Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Karl der Grosse]

I will say that Melinda definitely seems more calm and happier since she finally fled Marshall and placed herself beyond his reach. I think most of that is because she's found a new bunch of cultist suckers to mooch from and she's still in the honeymoon phase, before she gets pissed at the and starts spreading accusations of heresy around. It even sounds like Melinda's been offered some rent-to-own deal on what is probably a broken-down trailer. Rent-to-own is a wilderness of scams, it's the perfect way for some of her fellow cultists to leech what little cash money Melinda has. But she doesn't have to deal with HUD anymore.

 

[White Baby]

When the participants involved have different expectations, goals and understanding of what is going on. One may only want sex, the other may be understanding that there is a relationship, future and possible children implied. If the one just wanting sex leads the other to believe that they want the same outcome in order to just get sex, the other partner has been used for sex. I can't believe an adult needs this explained. You tell this shit to teens who are considering having sex.

@TamarYaelBatYah, I dunno if it's my bimbo side showing again or what but I surely don't see any gendered language here. Maybe your powers of astral projecting and secret knowledge will reveal to us the psychic truth.

Behead those who post on phones.

bro be nice

 

[LoverofPi]

I left every single one of my exes.

Strongly doubt, especially given that you were raging about Marshall Ghosting you awhile back.

Each of the guys that I was with wanted a long term relationship and/or marriage with me. I would never have sex with any guy who didn't say that up front. I've never had a one night stand or flings or hook ups.

So doesn't that lend weight to the "you were sold a lie" idea? Each of them told you what you wanted to hear.

Who is Christine?

You figure this out later, I just want to quote this to note it took you eight hours to make the connection.

Why would you think that any of your Scapegoats ("lolcows") would come here for "attention"?

Lolcows are not scapegoats- and that's yet another term you are misusing, are you going for a record- and yes, several of them do. Especially the ones that keep posting in their own threads while vociferously denying wanting attention.

Women are more likely to suffer from mental health issues because they are the gender more abused (by men).

Historically, Narcissism has been higher in men. Hence, Patriarchy, Polygyny and Prostitutes. DUH

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/03/150304104040.htm

Do you think that mental health issues only arise as a result of being abused, Mel?

If you are speaking of my biological sister, you're probably confusing facts. My biological sister Christine was raised by a Christian grandmother. She was adopted by my grandmother/grandfather. We didn't grow up in the same house.

My mom and dad were not Christian. I never once saw my mom read the Bible. She definitely wasn't a church goer. Like once for a funeral and once to see me sing in a play. My dad rejected church stuff too.

Melinda, you are hardly a trustworthy source. Your sister was of the mind that your mother was a believer, you admit your grandmother was a believer, and you yourself are a Christian larping as a non Christian. There's every reason to conclude you were raised by Christian parents. Far more than you have to assume the faith of anyone else's parents.

Is that why you think your Scapegoats ("lolcows") come here?

Melinda, what do you think a scapegoat is?

 

[Karl der Grosse]

Did your cousin want a long-term relationship, Melinda?

 

[obliviousbeard]

bro be nice

Not to a phoneposter.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Your sister was of the mind that your mother was a believer,

First to be clear, Christine is not my "sister". I cut ties with her 10 years ago. We had a brief encounter in 2013 and again in 2020 this past year to get my deceased mom's property. She is a biological relative, but not my "sister".

My sisters are women who share religious ties with me. In the words of The Messiah: "Who are my mother, brother and sisters? Those who listen and do the will of my Father in Heaven".

I know you are an atheist with an obsession over blood ties, so this may go right over your head, or be dismissed by your rationalizations.

Simply, Christine is a person with an opinion. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. She has her opinion, I have mine.

Nevertheless, she didn't grow up in the same house as my mom. She's entitled to her own opinion, but the fact remains she will have an opinion based on an outside view of a child that did not live with the woman known as Leslie Scott.

Lolcows are not scapegoats-

Denial

There's every reason to conclude you were raised by Christian parents. Far

Facts to support said statement?

Melinda, what do you think a scapegoat is?

That's a question you need to be asking yourself. You lack self awareness of your behavior.

just want to quote this to note it took you eight hours to make the connection.

