US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 




if this was Trump, I'd totally get why he'd do it. But with Biden, I'm at a loss.
The only way I see Biden agreeing to this is if behind close doors they require EVERY chip fab to build backdoors for the FBI, CIA, NSA, and local law inforcement. Because he's pro globohomo and doesn't get anything out of letting our allies make chips. I know there's a shortage of chips and everyone is feeling the crunch. But if the Great Reset it to believed, its all apart of the plan.

So I'm just at a loss.

Trump is going to rail hard about Xio Bi Den in his speech on Sunday, and Biden's trying to get ahead of it. I bet in exchange for "setting up supply chains" in America, he'll probably drop the current tariffs on China that were supposed to be part of further trade deals with China. It will be just like the solar industry in 2010, where the US invests in all this solar stuff for Obama cronies, but the product being built can't compete with China's prices so China comes out ahead, the democrats come out ahead with kickbacks, and the US jobs promised don't last if they ever show up.
 
The Britbongs are already trying to do it.

As a faggot I still have probably a decade or two before the pressure becomes significant for gay dudes. I hope by then I will have found a husband to live out our lives together.
You will eat out the hairy man-pussy AND YOU WILL LIKE IT, BIGOT
 
This was the final straw for my dad. They started fucking with Chrysler and that was a line too far for him.
I can't even be surprised by this anymore.
By the way, this is the reason why in modern history we almost never get two straight Republican presidents or two straight Democratic presidents.

The pendulum keeps swinging back and forth. One year ago, the moderates were convinced that they needed to get Trump out of office for the betterment of the country. Now they are realizing that the Democrats are no better. In 4 or 8 years, they will vote fot a Republican because the Democrats sucked. Then in 12 years they will vote Democrat because the Republicans suck.
It feels like the tempo is getting faster and faster.
Apparently no president has as clear a focus on Alzheimer's disease and dementia as Joe Biden. (Forgive me for not archiving right now, but the queues are rather long. I will try to update later).

Tweet / Archive
View attachment 1947209

Source / Archive

View attachment 1947211
President Joe Biden delivers a victory speech outside the Chase Center in Wilmington, Del. on Nov. 7, 2020.
William Bretzger—USA TODAY NETWORK/Sipa USA


Ideas
By Maria Shriver and George Vradenburg
February 24, 2021 8:53 AM EST

Shriver is the founder of the Women's Alzheimer's Movement
Vradenburg is the co-founder of UsAgainstAlzheimer's.

No president has entered the White House with as clear a focus on Alzheimer’s disease as Joe Biden. The commitment and attention on Alzheimer’s at the highest levels of our elected leadership is long overdue.

His pledge during his victory speech on November 7 to create an America that looks ahead to curing diseases like Alzheimer’s was a beacon of hope to 5.8 million Americans, their families and the 16.1 million caregivers currently devastated by a disease that has no cure.

President Biden understands the scope of this slow-moving pandemic, the opportunity, and the consequences of failing to seize the moment. “If we do not find an answer to Alzheimer’s, then in the next 19 years, every single solitary bed that exists in the United States of America now will be occupied by an Alzheimer’s patient,” he said at a campaign stop in Florida last fall. The fact is that Alzheimer’s is already our country’s most expensive disease, and continuing to manage it is more costly than developing a cure.

So where do we start?

First, launch an Operation Warp Speed for Alzheimer’s and other dementias. In the race to fight COVID-19, regulators cut red tape allowing pharmaceutical companies, the NIH and FDA to closely collaborate in an unparalleled way. By providing billions of dollars for development, production and distribution of vaccines, the government was able to incentivize participation in this important public-private partnership. Leveraging this model to combat Alzheimer’s will be critical – especially as the disease is unlikely to be solved with a simple vaccine. Just like in the fight against many forms of cancer and HIV/AIDS, incremental innovations must build on each other to deliver better treatments – as we strive toward a cure – step by step. As a recent editorial in Lancet Neurology put it, “regulators must find a way to allow access to potentially life-extending therapies while both scientific rigor and the safety of patients are maintained.”

The goal is to get treatments to patients who desperately need them. If a promising therapy is safe, patients deserve access. The suffering of millions of Americans cannot wait for a “best-in-class” breakthrough; they need “first-in-class” treatments that spark new innovations and draw greater resources and scientific attention to the cause.

Second, make greater investments in research. Every 65 seconds an American develops Alzheimer’s, about two-thirds are women, and the numbers even higher for communities of color. Addressing the realities behind these grim statistics demands resources. And while independent research plays a role in our fight against this disease, bipartisan support for government funding remains a key component. This is why the recommendation by the Trump Administration to cut funding to health and science agencies would have been catastrophic.

