US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?

 

[Kane Lives]

So we shouldn't worry about how China is dominating the likes of Hong Kong and Southern Mongolia and Xinjiang, and how President For Life Xi is working to develop a cult of personality mant to make him look like the reincarnation of Chairman Mao?

We're fucked, aren't we? It's starting to look like that we're going to be forced to learn Mandarin without China so much as firing a shot.

I mean, for those areas, they're going to be sinicized, if they haven't already. I don't see how it'd affect Americans though.

I think you need to understand one thing: China is not capable of projecting its power beyond its shores and land for the moment. I think you are underestimating how much a lead America has in this area. What the USA has been doing, as the world police, for the past fifty years have not been replicated by any other nations to date, and for good reason: it's bloody expensive, and there is not much benefit in it. Unless you're American and you're driven by that weird mix of American morality and hypercapitalism.

China is also surrounded by unfriendly nations, all of whom would be more than happy to gang up on them should they start rattling sabres a little too hard. All this talk of China dominating the world is fanciful, and only the most ardent CCP supporter would even believe it.

What is more likely to happen is a return to the multipolar world of pre-WWI, and the interwar period.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

And they're doing a great job at it.

Yep, meanwhile.

No 15 Minimum Wage
Kids in Cages getting Covid
Bombing in the middle east.

So the actual shit they wanted doesn't get through but....JEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP MAN BAD! So they will be too stupid to realize they were Played the Administrative Complex and by next election the faggotry that The Actual Elites used to create "Joe Joe's Dementia Adventure : Part 9 I MALARKIED MY PANTS" will be entrenched into our system and neither the left or the right will have a real voice.

 

[soy_king]

I mean, for those areas, they're going to be sinicized, if they haven't already. I don't see how it'd affect Americans though.

I think you need to understand one thing: China is not capable of projecting its power beyond its shores and land for the moment. I think you are underestimating how much a lead America has in this area. What the USA has been doing, as the world police, for the past fifty years have not been replicated by any other nations to date, and for good reason: it's bloody expensive, and there is not much benefit in it. Unless you're American and you're driven by that weird mix of American morality and hypercapitalism.

China is also surrounded by unfriendly nations, all of whom would be more than happy to gang up on them should they start rattling sabres a little too hard. All this talk of China dominating the world is fanciful, and only the most ardent CCP supporter would even believe it.

What is more likely to happen is a return to the multipolar world of pre-WWI, and the interwar period.

Of China's neighbors that are truly hostile, it's only really Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam, Indonesia, and India. The rest are neutral (Mongolia, Myanmar) or "allies" increasingly economically dependent on them (North Korea, Laos, Nepal, Russia)

 

[SmugAutist]

So we shouldn't worry about how China is dominating the likes of Hong Kong and Southern Mongolia and Xinjiang, and how President For Life Xi is working to develop a cult of personality mant to make him look like the reincarnation of Chairman Mao?

No, because their population is aging at the speed of light, their navy can't do shit, they get the vast majority of their energy from other countries and require the help of US protection (like I said, their navy can't do shit) in order to get their energy from those countries. The reason why they've been able to grow is that they became the world's factory but that required US protection in order to export their goods to other places. Those exports require US naval protection (I reiterate, China's navy is absolute shit and would get stomped even by Japan's navy). But those exports required a massive workforce that they won't have in a few years because the one child policy is retarded and have now passed the point of no return for their demographics unless the traditionally xenophobic Han decide to import millions from Africa. Talking about Africa and their other allies, they don't like China, they like their money and can default at any point if the US offers them a better deal. Russia told them that they would flat out nuke China if they tried to expand into Siberia and their social credit system is more symptomatic of the CCP being worried that their own population might start getting angsty that they have to put up with the party corruption and political repression when their standards of living go into a freefall.

 

[Garm]

View attachment 1978824
Now they're going after fucking cars.
Anyone else noticing this all happened as soon as Biden got in?

That was the last straw for my family. Going after Chrysler products. It was amazing.

It seems like they're more emboldened now. Biden will clearly support them on it, based on what he did with Dr Suess.

Of course they are. Biden is supposed to be a sympathetic ear and no one will challenge them.

Problem is if you push too far, the harsher the backlash.

I mean, for those areas, they're going to be sinicized, if they haven't already. I don't see how it'd affect Americans though.

I think you need to understand one thing: China is not capable of projecting its power beyond its shores and land for the moment. I think you are underestimating how much a lead America has in this area. What the USA has been doing, as the world police, for the past fifty years have not been replicated by any other nations to date, and for good reason: it's bloody expensive, and there is not much benefit in it. Unless you're American and you're driven by that weird mix of American morality and hypercapitalism.