No, it's called not making assumptions. But I wouldn't put it past narcissistic people like yourself who Cyberstalk to be trying to contact your Scapegoats' biological relatives. Further, I wouldn't put it past a person like my biological (ex-)sister to be feeders for people like you.

Strongly doubt, especially given that you were raging about Marshall Ghosting you awhile back.

Marshall giving me silent treatment isn't abandonment. There's a difference.

But I know part of your abuse tactics are false narratives. I can spot that a mile away. That's my "family of origin"'s speciality. I'm a master at spotting that.

Replace "think" with "know," and yeah, that's what most cows in their threads are here for

Confirmation bias

Lolcows are not scapegoats.

Denial

Hey Melinda what are your thoughts on mind altering drugs?

First please d

I've never seen anyone using lolcows as their scapegoats - they're just people acting funnily on the internet as far as I'm conserned.

Minimizing

Either they get off from humiliation, are attention starved mental health cases (Authphag), just enjoy kiwi farms infame (Starrygreeneyes or w/e nick they used) or what else (Tamarlover)

They told you this was their reason? Or you decided this for them?

Gender differences in narcissism: A meta-analytic review.

APA PsycNet

psycnet.apa.org

Except that there are 20 other studies showing otherwise

I posted a bunch of peer review studies showing that many of the myths that society holds regarding how easy men have it are just that, myths. Mel's response was "sounds like patriarchy to me". She will just shoot down any study that doesnt portray women as eternal victims of big bad man.
@TamarYaelBatYah Just admit you are a literal Neanderthal and let your vagina do all the thinking when it comes to choosing men. You are only attracted to the stereotypical macho man and never consider the consequences of your actions. Now that youre old and blown out, you want to play the victim and say all men are bad. Nah, youre just an ape who mates with what your vagina tells you is the bad guy because "good guys dont turn me onnn!" You realize there are attractive males who arent mouth breathing, meth smoking, inbred retards right?

Nevertheless, none of this matters because Im not seeing pictures of your shithole.

So, that's a narrative you invented in your head. It also shows you haven't taken the time to read and synthesize what I've said.

Maybe your powers of astral projecting and secret knowledge will reveal to us the psychic truth.

Only Elohim can fix a broken mind. And only if He is willing.

So doesn't that lend weight to the "you were sold a lie" idea? Each of them told you what you wanted to hear.

But again, if the woman was a consensual and willing partner in the sex, she can't be "used for sex".

This notion, that sex happens to a woman completely denies and ignores a woman's desire for sex. It is a philosophy that goes back to Aristotle. Aristotle believed "woman is the material on which a man acts". This kind of thinking compliments denies, ignores and dismissed women's sexual desires.

I'm guessing had poor performance in the sack with that kind of thinking.

Aristotle also thought that a man's sperm turned into a baby inside of a woman. So obviously he was just completely uneducated about woman's sexuality.

However, this general lack of understanding about woman's sexuality still persists today in many of the phrases modern people use to describe sex. Like the idea a woman can be "used for sex" (during consensual sex).

Do you think that mental health issues only arise as a result of being abused, Mel?

No. It can also happen because of malnutrition, sleep deprivation, and not following The Torah

Hey Melinda what are your thoughts on mind altering drugs?

First define "mind altering drugs". (And not cut and paste from the dictionary)

 

[obliviousbeard]

Minimizing

Gaslighting

They told you this was their reason? Or you decided this for them?

Sealioning

 

[White Baby]

Only Elohim can fix a broken mind. And only if He is willing.

Please point out on the doll post where the bad man touched you the gendered language is.

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

Denial

The fake Jew and hillbilly is in no position to talk about denial.

 

[Postal_Rat]

First define "mind altering drugs". (And not cut and paste from the dictionary)

LSD, Mushrooms, psychedelics, compelling but not addictive chemicals used to induce an altered state of awareness.
have you ever seen the machine elves?

 

[Drowningman]

I'm waiting for Mel to throw such a fit in court that a judge slaps her with a 5150 and sends her to the mental hospital.

 

[Toasty]

I'm waiting for Mel to throw such a fit in court that a judge slaps her with a 5150 and sends her to the mental hospital.