We are now counting on President Biden’s leadership. Within his first few months in office, Biden can and should lean on the power that comes with the office, and follow through on his promise of $300 billion to promote research and development, including $50 billion for the NIH to find cures for Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, cancer and diabetes. We know that presidential action, when coupled with bipartisan support, can lead to historic and seismic change.

Third, push global leaders to step up the fight against Alzheimer’s. During the Obama Administration, health ministers from the G7 nations announced a global “ambition to identify a cure or a disease-modifying therapy for dementia by 2025.” Seven years later, no G7 country has yet approved a disease-modifying therapy. As part of his commitment to rejoin global efforts and work with partner nations to address key goals, Biden should put the fight against Alzheimer’s back on the global agenda. With an estimated 50 million people worldwide living with Alzheimer’s and other dementias, we cannot afford not to.

We need to educate every generation about the risk factors for dementia, an effort that could prevent or delay 40% of dementia cases. Action is essential – longer life spans promise a rolling wave of Alzheimer’s cases that will threaten to bankrupt health care systems in even the wealthiest countries.

America has successfully mobilized to counter great threats or seize great opportunities many times in the past. Most recently we have seen this effectively done in California, with Governor Newsom’s commitments in the state budget, providing substantial support for the bold recommendations recently delivered by the Task Force on Alzheimer’s Prevention, Preparedness, and the Path Forward, including the creation of a senior advisor on Aging, Disability and Alzheimer’s and the investment of millions of dollars to standardize care, fund research and implement other aggressive actions to defeat Alzheimer’s disease.

Launching a new Operation Warp Speed for Alzheimer’s and dementia will save millions of lives, bring economic relief to families nationwide and re-establish global leadership in the fight against this terrible disease.

Today, there can hardly be a more noble mission than helping America – and the world – usher in a new era of healthy aging by re-engaging and re-committing to the defeat of Alzheimer’s.
:thinking:
Phrasing.
...does he not realize how easy it is to get a pack of disposable masks off the shelf at your local pharmacy?

Perhaps he's going to send out N95s...
Unless it is the counterfeit masks we got from China.
Cutting medicare? Gotta go look that up.




if this was Trump, I'd totally get why he'd do it. But with Biden, I'm at a loss.
The only way I see Biden agreeing to this is if behind close doors they require EVERY chip fab to build backdoors for the FBI, CIA, NSA, and local law inforcement. Because he's pro globohomo and doesn't get anything out of letting our allies make chips. I know there's a shortage of chips and everyone is feeling the crunch. But if the Great Reset it to believed, its all apart of the plan.

So I'm just at a loss.
Because by the time those facilities get built this crisis will have passed and China will be producing again. Or Kamala cancels it.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
By the way, this is the reason why in modern history we almost never get two straight Republican presidents or two straight Democratic presidents.

The pendulum keeps swinging back and forth. One year ago, the moderates were convinced that they needed to get Trump out of office for the betterment of the country. Now they are realizing that the Democrats are no better. In 4 or 8 years, they will vote fot a Republican because the Democrats sucked. Then in 12 years they will vote Democrat because the Republicans suck.
At this point, I have to blame moderates more than the commies. Instead of saying "I don't like Trump, but political violence is not acceptable period," they went full Orange Man Bad and proved their sheeple-ness. Commies are violent idiots, but they have conviction which is not something I can say out of Moderates. They just cower when decisions have to be made and pretend they're wise doing it.
 
I don't see the incentive for Democrats to nuke anyone.
1- You've spent decades dragging Harry Truman for using them and use it as a main talking point in explaining why America is so awful.
2- They will lose international support instantly, and I doubt their media allies will be able to mitigate that big of a shit storm.
3- The green team doesn't even like nuclear energy, even though it's their dream power source.
4- It will drive an even bigger wedge between the democrats and the military, and the democrats view the military as dogs. If they upset them too much, they'll get a hand bit.
5- Dropping traditional bombs indiscriminately kills just as many civilians as a nuclear strike would over time, but since it's a slow tally, it's easier to excuse.
6- The cost of one big ass bomb is less than the cost of hundreds of thousands of small bombs. It's more profitable for the military industrial complex, campaign donors, and lobbyists.
7- The chance for nuclear retaliation would be extremely high, and Russia isn't pointing those things at Oklahoma. Government and military targets are highest priority.

I'm guessing their desire for control of the nuclear strike process is having a tool for intimidation and leverage. They know shooting is a bad idea, but they feel better being the one holding the gun. That, or they legitimately think US nukes will be used against them somehow. That jives with their rhetoric. They don't trust the military at all, and they're the ones that constantly say that the 2nd amendment is pointless for removing a tyrant from power because the government would just start nuking them.
I don't necessarily disagree, but I feel like you're applying too much logic to senile politicians and politically chosen generals.
 