China is also surrounded by unfriendly nations, all of whom would be more than happy to gang up on them should they start rattling sabres a little too hard. All this talk of China dominating the world is fanciful, and only the most ardent CCP supporter would even believe it.

What is more likely to happen is a return to the multipolar world of pre-WWI, and the interwar period.

He's too autistic to understand that. He's going to be screaming about "inevitable Progressive Utopia" again here in a few minutes.

 

[Kane Lives]

Of China's neighbors that are truly hostile, it's only really Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam, Indonesia, and India. The rest are neutral (Mongolia, Myanmar) or "allies" increasingly economically dependent on them (North Korea, Laos, Nepal, Russia)

Neutrality is a very fickle thing. It might not be evident, but the SEAsian nations are not particularly comfortable with a belligerent China. (Not that it stopped the PRC from trying to buy influence in the region.) So yeah, if China started getting handsy around the region, I am absolutely certain the ASEAN nations will collectively tell China to fuck themselves.

And besides, if it comes down to a shooting war, I think I'll put my bets on poo-in-the-loo and hyperadvanced autism of Nippon, rather than the paper tiger of the PRC.

 

[WhatIsThePunchline]

Yeah, since Biden won they're emboldened. And they'll keep going as long as Democrats keep winning until they achieve their progressive utopia.

If you're going to keep using that term then use the correct words. The impact of sarcasm wears of after the fifth millionth time or something. An utopia is a good thing. "Progressive Dystopia."

 

[Random Internet Person]

Mongolia

You do realize there's a Southern Mongolia region where the CCP is going "Learn Mandarin and the ways of the Han or else!", right?

No, because their population is aging at the speed of light, their navy can't do shit, they get the vast majority of their energy from other countries and require the help of US protection (like I said, their navy can't do shit) in order to get their energy from those countries. The reason why they've been able to grow is that they became the world's factory but that required US protection in order to export their goods to other places. Those exports require US naval protection (I reiterate, China's navy is absolute shit and would get stomped even by Japan's navy). But those exports required a massive workforce that they won't have in a few years because the one child policy is retarded and have now passed the point of no return for their demographics unless the traditionally xenophobic Han decide to import millions from Africa. Talking about Africa and their other allies, they don't like China, they like their money and can default at any point if the US offers them a better deal. Russia told them that they would flat out nuke China if they tried to expand into Siberia and their social credit system is more symptomatic of the CCP being worried that their own population might start getting angsty that they have to put up with the party corruption and political repression when their standards of living go into a freefall.

Well, I watched this video a few days ago that talked about some aspects of China that sowed one aspect where China isn't doing so hot.

Of course they are. Biden is supposed to be a sympathetic ear and no one will challenge them.

Problem is if you push too far, the harsher the backlash.

And that's wy they're pushing so damn hard to establish their utopia as quickly as possible.

If you're going to keep using that term then use the correct words. The impact of sarcasm wears of after the fifth millionth time or something. An utopia is a good thing. "Progressive Dystopia."

Except to the left, they see it as a good thing.

 

[SmugAutist]

You do realize there's a Southern Mongolia region where the CCP is going "Learn Mandarin and the ways of the Han or else!", right?

Mongolia is not Siberia, and how is it any different from how China has acted out in the past? Mongolia is of no interest to anyone and the US is tired of being world police. That place is within China's natural sphere of influence but it has little to no resources to speak of. If they want to go into the world and get the things they actually need without US help? Well then they're going to have to deal with all of the problems the US has with a completely fucked up economy and a population that won't be able to support their boomer generation. Their military is shit, their navy is shit, and nobody is going to help them get stuff without at least getting paid.

 

[No. 7 cat]

China has barely one aircraft carrier, some old Soviet crock that had been left unfinished, scarely more than France.

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

 

[Random Internet Person]

China has barely one aircraft carrier, some old Soviet crock that had been left unfinished, scarely more than France.

Isn't that why they're moving to steal secrets from everywhere, especially America?

 

[Stoneheart]

More freedom bombs from Uncle Joe in the future?

Well he has to, the arabs are failing to even hold the line against a couple of thousand goatherders with surplus guns from iran and suicide drones from home depot.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

View attachment 1978847
I take it back, more woke please if it gets us more of this.

Not if they were born after 1993, they don't. I can do leagues better than vomit fried in vomit with a side of ??? all by myself, which is the best 70% of these women are willing to accomplish between between charging they phone, twerking, being bisexual, eating hot chip, and lying.

