Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
The whole superstraight thing is a cute and weirdly effective troll, some of them gen z kids are gonna turn out alright after all.

Happy womens day, yall. A natal woman in the U.S. will always have more in common with a woman in any other part of the world than with a transwoman who lives down the block and troons can fuckin' die mad about it. :)
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Winner
Reactions: Dolcit Star, Hell yeah dude, mister butafuco and 93 others
1615246773825.png


1615246914820.png
 
  • Horrifying
  • Islamic Content
  • Like
Reactions: Dolcit Star, Haftag, Shishou Dollars and 44 others
гape said:
maybe someone would've listened earlier if they didn't tune out immediately from their insufferable man hating wokescolding at every turn, if women are shit at fighting back against troons, its men's fault because the patriarchy's "female socialization". im surprised i even saw a few of them admit that in the past as liberal feminists, they helped bring all of this about, usually they just sit and play the victim all the time and act so dramatic with their oh woe is me, no one listens to women ever ever ever attitude, "oh this superstraight whatever is nice, but isnt it sad that men only started listening because of a meme and not because OF OUR STRUGGLES, WHY DONT MEN LISTEN TO RAPE VICTIMS?"
Click to expand...
Check out this Ovarit thread discussing SuperStraight:

Anybody irked that some little boy saying he's super straight on tik tok got more traction and support than say...Vancouver Rape Relief?

Posted in o/GenderCritical by linsin
ovarit.com ovarit.com

They're annoyed that the TikTok kid got more attention than they did, because he's a male of course. But some of them are starting to get a clue:
Keep it short and snappy. Keep it light and humorous. Troll but with serious, succinct inserts. Nobody wants lectures or rants, the people in the hashtag are there to have a fun, good time. Stick with that.
Click to expand...
A few of them are realizing that wit and humor work better than endless droning sermons.

Also, someone in that thread mentioned something even more interesting:
Most interesting to me is where are the usual suspects? Why hasn’t Clymer said anything? Isn’t he PR for the HRC? Is he waiting for it to die out? I don’t think it will. The memeing is out of control and hilarious.
Click to expand...
You think it's a coincidence that SuperStraight rhymes with GamerGate?

When the official talking heads are silent it's a bad sign for the status quo. When business is going on as usual, they're always quick to chime in and enforce the approved narrative. The fact that they're silent tells me that SuperStraight has caught them off guard and they're scared.

Why? My guess is that SS represents a perfect negative PR storm for them. It directly targets one of the weakest, least credible planks in their platform - that anyone refusing sex to a trans person is a bigot. Officially the trans institutions deny they believe this, but we know the trancels hold it near and dear to their hearts.

One of the reasons troons have taken so much institutional power over the last few years is that they've learned to fight ferociously for every bit of territory they can get and never, ever tolerate opposition. Anyone who opposes them must be crushed at all costs. And SS has just spit in their eye.

But the HRC and the other people pulling the strings know that this is a fight they must avoid. All their rabid footsoldiers are raring to go but they have to hold them back, because if they get into a public dispute where they're making a case that straight men owe it to trannies to suck their ladysticks, it's all over for their movement.

So will the Pritzkers and Clymers be able to keep their army of deranged incel diaper porn addicts under control or will they go into a vengeful frenzy and spark an online holy war bigger than GamerGate?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Hell yeah dude, pirate holiday, MikeFoxtrotTango and 29 others
Vaclav said:
Check out this Ovarit thread discussing SuperStraight:

Anybody irked that some little boy saying he's super straight on tik tok got more traction and support than say...Vancouver Rape Relief?

Posted in o/GenderCritical by linsin
ovarit.com ovarit.com

They're annoyed that the TikTok kid got more attention than they did, because he's a male of course. But some of them are starting to get a clue:

A few of them are realizing that wit and humor work better than endless droning sermons.

Also, someone in that thread mentioned something even more interesting:

You think it's a coincidence that SuperStraight rhymes with GamerGate?

When the official talking heads are silent it's a bad sign for the status quo. When business is going on as usual, they're always quick to chime in and enforce the approved narrative. The fact that they're silent tells me that SuperStraight has caught them off guard and they're scared.

Why? My guess is that SS represents a perfect negative PR storm for them. It directly targets one of the weakest, least credible planks in their platform - that anyone refusing sex to a trans person is a bigot. Officially the trans institutions deny they believe this, but we know the trancels hold it near and dear to their hearts.

One of the reasons troons have taken so much institutional power over the last few years is that they've learned to fight ferociously for every bit of territory they can get and never, ever tolerate opposition. Anyone who opposes them must be crushed at all costs. And SS has just spit in their eye.

But the HRC and the other people pulling the strings know that this is a fight they must avoid. All their rabid footsoldiers are raring to go but they have to hold them back, because if they get into a public dispute where they're making a case that straight men owe it to trannies to suck their ladysticks, it's all over for their movement.

So will the Pritzkers and Clymers be able to keep their army of deranged incel diaper porn addicts under control or will they go into a vengeful frenzy and spark an online holy war bigger than GamerGate?
Click to expand...
I'm hoping the leash breaks just this once and trannies are beset with bad optics for once. Won't happen because they're invincible, but a man can dream.
Also...
Hey, Ovarit ladies, if you're reading this: Plenty of guys are happy to have your back. Just give them a chance.
Don't be afraid to put your foot down when you need to, though. No one likes the proverbial "male feminist" so don't be surprised if in an attempt to oust perverted men pretending to be progressive, other men fill the void. Nature abhors a vacuum, after all.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: toetag, mama Lazarou, bloomingcactus and 28 others
Only a pornsick idiot could say something insane like an asshole is a universal vagina that somehow accesses "femaleness" or whatever.
You know what a vagina does? Its not just a hole for men to fuck. It leads to a uterus and is the exit for all new humans to be born from.
You know what breasts are? Not silicone balls that look good. They're milk banks that feed new humans and are what classify us as mammals.

So vaginas and breasts create and sustain all human life, without which we don't exist as a species.

But nah, for trannies "femaleness" is just all about (non reproductive) sex. Lets just call sex dolls women too then, they actually pass better than 99% of transwomen
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: HullDown, Shishou Dollars, repentance and 50 others
agree with @poggers. also, even without any kind of reproductive sex or making babies (like in the case of gay people)... the reproductive system and the hormones they produce keep one alive and healthy, developing correctly, not in heavy turmoil and not having endocrine malfunctions. it's also the seat of all sexuality. that's something to be grateful for regardless. i know trans ideology wants you to think that vaginas and penises are unremarkable shit hanging off you with holes in it and that your sexual function doesn't matter in the end, but it's not true. you can fuck with it for a few years without noticing anything, but it's going to come back to bite you, hardcore. imagine getting some kind of invasive cosmetic surgery on your liver, or your lungs.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: toetag, bloomingcactus, ScenarioOfTLoU2 and 19 others
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: ThotsForTism, Shishou Dollars, repentance and 28 others
poggers said:
Only a pornsick idiot could say something insane like an asshole is a universal vagina that somehow accesses "femaleness" or whatever.
You know what a vagina does? Its not just a hole for men to fuck. It leads to a uterus and is the exit for all new humans to be born from.
You know what breasts are? Not silicone balls that look good. They're milk banks that feed new humans and are what classify us as mammals.

So vaginas and breasts create and sustain all human life, without which we don't exist as a species.

But nah, for trannies "femaleness" is just all about (non reproductive) sex. Lets just call sex dolls women too then, they actually pass better than 99% of transwomen
Click to expand...
One thing I don't get at all is how people are saying that there is no way to tell the difference between a normal woman and a post-op man. Like, of course you can.
Comparing the hole that you get from transitioning to an actual vagina is like comparing a real flower to a $2 plastic nock off made in some sweatshop. Even that's a favorable comparison because at least the plastic nock off will resemble the thing it's imitating.

It's the reason why so many people can easily say they'll never be attracted to a trans person, because the harder you try to imitate something as complex as a human being, the harder your going to fall into the uncanny valley.
A lot of these trans people may "pass" when you just give them a quick glance, but if you where to spend your life with one then you'd begin to notice the small things. Bone structure, hormone balance [Smell, mood, sexual desire, how you age], the minor/major psychological differences between men and women. A couple of pills and a surgery can't even hope to match these incredibly complex and ever changing systems.
So eventually your brain is going to figure out this person you're with is neither a man or a woman and it's going to freak out and tell you to get the fuck away.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: ValVenus, LurkNoMore, Minister Burroughs and 25 others
Hollywood's Next Victim said:
One thing I don't get at all is how people are saying that there is no way to tell the difference between a normal woman and a post-op man. Like, of course you can.
Comparing the hole that you get from transitioning to an actual vagina is like comparing a real flower to a $2 plastic nock off made in some sweatshop. Even that's a favorable comparison because at least the plastic nock off will resemble the thing it's imitating.

