Diseased #Comicsgate - The Culture Wars Hit The Funny Books!

[Crescent Fresh]

Got a short one today. Ya Boi decided to take a shot at Joe Glass whining about his kickstarter shitting the bed because of books like BZRKR and Power Rangers "pushing" him out of the market to the tune of Rocky's speech about success from Rocky 1. It's funny, but as he shows in the end Rock N Roll Ninja can't even break 50k with a few hours left, get it together buddy.

View attachment 1957662

View attachment 1957746

I’m going to be annoyed when Zack inevitably tries to have things like this justify his “crowdfunded comics are dying” stance from a bit ago.

Of course this campaign was going to fail, this guy’s an absolute fucking idiot. What neither the video or his rant mentions is that he started the campaign in question the exact day that the MMPR Kickstarter ended. He effectively missed the rising tide entirely and now he’s blaming the moon for not staying out long enough.

Moreover, though, he’s asking for £35,000 when his last comic campaign did £11,417, and he’s known for making LGBT+ books, already a quite specific niche. I’d assume that asking for over three times the amount that your previous campaign ended at is a braindead move no matter who you are or which platform you use.

The art itself also just doesn’t look-

-wait

holy shit @FROG

Edit: There it goes, found a place that would embed the image properly.

 

[Pilule Noire]

Shouldn't this whole Stan v. Jack thing be in the sperg about comics thread?

I think it's relevant here as far as how it pertains to making and selling comics, the industry's past and future (or lack thereof) which are more Comicgate things. But if someone were to make a post putting the actual work of Lee vs Kirby/Ditko head-to-head, debating their respective merits, that would be more appropriate for the comics sperging thread? That's my understanding anyway.

As a person who's extensively studied all of this, there's a wave of Stan haters coming out but he did more than they give him credit for. Conversely Kirby and Ditko did more than Stan gave them credit for.

Apparently there's a new biography shitting on Stan coming out, so the debate is being dragged out again:

On the subject of Alan Moore, one interesting aspect in the Alan Moore vs Stan Lee debate is that Alan Moore takes an almost polar opposite approach to Stan's 'Marvel method'.

According to Rick Veitch, Moore would always call up a new artist and have long discussions to get to know him - his style and the things he would like to draw.

And subsequently, Moore's scripts almost took the form of long letters to the artist. Scripting and panel descriptions would be insanely detailed, down to the titles of books on the bookshelves, but much of it would not be demanded of the artist, so much as offered to him - apparently Moore would sort of go overboard and then say sorry Rick, feel free to ignore this if it's too much.

So he sort of 'sperged' a script at his artist, in a way, the script being like a personal letter to that artist in the wake of extensive phone interviews.

It's interesting to me because I wonder, would Kirby and Ditko have enjoyed this method of work?

Or, would they prefer the more open/delegated approach of Stan, where they would be left on their own to come up with stuff?

I can't be sure, but I think they would prefer Stan!

I mean who knows. But neither Ditko nor Kirby ever worked with Moore to my knowledge - there's no Moore and Kirby comics, or Moore and Ditko comics, despite the opportunity for collaboration surely being there?

The closest link I know of, is Alan Moore ripping off and parodying Ditko's Mr A with Rorschach, which Moore discusses in the 'In Search of Steve Ditko' documentary. But obviously that's not working with Ditko, that's ripping him off while attempting to satirize him.

Can I talk about this, @TheCosmicWarrior? Is it allowed? I know Alan Moore isn't Comicsgate like you, but this discussion is interesting for the Comicsgate thread, because we can get valuable input on the discussion from prominent, hot new up 'n' coming writers such as @NasserRabadi13.

What do you think about it Nasser?

It's especially interesting to hear from Nasser, because he himself is actually a writer who somehow managed to get "Stan Lee'd" out of a comic by the artist of the comic, the enormous arrogant cuckold Donal DeLay.

 

[Buck Mullet]

I've never done that. I've never said anything but good things about Kirby's work, outside of the fact that Stan Lee made the books better. Kirby is one of my favorite artists but he wouldn't have found the success he had without Stan.

You've got it the other way around, Stan would likely not had the success of early Marvel without Kirby (and Ditko). If Fantastic Four (and Spider Man) were drawn in a 60's era DC or Charlton house style (you could argue the earlier FF issues were to an extent and got more "Kirby" soon on, and can't not mention Sinnot's inks over Kirby evolving) it probably wouldn't have been a success, just another team superhero book that no one cared about.