Connecting to the LGBT bullying, this is the current state of politics infused with Tik Tok cancer. First it's some congresswoman trying to dunk on MTG:

Screenshot_2021-02-24 Congresswoman Marie Newman on Twitter(1).png




Credit to MTG, she punches back like Trump did:

Screenshot_2021-02-24 Raheem Kassam ( RaheemKassam) Twitter(1).png





Going by how liberal neighbors act to politicians, MTG will be tackled by one of her congress neighbors walking down the hall and then lose a piece of her lung.

A twitter person made a point that stood out; what flag did the congresswoman remove to put the tranny flag up? I bet it was a US flag.
 
Connecting to the LGBT bullying, this is the current state of politics infused with Tik Tok cancer. First it's some congresswoman trying to dunk on MTG:

View attachment 1947975

View attachment 1947971

Credit to MTG, she punches back like Trump did:

View attachment 1947977


View attachment 1947973

Going by how liberal neighbors act to politicians, MTG will be tackled by one of her congress neighbors walking down the hall and then lose a piece of her lung.

A twitter person made a point that stood out; what flag did the congresswoman remove to put the tranny flag up? I bet it was a US flag.
cross post

1614218017502.png
 
The Britbongs are already trying to do it.

As a faggot I still have probably a decade or two before the pressure becomes significant for gay dudes. I hope by then I will have found a husband to live out our lives together.
Bro it's all good. Women are fucking crazy anymore. If it doesn't work out in a decade or two I'll gay marry you and we can suck dicks and shoot guns out at our own little Ram Ranch.
 
The one positive I take from Trump losing the election is that I think it's more likely now for normies and undecideds to see what the left is REALLY like. If Trump was still in office, it would just be four more years of Orange Man bad.

People aren't swallowing the red pills yet, but Biden is sure as shit giving them out.
The real question is which side can approach them first: the left or the right. And if it's the Twitter crowd or the /pol/-The Donald.win people are doing the talking.
:thinking:Hmmm... CA and NY being nuked in "retliation" Let me think about that one. We'd probably get rid of Baltimore and Wash DC too.
Connecting to the LGBT bullying, this is the current state of politics infused with Tik Tok cancer. First it's some congresswoman trying to dunk on MTG:

View attachment 1947975

View attachment 1947971

Credit to MTG, she punches back like Trump did:

View attachment 1947977


View attachment 1947973

Going by how liberal neighbors act to politicians, MTG will be tackled by one of her congress neighbors walking down the hall and then lose a piece of her lung.

A twitter person made a point that stood out; what flag did the congresswoman remove to put the tranny flag up? I bet it was a US flag.
What are the odds that this MTG chick will be POTUS hopeful in the future? I get the feeling that with Trump gone, there are people with his platform that makes them wish Trump was back tweeting.
 
At this point, I have to blame moderates more than the commies. Instead of saying "I don't like Trump, but political violence is not acceptable period," they went full Orange Man Bad and proved their sheeple-ness. Commies are violent idiots, but they have conviction which is not something I can say out of Moderates. They just cower when decisions have to be made and pretend they're wise doing it.
The one nice thing I can say about Antifa is that they have been consistent in their rhetoric and policies this whole time. No speaking out of both sides of their mouths with them.
 
I don't necessarily disagree, but I feel like you're applying too much logic to senile politicians and politically chosen generals.
Fair enough, but I always preach the self-preservation principal when people start talking about nuclear threats. Same thing with Kim Jong-un. Dude is a crazy narcissist and arguably evil, but he doesn't want to die. Whoever is responsible for the first unprovoked nuclear attack will be weighing down a rope within the week. Once they're senile enough to not care if they live or die, then I'll worry.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
At this point, I have to blame moderates more than the commies. Instead of saying "I don't like Trump, but political violence is not acceptable period," they went full Orange Man Bad and proved their sheeple-ness. Commies are violent idiots, but they have conviction which is not something I can say out of Moderates. They just cower when decisions have to be made and pretend they're wise doing it.
Let's just hope that Antifa doesn't boot up Minecraft soon. They got tons of water carriers and ball washers since they've made it no secret they're going after what's been deemed "the right targets".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
Fair enough, but I always preach the self-preservation principal when people start talking about nuclear threats. Same thing with Kim Jong-un. Dude is a crazy narcissist and arguably evil, but he doesn't want to die. Whoever is responsible for the first unprovoked nuclear attack will be weighing down a rope within the week. Once they're senile enough to not care if they live or die, then I'll worry.
Doesn't half of congress have Alzheimer's prescriptions?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back