- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon
- Thread starter Hat
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2017
See, this is why Billy is shaping up to be one of the best cows on the site again. Every time you think he's run out of rope to give himself, he somehow manages to pull more out of thin air.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
You'd think that if Jake really cared about people, he wouldn't refer to them as a body count.“Extensive collective body count”
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2019
Seph did you ever consider that maybe trans and nonbinary people are predators and that's why this keeps coming up?
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2017
So KiwiFarms is a worse problem than Child Exploitation, am I reading this right?
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2018
INB4 more dumbasses come out of the woodworks.
WHAT?!
WHAT?!
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2019
Unfortunately you understood what these deranged mind said.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
Christa Mactíre 🏳️⚧️🐺 on Twitter: "This whole thing with Sophie La…
archived 28 Feb 2021 00:25:34 UTC
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2020
you chose the villain route yourself by being a pedophile, this is your folly sophie and nobody else'sView attachment 1955633
I DO NOT SHARE AN OUNCE OF BLAME FOR ART I POSTED PUBLICALLY BECOMING PUBLIC
EDIT TO ADD:
View attachment 1955679View attachment 1955761
Hear that everyone calling her out? Labelle SEE"S YOU and will never forget.
Consequences will never be the same.
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2014
I think ABDLs usually buy specially made diapers that are based on ones meant for actual babies, instead of medical incontinence products. Up to you if that's better or worse. There was some drama a few years ago when a store selling these products opened in a small town.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2017
Yes... that's what "porn" means
road timber
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2021
women they don't like being condemned at the same level as potential child molesters will result in more coverups, because of the obvious conflict of interest between the women who want to protect children and the men who want to exploit children.
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
If the images are meant to depict adults, why trace/reference a child? There are hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of pictures of adults in pools, many of whom are models who have consented to have their images distributed, shared, and used. And frankly, even the word 'child' seems dirty here, because we're talking about a literal baby.
If the kink is entirely non-sexual, why is he following kink/fetish blogs? Surely content of that nature would disgust him if that were true, would it not? Additionally, why tag the content 18+? Why place it in the AB/DL tags? If it's solely done for 'relaxation', why claim it's a kink? I know several older women who like those adult coloring books, or doing paint-by-numbers, or making bracelets, but they don't call it their kink.
The biggest red flag that Bill's a pedo is that he doesn't seem to realize he's done something wrong. He literally can't understand why exploiting a real baby and sexualizing kids is bad.
If the kink is entirely non-sexual, why is he following kink/fetish blogs? Surely content of that nature would disgust him if that were true, would it not? Additionally, why tag the content 18+? Why place it in the AB/DL tags? If it's solely done for 'relaxation', why claim it's a kink? I know several older women who like those adult coloring books, or doing paint-by-numbers, or making bracelets, but they don't call it their kink.
The biggest red flag that Bill's a pedo is that he doesn't seem to realize he's done something wrong. He literally can't understand why exploiting a real baby and sexualizing kids is bad.
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2013
Maybe it’s just phrased awkwardly and he means he draws art, some of which is porn but not all of his art is porn? (I have no idea the point he’s trying to make, maybe he’s assuming people are conflating Labelle‘s porn art with the babyfur stuff while somehow convincing himself it’s not a weird fetish)
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
For some reason I find it hilarious when troons refer to KF as “alt-right”. I literally laugh every time. Do you think they genuinely believe that, or are just trying to deter people from finding out for themselves? It seems to me that farmers pretty much cross the political spectrum, united only in our amusement at/disgust for freaks and degenerates.
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2019
It's usually the latter. Like they do with radical feminists, they're trying to bury anything that could be incriminating to them. They know this place meticulously documents people like LeBoy, so they have everything to gain by telling people it's nothing more than a hive of scum and villainy.
Their icon is a poorly-drawn naked demon with its tiny dick out. It's most likely a straight-up porn account.
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2019
Call a niggger a faggot next thing you know the glow in darks come a knocking. As for the troon toddler fondler
Theres really only one final solution
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2016
"Noooo! His degenerate pedoshit is making us look bad!"
Who cares about what we think of your community? A degenerate is still a degenerate!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2016
I think he means *all* his art, including the art that's not porn. As in he would mean "I draw porn, does that make everything else that I draw also sexual?" His point is still stupid, a piece is either sexual or not, but I would tend to think it is inherent with the author's intent for said piece.
As for all this debacle, WOW. I thought Sophie was done being an idiot when he moved to Finland. But wow, he's really hitting rock bottom now, all the while digging his own grave, and that's what it took, drawing fetish kink content.
Something I've seen is that you never apologize to Twitter, they will double down once you admit guilt, so Sophie chose the "right" option here, although they're still going to double down.
I'm surprised there's not more people defending him, I thought people were defending lolicon as "it's just drawings", or is that another crowd altogether...? Well either way, I'd be wary of anyone drawing or enjoying to look at anthropomorphic animals in diapers. You have to be abnormal in your head to enjoy that kinda content.