Kirby was already a consistently working artist. As successful as he would eventually come to be seen? No, but he had far more clout in the industry than Stan did at the time. Kirby could have worked wherever he wanted at that point in his career, Stan was lucky to even be there.

 

[Analog Devolved]

1) people are not reading now more than ever. If you mean higher literacy rates that doesn't mean anyone is actually reading anything.

2) i never said Dave sim was enlightened. I wrote "his work changed after he read the bible and koran"

3) i never said the world's first comic, but America's. It's almost like you half read everything I wrote. I wonder why.

To reiterate, I am the one who wrote that comics shouldn't be all you read. I'm sure that's hard for you to remember with all that wiki regurgitation you're doing.

Yes, all media is subversive. Posters, television, whatever else is meant to sway you. It isn't that hard to see.

Stop being a disingenuous faggot.

Holy shit you're an angry sperg. We've all seem those EVS screenshots from years ago, no one cares anymore. If you want to chimp out about subversion and Dave Sim post it here.
Thread 'Comicsgate Hangers-On and Drama Whores' https://kiwifarms.net/threads/comicsgate-hangers-on-and-drama-whores.59603/

Dave Sim cast himself as "Humbert Humbert" in his own wacked out autobiography of a life. If I had a 13 year old daughter and a comics pro picked her up at a convention I would bury that pedo fuck in a hole so remote the cops would never find the body.

You really think Ethan wants to deal with a dude that uses a fax machine as his primary method of communication? Why the hell would Ethan want to get involved with a kiddy diddling weirdo who lives in a hermitage house with photos of 13 year old girls everywhere?

Anyway, fuck Dave Sim and fuck you too, retard.

 

[Rupin]

I’m going to be annoyed when Zack inevitably tries to have things like this justify his “crowdfunded comics are dying” stance from a bit ago.

Of course this campaign was going to fail, this guy’s an absolute fucking idiot. What neither the video or his rant mentions is that he started the campaign in question the exact day that the MMPR Kickstarter ended. He effectively missed the rising tide entirely and now he’s blaming the moon for not staying out long enough.

Moreover, though, he’s asking for £35,000 when his last comic campaign did £11,417, and he’s known for making LGBT+ books, already a quite specific niche. I’d assume that asking for over three times the amount that your previous campaign ended at is a braindead move no matter who you are or which platform you use.

The art itself also just doesn’t look-

-wait

holy shit @FROG

Edit: There it goes, found a place that would embed the image properly.

Christ... didn't this guy make a career out of bashing people's bad art. Its awfully hypocritical for him to be putting shit out like this

 

[SuiSui1]

Christ... didn't this guy make a career out if bashing people's bad art. Its awfully hypocritical for him to be putting shit out like this

I think you are mistaking that as one of Zach's projects, it isn't, that is Joe Glass's project "The Miracles". What I noticed is a pic of a cybernetic frog on the bully's shirt.

 

[Rupin]

I think you are mistaking that as one of Zach's projects, it isn't, that is Joe Glass's project "The Miracles". What I noticed is a pic of a cybernetic frog on the bully's shirt.

ah ok, i stand corrected...

 

[Mister Dongs]

Wearing Frog shirt allows me to turn into an asian? Cool.

 

[Dong-Liquor]

Fourth World
New Gods
Forever People
Darkseid

I'm sorry Nasser, but your post is wrong in every possible way.

You're ripping on Nasser for agreeing with my post (which was also an agreement with Pilule Noire's post). And in my post I mentioned that Jack Kirby's Fourth World did not resonate with people as well until other writers made the concept work better. Jack Kirby had great ideas, but oftentimes the great ideas someone has need another person to help make the concept work better. That's what Stan Lee did and that is what Nasser was agreeing with. Nobody was discounting Kirby's contributions.

I did mis-speak in my previous post. I was confusing The Eternals not initially being part of Marvel Continuity and thinking that was the Fourth World not being part DC continuity.

 

[jspit2.0]

I think it's relevant here as far as how it pertains to making and selling comics, the industry's past and future (or lack thereof) which are more Comicgate things. But if someone were to make a post putting the actual work of Lee vs Kirby/Ditko head-to-head, debating their respective merits, that would be more appropriate for the comics sperging thread? That's my understanding anyway.

