economics, ie environmentalism where you have to actually quantify and put a dollar price on cause and effect.