Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

Xarpho said:
I don’t know, ejecting Billy from the LGBTQ clique just on the basis of “you make us look bad and prove our enemies’ points” seems to be with a healthy dollop of projection.
Click to expand...
Some people just want to live a quiet, uncomplicated life and not be bothered because of who they love or what gender they want to present as.

And this fat prick, he "represents" them as a notable and fairly public member of this certain bunch of people.

And he's expressing thoughts towards vulnerable children, and drawing erotic art catering to these base instincts.

And he (ok, she) deserves to be cast out into the darkness of hell, where you shall hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Or something like that.

So fucking denounce it. Do not condone this behavior and may the culture of shame and modesty prevail.

🧐
 
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
  • Feels
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Rizzo the Rat, Vibri and 18 others
The drama around Labelle drove this one to go "full baby"
1614487203754.png1614487232743.png

1614487297182.png
1614487353144.png
1614487407150.png
 
  • Horrifying
  • Islamic Content
  • Lunacy
Reactions: German der Speedwell, The Mass Shooter Ron Soye, WalterPresson96 and 74 others
Untitled.png
lol yup

I love their bickering about whether or not we're trustworthy.
Untitled.png

D_Tractor said:
According to the 4chan school of law the line between perfectly legal shota/loli and 20 years in club fed is if its based on a real person. Did the troon draw anything based on a real photo that fails the Potter Stewart test?
Click to expand...
He admitted he copied pictures of real babies, yes. He also admitted he drew this stuff because ABDL is his kink. That's the main reason for the salt.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Autistic
Reactions: cuddle striker, WalterPresson96, Rizzo the Rat and 19 others
D_Tractor said:
According to the 4chan school of law the line between perfectly legal shota/loli and 20 years in club fed is if its based on a real person. Did the troon draw anything based on a real photo that fails the Potter Stewart test?
Click to expand...

I had to look up what that meant, but here goes. And, I won't repost the art, it's been seen enough in the thread by now that you'll all know which drawings I'm referring to.

1. The average person, applying local community standards, looking at the work in its entirety, must find that it appeals to the prurient interest.

Both the diaper change photo and the pool climbing photo are obviously fetishistic in nature. Particularly the diaper changing one where the character is barely covered and is looking toward the viewer.

2. The work must describe or depict, in an obviously offensive way, sexual conduct, or excretory functions.

In the pool climbing photo, the diaper appears to be full and sagging (which is actually not present in the source it was traced from, I don't think.) In the diaper changing photo and the one of the dog, the characters are posed in sexually suggestive ways.

3. The work as a whole must lack "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific values".

The drawings do not make a statement about anything, or have a purpose beyond being fap fuel. The intent was clearly fetishistic and nothing more. While art can obviously have meaning beyond what the artist originally intended, I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who sees meaning in it beyond the fetishistic one.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Osyth Osyth, Vibri and 33 others
Piga Dgrifm said:
I had to look up what that meant, but here goes. And, I won't repost the art, it's been seen enough in the thread by now that you'll all know which drawings I'm referring to.

1. The average person, applying local community standards, looking at the work in its entirety, must find that it appeals to the prurient interest.

Both the diaper change photo and the pool climbing photo are obviously fetishistic in nature. Particularly the diaper changing one where the character is barely covered and is looking toward the viewer.

2. The work must describe or depict, in an obviously offensive way, sexual conduct, or excretory functions.

In the pool climbing photo, the diaper appears to be full and sagging (which is actually not present in the source it was traced from, I don't think.) In the diaper changing photo and the one of the dog, the characters are posed in sexually suggestive ways.

3. The work as a whole must lack "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific values".

The drawings do not make a statement about anything, or have a purpose beyond being fap fuel. The intent was clearly fetishistic and nothing more. While art can obviously have meaning beyond what the artist originally intended, I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who sees meaning in it beyond the fetishistic one.
Click to expand...
In the picture of the dog, there's a cameltoe in the diaper. In the pool climbing photo, Sophie added a buttcrack that wasn't in the original picture. All of this art was posted on a twitter account that followed a ton of accounts dedicated to posting explicit ABDL porn. Yeah, it's definitely sexual.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Struggle Cakes, Osyth Osyth and 26 others
From The Uncanny Valley said:
BIG OLE EYEBROWS
Click to expand...
That adult BABY diaper LOVER, the big eyebrow one from the land down under, he said, “childhood that they stole from us...” as many troons claim.
Stole?
They?
Yeah, who’s snatching childhoods from troons? No one, ya fuckn nut job . Nobody. Bad shit happens to plenty of people, that’s not what the troons are meaning by “stolen childhood” though.

