Superstraight or Super straight is a newly classified sexuality where an individual only finds sexual attraction to members who were born as the opposite sex.
For instance, a superstraight male is only attracted to a natal female, but not a trans female. Permutations of superstraight include superlesbian (female only attracted to natal female), supergay (male only attracted to natal male), and superbi (either sex attracted only to natal members of either sex)
However, it is an unfortunate reality where superstraights are surrounded by bigots and hate, and thus superstraights are often marginalized or sent death threats such as above. As a bastion of social justice, Kiwifarms has gone through great lengths to archive this prejudice while sharing and celebrating superstraight culture. The purpose of this thread is to make it easier to find and document interactions within and towards the superstraight community, from negative comments by detractors and examples of solidarity in the superstraight community.
Is this the end of the trans movement?
This does have tons of potential to shake things up.
IMO it will live or die based on how much the grassroots (not corporate) LGB people see it.
Is this the end of the trans movement?
This does have tons of potential to shake things up.
IMO it will live or die based on how much the grassroots (not corporate) LGB people see it.
I think this thread might already be infected, if we go by this definition. Maybe this should be a superphobia thread instead. After all, wouldn't it just be too mean to disrespect the wishes of the poor supers? You know, have a heart? He he he.
Not saying everyone will “peak” like radfem, but Ive seen a lot more talk from women I know from this going around. Trancels on suicide watch (what’s new)
That's called being straight. Adding a label like this insinuates that being straight means that you can date men which, no, that's gay. The whole thing stunk the moment it popped up given how much bullshit was spewed onto 4chan simultaneously. Gay op.
Interesting how they straight (lol) up admit that Systematic Oppression et al. are perfectly acceptable when used on the correct targets. It might be a troll, but given the context of the discussion that seems unlikely,