Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

TamarYaelBatYah said:
Ideal female beauty in the Renaissance...
Thick... voluptuous...curvey....

View attachment 1935812

View attachment 1935813

For 3 years I refused to come to Kiwi Farms for the very reason you stated: I didn't want to validate it's existence. Then in January of 2020 2 things happened: (a) I was alerted by another "Lolcow" that they were creating new content about me (page 40-ish of this thread). That was when someone on here made a comment about The Torah and (b) The Supreme Court petitions were denied. That is when I had to accept that these threads about me were not going to be removed. I chose to break my silence in defense of my honor and because of the theological aspect presented about righteous cursing. I came to confront the sexism here as well, to expose it for what it is. I believe in confronting dragons, not running from them. Silence only leads to more oppression for women. Not everyone is going to agree with my type of feminism, but that's okay. I'm still going to open my mouth just as black slaves did because they refused to be treated a certain way simply because of the color of the skin. Well, I refuse to be treated a certain way simply because I was born with a vagina.
Click to expand...
>Uses Renaissance paintings to push feminist ideals, complete with rant
>Still censors their bodies with no outside input to do so
Really gets those almonds activating.
You can laugh about people without laughing at them.
Click to expand...
I don't know how the sentence structure of Hebrew works but in the context of your sentence in English, they mean the same thing.
About
At
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Botchy Galoop, Pat Fried Rice and 3 others
TamarYaelBatYah said:
So, by European and Asian standards, I may be considered "fat". In my experience, Asian and European people tend to prefer to be on the scrawny side. I would say the same is true of American (USA) women in large metropolitan cities.

Southern white women, southern African American women, and Hispanic women tend to take more pride in being curvey, voluptuous, and thicker. Same with female boxing athletes and gymnasts who have large bulkier large muscle groups.

I don't think I'm fat, I'm thick. I like my curves and strong muscular arms and thighs which allow me to accomplish all the manual labor I have to do as a SAHM. My muscular arms have also made women think twice before swinging at me.

I'm also plump, which is good, because I breastfeed. You can't sustain ecological breastfeeding being skinny. Those extra 25 pounds that a woman should gain in pregnancy are for breastmilk. About 2 lbs for each month postpartum. At 12 months postpartum, all the extra weight is gone.

Thick women have no problem catching dick either. Don't you know?

"I'm 160 lbs and I can catch a dick whenever I want".


Nah, I have never ghosted a man like that lol


I don't fly in planes.

Virginia has a mutual combat law.

Read what you highlighted again.

"If true..."

And

"There is no evidence..."

I'll wait a minute for the light to turn on in your head
Click to expand...
I'm German, Germans tend to prefer their women a little on the larger side. That being said, you're fat and no one here wants to have sex with you.

Also, during the Renaissance era they didn't know how much damage fat can do to your health. By the way, for every piece of art of some large woman back than, there are paintings of slim women.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Trombonista, Kosher Salt, Viridian and 3 others
TamarYaelBatYah said:
You sure you want to take me on to debate this topic?
Click to expand...
Mel, you have debated biology with us before. You lost. You sure you want to take us on again?
Anyway, want to go back to what we had before? You tell me what your motion will be, and I tell you why you are wrong, you don't change it, and I get proven right. That was fun. Let's do it again
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Viridian, Whale Spotter and B’Elanna
TamarYaelBatYah said:
Ideal female beauty in the Renaissance...
Thick... voluptuous...curvey....

View attachment 1935812

View attachment 1935813




I also don't particularly like all the social media like Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, etc. I believe these are BaMaHs [בָּמָה]. Most people look more to these things than The Torah. Most people meditate more on social media than the word of Elohim. Social media also promotes grandiose narcissism and gives people easy avenues for marital affairs. It spawns evil.

Recently, Facebook has changed their platform lately to become more of a Marketplace rather than a lust fest, which is good. I use Facebook for business reasons to buy used goods/online yard sales. This is s limited use exception I think is okay: platonic business. However, I put limited information to prevent Cyberstalking, unwanted male advances and because I agree that it's an easy avenue for the government to invade your privacy. If the internet was around when the 4th Amendment was written, there would be a provision for a search of your social media.

For 3 years I refused to come to Kiwi Farms for the very reason you stated: I didn't want to validate it's existence. Then in January of 2020 2 things happened: (a) I was alerted by another "Lolcow" that they were creating new content about me (page 40-ish of this thread). That was when someone on here made a comment about The Torah and (b) The Supreme Court petitions were denied. That is when I had to accept that these threads about me were not going to be removed. I chose to break my silence in defense of my honor and because of the theological aspect presented about righteous cursing. I came to confront the sexism here as well, to expose it for what it is. I believe in confronting dragons, not running from them. Silence only leads to more oppression for women. Not everyone is going to agree with my type of feminism, but that's okay. I'm still going to open my mouth just as black slaves did because they refused to be treated a certain way simply because of the color of the skin. Well, I refuse to be treated a certain way simply because I was born with a vagina.

People will inevitably dislike people because of political, religious, and philosophical disagreements. But I am who I am and I have no shame in that.

I also came to this forum to understand the motives and mind of its users.

If the year was 1650, I'd challenge Joshua Moon with a (pistol) duel for attacking my public honor. But now modern society fights with words in courtrooms rather than with swords and pistols.

I think that Kiwi Farms has the potential to be a positive influence in society, but it cannot be that without cleaning up it's content and presenting more dignified journalism. Even comical journalism can be dignified.

You can laugh about people without laughing at them.





Prostitution is against The Torah. The way of YHWH is not the way of the Goyim. Goyim oppress women into prostitution. Hebrew Israelites help women in poverty because they are commanded to in The Torah.

In fact, The Torah is the first woman's rights document ever created. It includes a layout for women's rights to economic provision. Especially fatherless and widowed women. There is no need for women to resort to prostitution or Polygyny in a Torah observant society.
Click to expand...


1613839048583.png

For someone who claims to hate this place you sure do spend alot of time here.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: secret watcher, Trombonista, JustSomeDong and 6 others
TamarYaelBatYah said:
If the year was 1650, I'd challenge Joshua Moon with a (pistol) duel for attacking my public honor. But now modern society fights with words in courtrooms rather than with swords and pistols.
Click to expand...
If this were the year 1650, you'd be getting your ass publicly beaten or executed for being a whore and talking back to men, you would still be married to husband 1/9, and you would barely be literate.

Ok, so there is one similarity.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Prehistoric Jazz, Trombonista, JustSomeDong and 9 others
FencePost said:
>Uses Renaissance paintings to push feminist ideals, complete with rant
>Still censors their bodies with no outside input to do so
Really gets those almonds activating.
Click to expand...
It's actually kind of amazing how ashamed of the female form she is.
Though for an alternate explanation, it's not the forms that she's ashamed of, but how they make her feel.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: ConSluttant, Kosher Salt, Whale Spotter and 3 others
Fannyscum said:
I thought you were a proponent of traditional gender roles?
Click to expand...
So, this term: "traditional". I notice a lot of people use it to mean starting in 1950s. But if you go farther back in history women had more equality in other societies in some ways. Depends on where you start your observations of history

I do believe in masculine and feminine roles, what I do not believe in is female submission. Patriarchy and dominating women solely on the basis of their gender is male narcissism.



RabidWombat said:
That reminds me...

@TamarYaelBatYah HEY TOOTS, what does scripture say about fornication again?
Click to expand...

There's only a few forms of forbidden sex in The Torah. What me to name them?


ChadBrazilian said:
@TamarYaelBatYah 6 children with different fathers shows how much of whore you are.

I feel really bad for the children.
Click to expand...

Same song, different verse.

You're a sexist who is railing at me because I have a blended family that doesn't confirm to Patriarchy.

Btw, read before you type. We already hashed this out on the thread


Pork Fried Rice said:
If this were the year 1650, you'd be getting your ass publicly beaten or executed for being a whore and talking back to men, you would still be married to husband 1/9, and you would barely be literate.