Pretty certain they are feeding their delusions of sex/ gender blah blah blah & use “stolen” to mean “childhood I wished I had.”

Troons often have gross fantasies of how they’d prefer their puberty to be, which we know is nothing like an actual, adolescent girls experience. This is a strong, main, troon fantasy trope.
Nothing was fucking stolen from you assholes.

The above, adult Baby diaper Lover, is using a number one troon delusion to justify LeBoy being a sick, fuck, aBdL, kink, fetishists, on main.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: AssistantWeasel, WalterPresson96, Vampirella and 38 others
3MMA said:
That adult BABY diaper LOVER, the big eyebrow one from the land down under, he said, “childhood that they stole from us...” as many troons claim.
Stole?
They?
Yeah, who’s snatching childhoods from troons? Not one ya fuckn nuts. Nobody. Bad shit happens to plenty of people, that’s not what the troons are meaning by “stolen childhood” though.

Pretty certain they are feeding their delusions of sex/ gender blah blah blah & use “stolen” to mean “childhood I wished I had.”

Troons often have gross fantasies of how they’d prefer their puberty to be, which we know is nothing like an actual, adolescent girls experience. This is a strong, main, troon fantasy trope.
Nothing was fucking stolen from you assholes.

The above, adult Baby diaper Lover, is using a number one troon delusion to justify LeBoy being a sick, fuck, aBdL, kink, fetishists, on main.
Click to expand...

I read this in my head, especially the first four lines, with the same cadence and energy as a Rage lyric for some reason.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Dizzydent, Literally Murdered, CobraPlissken and 9 others
Intelligent Calcium said:
When even the age regressing plurals are trying to distance themselves from you, you know you fucked up.
Click to expand...
oh they know they are next on the guillotine, they want to portray a image that "it isn't like that" even though it is.
freerobux said:
I think fetishists are much more likely to try and make themselves ambassadors of the community so to speak, and surround themselves with like minded people. It's ideal for taking advantage of others and to build up your credibility to get what you want outside of the community.

