Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

And now I can't ever show my kids Muppet Babies. Thanks, LaBelle.
Muppet Babies.jpg
 
UPDATE: The crossover we've all been waiting for!
View attachment 1955190
"it's generally not a good idea to use a doxxing (sic) site run by nazis with an extensive body count as a resource for anything"

It's also generally not a good idea to use actual photos of children you don't know as a resource for creating furry cub porn, yet here we are.
 
We'll see more Keira Bell cases as this carries on.
Yes, and I'm sure we'll also see cases of 'ex gays', people who will say that they identified as LGBT/Pan/Asexual/Whatever because of peer pressure and the constant comments about how heteros are fucking plain and boring at best and evil, oppressive, bigoted and privileged at worst. And the blame won't be on the T, it will fall squarely on the whole community.

A lot of those reeeeing idiots (maybe Labelle too, since his gender fluctuates depending of his perversion du jour) will detransition quietly and avoid the backlash going back to their inceloid life, probably a few notable troons will write books about their detransition. Hell, maybe being a detransitioner will be the next trendy thing. And probably everyone, from the ones who will find themselves with a disfigured body, to the doctors and pharmas that profited by the whole shebang, will say that it was because of the LGBT community.

It's for animals like Labelle, Strangio, McKinnon and so on that I quietly went back in the closet. Only my family and my oldest friends know. I think that in a few years, being gay will be dangerous again in the West.
 
I'm so tired of these retards pretending that kinks like his being derived from something not inherently sexual means kinks themselves aren't sexual in nature. Feet might not be sexual by themselves, but people jacking off to them sure see them sexually. He's basically trying to pull a "takes one to know one" even though you don't need to be a degenerate to recognize degenerate behavior.
 
"My diaperfur blog was tagged 18+ and SFW because of the therapeutic and consensual aspect of it, and it's something private I did not want to be shared."

You tagged it as both 18+ and Safe For Work because it was therapeutic for who? And it was "private" but you shared it publicly on multiple websites and made a Patreon for it to profit off of it? Are you even reading what you write at this point?
 
"My diaperfur blog was tagged 18+ and SFW because of the therapeutic and consensual aspect of it, and it's something private I did not want to be shared."

You tagged it as both 18+ and Safe For Work because it was therapeutic for who? And it was "private" but you shared it publicly on multiple websites and made a Patreon for it to profit off of it? Are you even reading what you write at this point?
Therapeutic for his penis, probably.
 
So he's essentially saying that this was intended for pedo's eyes only and he was super duper careful not to let normies know he did it or that he posted it on the internet so it's totally not his fault that people are grossed out by his kink, er, therapy. "It wasn't meant to be shared FOR VARIOUS REASONS". So, what are those reasons, Bill? Maybe because pedos know the rest of us think all of them should get the rope.

> this is not porn

Maybe, but it's still degenerate.

It's not porn for normal people because we don't find toddlers in diapers sexy. This 100% is porn for pedophile furries like Bill, though. He'd draw naked baby boys if he could get away with it. The cartoon dog is just plausible deniability for him. But only a retard would accept the argument that it is just a cartoon from a pedo. It's never just a cartoon with them.
 
Back