🐮 Lolcow Mohammad Shafiq Khan - the man who disproved physics.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Skeealator said:
Hey, it looks like one of the commenters on that blog, Jack Sarfatti, is another sciency-lolcow with a pretty deep backcatalaog:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Sarfatti
Click to expand...

I'm always interested in how psuedo-science cows get along, especially when they're sharing theories with one another. Its not like the regular scientific community where a paper can be easily debunked. Do they just accept each other's findings and then ignore them entirely?
 
Yaks said:
I'm always interested in how psuedo-science cows get along, especially when they're sharing theories with one another. Its not like the regular scientific community where a paper can be easily debunked. Do they just accept each other's findings and then ignore them entirely?
Click to expand...
The circle jerk, triumphs over peer review. Either that, or he pays them to get his article published.
 
High-Tech Redneck said:
From what I understand, he thinks Physics = Atheism. This means, in his eyes, every time you move, you're making Atheism more valid.
Click to expand...

Well, Physics also covers sound, and every time Mohammad Shafiq Khan talks, atheism does indeed become more valid.
 
All right, I'm reading his original open challenge post. I'm not a science major or anything, and even I can poke holes in this garbage.
Also, his account from the site was banned, much like he was on his original Facebook group he showed this too. FYI.
 
He has this written as a note on Facebook, if anyone's interested:

Change Democratic Political System in the Muslim World

"There will always be protests and uprising till a just and practicable socio-political system is identified and world should at least try to look for the inherent problems of Democratic Political System. Though late let there be proper discussion on every fora.

I would like to inform you about the Book ‘Natural World Order & The Islamic Thought’ and the scientific article ‘Foundation of Theory of Everything: Non-living Things and Living Things’. The book is available on www.islamic-thought.com (free) and the scientific article is available free on www.indjst.org (under Archives; Issue 9 Vol. 3 Sept. 2010). The book clearly defines as to how the democratic political system is an impracticable and un-Islamic political system. Secondly the said book reveals that the Quran contains the well-defined Islamic Political System of Khilafat and the book substantiates with sufficient grounds that the Islamic Political System is the only political system under which peace and justice can prevail in the world.

The said scientific article proves that the correct physical & biological sciences and political science is contained in the Quran.

It will be your contribution towards Jehad if you would make all the educated people of your country and Egypt to read the said book so that Muslims of the world could realize that there is a well-defined Islamic Political System of Khilafat and movement in middle east is converted as the movement for establishment of Khilafat; through whatever means at your disposal."

Someone comments: "While from a medieval period i believe the khalifat was progressive(IE non-muslims did not have to follow shariah law, even in some extreme cases) However, i think modern day, it would be difficult to ensure human rights and a caliphate with such vastly contrasting morals now. I think we have to have a secular government in modern times."

And his response is: "The book mentioned above makes it clear rationally & logically that under secular or democratic political system peace & justice can never prevail in any society. Khilafah was converted into Kingdom by Muawiya. The book is actually written to substantiate that Khilafah is the only political system under which peace, justice & uniform development is possible."

No actual attempt to debate/address any points/actually have an opinion, it's literally just "no this is the truth, here's a source I found that backs me up therefore it is factual information, assimilate. Assimilate."
 
All right, this Is straight from the horse's mouth:
June 26th, 2012, 09:05 AM

Strange is really strange. Moderator please explain to him what he is writting.
Click to expand...
For some context, this was written after dozens of people made airtight arguments proving him wrong. I would post more rebuttals from him, but so far that all seem to be more or less like this one comment.

Seeing as his main word here was "strange", I'm guessing this was before he moved to "retarded".
Those_were_the_days_gif.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom