Lolcow Mohammad Shafiq Khan - the man who disproved physics.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Jashinist said:
He has this written as a note on Facebook, if anyone's interested:

Change Democratic Political System in the Muslim World

"There will always be protests and uprising till a just and practicable socio-political system is identified and world should at least try to look for the inherent problems of Democratic Political System. Though late let there be proper discussion on every fora.

I would like to inform you about the Book ‘Natural World Order & The Islamic Thought’ and the scientific article ‘Foundation of Theory of Everything: Non-living Things and Living Things’. The book is available on www.islamic-thought.com (free) and the scientific article is available free on www.indjst.org (under Archives; Issue 9 Vol. 3 Sept. 2010). The book clearly defines as to how the democratic political system is an impracticable and un-Islamic political system. Secondly the said book reveals that the Quran contains the well-defined Islamic Political System of Khilafat and the book substantiates with sufficient grounds that the Islamic Political System is the only political system under which peace and justice can prevail in the world.

The said scientific article proves that the correct physical & biological sciences and political science is contained in the Quran.

It will be your contribution towards Jehad if you would make all the educated people of your country and Egypt to read the said book so that Muslims of the world could realize that there is a well-defined Islamic Political System of Khilafat and movement in middle east is converted as the movement for establishment of Khilafat; through whatever means at your disposal."

Someone comments: "While from a medieval period i believe the khalifat was progressive(IE non-muslims did not have to follow shariah law, even in some extreme cases) However, i think modern day, it would be difficult to ensure human rights and a caliphate with such vastly contrasting morals now. I think we have to have a secular government in modern times."

And his response is: "The book mentioned above makes it clear rationally & logically that under secular or democratic political system peace & justice can never prevail in any society. Khilafah was converted into Kingdom by Muawiya. The book is actually written to substantiate that Khilafah is the only political system under which peace, justice & uniform development is possible."

No actual attempt to debate/address any points/actually have an opinion, it's literally just "no this is the truth, here's a source I found that backs me up therefore it is factual information, assimilate. Assimilate."
Click to expand...
We Are The Borg. You Will Be Assimilated.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Wally Balljacker, Varis, Sanae Kochiya and 4 others
Jashinist said:
So you're telling me this guy spends his entire life spamming his advertising all over the internet, and in a couple of hours we're already more relevant?
Click to expand...

Cows aren't good at SEO. You think a guy like Mohammed Shafiq Khan, who overturned all of physics, could manage to get some good search results, but instead, Mohammed Shafiq Khan is just another spamming kook, no better than Mr. Timecube or Ludwig Plutonium. (Ludwig/Archimedes Plutonium is also well worth the look. He is/was a dishwasher who made similar claims to Mohammed Shafiq Khan with as much actual scientific basis.

I think it would be pretty funny for Archimedes Plutonium and Mohammed Shafiq Khan to get in a cage match. I bet Mohammed Shafiq Khan would win, because he's a bit younger, I think, but Archimedes Plutonium would give Mohammed Shafiq Khan a run for his money.

Jeez, ten pages already about Mohammed Shafiq Khan. When I saw this, I thought he had already showed up because of all the mentions of Mohammed Shafiq Khan in the thread, but apparently, Mohammed Shafiq Khan has not yet shown up. People are just excited about Mohammed Shafiq Khan.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Coral Apples, Dork Of Ages, Sanae Kochiya and 3 others
AnOminous said:
Cows aren't good at SEO. You think a guy like Mohammed Shafiq Khan, who overturned all of physics, could manage to get some good search results, but instead, Mohammed Shafiq Khan is just another spamming kook, no better than Mr. Timecube or Ludwig Plutonium. (Ludwig/Archimedes Plutonium is also well worth the look. He is/was a dishwasher who made similar claims to Mohammed Shafiq Khan with as much actual scientific basis.

I think it would be pretty funny for Archimedes Plutonium and Mohammed Shafiq Khan to get in a cage match. I bet Mohammed Shafiq Khan would win, because he's a bit younger, I think, but Archimedes Plutonium would give Mohammed Shafiq Khan a run for his money.

Jeez, ten pages already about Mohammed Shafiq Khan. When I saw this, I thought he had already showed up because of all the mentions of Mohammed Shafiq Khan in the thread, but apparently, Mohammed Shafiq Khan has not yet shown up. People are just excited about Mohammed Shafiq Khan.
Click to expand...
He's an interesting man.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, CWCissey and Jashinist
AnOminous said:
Cows aren't good at SEO. You think a guy like Mohammed Shafiq Khan, who overturned all of physics, could manage to get some good search results, but instead, Mohammed Shafiq Khan is just another spamming kook, no better than Mr. Timecube or Ludwig Plutonium. (Ludwig/Archimedes Plutonium is also well worth the look. He is/was a dishwasher who made similar claims to Mohammed Shafiq Khan with as much actual scientific basis.

I think it would be pretty funny for Archimedes Plutonium and Mohammed Shafiq Khan to get in a cage match. I bet Mohammed Shafiq Khan would win, because he's a bit younger, I think, but Archimedes Plutonium would give Mohammed Shafiq Khan a run for his money.

Jeez, ten pages already about Mohammed Shafiq Khan. When I saw this, I thought he had already showed up because of all the mentions of Mohammed Shafiq Khan in the thread, but apparently, Mohammed Shafiq Khan has not yet shown up. People are just excited about Mohammed Shafiq Khan.
Click to expand...

What can I say? There just something entertaining about a religious nut who thinks he can science!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jashinist
AnOminous said:
Cows aren't good at SEO. You think a guy like Mohammed Shafiq Khan, who overturned all of physics, could manage to get some good search results, but instead, Mohammed Shafiq Khan is just another spamming kook, no better than Mr. Timecube or Ludwig Plutonium. (Ludwig/Archimedes Plutonium is also well worth the look. He is/was a dishwasher who made similar claims to Mohammed Shafiq Khan with as much actual scientific basis.

I think it would be pretty funny for Archimedes Plutonium and Mohammed Shafiq Khan to get in a cage match. I bet Mohammed Shafiq Khan would win, because he's a bit younger, I think, but Archimedes Plutonium would give Mohammed Shafiq Khan a run for his money.

Jeez, ten pages already about Mohammed Shafiq Khan. When I saw this, I thought he had already showed up because of all the mentions of Mohammed Shafiq Khan in the thread, but apparently, Mohammed Shafiq Khan has not yet shown up. People are just excited about Mohammed Shafiq Khan.
Click to expand...

The people want to see Mohammed Shafiq Khan. Mohammed Shafiq Khan verses Archimedes Plutonium would be the cage match of the century. Can you imagine all the scientific minds Mohammed Shafiq Khan and Achimedes Plutonium would gather to see Mohammed Shafiq Khan take the title?
 
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Sczylak Madgar, Sanae Kochiya, Jashinist and 1 other person
Skeealator said:
As a for-reals science guy (sorry to powerlevel), there's actually loads of terrible grammar in the literature just because so much work is done by smart people who speak English as a second language. Most of it gets corrected by journal copy editors, but there's plenty of dubious English that winds up in print.
Click to expand...

I see. I know that most scientists hate poor grammar because they hate ambiguity.

AnOminous said:
Cows aren't good at SEO. You think a guy like Mohammad Shafiq Khan, who overturned all of physics, could manage to get some good search results, but instead, Mohammad Shafiq Khan is just another spamming kook, no better than Mr. Timecube or Ludwig Plutonium. (Ludwig/Archimedes Plutonium is also well worth the look. He is/was a dishwasher who made similar claims to Mohammad Shafiq Khan with as much actual scientific basis.

I think it would be pretty funny for Archimedes Plutonium and Mohammad Shafiq Khan to get in a cage match. I bet Mohammad Shafiq Khan would win, because he's a bit younger, I think, but Archimedes Plutonium would give Mohammad Shafiq Khan a run for his money.

Jeez, ten pages already about Mohammad Shafiq Khan. When I saw this, I thought he had already showed up because of all the mentions of Mohammad Shafiq Khan in the thread, but apparently, Mohammad Shafiq Khan has not yet shown up. People are just excited about Mohammad Shafiq Khan.
Click to expand...

Everybody's really got their hopes up that he'll notice the thread and join. Which is the reason why everyone is spamming this thread as hard as possible to get as a first page Google result.

By the way, you may want to edit your post to Mohammad Shafiq Khan. I fixed it for you so just copy/paste it in your old post or whatever.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CWCissey and Jashinist
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back