Ok, so there is one similarity.
Click to expand...
That's actually not historically or biblically accurate.

I haven't violated any sexual law of The Torah, so I wouldn't be flogged or stoned.

It's a myth that women in Israelite societies never divorced. And Israelite women were taught to read, as demonstrated by their presence as Priestesses and Prophetesses in The Hebrew Bible.

Now had I lived in a Goyim nation, maybe some of those things would be true. The Goyim have a history of misogyny, sexism and refusing to educate women. But any self respecting woman such as myself would leave a Goy nation and join herself to Israel.




Useful_Mistake said:
Mel, you have debated biology with us before. You lost. You sure you want to take us on again?
Anyway, want to go back to what we had before? You tell me what your motion will be, and I tell you why you are wrong, you don't change it, and I get proven right. That was fun. Let's do it again
Click to expand...
Not on the Shabbat. I can discuss stuff like that after my Shabbat




Karl der Grosse said:
fathered by losers
Click to expand...
Why does it matter who the natural father of a child is?
 
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: secret watcher, Dynamite Ninja, Kosher Salt and 2 others
TamarYaelBatYah said:
That's actually not historically or biblically accurate.

I haven't violated any sexual law of The Torah, so I wouldn't be flogged or stoned.

It's a myth that women in Israelite societies never divorced. And Israelite women were taught to read, as demonstrated by their presence as Priestesses and Prophetesses in The Hebrew Bible.

Now had I lived in a Goyim nation, maybe some of those things would be true. The Goyim have a history of misogyny, sexism and refusing to educate women. But any self respecting woman such as myself would leave a Goy nation and join herself to Israel.
Click to expand...
Last I checked, you are living in a Goyim nation, you fucking sperg. So I'm applying things as they would be in 1650, which would put the Americas under British Rule. Last I checked, Britain did not follow the rule of the Torah at any point in it's history. In addition, you're a fake Jew, who has no chance in hell at any point of getting into Israel as a Jew, so I'm not applying the law of the Torah here, I'm applying the law and societal norm of the time. As the cherry on top, Israel as a nation did not exist in 1650, so no, you couldn't have emigrated there, you retarded sow

So you're completely fucking wrong. Again. As usual.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist, secret watcher, ConSluttant and 5 others
Pork Fried Rice said:
Last I checked, you are living in a Goyim nation, you fucking sperg. So I'm applying things as they would be in 1650, which would put the Americas under British Rule. Last I checked, Britain did not follow the rule of the Torah at any point in it's history. In addition, you're a fake Jew, who has no chance in hell at any point of getting into Israel as a Jew, so I'm not applying the law of the Torah here, I'm applying the law and societal norm of the time. As the cherry on top, Israel as a nation did not exist in 1650, so no, you couldn't have emigrated there, you retarded sow

So you're completely fucking wrong. Again. As usual.
Click to expand...
Not accurate.

Firstly, you don't have to be born Jewish to join yourself to Israel in antiquity. There is nothing in The Torah that says you need a conversion certificate from a Rabbi to join yourself to Israel. Take Ruth for example. She simply followed her deceased husband's father into the land.

Secondly, the United States has NEVER had any such law allowing women to be flogged or beaten for defying Christian standards of sexuality. So even if it was 1650 in the USA, I wouldn't be in danger. A self respecting woman would not be part of Christianity.

Thirdly, the State of Israel is not synonymous with the "Nation of Israel" (YHWH Elohim's people). Even the Haredi agree with that. Elohim's people have existed since Adam and Eve, so you're wrong about that.

Lastly, my grandmother is Ashkenazi, therefore I have the right of Aliyah. Most Ashkenazi Jews can spot me right away.



LoverofPi said:
Garbage in, garbage out. I know you don't actually understand genetics, but a child's biological parents can have just as much effect on them as any adoptive ones.
Click to expand...
Let's go then.

Go ahead, let me hear your theories about ancestral DNA

TamarYaelBatYah said:
father
Click to expand...
*mother
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: secret watcher, Young Ned of the Hill, Dynamite Ninja and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back