Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

Assuming everything is sexual is of course a stupid stance, but thats not what is going on here.

The drawings Labelle did were part of an online identity where they placed themselves among tons of people who have sexual diaper kinks. A child in a diaper on it's own is not sexual no, but when you posted a traced photo of a baby you did as a puppy in the context that you're a diaperfur following other degenerates the debate ends. There is no point in trying to blame the people pointing out that this is a fetish for sexualizing something innocent, because that is not the context here. Perhaps in other settings you could do your mental gymnastics but they are wasted here and you're honestly just making yourself look like a predator doing it.
Labelle himself called it a kink.
Ah yes, hoping to get the thirsty chasers to white knight him. Sorry, Waffles, everyone knows you’re a big fat man now. The days of pretending to be a teenage futa trap are behind you.
 
I came here because I read about Rhys and I got really pissed off at how he cheated. I think it was his NBC Op-ed that really got me angry. I didn't care about what the women he cheated, just how smug and vile he was about it. I wasn't being a misogynist, it just wasn't on my radar. I had guy stuff to worry about.

Now after spending a year hear lurking and later posting I see the need to protect women's spaces. I would even go so far as to say that I see the constructive good in feminism now. Thanks, troons! You took a beer drinking F150 red state gun guy and turned him into an admirer of feminism. I don't know how to feel about that but I think it's probably a good thing. Progress even.

Just don't tell the guys; they'll take away my Skoal.
 
1614290957192.png

1614291008353.png

1614291031336.png
 
First off: No social repercussions? Gay men aren't that high on the oppression hierarchy. I'm not a fan of Buttigieg, but for many progressives he was no different from a cis-het white guy. Glenn Greenwald was accused of colonializing brown bodies because his boyfriend is from Brazil. Furthermore there are still enough gay men who blindly follow any man in a dress. Subversive gay culture was itself subverted in the 90's when the whole "you have to include us in any instutition, or you're a biggot!" circus really begun. Now gay men are as boring and uncreative as your average straight person and we'll probably never hear of gay designers again who made fascist fashion for women, since women now think they can make their own dresses (they can't).

And the mainstreaming of troonerism shouldn't surprise anyone. I know that everoyne has his/her/its theory for the sudden explosion of troons. The culprit is industrialization, as I've pointed out before. Industrialization and capitalism disrupted all old traditions that were built to help humans to live in a civilization in harsh conditions. I&C made life much more comfortable and in the spirit of the enlightenment old traditions and norms were questioned as harshly as probably never before. Some traditions of course became useless in an industrialized society, but the questioning became a juggernaut that wants to destroy anything that is old. Troons aren't new and were known in many different cultures under different names. The difference is that their behaviour was ritualized and they had to upheld their own troon laws (in Greece, for example, you had to become a kind of priestess). Modern western troons, on the other hand, don't have to follow any rules. They only exist to disrupt. What they don't realize is that without ritualized behaviour society can easily turn against them again if things get tough. Gay men and lesbians will face the same issue if they can't signal to society that they fulfill a certain niche role, as they did in many different cultures in different times.

History of troonery is rooted in misogyny/homophobia to the extent that Hijra were made to sit on stones to bleed to simulate a period. This was often a solution to homosexuality because they saw homo males as abnormal but let them participate just under different roles because heaven forbid a homosexual male be deemed MALE.

The same thoughts of "men can't be gay or feminine time to troon" is part of the crisis of today. Weirdo misfit autists compare themselves to what they think of as a "man" and fail to realize "man" is just born with Y chromosomal mutation. So they think "hm im not a living stereotype so i must be a woman". Note how a lot of troons who don't chase irl lesbians end up in weird hugbox mtf orgys amongst themselves because they're totally not gay or degenerate perverts and agp diaper pedo shit is #justgirlythings now.

Inventing genders to make up for personality quirks, degenerancy, or any nuances is dumb and the fact that its happened for thousands of years doesn't make it less retarded.

It' samefag different era.
 
Jesus fucking christ.

Reminder, if you use real kids as references to any sort of drawing or anything, that is child porn. I don't think anyone has ever been prosecuted (people have been sued) for it, but it still is under the law and I agree. Because holy shit that is creepy as fuck.
what are your thoughts on drawings of children in skimpy clothing or exagerated tits and ass like in many japanese cartoons?
 
History of troonery is rooted in misogyny/
Yes, troonerism correlates strongly with misogyny. I've written about this here as well. Countries like Iran force gay men to become "women" because they can't accept the fact that some men will diverge from the typical male presentation. Now try to explain this to a queer theorist.

Weirdo misfit autists compare themselves to what they think of as a "man" and fail to realize "man" is just born with Y chromosomal mutation.
A lot of our problems today were caused by high functioning autistic men. Their influence on your society is visible anywhere, whereas the influence of artistic, spiritual, intellectual (not programmers!) men + men who have leadership qualities have lost a lot of prestige or at least were highly influenced by the autistic men themselves.

Inventing genders to make up for personality quirks, degenerancy, or any nuances is dumb and the fact that its happened for thousands of years doesn't make it less retarded.
Yeah, it's retarded. I don't think that gender identity exists. At least I never felt that I've got one and I've heard from many other people that they don't know what the troons are talking about. My examples of Greece (or Pakistan and India for that matter) was to show that troons were able to integrate somewhat into society, something they now seem unable to do.
 
what are your thoughts on drawings of children in skimpy clothing or exagerated tits and ass like in many japanese cartoons?
That stuff grosses me out as well, honestly.
What REALLY gets me is those fucking people who make realistic 3D scenes of kids and adults fucking in blender or something. Some of those look like photos at a glance and even get put on shady video thumbnails to try advertise real cp links. It's fucking disgusting.

But yeah, places like Russia have a big, BIG problem with 'non-nude' material. Photography studios who specialize in taking pics of kids in skimpy outfits for their magazines. It is definitely aimed at pedos. It's the next best 'legal' thing they have when not looking at nude cp.
 
Being explicit is THE prerequisite for art to be considered porn. There is nothing on this planet that some autistic jerkoff would not be able to sexualize. It does not make everything porn. Try applying this retarded standard to things you actually like that feature sexy women and you'll instantly realize how dumb it is.
What's the word you would use, then? It's obviously intended to be masturbation fodder, even if it's not clear cut "porn". It was drawn by someone who gets off to toddler animals in diapers and intended to be viewed by others who get off to toddler animals in diapers, so whatever you label it it's still going to make people uncomfortable.

There's plenty of art out there that features full blown nudity but isn't considered porn because it's not intended to be masturbated to. Michelangelo's David, anyone?
 
Last edited:
What the fuck is a Sia?

Why do these people have a public square? What the fuck went wrong that people are openly defending this? This isn't my first rodeo, I've been online for most of my life and that's been a bit of time. Why are fucking shitposters being watched be the feds when twitter EXISTS?

Support Trump or something? You're a terrorist Nazi who needs to be erased.

Fuck children and shit in your own diaper while providing dated picture evidence, you're a fucking national hero, Jesus fuck I'll put my own Fucking top hat on what on the fuck is WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE.
 
What the fuck is a Sia?

Why do these people have a public square? What the fuck went wrong that people are openly defending this? This isn't my first rodeo, I've been online for most of my life and that's been a bit of time. Why are fucking shitposters being watched be the feds when twitter EXISTS?

Support Trump or something? You're a terrorist Nazi who needs to be erased.

Fuck children and shit in your own diaper while providing dated picture evidence, you're a fucking national hero, Jesus fuck I'll put my own Fucking top hat on what on the fuck is WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE.
The singer Sia, who is really an amazing artist but sold out big time. She recently made autistic people angry and was "canceled", but too late to take away all the fuck you money.
 
What's the word you would use, then? It's obviously intended to be masturbation fodder, even if it's not clear cut "porn". It was drawn by someone who gets off to toddler animals in diapers and intended to be viewed by others who get off to toddler animals in diapers, so whatever you label it it's still going to make people uncomfortable.

There's plenty of art out there that features full blown nudity but isn't considered porn because it's not intended to be masturbated to. Michelangelo's David, anyone?
This is one of those moments where we have to remember where we are. Do artists use references? Of course. Was his reference illegal? Clearly not. Is his art illegal? No, nor should it be.

Is he a creepy fuck? Most definitely.
 
This is one of those moments where we have to remember where we are. Do artists use references? Of course. Was his reference illegal? Clearly not. Is his art illegal? No, nor should it be.

Is he a creepy fuck? Most definitely.
I feel like the entire Assigned Male comic crosses more lines of acceptability than this vague diaper bullshit. He crossed the line a long time ago in my opinion, I guess it took tracing a baby photo from the internet to finally shut him down.
 
I feel like the entire Assigned Male comic crosses more lines of acceptability than this vague diaper bullshit. He crossed the line a long time ago in my opinion, I guess it took tracing a baby photo from the internet to finally shut him down.
Don't celebrate just yet, Billy's still in business. Personally I'm waiting for the cops to find something prison-worthy on his laptop.
 
Women are overgrown children who rely on men to uphold civilization. It doesn't matter how radical you are, if a group of men decide your feminist book club is now the feminist being raped club you're not able to prevent it.
There's both men and women pushing for troons to be allowed in the opposite sex's spaces, though. It's not like "a group of men" is the only culprit.

Transexuals have beaten you at your own game and proven it. Now lesbians have to take a dick or be outed from lesbian circles circles. If instead they let men protect them they could avoid all the dickings they're having forced on them as long as the men got to watch them kiss while drunk once in a while.


It's the classic no true Scotsman with feminists. They have played the same card every time their schemes blow up in their face.
They don't have to take a dick. This is why most troons end up incels or dating other troons, they keep getting rejected.
 
There's no difference. Both need to realize men protect them and distancing themselves and harming men is destructive to them.

Who are men protecting women from? Other women? Or... other men?

This kinda makes the relationship between the sexes sound like a Mafia protection racket, dude. I like to think that women can actually LIKE men, not just be terrified of another somewhat more violent man.
 
Back