Individuals with Werner syndrome have an abnormally slow growth rate, and growth stops at puberty. As a result, affected individuals have short stature and low weight relative to height. By age 25, those with the disorder typically experience early graying (canities) and premature loss of scalp hair (alopecia). As the disease progresses, additional abnormalities include loss of the layer of fat beneath the skin (subcutaneous adipose tissue); severe wasting (atrophy) of muscle tissue in certain areas of the body; and degenerative skin changes, particularly in the facial area, the upper arms and hands, and the lower legs and feet (distal extremities). Due to degenerative changes affecting the facial area, individuals with Werner syndrome may have unusually prominent eyes, a beaked or pinched nose, and/or other characteristic facial abnormalities.
Someone is slowly making their way through the fun house that is "Tranny Sideshows". I just got an upvote on a post from 100 pages back, by a totally new account. It just chuckled me up is all.
Interesting take, biut I don't think she's got something wrong with her physically.
though a few comments back she's already confirmed on Reddit that her face is scarred due to burns. You could see the burns on her hands as well as a few amputated fingers. And hairy part on her face due to grafted tissue.
The scars certainly could be from burns, but I went through her whole Reddit history and did not ever see her confirm that herself. All she says is that she has scars on her face and a large bald spot on top of her head.
[Unrelated side note: it's funny that all these Twitter troons are screaming about Glinner "trawling lesbian dating apps" when he's really copping all of those Her monstrosities directly from this thread courtesy of our very own @garbage cake.]
Interesting take, biut I don't think she's got something wrong with her physically.
though a few comments back she's already confirmed on Reddit that her face is scarred due to burns. You could see the burns on her hands as well as a few amputated fingers. And hairy part on her face due to grafted tissue.
Werner's syndrome is kind of a fast aging genetic disorder. Does she look older than 21? Is she losing hair? Is her skin thin and dry? Is her nose peaky and are her eyes large? Is she particularly short? Does she have flat feet? Does she have finger deformities? These are all signs of Werner's
Not quite a tranny sideshow but relates to the whole gender delusion - delete if inappropriate - but another gem from the sub r/latebloomerlesbians - where straight women who love cock and have husbands somehow convince themselves they are lesbians.
Do these women actually believe the shit they're typing down? I'm a vegan! So what I eat meat occasionally? Doesn't make me any less vegan than you, gatekeeping bigot.
It's interesting that you almost never see this among men, heterosexual men who enjoy having sex with women while claiming to be 100% homosexual, yet it's incredibly common among women nowadays.
I thought the angry troon running the HIM HER account said they were going to ban Glinner. No luck, I guess? These asswipes can't police their own platform and they want to get him banned from SubStack lol
Do these women actually believe the shit they're typing down? I'm a vegan! So what I eat meat occasionally? Doesn't make me any less vegan than you, gatekeeping bigot.
It's interesting that you almost never see this among men, heterosexual men who have sex with women yet claim to be 100% homosexual, yet it's incredibly common among women nowadays.
Because the words women and female now mean nothing, because anyone can be one just by saying so, it makes sense that the word lesbian means nothing as well.
Not quite a tranny sideshow but relates to the whole gender delusion - delete if inappropriate - but another gem from the sub r/latebloomerlesbians - where straight women who love cock and have husbands somehow convince themselves they are lesbians.
Do these women actually believe the shit they're typing down? I'm a vegan! So what I eat meat occasionally? Doesn't make me any less vegan than you, gatekeeping bigot.
It's interesting that you almost never see this among men, heterosexual men who enjoy having sex with women while claiming to be 100% homosexual, yet it's incredibly common among women nowadays.
I think the idea that men are too inhibited in regards to their feelings is kind of a myth.
Like the typical way it's framed is that men are artificially pressured not to cry (just one example). But there's actual physiological reasons why males cry less than women. Higher levels of testosterone and lower levels of prolactin make it harder for men to cry. I don't think your average man needs to be shamed into not crying. (Though perhaps the outliers, more naturally sensitive men, get shamed about crying.)
I think men have different emotional needs than women. They don't feel some emotions as intensely as women, specifically due to testosterone. FtMtF detransitioners report that T blunted their emotions (also made them more ragey).
The approach of "letting it all out and having a cry" (or similar exhibitions) isn't useful to men because they have different needs, not necessarily because they're suppressing things.