I think the trans kids phenomenon is how troons push a "born this way" theory, since they piggyback and leech off of the gay rights movement. We'll see more Keira Bell cases as this carries on. Speaking of the UK, leaks came out of the Tavistock clinic that parents outright told doctors that they're relieved their child is trans because they worried they had a gay or lesbian child. Studies confirm that children with behaviors, mannerisms, and interests associated with the opposite sex often grow into gay or bisexual adults. Homophobic parents are especially aware of this. Basically, it's a major shitshow and in a decade or so we'll have loads of adults whose bodies are permanently damaged and permanently childlike, probably realizing they could have been a normal gay adult instead. Not pretty.
Click to expand...
i believe more it's more to garner woke support, we are seeing this currently with sophie and it only halted because another "important" member said something else it would be scoffed with the whole "it's kiwifarms thing", they go by the pretense that if you dare saying anything that they see as negative you are wrong, should be deplatformed and have your life destroyed no matter what.
Banditotron said:
Hey, if you can remember how things were a decade or two ago, I'm happy for you. If you asked me what I thought about trans people on 2010, I'd have said "live and let live. Who cares if some dudes want to dress up like women?"
But these troons have eclipsed what we once knew as "transgendered people" so greatly that, frankly, the original style of trans person is not even a consideration in my assessment. Combine that with all I've learned about the general incompetence and malpractice around trans medicine and how almost all original style trans stuff was motivated by homophobia and sexism...
Well, you can't blame a man for running out of patience.
Click to expand...
good thing is that people are running out of patience for them, especially with corona making things stressful so once this is over the future seem bright, for the farms that is.
TungstenCarbide said:
Yes, and I'm sure we'll also see cases of 'ex gays', people who will say that they identified as LGBT/Pan/Asexual/Whatever because of peer pressure and the constant comments about how heteros are fucking plain and boring at best and evil, oppressive, bigoted and privileged at worst. And the blame won't be on the T, it will fall squarely on the whole community.
A lot of those reeeeing idiots (maybe Labelle too, since his gender fluctuates depending of his perversion du jour) will detransition quietly and avoid the backlash going back to their inceloid life, probably a few notable troons will write books about their detransition. Hell, maybe being a detransitioner will be the next trendy thing. And probably everyone, from the ones who will find themselves with a disfigured body, to the doctors and pharmas that profited by the whole shebang, will say that it was because of the LGBT community.
It's for animals like Labelle, Strangio, McKinnon and so on that I quietly went back in the closet. Only my family and my oldest friends know. I think that in a few years, being gay will be dangerous again in the West.
Click to expand...
so we'll have neo dicks and neo baginas in the future? hope it's after the life-extending shit. besides there's 'ex-gays' and people that aren't gay anymore. you won't see repressed faggotry in their eyes because of the psychological support they got rather than doing it for gayass points or peer pressuring, as i pointed earlier, the former is vilified, the latter is not because they say "oh *it's* in the closet, *it* never abandoned gaydom", the shifting blame can be expected as a broken clock being right at least twice a day and the media will give proper spotlight as usual.
Marshal Mannerheim said:
1) KF is not alt-right. The existence of @Arm Pit Cream and @Hollywood Hulk Hogan is a testament to that.
2) the only cartoonist people have been making anti-Semitic parodies of is Ben Garrison, and that's only because people photoshopping the happy merchant onto his drawings gets him MATI.
3) I see the Notsexual™ defence is still a thing.
Click to expand...
1 - alot of sites (fags) say KF is alt right and a haven of trolls and y'all motherfuckers need jesus because evilness (even though these site fags don't believe in jesus, k).
2 - they don't care if you are mocking him or the nazis we currently have threads about, that doesn't change the fact that KF is full of right-wing neonazis according to their half-bit neurons.
3 - when did it stop being a thing? erp's usually say that.
JYBlowsIt said:
I'm so tired of these retards pretending that kinks like his being derived from something not inherently sexual means kinks themselves aren't sexual in nature. Feet might not be sexual by themselves, but people jacking off to them sure see them sexually. He's basically trying to pull a "takes one to know one" even though you don't need to be a degenerate to recognize degenerate behavior.
Click to expand...
even a fellow kiwi posted that wikipedia disagrees with that stupid mindset, kinks are sexual because they deviate from straight/vanilla sex... this is a hill sophie chose to die on and *it's* fans will support sophie no matter what, twitter is currently with a mental glitch as to whether support sophie because kiwifarms are exposing the pedobear behaviour or to actually turn against sophie because pedobear behaviour.
cowisnow said:
Some people just want to live a quiet, uncomplicated life and not be bothered because of who they love or what gender they want to present as.
And this fat prick, he "represents" them as a notable and fairly public member of this certain bunch of people.
And he's expressing thoughts towards vulnerable children, and drawing erotic art catering to these base instincts.
And he (ok, she) deserves to be cast out into the darkness of hell, where you shall hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Or something like that.
So fucking denounce it. Do not condone this behavior and may the culture of shame and modesty prevail.
🧐
Click to expand...
it still projecting doe. k, still to live a quiet life the dudes should follow what it says, BE FUCKING QUIET. doing shit like Pride Parades will only show the hypocrisy...
💗Bitchstopher Columbitch💗 said:
View attachment 1956527
lol yup
I love their bickering about whether or not we're trustworthy.
View attachment 1956531
He admitted he copied pictures of real babies, yes. He also admitted he drew this stuff because ABDL is his kink. That's the main reason for the salt.
Click to expand...
KF saying troons, gaes, asexuals, queers, the whole fucking bazillion determinations for faggotry and str8's have predators innit that may act like predators. who woulda fucking guess?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Vibri, Mealy Mouth Spittle and 15 others
To all the troons and even kiwis that have tried to somehow defend these diaper pics on their own merits: this is the final straw on the camel's back.