If this dead baby of a lawsuit somehow miraculously ends up in a court hearing, due to the wonders of covid, it will most likely be over the internet. Which will be brilliant, as anyone anywhere in the states will be able to watch it. No need to go to Backfat, Va, and sit in a courtroom.
Not that it will of course, as she objectively never served him, and she also objectively has no case, but a girl can dream of watching this idiot trip over herself in public.

 

[Baby Yoda]

First to be clear, Christine is not my "sister". I cut ties with her 10 years ago. We had a brief encounter in 2013 and again in 2020 this past year to get my deceased mom's property. She is a biological relative, but not my "sister".

My sisters are women who share religious ties with me. In the words of The Messiah: "Who are my mother, brother and sisters? Those who listen and do the will of my Father in Heaven".

I know you are an atheist with an obsession over blood ties, so this may go right over your head, or be dismissed by your rationalizations.

Simply, Christine is a person with an opinion. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. She has her opinion, I have mine.

Nevertheless, she didn't grow up in the same house as my mom. She's entitled to her own opinion, but the fact remains she will have an opinion based on an outside view of a child that did not live with the woman known as Leslie Scott.





Denial


Facts to support said statement?


That's a question you need to be asking yourself. You lack self awareness of your behavior.



No, it's called not making assumptions. But I wouldn't put it past narcissistic people like yourself who Cyberstalk to be trying to contact your Scapegoats' biological relatives. Further, I wouldn't put it past a person like my biological (ex-)sister to be feeders for people like you.



Marshall giving me silent treatment isn't abandonment. There's a difference.

But I know part of your abuse tactics are false narratives. I can spot that a mile away. That's my "family of origin"'s speciality. I'm a master at spotting that.



Confirmation bias

Denial




First please d

Minimizing




They told you this was their reason? Or you decided this for them?




Except that there are 20 other studies showing otherwise




So, that's a narrative you invented in your head. It also shows you haven't taken the time to read and synthesize what I've said.


Only Elohim can fix a broken mind. And only if He is willing.




But again, if the woman was a consensual and willing partner in the sex, she can't be "used for sex".

This notion, that sex happens to a woman completely denies and ignores a woman's desire for sex. It is a philosophy that goes back to Aristotle. Aristotle believed "woman is the material on which a man acts". This kind of thinking compliments denies, ignores and dismissed women's sexual desires.

I'm guessing had poor performance in the sack with that kind of thinking.

Aristotle also thought that a man's sperm turned into a baby inside of a woman. So obviously he was just completely uneducated about woman's sexuality.

However, this general lack of understanding about woman's sexuality still persists today in many of the phrases modern people use to describe sex. Like the idea a woman can be "used for sex" (during consensual sex).


No. It can also happen because of malnutrition, sleep deprivation, and not following The Torah

Cope. I havent invented any narrative in my head. Its real.

Marshall made your clitoris puff up and you wanted his man meat deep in you. Now that Marshall's biological imperative is done and hia genetics are spread, your ape mind tells you to settle for some cuck and leech resources from him.

Make yourself useful and go make me a bacon and cheese sammich with scallops mixed in.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

First to be clear, Christine is not my "sister". I cut ties with her 10 years ago. We had a brief encounter in 2013 and again in 2020 this past year to get my deceased mom's property. She is a biological relative, but not my "sister".

My sisters are women who share religious ties with me. In the words of The Messiah: "Who are my mother, brother and sisters? Those who listen and do the will of my Father in Heaven".

I know you are an atheist with an obsession over blood ties, so this may go right over your head, or be dismissed by your rationalizations.

Simply, Christine is a person with an opinion. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. She has her opinion, I have mine.

Nevertheless, she didn't grow up in the same house as my mom. She's entitled to her own opinion, but the fact remains she will have an opinion based on an outside view of a child that did not live with the woman known as Leslie Scott.





Denial


Facts to support said statement?


That's a question you need to be asking yourself. You lack self awareness of your behavior.



No, it's called not making assumptions. But I wouldn't put it past narcissistic people like yourself who Cyberstalk to be trying to contact your Scapegoats' biological relatives. Further, I wouldn't put it past a person like my biological (ex-)sister to be feeders for people like you.



Marshall giving me silent treatment isn't abandonment. There's a difference.

But I know part of your abuse tactics are false narratives. I can spot that a mile away. That's my "family of origin"'s speciality. I'm a master at spotting that.