To bring this back around to trannies: I first encountered that article on twitter where the author was posting in some big tranny thread. I'm paraphrasing, but he said something about how at his school, the troon menace had shown up to integrate locker rooms. So what he and his buddies did was they cleared out the men's locker room and let any females use it. They guarded the door to keep males out. It's really a brilliant approach because what are the troons gonna do, start demanding access to the men's room again?
And if only when the troons threw their hissy fit about not having unrestricted access to women would people see the light... but God knows people with their heads in their asses wouldn't see it.
Not quite a tranny sideshow but relates to the whole gender delusion - delete if inappropriate - but another gem from the sub r/latebloomerlesbians - where straight women who love cock and have husbands somehow convince themselves they are lesbians.
The first mention about ovaries seems like he never had them, but rather was transplanted in later. - But the question arised later as if they could not find the complete ovaries in subsequent surgeries. This assume that it was never completely transplanted in the first place or his body 'rejected' it and started to degrade somehow.
Kidney issues were presumably true, - However it is questionable if Elbe's death has absolutely nothing to do with the operation at all. See the word 'Andreas in the book, Lili Elbe to us'. Seems like the writer supported the trans narrative and believe that the operation should not go wrong and may wished to blame the failure on something already existing in him. His relatives may wanted to respect his wish and perhaps 'delusion' is succinct - Remember that not everyone has any in-depth medical knowledge and even doctors themselves made mistakes so often (medical mistakes were barely represented in mainstream sentiment and there's a lot of white lies in medical field)
The disjoint between how he acted in the clinic and another place just seem like a classic troon behaviour to me, to seem good in front of professionals.
I added the (Lili Elbe to us) - just that part, not the Andreas part. just so ppl that don't know all the different names of Elbe in relation to this narrative.
Your point still stands though. The book was a narrative based on fact, i guess.
I am sorry if anyone thinks that skewed the information, i should have made that clearer. All of the text is untouched aside from that little change i made for readers of this forum that don't know!
I added the (Lili Elbe to us) - just that part, not the Andreas part. just so ppl that don't know all the different names of Elbe in relation to this narrative.
Your point still stands though. The book was a narrative based on fact, i guess.
I am sorry if anyone thinks that skewed the information, i should have made that clearer. All of the text is untouched aside from that little change i made for readers of this forum that don't know!
The woman has peach fuzz from many years of eating disoders. She is underdeveloped from chronic malnutrition, and her skin has lost collagen and become brittle.
Not everyone gets to be Ashley with level cap on lich mastery.
Where are the happy trannies? If they exist and are simply staying off SM, maybe the rest of the mardy glitter family needs to do the same & see if it makes them enjoy life a tiny bit?
I think the idea that men are too inhibited in regards to their feelings is kind of a myth.
Like the typical way it's framed is that men are artificially pressured not to cry (just one example). But there's actual physiological reasons why males cry less than women. Higher levels of testosterone and lower levels of prolactin make it harder for men to cry. I don't think your average man needs to be shamed into not crying. (Though perhaps the outliers, more naturally sensitive men, get shamed about crying.)
I think men have different emotional needs than women. They don't feel some emotions as intensely as women, specifically due to testosterone. FtMtF detransitioners report that T blunted their emotions (also made them more ragey).
The approach of "letting it all out and having a cry" (or similar exhibitions) isn't useful to men because they have different needs, not necessarily because they're suppressing things.
To bring this back around to trannies: I first encountered that article on twitter where the author was posting in some big tranny thread. I'm paraphrasing, but he said something about how at his school, the troon menace had shown up to integrate locker rooms. So what he and his buddies did was they cleared out the men's locker room and let any females use it. They guarded the door to keep males out. It's really a brilliant approach because what are the troons gonna do, start demanding access to the men's room again?
PL to make an illustration. Sperge about complexities in regards to crying, socialization.
I've noticed, at least in the past as a girl growing up and as a young woman, my reaction to anger/frustration would often be tears. Sisters and there women I've known claimed the same phenomenon happened to them.
It's totally taboo to display "anger" as a girl in many cultures, so it doesn't shock me at all that women might be more likely to cry instead of throw shit/punch faces when they're angry. I think it's often a reaction to complete helplessness/hopelessness.
Example, if an older sibling taunted me, I was forbidden from being a "tattle tale", and yet I was also forbidden from defending myself. Result? Since I couldn't hit, punch, yell or get revenge (incidentally the reaction many toddlers might exhibit before they're "trained" to be nice girls), I cried. Since my parents demanded that I be "a nice girl who smiles and turns the other cheek at all times", I had no outlet for my rage. I encountered this over and over again, so I cried a lot. Then I got shit for "being manipulative" for crying, and as a kid you learn fast that crying makes one a bully magnet, interferes with school, etc-- so I somehow curbed this habit well before middle school.
In terms of boys I've seen growing up, I've often seen parental figures ridicule them mercilessly for tears. Many people have amnesia when it comes to little boys, forgetting that as young children they will always cry over silly things. They'll accost a three year old boy for crying when his favorite toy breaks, but that's totally normal for a kid that age. You give them a hug and help them fix it, maybe use it as a teaching lesson about being super careful with one's possessions. People who have no patience for this will knee kick call their sons "sissy cry babies" for normal crying. People need to keep in mind what's considered age-appropriate behavior before they ridicule their kids for tears over "silly things". Doesn't surprise me if "lashing out in anger" is the response many boys and men make in terms of sadness.
Coddling crying isn't always a good thing, though. Like I said, I often think crying is a reaction to hopelessness/helplessness. I think some people are infantilized while growing up, and are indirectly encouraged to cry when they're frustrated rather than to remain calm and solve their own problems in that way. They are never taught past that crybaby whiny toddler age to remain calm and figure things out. Example, some of the munchie moms on this site encourage their kids to "waif out" and cry and whine for help on social media, rather than figure out problems for themselves as independent people. Munchie moms want their kids to keep crying, because they want helpless babies to take care of. It's hard to explain what it's like to have a mother like that unless you've experienced it first hand.. you get rewarded for regressive behavior, but are punished when you act in more mature ways.
Unfortunately, I think more and more parents (at least in the US) are encouraging their kids to "waif" as of late, regardless of sex. This is a bad thing to me, as outside of crying due to grief, extreme loss, etc. or appropriate circumstances, it can attract negative attention to oneself. Crying makes one appear vulnerable, which will attract abusive/exploitive people (like school geek/prison bitch phenomenon). Crying sometimes makes one appear psychologically unstable, which can be problematic in a number of situations (work, school, relationships).
Crying will often coincide with poor choices in terms of behavior/reaction to things-- and many people in jobs that are emotionally taxing, including women who consider themselves to be "emotional", know this. Nurses, who often embody the female care-giver stereotype, manage to keep stone-cold facades while working... crying over every death or major health catastrophe negatively impacts their ability to function on the job. (Would you rather have a sobbing blubbering hand holding nurse taking care of your dying parent, screwing up medication dosages/unable to calmly communicate with the physicians, or the stone cold nurse who does everything in an accurate and timely manner?) Nurses often seem to learn how to contain their crying to a more appropriate time and place if they must. Teachers, who quite often see some horrendous shit and are exposed to horrendous abuse during their time teaching, also manage to contain their emotions when they are upset. Those who don't manage to succeed at this often wind up being penalized professionally, develop a poor reputation.
The way in which some of these troons act as if women spend most of their waking hours sobbing is ridiculous. It's impossible to maintain normal relationships, function at school, or hold a job if you blubber every day over nothing. If their HRT is making them behave like this, they need to get their doses tweaked ASAP. The only time I can remember a short crying jag that I KNOW was triggered directly by hormones was when I happy-cried two days after my kid was born.
It's interesting that you almost never see this among men, heterosexual men who enjoy having sex with women while claiming to be 100% homosexual, yet it's incredibly common among women nowadays.
Some of the gay guys I work with seem to be having issues dating as of late. They're both young, attractive, have excellent degrees... they're "underemployed" but have decent enough jobs considering their ages. These guys I know seem to want actual relationships, but I think they often encounter men their age (millennial) who flake out on them in terms of their sexuality. I get this sense there are an increasing number of young men who claim to be queer for "woke points" when they actually aren't.
I think for a very small percentage of trannies, maybe transitioning does help them somewhat. But at the same time, if they regret it, you almost never hear about it, especially if they've gone through all the surgeries. It also seems that if they've gone through all the surgeries and have spent years living as a tranny, it makes them feel as though it's pointless to detransition. They just sort of seem resigned to their fate, and really, can you blame them? If they decide to detransition, that means another change of identity and you have to admit to yourself and others that you were wrong and made a mistake. How can you go through the world as a man again when you have a hole in your body instead of a dick., and manboobs or implants? How are you supposed to be a female again when you've got a beard, no breasts, body hair everywhere, a deepened voice, and you've removed all your internal sexual organs and removed your vagina and have a "micro penis" or "flesh tube" complete with fake balls? Not to mention you've already spent thousands of dollars to get all these surgeries, and you're looking at spending even more trying to fix it all, but even that isn't feasible, because well...we can't really fix it.
