Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

@Rekkington Interesting idea.

Funnily enough, gay men have BTFO'd troons HARD. Like in ways that women could never without their lives being ruined. The maleness has been activated and whining gender-specials being told "NO" by another full-ass male is fucking hilarious. A lot of gay men seeing Grindr or whatever sites infiltrated by troonery are now empathizing with lesbians and actually are able to 1 v 1 retards with no social repercussions. I hope more scrotes publicly shame this pedo
First off: No social repercussions? Gay men aren't that high on the oppression hierarchy. I'm not a fan of Buttigieg, but for many progressives he was no different from a cis-het white guy. Glenn Greenwald was accused of colonializing brown bodies because his boyfriend is from Brazil. Furthermore there are still enough gay men who blindly follow any man in a dress. Subversive gay culture was itself subverted in the 90's when the whole "you have to include us in any instutition, or you're a biggot!" circus really begun. Now gay men are as boring and uncreative as your average straight person and we'll probably never hear of gay designers again who made fascist fashion for women, since women now think they can make their own dresses (they can't).

And the mainstreaming of troonerism shouldn't surprise anyone. I know that everoyne has his/her/its theory for the sudden explosion of troons. The culprit is industrialization, as I've pointed out before. Industrialization and capitalism disrupted all old traditions that were built to help humans to live in a civilization in harsh conditions. I&C made life much more comfortable and in the spirit of the enlightenment old traditions and norms were questioned as harshly as probably never before. Some traditions of course became useless in an industrialized society, but the questioning became a juggernaut that wants to destroy anything that is old. Troons aren't new and were known in many different cultures under different names. The difference is that their behaviour was ritualized and they had to upheld their own troon laws (in Greece, for example, you had to become a kind of priestess). Modern western troons, on the other hand, don't have to follow any rules. They only exist to disrupt. What they don't realize is that without ritualized behaviour society can easily turn against them again if things get tough. Gay men and lesbians will face the same issue if they can't signal to society that they fulfill a certain niche role, as they did in many different cultures in different times.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There's no difference. Both need to realize men protect them and distancing themselves and harming men is destructive to them.
There absolutely is a difference. You're not going to get radical feminists to agree with that they need to be protected by men, but liberal feminists will absolutely agree while they still insult men. The difference between radical feminists and liberal feminists is radfems don't give a shit what men think. Liberal feminists are the ones that think you can teach men not to rape and wear male tears shirts while acting surprised that men think they're misandrist.
 
i'd appreciate it if people stopped multipara politisperging about how feminism is bad or good and focus on the diaper troon.
people will disagree on specifics. we have right wing and left wing people here with varying beliefs. but that isn't the point, is it.
I can't imagine the LGBT and Feminist communities not being front and center in this whole thing, it's going to come up at every level of this. It might require more aggressive modding I guess, but pretty much everyone here is just waiting to see what mainstream queers are going to do with this.
 
Devastatingly cute, Bill.
View attachment 1950173
Feeling cute, might delete this later:
73C53428-155C-4F14-BD23-060CA9108025.jpeg
 
I can't imagine the LGBT and Feminist communities not being front and center in this whole thing, it's going to come up at every level of this.
my point is that some people have personal pet peeves about lgbt or feminism, or personal defenses of various aspects of lgbt or feminism, that have little to nothing to do with the topic at hand (pedophile infiltration and them getting away with it).

i think those side conversations would be better in the general trans thread or whatever feminism discussion thread there is.
(i.e. the ones about feminists being hypocrites for rejecting men that could protect them, or whatever. that is irrelevant here)
 
There absolutely is a difference. You're not going to get radical feminists to agree with that they need to be protected by men, but liberal feminists will absolutely agree while they still insult men. The difference between radical feminists and liberal feminists is radfems don't give a shit what men think. Liberal feminists are the ones that think you can teach men not to rape and wear male tears shirts while acting surprised that men think they're misandrist.
Women are overgrown children who rely on men to uphold civilization. It doesn't matter how radical you are, if a group of men decide your feminist book club is now the feminist being raped club you're not able to prevent it. Transexuals have beaten you at your own game and proven it. Now lesbians have to take a dick or be outed from lesbian circles circles. If instead they let men protect them they could avoid all the dickings they're having forced on them as long as the men got to watch them kiss while drunk once in a while.

I can't imagine the LGBT and Feminist communities not being front and center in this whole thing, it's going to come up at every level of this. It might require more aggressive modding I guess, but pretty much everyone here is just waiting to see what mainstream queers are going to do with this.
It's the classic no true Scotsman with feminists. They have played the same card every time their schemes blow up in their face.
 
an innocent drawing of a baby in a diaper is one thing, saying you draw this stuff cuz you have a fetish for it is another.
If you see anyone drawing a baby in a diaper and they are the singular focus of the piece, call the police on yourself after burying them in folding chairs.
 
my point is that some people have personal pet peeves about lgbt or feminism, or personal defenses of various aspects of lgbt or feminism, that have little to nothing to do with the topic at hand (pedophile infiltration and them getting away with it).

i think those side conversations would be better in the general trans thread or whatever feminism discussion thread there is.
(i.e. the ones about feminists being hypocrites for rejecting men that could protect them, or whatever. that is irrelevant here)
It's related to the topic at hand because it's what we're seeing happen here. We have a sexual predator bullying women into getting access to kids. The transmaidens are covering for a guy photoshopping children into porn images to masturbate to. The conversation moved to how sexual predators are able to infiltrate female groups and get access to children/women to abuse. The drama has drown beyond the one person being a pedo, it's now about the response we're seeing and the consequences of the reaction
 
yes there is.

an innocent drawing of a baby in a diaper is one thing, saying you draw this stuff cuz you have a fetish for it is another.

anything can be fetishized in this day of age cuz of the internet. context matters.
how many adult men draw more than one image of babies in diapers with no ulterior motive? what are you talking about?
it's the volume. there is no other possible conclusion when someone does that, unless said person is an animator on rugrats.
...actually not even then, one of the people who worked on rugrats did some pedo storyboard on their own time lmao.
 
You're talking about two different groups. Radical feminists don't want to be included in male spaces - they want to have spaces for themselves because they see men as dangerous.
I generally agree with radical feminists, and think liberal feminists are idiots. Radical feminists are far more likely to be biological essentialists and realize there are actual vital differences between males and females, and realize they need to defend themselves.

The refusal to admit these biological differences has left the third wave of feminism unable to defend itself from a wave of violent male rapists who have literally just declared themselves female in outright revolt against reality.
 
Assuming everything is sexual is of course a stupid stance, but thats not what is going on here.

The drawings Labelle did were part of an online identity where they placed themselves among tons of people who have sexual diaper kinks. A child in a diaper on it's own is not sexual no, but when you posted a traced photo of a baby you did as a puppy in the context that you're a diaperfur following other degenerates the debate ends. There is no point in trying to blame the people pointing out that this is a fetish for sexualizing something innocent, because that is not the context here. Perhaps in other settings you could do your mental gymnastics but they are wasted here and you're honestly just making yourself look like a predator doing it.
 
It's not that surprising, many trans people despise Labelle and everything they stand for. I found out about Assigned Male through a trans man friend of mine who ranted about how horrible AM is and how much he hated Labelle.
 
These fucks refuse to even consider that wearing cummy diapers and trying to assimilate with the kids on the playground isn't a healthy coping mechanism in the first place.
If your goal is to heal from abuse why would you roleplay as yourself in the position you were in when you were abused, on a daily basis.
It's like Tumblr never left, cause this same excusal of disgusting "kinks" was constantly being spewed by creeps residing there.
 
I went to see if their fur affinity is any worse and it turned out to be the case. Horrifically, I found out that he watched an account that has fetish art of baby furries getting their rears abused. (:_( It looks like he took inspiration from some of the artists too.

View attachment 1949029View attachment 1949030View attachment 1949031


Please. Labelle may have not drawn anything to the extreme with this (yet), but his entire following is enough proof that he does use ABDL as personal coomer material than a “lifestyle” he just bullshitted about. Its not only ABDL he is into either. He gets off to more weirder shit too!

EDIT: Fur Affinity Following!

Yeah, no. Fuck this troon! This is beyond grotesque that I’m already feeling sick and angry looking at this crap.
 
Last edited:
how many adult men draw more than one image of babies in diapers with no ulterior motive? what are you talking about?
it's the volume. there is no other possible conclusion when someone does that, unless said person is an animator on rugrats.
...actually not even then, one of the people who worked on rugrats did some pedo storyboard on their own time lmao.
yes in this case it is pedo fodder. i was on about generally. nobody draw this much clear as day cp. i was talking about one off cases and thats it. this isnt a one off case.
 
Back