Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
This is kind of old milk, but hey, ya know, whatever. I've seen this troon pop up here and there, so I wanted to document his past biggest kerfuffle. One tranny's spergout caused an 8 month long debate among atheists about what is and isn't transphobic, and who is or isn't transphobic.

EssenceOfThought, or Peter/Ethel, is a white dude with long hair who lives in India, but he's oppressed because he has ladybrain. He makes youtube thunkpieces about the secular community from the perspective of an unchecked narcissist.

ESMsWfhUEAUK1kz.jpg

Rationality Rules, or Stephen Woodford, is another dude with long hair, but he knows he's a dude. He also makes youtube thunkpieces about the secular community and does so from the perspective of someone with basic reading comprehension.

In March 2019, Rationality Rules made a video about trans women in sports, pointing out some basic fact like... the fact that males generally outperform females in sports. He fully toed the line that trans women are women and all that, but he happened to include some clips from people who were calling the innocent twans gorls men. One clip was one from evil, evil Joe Rogan, who bathes in trans blood like some kind of modern Bathory. He also made a mistake where he said that the effects of HRT don't counter any advantage that male puberty might confer, and then made a comparison between a female and a male that hadn't undergone HRT.

EssenceOfThought made a series of videos in response. In the first one, he says that Woodford is a transphobic meanie alt-lite poopy head. He makes much of the mistake Woodford made regarding the HRT comparison and the Rogan clip. At one point in the video he asserts that Woodford made the video purely to attack trans women. From then on, his position was that Woodford was a violent transphobe, and that anyone who supported or didn't denounce Woodford was also a violent transphobe.

After this, the Atheist Community of Austin-- a nonprofit that runs some podcasts and call in shows for atheists-- decries Woodford as a transphobe, right after featuring him on their podcast. The atheist community in general began picking sides, with one side standing behind EoT and the other side loosely going, "is this a real problem?" After community backlash, the ACA retracts this.

Woodford released an apology vid and tried to clarify his stance. He took down the original vid and donated the ad rev from it to some tranny charity. EoT decided it's not good enough. Makes some thin connections to Trump. Says Woodford is responsible for the removal of trans people's human rights. He also says that Woodford's donation and demonetization of the video wasn't enough, because he didn't credit EoT for the idea of doing this. Then he brings up Rachel Oates.

Rachel Oates is a redhead youtuber cis oppressor, and a friend of Woodford. In response to a possible blocklist of people who support Woodford, Oates said she ought to be put on it, because she believes she can be friends with people she disagrees with, and she advocates for finding common ground between those who believe EoT's accusations of transphobia and people with above room temperature IQ. The blocklist was from a secret atheist troon facebook group that was made to protect against Woodford's general existence, so EoT decided this was a transphobic attack. All the other atheist troons on twitter demanded that Oates call out Woodford, which she refused to do. EoT began accusing Oates of also trying to strip trans people of their rights.

screenshot-twitter.com-2021.03.01-22_52_43.png


Later on, in yet another twitter spat, EssenceOfThought tells someone to "do the world a favor and exit it." What they allegedly meant to say was "leave Woodford's Evil Transphobia Cult" which makes more sense in context. Some especially fragile people, including Oates, took this as suicide bait. Oates wanted an apology. At some point here, EoT blocked her. She again asked for an apology and asked for one of her followers to ping him so he could see it. This has been presented by those who support EoT as sending her subscribers to harass EoT, which is, as you may have guessed, violent transphobia. EoT tweets about Oates being a transphobic bigot, an opportunistic vulture, and says she has trans blood on her hands. EoT also called her a shit spewing sewer mouth, a lying piece of shit, and a bigot in general. Oates responds with a video of her cutting her wrists. I can't find the fucking vid, but here's the tweet thread she released it on.