This person Sophie Labelle has made it her stock and trade to make other people feel uncomfortable for many years. You might say it's passive-aggressive. She put together a lot of creepy and neurotic personal shit into a comic called Assigned Male and until now managed to coast along on liberal goodwill toward the idea of the best that someone like Labelle could be, not who she actually is. How many people learned something "valuable" from AM t hat weren't already drinking the kool-aid? Give me a break.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Grog, Struggle Cakes and 26 others
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Rizzo the Rat, GreeneCoDeputy and 16 others
Hongourable Madisha said:
Non-sexual, more like nonce-sexual.

If anything, they're neoliberals and postmodernists. I've ranted about this before, but there's plenty of "old left", communists and socialists around (including here on Kiwi Farms, I'm a Marxist-Leninist myself) who can't fucking stand this woke shit. This bunch of baizuo love any corporation that virtue signals to them, they believe reality is subjective and they demand those corporate employers have the power to fire workers for having the wrong opinions. What sort of leftist or dialectical materialist does that?
Click to expand...

I can't speak for the rest of the world, but I feel like political discourse in the US has come apart like the pants of the kid who didn't use a piece of cardboard on the long slide at Codornices Park.

And I say this as someone who just unironically accused Secret Gamer Girl of thinking like a chicom.

The conflation in the MSM of fascism and white supremacy is just appalling. Or the conflation of TERFs and the alt-right. Or the conflation of bible-believing Christians and good-old-boy gay bashers. Or the conflation of Kyle Rittenhouse and the KKK. Or the conflation of [thing that makes me uncomfortable] with fuckin' Jim Clark riding people down on the Pettus Bridge.

JFC, just look at the discussion around anti-Asian attacks. If you label Trump's governing philosophy as "white supremacy" and if all hate crimes are white supremacist in nature because only white people can be racist, then a black man punching an elderly Asian woman becomes Trump's fault.

God, yesterday some tard on MSNBC said that the Republicans have lost people of color for all time and eternity and then not two minutes later said that 1/3 of Latinos voted for Trump in 2020. Because it's obvious to everyone with half a brain that Trump's governing philosophy is white supremacy and no person of color could ever be a white supremacist, right?

(Give me another glass of wine and I might argue that Trump's governing philosophy is Satanism, but right now fascism seems to be a shoe that fits pretty good. But you can't call someone a fascist in this day and age without calling them Literally Hitler because people are ignorant about what fascism is and why it appeals to people.)

Biden is ramping up all the asstastic policies of the Reagan-Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama years and my boomer mom is all :shocked pikachu: as if this was some huge surprise.

We have lost the political vocabulary to discuss any current policies as part of a coherent political philosophy. "Postmodernist" describes a lot of it, but the worst part is that people themselves are not good at putting their own thinking into a systematic framework. If you don't understand your own thinking, then you can't say why someone else's thinking is wrong, and this leads to shit where someone comes at them with an opposing view and instead of considering it, they label it wrongthink and demand that the person be subjected to a struggle session and then deplatformed.

One thing we really need to get a handle on is the role of materialism in political thought, and I don't mean capitalism/consoomerism or Marxism, I mean the idea that someone can be born with a cock and balls and have the apparent thought patterns of a middle-class white man, but have the inner soul of a Disney princess. A lot of this shit needs to invoke the supernatural on some level in order to hold together.

In summary, the attempt by these chomos to blame Kiwis for this chomo being outed as a chomo seems like the desperate act of people who don't have a coherent political worldview.

Gimme my fucking hat.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Rizzo the Rat, chickenbutt and 33 others
"But! But KiwiFarms is just alt-right NAZI FASCISTS so you can't take them seriously!" I crack up whenever I see this.