I understand and concede that when CG cows bring the topic up it fits. Still, we are afflicted at times and I would hate to miss CG autism in a fight about zombie Jews, who are the real victims here.

Apparently there's a new biography shitting on Stan coming out, so the debate is being dragged out again:

On the subject of Alan Moore, one interesting aspect in the Alan Moore vs Stan Lee debate is that Alan Moore takes an almost polar opposite approach to Stan's 'Marvel method'.

According to Rick Veitch, Moore would always call up a new artist and have long discussions to get to know him - his style and the things he would like to draw.

And subsequently, Moore's scripts almost took the form of long letters to the artist. Scripting and panel descriptions would be insanely detailed, down to the titles of books on the bookshelves, but much of it would not be demanded of the artist, so much as offered to him - apparently Moore would sort of go overboard and then say sorry Rick, feel free to ignore this if it's too much.

His scripts are notorious. One of them broke Rob Liefeld who has dozens of them sitting in a drawer never to see daylight.

Interestingly, he switched methods to Marvel sometimes. In the 90s, he would sometimes thumbnail for hack jobs like his stuff for McFarlane.

So he sort of 'sperged' a script at his artist, in a way, the script being like a personal letter to that artist in the wake of extensive phone interviews.

It's interesting to me because I wonder, would Kirby and Ditko have enjoyed this method of work?

No. Greg Capullo famously got his first script from Scott Snyder and was not happy as it was enormous. He was used to McFarlane.

I can't be sure, but I think they would prefer Stan!

I mean who knows. But neither Ditko nor Kirby ever worked with Moore to my knowledge - there's no Moore and Kirby comics, or Moore and Ditko comics, despite the opportunity for collaboration surely being there?

Moore met Kirby. But I think Jack Kirby was in his twilight at that point? It would have been 80s before his death in the 90s.

View attachment 1958956

Wearing Frog shirt allows me to turn into an asian? Cool.

What's his alias? Trigger warning?

 

[KingofNothing]

holy shit @FROG

Wearing Frog shirt allows me to turn into an asian? Cool.

Frankly, I'm just surprised he took a shot at EVS instead of Ya Boi. I would have thought he had a bigger grievance with him.

 

[FROG]

I feel like a lot of SJWs are mad at me and CYBERFROG.

 

[5t3n0g0ph3r]

Of course this campaign was going to fail, this guy’s an absolute fucking idiot. What neither the video or his rant mentions is that he started the campaign in question the exact day that the MMPR Kickstarter ended. He effectively missed the rising tide entirely and now he’s blaming the moon for not staying out long enough.

Moreover, though, he’s asking for £35,000 when his last comic campaign did £11,417, and he’s known for making LGBT+ books, already a quite specific niche. I’d assume that asking for over three times the amount that your previous campaign ended at is a braindead move no matter who you are or which platform you use.

The art itself also just doesn’t look-

-wait

holy shit @FROG

Edit: There it goes, found a place that would embed the image properly.

Imagine being this petty.

 

[FROG]

To put this in perspective of Scivergate, if any of the cutthroat tactics employed by company men like Stan the Man in his day were exposed in real time like they are now, you could probably forget about a graceful fade into the sunset. It probably would have meant Stan disappearing for a while before crawling back. Not as severe as what might have happened to Bob Kane had it been common knowledge what he did to Bill Finger. The comic book industry has been a creative sweathouse for so long that I wouldn't be shocked if most of the professionals working inside it were accustomed to pulling some outrageous CYA moves just to stay in the mix.. and that's before the SJW invasion. The extreme pressure to produce has given at least 2 industries in Film and TV a near infinite creative well to draw from but the human toll was steep.

Sciverfrog is by no means the worst to come out of that system, but he is the only one who posts here and tries to use it to his own advantage. The fear and intimidation of not wanting to be excluded from a career doesn't exist here, so I think that's why Ethan is reduced to using the "obsession" card when the red carpet isn't unfurled for him. I personally can't stand the attempted gaslighting, particularly when we have the receipts on his activities all over this thread. For the most part I think he's looking for dirt on his adversaries, especially now that his WC brownnose shirts have been politically discarded. I can't say for sure, but it seems like he's been posting here a lot more since the breakup.