Confirmation bias

Denial




First please d

Minimizing




They told you this was their reason? Or you decided this for them?




Except that there are 20 other studies showing otherwise




So, that's a narrative you invented in your head. It also shows you haven't taken the time to read and synthesize what I've said.


Only Elohim can fix a broken mind. And only if He is willing.




But again, if the woman was a consensual and willing partner in the sex, she can't be "used for sex".

This notion, that sex happens to a woman completely denies and ignores a woman's desire for sex. It is a philosophy that goes back to Aristotle. Aristotle believed "woman is the material on which a man acts". This kind of thinking compliments denies, ignores and dismissed women's sexual desires.

I'm guessing had poor performance in the sack with that kind of thinking.

Aristotle also thought that a man's sperm turned into a baby inside of a woman. So obviously he was just completely uneducated about woman's sexuality.

However, this general lack of understanding about woman's sexuality still persists today in many of the phrases modern people use to describe sex. Like the idea a woman can be "used for sex" (during consensual sex).


No. It can also happen because of malnutrition, sleep deprivation, and not following The Torah

More than 100 research papers on the subject. Researchgate is a well known site for reposting peer reviewed papers.

Search Publications | ResearchGate

Discover the world's scientific knowledge | With 15+ million researchers, 1+ million questions and 118+ million publications, this is where everyone can access science

www.researchgate.net

. Even more on Google Scholar https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?start=210&q=gender+differences+in+narcissism&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5.

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

@TamarYaelBatYah - So I guess by virtue of not answering my question, you’re admitting that you lied? Now that you’ve admitted that you’re capable of it, it makes all of your statements that much more suspect.

 

[Baby Yoda]

@TamarYaelBatYah - So I guess by virtue of not answering my question, you’re admitting that you lied? Now that you’ve admitted that you’re capable of it, it makes all of your statements that much more suspect.

@TamarYaelBatYah Remember last year when you called @Sir Dank-a-Lot a stupid nigger? Why did you call him that? I think you really hurt his feelings.

Arent black people also children of Elohim and just as worthy of salvation?

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

My sisters are women who share religious ties with me. In the words of The Messiah: "Who are my mother, brother and sisters? Those who listen and do the will of my Father in Heaven".

To my knowledge followers of actual Judaism still await the Messiah and there is no Third Temple standing for him to fulfill his role.

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

@TamarYaelBatYah Remember last year when you called @Sir Dank-a-Lot a stupid nigger? Why did you call him that? I think you really hurt his feelings.

Arent black people also children of Elohim and just as worthy of salvation?

No, we’re apparently stupid niggers according to her.

 

[LoverofPi]

First to be clear, Christine is not my "sister". I cut ties with her 10 years ago. We had a brief encounter in 2013 and again in 2020 this past year to get my deceased mom's property. She is a biological relative, but not my "sister".

Yes, she is your biological sister. Glad we cleared that up.

My sisters are women who share religious ties with me. In the words of The Messiah: "Who are my mother, brother and sisters? Those who listen and do the will of my Father in Heaven".

So, Christians. So again also her.

I know you are an atheist with an obsession over blood ties, so this may go right over your head, or be dismissed by your rationalizations.

That "obsession" is your assumption, Mel. I fully understand the notion of a found family. I just don't care about yours.

Simply, Christine is a person with an opinion. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. She has her opinion, I have mine.

You keep retreating to differences of opinion when discussing matters of fact. Is that another way you avoid admitting being wrong?

Nevertheless, she didn't grow up in the same house as my mom. She's entitled to her own opinion, but the fact remains she will have an opinion based on an outside view of a child that did not live with the woman known as Leslie Scott.

But who knew the woman her entire adult life. And that's assuming you're telling us the truth about not growing up in the same home. We have no reason to trust your version of events on, well, anything without external verification.

Denial

You keep throwing out psychology terms without knowing what they mean. "Denial" is not the same as "I do not agree that/ you are wrong"

Facts to support said statement?

Your mother was raised in a Christian environment by a Christian mother and was regarded as a Christian by those close to her in her old age. You, a known liar, are the only source for the claim that she was not one.
Plus, any time you say "Facts to support said statement" it's because we're right and you're mad.

That's a question you need to be asking yourself. You lack self awareness of your behavior.

