Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

This is a common misconception. Red blood cells (erythrocytes) do not contain DNA or RNA, they have no nucleus. In their evolutionary history they jettisoned everything that wasn't necessary to carry oxygen and carbon dioxide. During development they have a nucleus but once they mature and before they enter the circulatory system their nucleus is discarded.

View attachment 1940605

View attachment 1940606

(Sherwood, L., & Ward, C. (2019). Human physiology: From cells to systems, p.37.)

The white blood cells (leukocytes) do have nuclei and hence DNA. This is why blood can be used for forensic DNA profiling.

In this regard scientifically illiterate Melinda is more wrong. It is utterly absurd to propose that the spermatozoa in a vagina after ejaculation somehow, magically, make their way into the circulatory system releasing their DNA into plasma. Even if they were to achieve this miraculous act, erythrocytes carry no DNA that will magically interact with DNA released by the spermatozoa that magically made their way through the vaginal mucosa. Further, erythrocytes have no mechanism for incorporating external DNA into themselves. They have no such cellular machinery.

Of the leukocytes, the phagocytes (neutrophils and monocytes) would destroy any DNA they find in plasma. It would be treated as a foreign body.

Melinda's scientific illiteracy is expressed well in her complete ignorance of relative sizes and permeability of physiological components. A DNA molecule -- let alone the head (and tail? I don't know what her fetid little mind is imagining) -- can't cross the vaginal mucosa in the same way that a loaf of bread can't be pushed into the coin slot of a parking meter.

Consider,

View attachment 1940766

View attachment 1940767

(Van Eyk AD, Van Der Bijl P, Moll LM. Physicochemical Characteristics of Molecules and Their Diffusion across Human Vaginal Mucosa. European Journal of Inflammation. May 2008:65-71. doi:10.1177/1721727X0800600203)

A cyclosporin A molecule is 1.6nm x 1.24nm and has a molecular weight (MW) of 1203 Da. Further,

View attachment 1940790

So despite the "chameolonic" ability of cyclosporin A it is barely able to traverse vaginal mucosa even when that mucosa has had the protective epithelium removed.

A human DNA molecule is 2 nm wide and stretched it has a length of 2 m. It has a molecular weight of 2.15 x 10^12 Da.

2.15 x 10^12 Da is many orders of magnitude greater than 1203 Da. It is 9 orders of magnitude larger. A DNA molecule has zero chance of crossing vaginal mucosa. Even on the basis of dimensions rather than MW it can't be done, it's wider than a cyclosporin A molecule..

The notion of a spermatozoon traversing the vaginal mucosa is utterly ludicrous. The head of a human spermatozoon is 5100 nm wide. The human vaginal microbiome includes lactobacilli. Lactobacilli are about 700 nm wide. Lactobacilli would be entering the circulatory system via the vaginal mucosa. This would result in septicemia and the sheer volume of bacteria of the vaginal microbiome entering the circulatory system would produce a quick death.

I'm quite confident that Melinda understands none of the above but nevertheless has an idiotic opinion about it because she is an idiot.

@Sir Dank-a-Lot stated something earlier which bears repeating because it gets to the core of one of Melinda's chief behavioral traits but it can be extended further. Melinda isn't just ignorant, she is meta-ignorant. She is ignorant about her ignorance. She is so ignorant she has no comprehension of the breadth and depth of her ignorance. This is the Dunning-Kruger Effect as others have mentioned. But the Dunning-Kruger Effect doesn't fully capture Melinda. In addition to being profoundly and cripplingly ignorant she is also profoundly and cripplingly stupid. She is an imbecile but her delusional disorder of the grandiose subtype (as defined in the DSM-V) causes her to believe she is a genius. She has repeatedly declared herself to be a genius. She has a "Genius level IQ" she tells us (with random capitalisation) yet she has no understanding of what IQ is, nor how it is measured and she has never sat a professionally administered IQ test. Melinda is so stupid that in proclaiming her intellect she demonstrates repeatedly that she is both meta-ignorant and cretinous. She has also described her moral virtue in similar grandiose terms.