The real reason that I post on KiwiFarms is that nobody wants anything from me here. Therefore, people are honest in a harsh way that I appreciate.

Sure, I still need to filter out you and Newmans #1 and 2, because you're angry retards, and biased. You're muted, and I only unmute you occasionally to get context from someone who is replying to you.

But almost everyone else is refreshingly candid and forthright to the point of cruelty, and so being here helps me keep grounded about my own work, and ComicsGate in general. I like it here.

 

[TheCosmicWarrior]

I think it's relevant here as far as how it pertains to making and selling comics, the industry's past and future (or lack thereof) which are more Comicgate things. But if someone were to make a post putting the actual work of Lee vs Kirby/Ditko head-to-head, debating their respective merits, that would be more appropriate for the comics sperging thread? That's my understanding anyway.


Apparently there's a new biography shitting on Stan coming out, so the debate is being dragged out again:

On the subject of Alan Moore, one interesting aspect in the Alan Moore vs Stan Lee debate is that Alan Moore takes an almost polar opposite approach to Stan's 'Marvel method'.

According to Rick Veitch, Moore would always call up a new artist and have long discussions to get to know him - his style and the things he would like to draw.

And subsequently, Moore's scripts almost took the form of long letters to the artist. Scripting and panel descriptions would be insanely detailed, down to the titles of books on the bookshelves, but much of it would not be demanded of the artist, so much as offered to him - apparently Moore would sort of go overboard and then say sorry Rick, feel free to ignore this if it's too much.

So he sort of 'sperged' a script at his artist, in a way, the script being like a personal letter to that artist in the wake of extensive phone interviews.

It's interesting to me because I wonder, would Kirby and Ditko have enjoyed this method of work?

Or, would they prefer the more open/delegated approach of Stan, where they would be left on their own to come up with stuff?

I can't be sure, but I think they would prefer Stan!

I mean who knows. But neither Ditko nor Kirby ever worked with Moore to my knowledge - there's no Moore and Kirby comics, or Moore and Ditko comics, despite the opportunity for collaboration surely being there?

The closest link I know of, is Alan Moore ripping off and parodying Ditko's Mr A with Rorschach, which Moore discusses in the 'In Search of Steve Ditko' documentary. But obviously that's not working with Ditko, that's ripping him off while attempting to satirize him.

Can I talk about this, @TheCosmicWarrior? Is it allowed? I know Alan Moore isn't Comicsgate like you, but this discussio

The art itself also just doesn’t look-

-wait

holy shit @FROG

Edit: There it goes, found a place that would embed the image properly.

lmao

This is cringe on every level. from the stiff pose to the exact same shot copy-pasta'd with a different expression/background bendis style, to the "ugly skinhead" trope to the shaved sides of the head with long hair "hero", before we even get to the "omg i'm so mad at EVS I literally can't even" signaling.

This is why I never put people I hate into books. It's just butthurt and awful for any outsider who knows the reference. I do the opposite and make people I like and my friends the villains cuz then it's just lawlz. It's much more fun.

 

[Smug Freiza]

CG: The L Words

A giant scandal was just revealed on DA Talks and @VIkkiVerse's latest CGDG stream, in that a creator of Preston Poulter's Comicsgate™ and several others were sharing lolicon (cp) in Preston's discord server. The individual in question is one John Lamont, who was previously an entrant in Preston's Comic Contest which took place last year, a contributor to Preston's now defunct Comicsgate™ shared universe and a regular guest on Preston's writer's streams. According to the video previously put out by DA Talks, John Lamont and Preston are old friends from Preston's time living in Los Angeles.

I decided to investigate this further myself to see if there was any truth to the claims and was shocked at the degeneracy that continues to abound within Preston's Comicsgate™ faction. When searching for the term "loli" in Preston's server, I was surprised to discover 40 results, which is obviously 40 too many.

Obviously all images will be censored from here on out.

The majority of the results appear to stem of this John T Lamont, Larry M Holder and another individual called "Can" sharing lolicon pictures and debating the morality of lolicon between themselves in a channel described as a "MGTOW-redpill-blackpill" channel. Again I must stress that the images have been censored so not to break site rules and will be spoilered below.

Spoiler: 40 loli search results

A further deep dive into this John Lamont reveals that he also has lolicon favorited on his Deviant Art account and according to archives, recently went DFE probably in response to DA Talks video. Again the images below will be censored and spoilered so not to break site rules.