Ooh, a classic deflection. So I'm just going to assume you don't know what a scapegoat is, because you still haven't used the term correctly. In either primary sense of the word.

No, it's called not making assumptions. But I wouldn't put it past narcissistic people like yourself who Cyberstalk to be trying to contact your Scapegoats' biological relatives. Further, I wouldn't put it past a person like my biological (ex-)sister to be feeders for people like you.

I'm not contacting anyone and you're not a scapegoat.

Marshall giving me silent treatment isn't abandonment. There's a difference.

Now that actually is a pretty good example of denial.

But I know part of your abuse tactics are false narratives. I can spot that a mile away. That's my "family of origin"'s speciality. I'm a master at spotting that.

Okay, so "False Narrative" is what you say when people don't believe your version of events in favor of the version of events as they witnessed it. Because I sure as hell witnessed Marshall leaving you high and dry the second your baby was born and ghosting you apart from sex now and then.

But again, if the woman was a consensual and willing partner in the sex, she can't be "used for sex".

So even under false pretenses, if a woman agrees, that's full consent? Welp, Melinda the feminist again! Rape by deception apparently does not exist in her world.

This notion, that sex happens to a woman completely denies and ignores a woman's desire for sex. It is a philosophy that goes back to Aristotle. Aristotle believed "woman is the material on which a man acts". This kind of thinking compliments denies, ignores and dismissed women's sexual desires.

I'm guessing had poor performance in the sack with that kind of thinking.

Aristotle also thought that a man's sperm turned into a baby inside of a woman. So obviously he was just completely uneducated about woman's sexuality.

However, this general lack of understanding about woman's sexuality still persists today in many of the phrases modern people use to describe sex. Like the idea a woman can be "used for sex" (during consensual sex).

This was a whole load of your emotional baggage that was very enlightening but honestly not really relevant to the discussion at hand.

No. It can also happen because of malnutrition, sleep deprivation, and not following The Torah

There's an obvious follow up zinger her but it's such low hanging fruit it's not even worth typing out. Following the Torah has nothing to do with whether or not someone suffers a mental illness. And there are times when a mental illness is genetically predisposed. NPD and Schizophrenia are both strongly correlative within a given biological family. And then sometimes something just... goes wrong for no discernable reason. That can happen and result in severe paranoia.

To my knowledge followers of actual Judaism still await the Messiah and there is no Third Temple standing for him to fulfill his role.

You would be correct. But Mel is is a Messianic, AKA a Christian LARPing as a Jew. She honestly has more in common with pre-millenial dispensationalists than any other denomination out there. She very much believes in the vengeful Jesus- or Yeshua in her case- who shall smite the unworthy when he comes

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Why would you think that any of your Scapegoats ("lolcows") would come here for "attention"?

Because why else would a lolcow be on a site that mocks them with no end? Some cows like Pamela Swain even admit they seek attention from us.

Women are more likely to suffer from mental health issues because they are the gender more abused (by men).

Citation?

Historically, Narcissism has been higher in men.

Meaningless. For example, NPD has historically been higher in poor people than in rich. Higher in blacks too. Does that have any effect on existance of the below mentioned things? No. Historically NPD has been linked with self employment. I could go on and on. But it's not "males are ~2-3% more likely to have npd so everything is men's fault". Also, if you look at the numbers, you'll find they are increadibly small. Less than 6-7% for both.
Assuming NPD is higher among men (by at most 3%) still does not make everyone here, and in your life, NPD. That's just statistically, and logically, impossible

Hence, Patriarchy, Polygyny and Prostitutes. DUH

That's retarded. Male prostitutes exist, and women partake in them. Male strippers exist for women. Women do polygamous relationships too, and blaming everything on patriatchy is just sad and retarded (as well as not accurate).
You take two unrelated things, and because they both exist, you assume they must be linked.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/03/150304104040.htm

You could not pick a worse study if you tried.
"Here they did a research on uni students, but that totally applies to adults though".
The conclusion of the study? Women don't seek power, therefore they need to be put in positions of power, and magically sexism is no more.

Also, you seem to have missed your responce to your mistake on BPD.

I posted a bunch of peer review studies showing that many of the myths that society holds regarding how easy men have it are just that, myths.

Link?