The combination of meta-ignorance and delusional disorder (of the grandiose subtype) is an utterly toxic blend of malignant cognitive and psychopathological trait. Every possible means of escape from her abject ignorance, morally reprehensible behaviour and inveterate idiocy is preemptively blocked. The figurative prison is not only invisible but there is a cherished illusion of expansive freedom, supremely rational action and transcendent virtue. If I believed in divine curses this would meet the criteria of a cruel divine curse. It would be an evil deity that inflicts such stupidity and ignorance on someone and at the same time inflicts another layer of personality flaws that assure that a person stays stupid and ignorant.

All accurate. I probably should have been more clear initially but Mel isn't good with small details and exceptions to rules.
 
I can definitely see how the thread has negative and positive affects. When you talk of being the scapegoat in your family am I right to assume this was when you were a child? Is it still the same now that you are an adult? You can change your own mind but you can’t change other people’s mind for them. Did the family members that treated you that way change, or did you have to cut ties with them? I would agree that there are probably more men than woman posting here, but I also think there are more women than you think. Women can be as aggressive and toxic as men, in fact I think women can hide it better sometimes. When your lawsuit(s) are all done, and you are no longer breastfeeding, what do you see yourself doing in the future? Are you considering going back to school for law, or maybe a career in teaching as you enjoy debates, and writing?
I asked you about how much time you spent on your lawsuits as I am trying to imagine what value your time was, as in how much it is costing you. If your lawsuit was successful what exactly would you gain? I would hope that it isn’t to get your thread removed as it does have some positive value to you. If it is for financial gain, I don’t understand that either as I don’t see Null having much money, he seems to live a modest, nomadic kind of life and any income is put back into this site. From reading your thread I don’t recall you ever seeming to be a materialistic type of person. I am glad you have also found other threads here interesting and feel they had value in that you could learn from it. I am hoping this site and thread can continue and it provides you with some interesting debates, and that it continues to make you laugh.
edit: typing sucks


I have found that you can get a lot more information by asking nicely. Don’t lie and say you were not just a little bit curious about the breastfeeding fedish question, and lesbianism, lol


Speaking of butts, would you say you have a diaper fetish? Asking for a friend.
fuck off, faggot. go back to your baby yoda persona
 
fuck off, faggot. go back to your baby yoda persona
Im not the Lurkness Monster. Stop spreading disinformation Ashley you petulant swine.

@TamarYaelBatYah Do you prefer having your pussy licked like the whole vagina or just the clitoris? Does your clit balloon and get all hard when turned on? When starting out do you like whoever is licking to do it in a slow scooping motion whooshing thru the slit upwards to the bean spot, or just to rapidly "box" against the clit with their tongue.

Why is @Burmese Rice Farmer comic relief to you?

Also, show shithole.
 
You're trying to educate a brick wall. The whole "organic" "inorganic" thing has been hashed out with her before. You won't penetrate her delusions, she's just too retarded.

I remember. I tried hashing it out with her before. I have no expectations Mel will admit she's wrong, but being told she's wrong absolutely has been a berserk button for her in the past, so I think it's worth doing.
 
I remember. I tried hashing it out with her before. I have no expectations Mel will admit she's wrong, but being told she's wrong absolutely has been a berserk button for her in the past, so I think it's worth doing.
Not everything is "right" or "wrong", some things are a matter of opinion.

Other subjects cannot be proven by science, they require religious texts, logic and reason. The folly of modern man is to be overly reliant on finding scientific proof, when religious texts already show the way to be.


This is a common misconception. Red blood cells (erythrocytes) do not contain DNA or RNA, they have no nucleus. In their evolutionary history they jettisoned everything that wasn't necessary to carry oxygen and carbon dioxide. During development they have a nucleus but once they mature and before they enter the circulatory system their nucleus is discarded.

View attachment 1940605

View attachment 1940606

(Sherwood, L., & Ward, C. (2019). Human physiology: From cells to systems, p.37.)

The white blood cells (leukocytes) do have nuclei and hence DNA. This is why blood can be used for forensic DNA profiling.

In this regard scientifically illiterate Melinda is more wrong. It is utterly absurd to propose that the spermatozoa in a vagina after ejaculation somehow, magically, make their way into the circulatory system releasing their DNA into plasma. Even if they were to achieve this miraculous act, erythrocytes carry no DNA that will magically interact with DNA released by the spermatozoa that magically made their way through the vaginal mucosa. Further, erythrocytes have no mechanism for incorporating external DNA into themselves. They have no such cellular machinery.

Of the leukocytes, the phagocytes (neutrophils and monocytes) would destroy any DNA they find in plasma. It would be treated as a foreign body.

Melinda's scientific illiteracy is expressed well in her complete ignorance of relative sizes and permeability of physiological components. A DNA molecule -- let alone the head (and tail? I don't know what her fetid little mind is imagining) -- can't cross the vaginal mucosa in the same way that a loaf of bread can't be pushed into the coin slot of a parking meter.

Consider,

View attachment 1940766

View attachment 1940767

(Van Eyk AD, Van Der Bijl P, Moll LM. Physicochemical Characteristics of Molecules and Their Diffusion across Human Vaginal Mucosa. European Journal of Inflammation. May 2008:65-71. doi:10.1177/1721727X0800600203)

A cyclosporin A molecule is 1.6nm x 1.24nm and has a molecular weight (MW) of 1203 Da. Further,

View attachment 1940790

So despite the "chameolonic" ability of cyclosporin A it is barely able to traverse vaginal mucosa even when that mucosa has had the protective epithelium removed.

A human DNA molecule is 2 nm wide and stretched it has a length of 2 m. It has a molecular weight of 2.15 x 10^12 Da.

2.15 x 10^12 Da is many orders of magnitude greater than 1203 Da. It is 9 orders of magnitude larger. A DNA molecule has zero chance of crossing vaginal mucosa. Even on the basis of dimensions rather than MW it can't be done, it's wider than a cyclosporin A molecule..

The notion of a spermatozoon traversing the vaginal mucosa is utterly ludicrous. The head of a human spermatozoon is 5100 nm wide. The human vaginal microbiome includes lactobacilli. Lactobacilli are about 700 nm wide. Lactobacilli would be entering the circulatory system via the vaginal mucosa. This would result in septicemia and the sheer volume of bacteria of the vaginal microbiome entering the circulatory system would produce a quick death.

I'm quite confident that Melinda understands none of the above but nevertheless has an idiotic opinion about it because she is an idiot.

@Sir Dank-a-Lot stated something earlier which bears repeating because it gets to the core of one of Melinda's chief behavioral traits but it can be extended further. Melinda isn't just ignorant, she is meta-ignorant. She is ignorant about her ignorance. She is so ignorant she has no comprehension of the breadth and depth of her ignorance. This is the Dunning-Kruger Effect as others have mentioned. But the Dunning-Kruger Effect doesn't fully capture Melinda. In addition to being profoundly and cripplingly ignorant she is also profoundly and cripplingly stupid. She is an imbecile but her delusional disorder of the grandiose subtype (as defined in the DSM-V) causes her to believe she is a genius. She has repeatedly declared herself to be a genius. She has a "Genius level IQ" she tells us (with random capitalisation) yet she has no understanding of what IQ is, nor how it is measured and she has never sat a professionally administered IQ test. Melinda is so stupid that in proclaiming her intellect she demonstrates repeatedly that she is both meta-ignorant and cretinous. She has also described her moral virtue in similar grandiose terms.

The combination of meta-ignorance and delusional disorder (of the grandiose subtype) is an utterly toxic blend of malignant cognitive and psychopathological trait. Every possible means of escape from her abject ignorance, morally reprehensible behaviour and inveterate idiocy is preemptively blocked. The figurative prison is not only invisible but there is a cherished illusion of expansive freedom, supremely rational action and transcendent virtue. If I believed in divine curses this would meet the criteria of a cruel divine curse. It would be an evil deity that inflicts such stupidity and ignorance on someone and at the same time inflicts another layer of personality flaws that assure that a person stays stupid and ignorant.
Your posts are wordy, but lack substance. You present a scientific argument as you do a theological one.