Spoiler: deviant art lolicon

Deviant Art Gallery Favorite:

jtl2 - Hobbyist, Digital Artist | DeviantArt

www.deviantart.com

Archive

Deviant Art loli "Meyow" Collection:

jtl2 - Hobbyist, Digital Artist | DeviantArt

Explore the Meyow collection - the favourite images chosen by jtl2 on DeviantArt.

www.deviantart.com

Archive

His Deviant art homepage features some of the examples he shared in Preston's discord.

jtl2 - Hobbyist, Digital Artist | DeviantArt

Check out jtl2's art on DeviantArt. Browse the user profile and get inspired.

www.deviantart.com

Archive

Oddly enough the response has been rather conciliatory towards the sharing of lolicon, with Otis Stein creator and Kiwifarms member @Skinny describing it as a "gay op". I'm sure Skinny can give us a detailed description about how DA Talks hacked John Lamont's account and shared lolicon in Preston's server?

Skinny is not the only prominent anti-CG personality to be featured in Preston's lolicon server, other such members include @edwin_boyette, Bean from PA, Douglas Ernst, Lorenzo Sleestak and another degenerate Preston orbiter Daddy Darth Lunga [dox].

In Lunga's defense however, he appears to be one of the sole voices telling Preston that the sharing of lolicon in his server is a bad idea, so I guess I have to give credit where credit is due.

Well its about that time again folks...

John T Lamont / John Thomas Lamont / JTL2 / jtl2dotnet / Optical Illusion Studios / jtlois /

​

NAME: John Thomas Lamont
D.O.B: December 1981
PH NO: (424) 646-1274
EMAIL ADDRESSES:
sindre.kartvedt@gmail.com
jtl2@gmx.com
admin@jtl2.net
opticalillusionstudios@jtl2.net

ADDRESS:
7438 Gates Cir
Spring Hill, Florida 34606

SOCIALS:
Facebook (deleted or privated)
Main Twitter
Archive
Optical Illusions Twitter
Archive
Youtube
Archive
Deviant Art
Archive
Vimeo
Archive
Steam
Archive

Discord:

LOLICON ARCHIVES:

jtl2 - Hobbyist, Digital Artist | DeviantArt

archived 1 Mar 2021 05:58:44 UTC

archive.is

jtl2 - Hobbyist, Digital Artist | DeviantArt

archived 27 Feb 2021 01:12:11 UTC

archive.is

jtl2 - Hobbyist, Digital Artist | DeviantArt

archived 1 Mar 2021 05:49:52 UTC

archive.is

Would @Skinny and @edwin_boyette care to comment on why they are in a server that openly shares and discusses the ethics and morality of cartoon child pornography? In Skinny's case why revealing the degeneracy he feels is a "gay op?"

I'm looking forward to hearing the answers, for the official kiwi record.

@FROG with enemies like these I'm not surprised you keep steam rolling your critics, give me an honest answer, are you tired of winning yet?

 

[cow-wannabe]

You're ripping on Nasser for agreeing with my post (which was also an agreement with Pilule Noire's post). And in my post I mentioned that Jack Kirby's Fourth World did not resonate with people as well until other writers made the concept work better. Jack Kirby had great ideas, but oftentimes the great ideas someone has need another person to help make the concept work better. That's what Stan Lee did and that is what Nasser was agreeing with. Nobody was discounting Kirby's contributions.

I did mis-speak in my previous post. I was confusing The Eternals not initially being part of Marvel Continuity and thinking that was the Fourth World not being part DC continuity.

I wasn't 'ripping' on anyone, in fact I believe my disagreement on this point was quite polite.

 

[TESTEFY-HD]

Liam Meltdown #100 and ? is happening right now! it is glorious!

 

[Pilule Noire]

LOL Testy did you DL it? I only caught the end with Micah yelling at him in all caps from the chat, and then Leedle came on and told him to knock it off. Oh she gave him a dressing down, she did!

Of course he's almost instantly privated it.

Liam...!

 

[Rupin]

Liam Meltdown #100 and ? is happening right now! it is glorious!

looks like liam got a little embarrassed of his temper tantrum. It was just him doing damage control and shifting the blame to others while his fans made him out to be the second coming of warcampaign.