The DWD stream has been deleted from YouTube. This is so depressing to see big corp social media defend animal sadism killers, meanwhile the internet hate machine actually does something positive by outing dangerous criminals.
let's not be stupid, animals abused sexually are going to be euthanized because of aggression, so in essence, what these fuckers do is always going to kill their pets victims as a result. Toggle can sit on his throne of bullshit and act like he's better than the zoosadists because he doesn't "kill", but in raping those animals, he has effectively signed their death warrant.
This abuse can not be undone. nearly all sexually assaulted animals are euthanized, it is impossible to rehabilitate them enough to not be a safety risk if they are rehomed and resources are stretched so thin for healthy stray dogs that aren't going to be permanently given fear aggression. Toggle has murdered those dogs.
I'm so fucking alogging mad at the internet right now. These are not harmless parapholias, these are all fucked up sexual crimes. I'm not a vegan, I'm ok with agriculture, but this? This is beyond saving and the ultra woke dumbasses are trying to be allies to them. Fuckin hell. Get the chlorine.
I am going to touch on the factors as to why some animals that have been sexually abused can be rehabilitated but most can't, since saying "all animals who are sexually abused are killed by shelters" makes it sound like getting assaulted turns them instantaneously into human killing machines when the problem is a lot more complex;
1) How long the abuse has been going on; whether it was a one-time event, or active grooming over months or years towards the specific purpose of creating a compliant victim. Long-term sexual grooming from early on (something all zoos do in order to create compliant and obedient victims, never believe their rhetoric of only being attracted to "adult" animals because the grooming process starts very early) can be impossible to unlearn, but grown animals that had no prior history of being abused has a better chance of recovering from an assault with adequate care, provided it remains a one-off event. Fence jumpers are also deserving of hatred, but it's the equivalent of getting raped by a relative stranger on the street vs. at home by someone you knew. The person on the street loses trust in strangers; the person at home loses trust in everyone.
2) The nature of the abuse in question; animals who have been taught to "top" tend to be far more aggressive sexually towards both people and other animals. This may also depend on the animal's size and overall nature, but for animals a lot of sex is also tied to dominance and competition, particularly in males but also sometimes females. This often leads to instances of an animal (even castrated) attempting to mount, which can come with additional risks of biting and clawing if the recipient is not responding in the way the animal wants or has come to expect them to.
3) The level of aggression displayed by the animal under stress in general; much like people, animals have different responses to fear and anxiety. Fight or flight is the most well known, but freezing and fawning are also likelihoods. Animals by nature are fairly unpredictable and may not always react to the same stressor in the same way, though, and may even react in multiple different ways for as long as that stress is applied. A lot of zoos like to use the "the animal would bite me if they didn't want it" excuse for how consent works, but this is actually a serious problem; if the animal learns that the
only way to avoid sexual assault is to act out violently, then it will begin cementing that as a default response to negative stimuli in general.
4) The competency of the new owner and how aware they are of the animal's prior history; knowing what stimuli causes the animal's trigger response can be half the battle with rehabing them, because animals can't just tell people the source of their trauma. If you know what kind of bodily contact was most frequently used to instigate an assault (ie; touching the inner thigh, the scruff of the neck, etc.) then knowing what to avoid and/or how to create new associations with that contact that aren't violent and sexual in nature is critical to the rehabilitation process. Once again, long-term grooming can result in there being many such trigger points, and the more there are the harder it is to deal with.
Sometimes the stars align and you may find an animal that has only been abused once or twice, doesn't develop an aggressive response to trauma, isn't dealing with dominance issues and the trigger stimuli for their trauma is obscure enough that it likely wouldn't come up casually in their daily life.
Most of the time though this is not the case.
And, lastly, it's also a matter of resources; the group most likely to get involved in animal abuse cases of any kind is the ASPCA or underfunded local shelters who simply do not have the time and resources for extended one-on-one treatment of psychological trauma, especially if they have immediate physical trauma they are trying to remedy. They also may not want to deal with the legal liability of giving away an animal that requires very specific care in the fear that if it gets rehomed again it'll start acting out in a sexually aggressive manner sometime down the line, especially if the new owner(s) are unaware of it's history.