I've already posted scientific articles showing that semen crosses vaginal walls.

Most importantly, you lack awareness of a basic scientific principle called "permeable cell membrane". Any substance that remains on a surface for any length of time will infuse into the surface/matter over time. This is why wood rots when you leave water on it. Or why a plastic bottle remains oily after holding olive oil or barbeque sauce. Or why lotion works on skin. It gets absorbed because the cell has a permeable membrane.

Semen left along the vaginal walls of a woman will infuse into her body, immediately, within days, and over time. This is because every cell in every organ in the body, and skin, is a permeable cell membrane. This is why people develop skin cancer from using synthetic lotions, make up and other non-organic chemicals on their body: their skin absorbs it. Cell walls are not solid metal.

Further, it's already been scientifically proven that semen, as well as sperm, contains DNA. It's no different than saliva. All body fluids can carry disease, as well as other contents like DNA.

The Torah has known this long before science ever did. After Adam lay with Chavah he spoke these words: "you are now flesh of my flesh, and bone of my bone". Ejaculation into a female creates the exchange of white blood into the female's body. This is why sex makes a Covenant: blood is exchanged. Isaac did only one thing to marry Rebekah: he lay with her in his tent.


Are you considering going back to school for law, or maybe a career in teaching as you enjoy debates, and writing?

I've abandoned my plans to go back to law school and instead I would like to pursue a PhD in Outdoor Recreation. I would like to be a professor at a University, write philosophical papers about Outdoor Recreation, and publish books about Outdoor Recreation.

For a long time I wanted to have a farm and also go to law school but I realized that I have a passion for academia and am a Scholar at heart. I love writing, books, and the feeling of being at a desk putting my thoughts on paper in the quiet early mornings.


If your lawsuit was successful what exactly would you gain?

Holding Joshua Moon accountable for his actions



Not to mention the common law marriage laws here
Marriage as an institution has decreased in importance as Capitalism and Democracy has emerged and gained strength. Women no longer need marriage for sex or financial resources and men no longer need to marry women to obtain sex and children. In modern times both men and women can find attention, intimate conversation and sex anywhere these days.

The ability to find attention, intimate conversation and sex outside of marriage with such ease is one reason marriages do not last anymore. The majority of people no longer value the sacredness of a Covenant. They'll take a cheap thrills wherever they can find it.

Not that I condone that. I believe that Elohim's ways are Eternal and that keeping sex and emotional intimacy within the context of Covenant is best. This is why I still believe in the principle of marriage.
 
Semen left along the vaginal walls of a woman will infuse into her body, immediately, within days, and over time. This is because every cell in every organ in the body, and skin, is a permeable cell membrane.
Except it literally won't because, as @CyrusKissFanClub said, the head of a sperm is too big to penetrate any boundaries. Are you going to pay him for making him dumb down basic biology knowledge to kindergarten level so you can read it?
Further, it's already been scientifically proven that semen, as well as sperm, contains DNA. It's no different than saliva. All body fluids can carry disease, as well as other contents like DNA.
Yes, and if sperm starts going places it shouldn't or if someone's immune system is overactive, it causes a literal allergic reaction. Google it. "Sperm antibodies" are a thing that exists and causes infertility.
 
Last edited:
Not everything is "right" or "wrong", some things are a matter of opinion.

Other subjects cannot be proven by science, they require religious texts, logic and reason. The folly of modern man is to be overly reliant on finding scientific proof, when religious texts already show the way to be.



Your posts are wordy, but lack substance. You present a scientific argument as you do a theological one.

I've already posted scientific articles showing that semen crosses vaginal walls.

Most importantly, you lack awareness of a basic scientific principle called "permeable cell membrane". Any substance that remains on a surface for any length of time will infuse into the surface/matter over time. This is why wood rots when you leave water on it. Or why a plastic bottle remains oily after holding olive oil or barbeque sauce. Or why lotion works on skin. It gets absorbed because the cell has a permeable membrane.