EssenceOfThought accuses her of using self harm to silence trannies. If that worked, my arms would be pure scar tissue. I'd just sit on twitter with a veggie peeler. Can only find screenshots of this.

screenshot-twitter.com-2021.03.01-22_24_08.png

screenshot-twitter.com-2021.03.01-22_45_05.png


And here's why I mentioned that he's white in the beginning:
screenshot-web.archive.org-2021.03.01-22_47_22.png

screenshot-twitter.com-2021.03.01-22_45_57.png


After realizing this wasn't a good look, EoT released a two page statement where he said he hadn't seen the video until later, and that he called the cops to do a wellfare check on Oates. And how he wouldn't have sent those meanie tweets if he'd known Oates was painting her apartment red. Oates is fine, and now focuses on fighting shitty poetry published by internet celebrities.

EoT then began attacking the ACA directly, by accusing them of voting in two of Woodford's "drinking buddies" on to the board. In a video, he suggested that there was a concerted effort of Woodford's fans to rig the board election to make sure the ACA stays transphobic.

The words of a completely sane individual:
Turns out that not only is Drew McCoy one of Woodford’s drinking buddies and person friends, but he actually violated the ACA bylaws in order to be elected onto the board... So whilst others with actual ACA membership are blocked from running, the people currently in power at the ACA are all too happy to ignore the same bylaws in order to replace board members that remained critical of Stephen Woodford with his personal friends... The cis white atheists are above criticism, and anyone who dares challenge that is not welcome at what was once the Atheist Community of Austin.

A lot of people who were invested in this trans narrative walked out. Here's a collection of transcripts. None of them have notability now that they left the ACA, which is very funny. They've attempted to form the Progressive Secular Alliance. Never heard of it? No one else has, either.

EoT continued trying to get some more shit spinning, including an attempt to get Matt Dillahunty, the president of the ACA, cancelled for violent transphobia. But, the atheists were all shitted out. EoT now stirs shit up with bigger twans creators. Most notably Contrapoints, Jerry Peet and Sophie Labelle.

At some point, Contrapoints pissed off the enbies. I don't remember how, but pissing off enbies is as easy as not liking Steven Universe. Because of this, Contrapoints released a video about being cancelled. EoT released a 40-something minute long video critisizing Contra's cancellation vid. In the transcript he reveals having been a furry, to the surprise of no one. In this video, he says Contrapoints is a big meanie transphobe because he played a 6 second clip of Buck Angel, the gender crit ftm porn star. Surprisingly, Breadtube seems to have taken this accusation with more salt than the atheist community had, and were actively skeptical of EoT's accusations. Almost no shit was stirred.

EoT made a couple videos about Jerry Peet, but that fizzled out as well with almost no shit stirred. Maybe the other narcissists can sense when a narcissist is trying to latch.

Most recently, EoT is taking shots at Sophie Labelle. With a tweet thread, EoT calls out Labelle for being disgusting. This is the most normal I've seen him act, so I expect this will give him a broader platform, since other troons are boosting this thread in particular. That's why I wanted to go through this whole backstory in this much length. I highly anticipate more content from this one.
 
The fact humans still rape means that somewhere along the line it became evolutionarily beneficial to do so. Men who raped passed their genetic material on. If all or most women abandoned or didn't bond with rape-babies, then rape would not have been beneficial and the behavior would have died out. I would hazard a guess that in long ago times it really wasn't seen as a problem, it was just how (some) men were. The same way as people used to kill each other on the regular. Humans were a violent species from the start
I think it's high time women are granted the ability to evolve corkscrew vaginas like ducks or self-abortion methods like foxes. Though, this wouldn't be necessary if men would also just stop raping. :)
 
@Janae Rose 💔🥀 delivered on their promise to make a Kiwi Farms review:

Original:
Archive (480p):
View attachment 1961759
"I did actually infiltrate their site and I was talking with some people. I ended up getting fucking baand which is crazy but they basically told me I got banned because I, like I'm not fucking, like I'm too normal basically, like I'm not fucking weird. And like cause there's like some fucking people on there that, like, are trans and are allowed to be on there cause they're batshit crazy like one other person has like their own thread."

Oh hun, no. You didn't infiltrate anything, you made an account the same way anyone can. You didn't get banned for being too normal or for being trans, you got banned because you were derailing this thread by doing stuff like posting your Instagram.

"People low key fucking with me cause I'm charismatic and shit. "

There are not enough :story: in the world for this sentence.
 
Have some TikToks, I'm on a kick.

This is content children should be seeing. Yep. This is normal.