Also every single 'defense' these people have can easily be refuted, but it also reminds me to stay far far away from Twitter.
  • "It's just fiction!"
    • Normally, I'd agree. A lot of kink - age regression / ABDL included - is fictional fantasizing and not reflective of someone's real-world desires, BDSM and related kinks are often like that. If Labelle wants to shit in diapers and get dressed up in onesies, then as long as those present give the okay for it, then whatever, just keep it in the bedroom where everyone consents. In a roleplay scene, everyone involved is consenting, and it follows the general BDSM rule of SSC. Paraphrasing from Wikipedia...
      • SSC
        • Safe - everything is based on safe activities.
        • Sane - all participants are of sound mind to give consent.
        • Consensual - all participantes give consent.
    • HOWEVER, the moment Labelle referenced an actual baby and directly traced a real toddler to create fetish content, it brought non-consenting real people - a toddler and an infant - into their kink, and broke that line between fictional fantasy roleplay and real-world desires.
    • Labelle seeked out references of real-world BABIES to make fetish content out of, and at no point had any second thoughts about it, and still defends making fetish content from tracing said photos.
    • It is no longer 'just fiction' once real infants are brought in.
    • Sorry, I forgot to mention this is a 32 year-old defending making fetish art from an image of a toddler.
  • "But age regressors like to think about themselves as cubs, not others!"
    • Then it'd make sense for Labelle to have a single self-insert character to represent them, right? Yet they drew sexually-charged diaper art of multiple cub characters, none of which were explicitly meant to depict LaBelle.
  • "But it's not a kink!"
    • Sure, it isn't always, but it absolutely can be, and it certainly is for LaBelle, because they said it themselves and claimed they 'wouldn't be kinkshamed.'
  • "Just because it's a kink doesn't mean it's sexual!"
    • That's the kind of shit I was told by 20-year-olds when I was underage to get me to engage in sexual kink content for them. The only people who ever use that argument are people trying to get unsuspecting others to do shit to arouse them.
    • Just because sex isn't involved, doesn't mean that something isn't sexual. Look at people who like vore or inflation - there's rarely sex in that art, yet it's still sexually arousing masturbation material for those fetishists.
    • Kink has always been used to denote sexualbehaviour that deviates from the norm.
      • " In human sexuality, kinkiness is the use of non-conventional sexual practices, concepts or fantasies. The term derives from the idea of a "bend" in one's sexual behaviour, to contrast such behaviour with "straight" or "vanilla" sexual mores and proclivities. It is thus a colloquial term for non-normative sexual behaviour. The term "kink" has been claimed by some who practice sexual fetishism as a term or synonym for their practices, indicating a range of sexual and sexualistic practices from playful to sexual objectification and certain paraphilias." / src
  • "There's no genitals, so it's not sexual!"
    • Other kinks don't always show genitals. Look at inflation, vore, or hell, even foot kinks, for example. Not all of the art for those things has tits 'n cocks hanging out, but like above, people still jack off to it - it's still sexually arousing to people into those things.
  • "Well asexual people can engage in kink, so it's not inherently sexual!"
    • "Every asexual person is different. Some might be repulsed by sex, some might feel nonchalant about it, and some might enjoy it." / src
    • "[Gray asexuality...] is used to refer to people who experience limited sexual attraction. In other words, they experience sexual attraction very rarely, or with very low intensity." / src
    • "A common reason someone may identify as [gray asexual] is that they experience sexual attraction but very infrequently." / src
    • "Some asexuals may still have a sex drive despite not feeling sexual attraction to anyone. They may still masturbate, watch porn, or participate in sexual activities." / src
    • "Sex-favorable is a term that is most commonly used by asexual and [asexual spectrum] individuals to indicate that they enjoy the act of sex or the concept of sex. Sex-favorable aces do not typically experience sexual attraction, but they may enjoy sex or sexual acts, and/or seek out sexual relationships. " / src
      • These are kinda shit sources so don't get into a slapfight over this, but these are asexual people saying that ace people can have a sex drive, which completely nullifies the "It can't ever be sexual because ace people do it!" argument.
  • "It's just a reference!"
    • A reference of a real-world infant and a tracing of a real-world toddler for sexually charged kink art. Would you feel comfortable with a 32-year-old making fetish art from a photo of your toddler?
  • "But! But KiwiFarms is just full of transphobic gay-hating alt-right nazis!!! This is a transphobic witch hunt trying to kink shame a trans woman for having sexual interests!!!"
    • I'm a trans gay liberal who uses KF, so it's safe to say I'm fairly far from an alt-right trans-hating fascist. I disagree with a lot of shit that's said here, but I agree with the evidence posted here regarding the Labelle-diaper-saga. The fact that Labelle referenced and traced real children for fetish art doesn't suddenly become less true just because you're hearing it from people you hate.
What a hill for these people to die on. Defending the usage of actual children as reference for fetish material because you don't like the people presenting the evidence. I don't miss social media in the slightest.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: cuddle striker, double second, The Mass Shooter Ron Soye and 115 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back