It's the reason why so many people can easily say they'll never be attracted to a trans person, because the harder you try to imitate something as complex as a human being, the harder your going to fall into the uncanny valley.
A lot of these trans people may "pass" when you just give them a quick glance, but if you where to spend your life with one then you'd begin to notice the small things. Bone structure, hormone balance [Smell, mood, sexual desire, how you age], the minor/major psychological differences between men and women. A couple of pills and a surgery can't even hope to match these incredibly complex and ever changing systems.
So eventually your brain is going to figure out this person you're with is neither a man or a woman and it's going to freak out and tell you to get the fuck away.
Click to expand...
I will never be attracted to troons or their genitals in the same way I can say with 100% certainty I wouldn't fuck or lick someone's colostomy stoma "B-But you haven't even--" It's an INNATE reaction of disgust, and if you're a good person, you won't force someone to do something disgusting.
But they're npd pervs.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Somchai, s0mbra, Iraq Lobster and 33 others
гape said:
maybe someone would've listened earlier if they didn't tune out immediately from their insufferable man hating wokescolding at every turn, if women are shit at fighting back against troons, its men's fault because the patriarchy's "female socialization". im surprised i even saw a few of them admit that in the past as liberal feminists, they helped bring all of this about, usually they just sit and play the victim all the time and act so dramatic with their oh woe is me, no one listens to women ever ever ever attitude, "oh this superstraight whatever is nice, but isnt it sad that men only started listening because of a meme and not because OF OUR STRUGGLES, WHY DONT MEN LISTEN TO RAPE VICTIMS?"
Click to expand...

I made this point ages ago in this thread that a large part of why people don't listen is because of their attitude and how they frame their arguments. If you want the bulk majority of women on your side (and other people) it does not help your cause to demonize the whole of men who are their fathers, husbands, sons and brothers and why would any man want to lend his genuine support to a movement that hates him. That aggressive stance toward men and yelling about the patriarchy constantly will only drive people away from the supporting the cause. The man hating feminist as a trope is based quite a bit on their own rhetoric and behaviors which is actively sabotaging their own movement.

The ovarit thread below is just as petty as some of the TRA comments. Mad because they've been ignored, mad because women's voices aren't being centered, mad because nobody is listening to them. If nobody is listening to what you're saying maybe you need to consider why your message is being ignored and not just immediately pin the problem as being men or the patriarchy. There's an element of the delivery that very few of them seem to want to examine.

Superstrait has been picked up because it's highly accessible. There's no caveats to the belief their espousing. The only qualifier is that you are a natal sex person who only wants to date and have a relationship with some of the opposite natal sex who still presents that way, anyone who demonizes your sexual preference is literally attempting sexual coercion. Every strait person can get on board with this because it's a truth. No one is actually, as anyone with a lick of sense can see, demonizing anyone by stating what they are and their sexuality. It's literally just a statement of fact via meme.

Vaclav said:
Check out this Ovarit thread discussing SuperStraight:

Anybody irked that some little boy saying he's super straight on tik tok got more traction and support than say...Vancouver Rape Relief?

Posted in o/GenderCritical by linsin
ovarit.com ovarit.com

They're annoyed that the TikTok kid got more attention than they did, because he's a male of course. But some of them are starting to get a clue:

A few of them are realizing that wit and humor work better than endless droning sermons.

Also, someone in that thread mentioned something even more interesting:

You think it's a coincidence that SuperStraight rhymes with GamerGate?

When the official talking heads are silent it's a bad sign for the status quo. When business is going on as usual, they're always quick to chime in and enforce the approved narrative. The fact that they're silent tells me that SuperStraight has caught them off guard and they're scared.

Why? My guess is that SS represents a perfect negative PR storm for them. It directly targets one of the weakest, least credible planks in their platform - that anyone refusing sex to a trans person is a bigot. Officially the trans institutions deny they believe this, but we know the trancels hold it near and dear to their hearts.