More like "the whole Buffalo Bill" amiright?

No.

You've heard of titty skittles, now it's time for "fem&ms"
 
The fact humans still rape means that somewhere along the line it became evolutionarily beneficial to do so. Men who raped passed their genetic material on. If all or most women abandoned or didn't bond with rape-babies, then rape would not have been beneficial and the behavior would have died out. I would hazard a guess that in long ago times it really wasn't seen as a problem, it was just how (some) men were. The same way as people used to kill each other on the regular. Humans were a violent species from the start
Humans rape because sexual intercourse feels good. Not everything has to have an evolutionary benefit or have a genetic marker for it.

I also find the idea that "offspring of rapists grow up to be rapists and that is why rape did not die out" extremely flawed.

Until relatively recently in human history, women often didn't survive pregnancies altogether, and children often did not survive past the age of 5-6.

The reason most human societies historically have a "rape culture" wherein we shun the female victim is because rapes often left the female victim infertile.

How did this batshit segue come about anyway?!
 
The fact humans still rape means that somewhere along the line it became evolutionarily beneficial to do so. Men who raped passed their genetic material on. If all or most women abandoned or didn't bond with rape-babies, then rape would not have been beneficial and the behavior would have died out. I would hazard a guess that in long ago times it really wasn't seen as a problem, it was just how (some) men were. The same way as people used to kill each other on the regular. Humans were a violent species from the start

Men also rape other men’s assholes. And dogs. And pre-pubescent children. And they don’t give up on that when they discover they can’t impregnate men or toddlers or dogs. There is absolutely no reason to think that men have ever gone around thinking oh wow, she might abort my rape baby, best not waste my time raping her. Lol.
 
1.jpg

People love to shout that anyone who doesn't unconditionally accept trannies has a "fifth grade understanding of biology", yet then go and give the most reductionist and disingenuously phrased descriptions of chromosomal disorders possible. I would be pretty pissed off if I had one of these legitimate disorders and then found out that people are using me to defend their decision to act out on their fetishes.

"Some unfortunate people have really fucked up sex chromosome mutations that render them 99% infertile, among other things. So how dare you claim that I, with normal XY chromosomes, could somehow NOT become a bimbo princess ditz womxn?!?!

I'm going to start acting like a retard in public and screaming on airplanes while collecting disability checks from now on. How dare you say I can't! Don't you know that some people are born with 47 chromosomes?!?!
 
Humans rape because sexual intercourse feels good. Not everything has to have an evolutionary benefit or have a genetic marker for it.

I also find the idea that "offspring of rapists grow up to be rapists and that is why rape did not die out" extremely flawed.

All of our base, biological behavior occurs because millions of years of evolution shaped us as an animal species to behave these ways. This in no way implies the behavior is justifiable or inevitable, many things we do are not. We have free will and all that. But the impulses are a result of evolution. Humans have always raped and murdered each other. It is not uncommon either.
Nature does not always mean something is good. It is just explaining why behavior occurs, simply because for some genes it enabled them to be successfully passed on. The genetics for "rape" not specifically, but the combo of aggression/impulsivity/dominance/control/lust tendencies (or whatever) that create a rapist may have been.

Any behavior from our ancestors that decreased their genes being passed on would have died out, and been very rare today.
 
More like "the whole Buffalo Bill" amiright?
View attachment 1962570
No.
You've heard of titty skittles, now it's time for "fem&ms"
**Links Broken I am referring tot he troon in pink. That's also not her speaking shes lip syncing over something.

Always smile when I see a familiar face on the farms
 
Last edited:

"First of all in a sexual species..." *proceeds to list insects, birds, worms, reptiles, fish, slime mold? mushrooms?*
Are trannies a type of funghi?

Men also rape other men’s assholes. And dogs. And pre-pubescent children. And they don’t give up on that when they discover they can’t impregnate men or toddlers or dogs. There is absolutely no reason to think that men have ever gone around thinking oh wow, she might abort my rape baby, best not waste my time raping her. Lol.

That's not how our base instincts work. The point is we don't "think" rationally about them.
Anyways sociobiology is a bit much for this thread. At least in evolutionary biology, trannies are destined to become extinct
 
Back