 

[soy_king]

Neutrality is a very fickle thing. It might not be evident, but the SEAsian nations are not particularly comfortable with a belligerent China. (Not that it stopped the PRC from trying to buy influence in the region.) So yeah, if China started getting handsy around the region, I am absolutely certain the ASEAN nations will collectively tell China to fuck themselves.

And besides, if it comes down to a shooting war, I think I'll put my bets on poo-in-the-loo and hyperadvanced autism of Nippon, rather than the paper tiger of the PRC.

ASEAN is a failure because it operates on a EU-style unanimous consensus model, and both Hun Sen of Cambodia and the Laotians are friendly to China and scupper any attempt at joint action against the PRC. If it got down to war, Poo-in-the-loo would have to deal with an attack from the Pakistani border and possible attacks from Nepal, while Japan can't really do anything without US support. South Korea was once a pretty dependable ally, but that too has become less uncertain since the election of CCP shill Moon Jae In.

You do realize there's a Southern Mongolia region where the CCP is going "Learn Mandarin and the ways of the Han or else!", right?

You do realize that the Republic of Mongolia has like 3 million people and is sandwiched between two countries that are much larger, more powerful than it, and are, for the moment, on very close terms, right?

 

[teriyakiburns]

China has barely one aircraft carrier, some old Soviet crock that had been left unfinished, scarely more than France.

They have two operational carriers. One they bought from Russia, one they built themselves. The second one sank at the dock, but has been out at sea since.

The problem that China faces is the same that Russia faced when they tried live carrier operations against Syria: lack of institutional knowledge. During that conflict, the Russians managed about three days of carrier operations, which were plagued by malfunctions, poor organisation and injuries. Carrier ops are complex. Too complex to just create out of thin air.

As of now there are only three nations on earth that have operated carriers for any significant period of time: the UK, France, and the United States. They started from first principles, learning everything as they went, and developed modern carrier doctrine from nothing, and have operated carriers continuously for nearly a century (I'm including the Invincible class because, while tiny by the standards of even the 80s, they were full-fledged aircraft carriers). The US in particular has honed carrier operations to a fine art, over decades of trial and error.

China thinks they can just copy a Russian aircraft cruiser, crib a few doctrine manuals, and field a fully operational carrier group to dominate the south china sea. First time they go up against any serious threat, they'll lose. It will require at least fifty years of learning before they can hope to maintain a viable carrier group.

 

[Scale Smerch]

Mongolia is not Siberia, and how is it any different from how China has acted out in the past? Mongolia is of no interest to anyone and the US is tired of being world police. That place is within China's natural sphere of influence but it has little to no resources to speak of. If they want to go into the world and get the things they actually need without US help? Well then they're going to have to deal with all of the problems the US has with a completely fucked up economy and a population that won't be able to support their boomer generation. Their military is shit, their navy is shit, and nobody is going to help them get stuff without at least getting paid.

Slight correction, Mongolia actually has extensive mineral reserves, especially gold, copper, and coal. Also they might share a long border with China, but they are firmly in Russia's sphere of influence (the Soviets are the whole reason Mongolia exists) and have built very friendly relations with South Korea, Japan, and the US. This is largely why China hasn't made any aggressive moves towards Mongolia, the risk is too great vs. the reward, in part because Russia doesn't care about optics - ask pro-Western groups in Georgia and Ukraine how well fucking around in Russia's backyard goes.

You do realize there's a Southern Mongolia region where the CCP is going "Learn Mandarin and the ways of the Han or else!", right?

Inner Mongolia isn't that comparable to Xinjiang, largely due to its geographical proximity to Beijing, larger native Han population (even before the CCP), and Mongolia itself providing a vehicle to retain Mongolian culture and traditions. Also most Inner Mongolians have long been loyal to China so from a Western perspective there isn't as much incentive to recognize a problem.

 

[SmugAutist]

Slight correction, Mongolia actually has extensive mineral reserves, especially gold, copper, and coal. Also they might share a long border with China, but they are firmly in Russia's sphere of influence (the Soviets are the whole reason Mongolia exists) and have built very friendly relations with South Korea, Japan, and the US. This is largely why China hasn't made any aggressive moves towards Mongolia, the risk is too great vs. the reward, in part because Russia doesn't care about optics - ask pro-Western groups in Georgia and Ukraine how well fucking around in Russia's backyard goes.

I think Putin flat out told Beijing that if they tried to fuck with Siberia, Russia would just nuke them. Russia may be completely screwed in the future but they still have that nuclear arsenal.

 

[Dark Edea]

Isn't that why they're moving to steal secrets from everywhere, especially America?

You can't steal operational experience. The equipment is nice but without experience and a mature training program the equipment amounts to a very expensive target.

 

[Terrifik]