Semen left along the vaginal walls of a woman will infuse into her body, immediately, within days, and over time. This is because every cell in every organ in the body, and skin, is a permeable cell membrane. This is why people develop skin cancer from using synthetic lotions, make up and other non-organic chemicals on their body: their skin absorbs it. Cell walls are not solid metal.

Further, it's already been scientifically proven that semen, as well as sperm, contains DNA. It's no different than saliva. All body fluids can carry disease, as well as other contents like DNA.

The Torah has known this long before science ever did. After Adam lay with Chavah he spoke these words: "you are now flesh of my flesh, and bone of my bone". Ejaculation into a female creates the exchange of white blood into the female's body. This is why sex makes a Covenant: blood is exchanged. Isaac did only one thing to marry Rebekah: he lay with her in his tent.




I've abandoned my plans to go back to law school and instead I would like to pursue a PhD in Outdoor Recreation. I would like to be a professor at a University, write philosophical papers about Outdoor Recreation, and publish books about Outdoor Recreation.

For a long time I wanted to have a farm and also go to law school but I realized that I have a passion for academia and am a Scholar at heart. I love writing, books, and the feeling of being at a desk putting my thoughts on paper in the quiet early mornings.




Holding Joshua Moon accountable for his actions




Marriage as an institution has decreased in importance as Capitalism and Democracy has emerged and gained strength. Women no longer need marriage for sex or financial resources and men no longer need to marry women to obtain sex and children. In modern times both men and women can find attention, intimate conversation and sex anywhere these days.

The ability to find attention, intimate conversation and sex outside of marriage with such ease is one reason marriages do not last anymore. The majority of people no longer value the sacredness of a Covenant. They'll take a cheap thrills wherever they can find it.

Not that I condone that. I believe that Elohim's ways are Eternal and that keeping sex and emotional intimacy within the context of Covenant is best. This is why I still believe in the principle of marriage.
Kill yourself, fuck pig.
 
Common law marriages have been a thing since ancient Greece and Rome where marriage was just a private agreemnent between two people. Wasn't until the 11th century I believe when they went out and outlawed it for awhile (fuck the Catholic church of that time. Also, fuck British laws that also forbad them. Luckily their colonies didn't have to obey such laws). Even Israel has similar laws put into place.
 
Not everything is "right" or "wrong", some things are a matter of opinion.
Science is not a matter of opinion. Reality exists regardless of what you'd like it to be.

Other subjects cannot be proven by science, they require religious texts, logic and reason. The folly of modern man is to be overly reliant on finding scientific proof, when religious texts already show the way to be.
Hilarious coming from a woman who ignores her own religious texts when they don't say what she wants, then pretends they do say what she wants no matter how ludicrous her alleged "exegesis" is compared to the plain text of her alleged holy book.

Your posts are wordy, but lack substance. You present a scientific argument as you do a theological one.
No he doesn't. You're the one who keeps wanting to ignore science because it doesn't prove what you want the world to be. Then you make up some shit you call your "religion" and claim what you made up somehow disproves science.

I've already posted scientific articles showing that semen crosses vaginal walls.
No peer reviewed scientific article you have posted ever said anything of the kind.

Most importantly, you lack awareness of a basic scientific principle called "permeable cell membrane". Any substance that remains on a surface for any length of time will infuse into the surface/matter over time. This is why wood rots when you leave water on it. Or why a plastic bottle remains oily after holding olive oil or barbeque sauce. Or why lotion works on skin. It gets absorbed because the cell has a permeable membrane.
That's not how reality works. All substances are not permeable to all other substances. Everything about this paragraph is objectively, provably wrong.

Semen left along the vaginal walls of a woman will infuse into her body, immediately, within days, and over time. This is because every cell in every organ in the body, and skin, is a permeable cell membrane. This is why people develop skin cancer from using synthetic lotions, make up and other non-organic chemicals on their body: their skin absorbs it. Cell walls are not solid metal.
That's not how reality works. Semen does not "infuse" into a woman's body, end up in her blood, or alter her own DNA in any way. Everything about this paragraph is objectively, provably wrong.