This is probably a huge factor in why trannies are more prone to kill themselves after SRS. You're not the opposite sex, and while you're still your birth sex, you look nothing like it anymore, so you're stuck in a limbo. And let's not forget that even the butchers that do SRS don't even have an idea of how to really fix their own surgeries if something goes wrong, and they sure as hell don't want to touch other butcher's patients, because they have no goddamn idea of what that particular surgeon did, so have no way of knowing if they'll actually be able to fix it, or end up making it worse. And if they do attempt to try to correct it, majority of time they just botch it even worse.
This is why the leading experts in gender dysphoria all agree that transitioning shouldn't even be an option, and instead try to get their patients to learn to accept themselves as they are, while also trying to find other causes for their gender dysphoria. But of course, these doctors have been silenced, fired, or called bigots for doing conversion therapy.
It's going to be a messy situation when the backlash against the troon movement finally happens, and people are already starting to push back against it. This will definitely be looked back upon as a dark period in humanity, where experimental surgery and medicine were forced upon innocent children and mentally ill people.
All of this is why I hate how a big argument for the trans rights movement is that this is the similar to gay rights except being extended to more people. Okay. No. No it is not. This is far, far more unsustainable and deranged.
1) Having homosexual urges is inherently much easier to definitively prove. You think you're not straight? Okay, go fuck a member of the same gender and see how it goes. Can you see yourself in a relationship with a person of the same sex? Can you see yourself marrying a member of the same sex? These are all things that you can easily go out and prove that you have the desire to do them. Some people will call themselves bisexual for attention or will experiment in college or something, but it's pretty easy to prove whether these feelings are actually meaningful or not.
Being trans on the other hand, there are multiple different reasons that someone might choose to transition, but we are expected to view all of these reasons as essentially being the same thing and as all equally valid. Personally I do think there are people who would identify as trans in a vacuum, i.e. before the trans movement picked up steam, but it's clear that this is not the main cause of the influx of transitioners nowadays. These reasons include 1) believing it will solve your existing mental illness, 2) The desire to live out a fetish, 3) insecurity about existing as the gender that you actually are, and so on. The problem is that there are clearly multiple reasons for transition, but the current activist movement refuses to meaningfully differentiate between them. It's much harder to mistakenly believe that you're gay than it is to convince yourself that you're trans.
2) If you decide that you're not gay, you can stop dating/fucking the same sex at any time (assuming you didn't get manage to get all the way to marriage under this mistaken belief, which is a highly unlikely occurrence). If you decide that you're not trans however, this can become problematic, especially if you're a young woman who's permanently chopped her tits off under the assumption that her discomfort with them meant that she wanted them gone forever. In this sense I think it might be harder on women as opposed to men, because "top surgery" is much more common for people to get than bottom surgery. At worst, men will be stuck with some moobs. In any case, you're able to stop being gay/bi/whatever without suffering from lasting bodily disfigurements from that phase in your life when you were experimenting with your sexuality.
TL; DR Being trans has a much lower bar to entry and yet far greater consequences then being gay does.
Not quite a tranny sideshow but relates to the whole gender delusion - delete if inappropriate - but another gem from the sub r/latebloomerlesbians - where straight women who love cock and have husbands somehow convince themselves they are lesbians.
Do these women actually believe the shit they're typing down? I'm a vegan! So what I eat meat occasionally? Doesn't make me any less vegan than you, gatekeeping bigot.
It's interesting that you almost never see this among men, heterosexual men who enjoy having sex with women while claiming to be 100% homosexual, yet it's incredibly common among women nowadays.
With some women I think their sexuality does genuinely change over time, so I think a few of them probably aren't bullshitting when they say they aren't attracted to men. But because of this, there's a good chance that they're not going to be a lesbian forever and will end up going back to men eventually. If they do express this kind of "I'm a lesbian but I have sex with men" thing, I don't see why they have to be a lesbian and not just a 20/80 or 30/70 bisexual or something. You can be bisexual and favor one sex over the other, it's not that complicated.