One of the reasons troons have taken so much institutional power over the last few years is that they've learned to fight ferociously for every bit of territory they can get and never, ever tolerate opposition. Anyone who opposes them must be crushed at all costs. And SS has just spit in their eye.

But the HRC and the other people pulling the strings know that this is a fight they must avoid. All their rabid footsoldiers are raring to go but they have to hold them back, because if they get into a public dispute where they're making a case that straight men owe it to trannies to suck their ladysticks, it's all over for their movement.

So will the Pritzkers and Clymers be able to keep their army of deranged incel diaper porn addicts under control or will they go into a vengeful frenzy and spark an online holy war bigger than GamerGate?
Click to expand...

This thread is the perfect example of why they failed. So few are getting it.
Irked? Sure. Surprised, no. I mean society is always far more interested in trivialities than in in-depth information. Sloganeering is easily consumed and requires no thought. That’s one of the reasons trans caught on. Meanwhile our thoughtful nuanced responses are ignored and dismissed.

Social media is quirky and capricious. Marketers spend billions trying to trend and this kid comes along and blows up for no good reason. It’s impossible to predict viralability that’s what makes it so frustrating.

Most people come to social media for entertainment and distraction. SuperStraight is an easy to understand slogan that requires no thought, and for god’s sake no reading or research. Perish the thought.

It’s unfortunate but we have to deal with people where they are but hopefully we’ve learned a lesson: keep it short and pithy. Don’t bury the lede. Most people are not going to read a thesis length document. I really became more aware of this when I developed eye problems. My eyes tire easily and I can’t read lengthy expositions anymore. If you can’t make a point in a sentence or two no one is going to read it.
Click to expand...

The irritation in this post before she gets to the end. If you manage to hook people they are far more likely to actually look into and research but short and sweet to catch their attention is important. It's like a book cover. Sure there's all the knowledge inside and it might be very relevant or interesting to a person but if the book doesn't have a cover that catches their attention, it's far less likely to be pick up and read.

This is why it's so hard to convince other women. They have to shove those dark feelings down every single day just to move forward and cope.

If we start saying "women who experience XYZ are victims" they think, well I've experienced XYZ, am I a victim? And the word victim is a slur to us, because most victims are women and we despise women.

The denial overrides common sense because without that denial most women would be living on psych wards.
Click to expand...

Your viewpoints are not universal. I've been heckled and had to deal with rude men but I am not sitting here letting them control my life and play victim to all the 'horrors'. A lot of women don't want to consider themselves perpetual victims, they just move on. My mother always taught me that if you linger on a bad thing that someone did to you, you are letting them continue to control you. Acting like terrible things happening to a person destroys them and we're all walking around wearing masks to hide how traumatized we are is some dumbass shit. We should not be glorifying or weaponizing the suffering we've gone through, being stronger than- adapting- processing and moving on from our traumas should be the concept placed on pedestal as the standard. Saying 'you are a victim because of XYZ' does not mean you need to center your whole life around that trauma. Talk about taking away from the strength that females have by wanting them to dwell on and stay victimized.

The ovaredit thread is just more oppression Olympics and it's funny, but sad, I am female myself and I have no desire to sit around and woe is me(n). This is exactly the tactic the TRAs use. Constantly bringing up their oppressions, their victimhood, and I want no part of supporting that sort of bullshit being used by feminists either.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: HullDown, Hell yeah dude, repentance and 39 others
i get people not liking the "man-hating feminist" thing, but troons hate basically everyone who isn't a troon or an asslicker. being on their side doesn't really benefit anybody, even the fucking troons themselves (the ideology is enabling mental illness). being "for women's rights" is something compassionate people should want to do, even if they don't like some womens' approach.

it's a moral principle. men and women who cannot be convinced to give a fuck about women's rights even "nicely" never will.
case in point: liberal feminists/trans activists. radical feminists/"terfs" are nice and civil to those assholes but nothing happens.
women get bitter when they see that nothing is happening or things have gotten even worse, even if they were "nice" before.

tl;dr: so what if becky is a cunt, fgm is still happening.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Chic-fil-a fiend, UselessRubberKeyboard, Bleeding Heart and 54 others
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Big Tiddy Bara, Windows XP Home Edition, PizzaOfLass and 15 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back