The Torah has known this long before science ever did. After Adam lay with Chavah he spoke these words: "you are now flesh of my flesh, and bone of my bone". Ejaculation into a female creates the exchange of white blood into the female's body. This is why sex makes a Covenant: blood is exchanged. Isaac did only one thing to marry Rebekah: he lay with her in his tent.
That's not how reality works. Semen does not "infuse" into a woman's body, end up in her blood, or alter her own DNA in any way. Everything about this paragraph is objectively, provably wrong.

I've abandoned my plans to go back to law school and instead I would like to pursue a PhD in Outdoor Recreation. I would like to be a professor at a University, write philosophical papers about Outdoor Recreation, and publish books about Outdoor Recreation.
This will never happen, because you are a crazy retard sucking on the government teat.

For a long time I wanted to have a farm and also go to law school but I realized that I have a passion for academia and am a Scholar at heart. I love writing, books, and the feeling of being at a desk putting my thoughts on paper in the quiet early mornings.
You are as much a scholar as I am Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom.

Holding Joshua Moon accountable for his actions
Null has not done anything to you that warrants any legal action against him. You have failed in every single lawsuit you've filed against him in the past. You will continue to fail in every present or future lawsuit against him. You are a crazy retard with no case.

I'm still waiting for you to cite that (100% imaginary) book that Hugh J. Schonfield (never) wrote that backs up your (100% wrong and outright delusional) theory that all the "real Jews" moved to Scotland.
 
Not everything is "right" or "wrong", some things are a matter of opinion.

Other subjects cannot be proven by science, they require religious texts, logic and reason. The folly of modern man is to be overly reliant on finding scientific proof, when religious texts already show the way to be.



Your posts are wordy, but lack substance. You present a scientific argument as you do a theological one.

I've already posted scientific articles showing that semen crosses vaginal walls.

Most importantly, you lack awareness of a basic scientific principle called "permeable cell membrane". Any substance that remains on a surface for any length of time will infuse into the surface/matter over time. This is why wood rots when you leave water on it. Or why a plastic bottle remains oily after holding olive oil or barbeque sauce. Or why lotion works on skin. It gets absorbed because the cell has a permeable membrane.

Semen left along the vaginal walls of a woman will infuse into her body, immediately, within days, and over time. This is because every cell in every organ in the body, and skin, is a permeable cell membrane. This is why people develop skin cancer from using synthetic lotions, make up and other non-organic chemicals on their body: their skin absorbs it. Cell walls are not solid metal.

Further, it's already been scientifically proven that semen, as well as sperm, contains DNA. It's no different than saliva. All body fluids can carry disease, as well as other contents like DNA.

The Torah has known this long before science ever did. After Adam lay with Chavah he spoke these words: "you are now flesh of my flesh, and bone of my bone". Ejaculation into a female creates the exchange of white blood into the female's body. This is why sex makes a Covenant: blood is exchanged. Isaac did only one thing to marry Rebekah: he lay with her in his tent.
"Lol Goyim science" it is. Nice to know you didn't clean yourself out after your sperm donors nutted in you.
Further, it's already been scientifically proven that semen, as well as sperm, contains DNA. It's no different than saliva. All body fluids can carry disease, as well as other contents like DNA.
Nigger, are you double retarded? Semen is the fluid that contains sperm, which delivers the male's DNA, of course it has DNA in it.
 
Not everything is "right" or "wrong", some things are a matter of opinion.

This is not one of them. Organic has a very specific meaning with regards to chemistry. Additionally, changing a hydrocarbon chain doesn't result in a "synthetic" chemical, it results in a different chemical entirely.

But thank you for once again demonstrating you can never admit to being wrong. It's a handy example.

Other subjects cannot be proven by science, they require religious texts, logic and reason. The folly of modern man is to be overly reliant on finding scientific proof, when religious texts already show the way to be.

You say this while playing mix and match with what religious text you want to follow.

Other people have responsed handily to the rest of this.
 
PhD of Outdoor Rec.
As a person that spends most of her days indoors, retard thrashing on a forum.
I've got money down that she doesn't even know what outdoor rec is.
She wrote an entire book on how to play outside, but I'm pretty sure she hasn't gone outside for more than doctor's visits and grocery runs since her third kid.
 
Back