U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
This article has some interesting takes on the autopsy.

Forensic Pathologist Breaks Down George Floyd's Death​

— An outside perspective on viral videos, autopsy findings, and the medical examiner's role​


On May 25, 2020, George Floyd, 46, died following his arrest and restraint, handcuffed and prone, at the hand of Minneapolis Police Department officers. Eyewitness video of Officer Derek Michael Chauvin kneeling on Floyd's neck went viral on social media. I'm first going to take you through the videos of George Floyd's death so you can see them through the eyes of a forensic pathologist. I currently perform forensic autopsies in California, and I analyze videos of officer-involved deaths as a part of that job. I played no part in this death investigation.

Autopsy means "see for yourself" -- but sometimes the autopsy doesn't show you everything. A forensic pathologist cannot accurately determine the cause of death and the manner of death by looking at the autopsy findings alone. That's because there are several ways to kill people without causing devastating injury to the internal organs. Asphyxia from neck and chest compression is one of those ways.

The Washington Post has video from a restaurant pointed at the street that captured George Floyd's first interactions with the police. In it, you can see two police officers. One talks to Floyd for over two minutes before he tries to remove him from the vehicle. Floyd then briefly struggles with both officers and appears to nearly collapse at 03:14- 03:17. As an officer walks Floyd, who is handcuffed behind his back, over to the wall, Floyd's gait is uneven. He is talking to the officer, and they appear to continue the dialogue as the officer assists Floyd in sitting down against the wall. The officer even makes some notes in his notepad. The officer lifts Floyd back to his feet by pulling up on his arms, which causes Floyd to grimace and turn his face toward the officer. His gait is again lurching and uneven as the two officers walk him across the road to their patrol vehicle. When they reach it, he falls to the ground for a moment.

The fact that Floyd appears to be talking to the officer and the officer is taking notes suggests that Floyd is engaging in dialogue. The gait disturbance suggests that Floyd may have been under the influence of alcohol or some other drug that could affect his balance. The grimace as he is being handled suggests that the cuffs are on too tight or that he is in pain during this encounter as the officer pulls up on his cuffed arms. Here's what I don't see: I don't see someone who appears to be suffering from excited delirium when drugs of abuse can cause agitation, hyperthermia, and sudden death. Floyd is not naked or dressed inappropriately for the weather. He does not appear to be sweating profusely. He does not appear to be agitated or violent.

A short bystander video from another perspective shows three police officers kneeling on Floyd while another stands at his head. They appear to be exerting pressure on his neck, torso, left (still handcuffed) arm, and legs. Pressure on the torso can limit chest rise, and added pressure on other parts of the body can decrease cardiac return (the volume of blood coming back from the limbs).

Looking at a longer, unedited bystander video posted on Facebook, the first thing I notice is that Floyd's voice sounds gravelly, and he repeatedly says, "I can't breathe." EMS and police are sometimes trained that anyone who says "I can't breathe" is lying -- because if you can speak, you can breathe. This is not true, and there are many reasons why people might say "I can't breathe" and still be in medical distress. These reasons include increasing fatigue of respiratory muscles; blockage of pulmonary blood flow; incomplete airway obstruction; and acidosis, a buildup of acid in the blood which triggers an increased breathing rate and causes the sensation of shortness of breath.

At the start of the video, Floyd has already appeared to have lost bladder function. This can be a sign of medical distress. Floyd specifically mentions "the knee in my neck," a coherent statement and not the grunting and screaming we typically hear in deaths from excited delirium. As this video starts, Officer Chauvin already has his knee pressed on Floyd's neck, and you can see that pressure is being applied to the part of his anatomy that contain the carotid arteries and jugular veins. Floyd first appears to become unresponsive at 4:01. He stops talking, his eyes close, and his face is still. Bystanders start noticing this at 4:45. At 6:58 an officer checks his pulse. Officer Chauvin's knee doesn't come off Floyd's neck until 7:55, over 3 minutes after Floyd first seems to have gone unconscious.

The district attorney's charging documents in the case stated, "The autopsy revealed no physical findings that support a diagnosis of traumatic asphyxia or strangulation," and that "Floyd had underlying health conditions including coronary artery disease and hypertensive heart disease. The combined effects of Floyd being restrained by the police, his underlying health conditions, and any potential intoxicants in his system likely contributed to his death." In contrast, the medical examiner's first press release stated that "the cause and manner of death is currently pending further testing."

Why the difference?

Charging documents are usually written by attorneys based on information obtained from police officers and a representative of the medical examiner's office. They should not be interpreted as the definitive result of the autopsy, and they are frequently inaccurate. The headlines that suggested that asphyxia had been ruled out by the medical examiner were wrong.

So were the ones that said that Michael Baden, MD, did an "independent autopsy." Baden is a retained expert and is being paid for his services by Floyd's family. He is not independent. The Hennepin County Medical Examiner, which is paid by taxpayer money, is the only independent agency here. They did the first, legally-mandated autopsy, and collected the evidence. The medical examiner's office is not an arm of law enforcement. If a retained expert finds something at autopsy that is not favorable to the client's legal case, the client doesn't have to disclose that expert at all. Everything the medical examiner does and all the evidence they collect is a public record. None of their findings, no matter what they reveal, can be suppressed.

Furthermore, a "second autopsy" is always fraught with problems. The process of performing the first autopsy causes "autopsy artifact" -- severed blood vessels, dissected organs, and even broken bones -- that the second autopsy pathologist may not be able to distinguish from inflicted injury. When I perform a forensic autopsy on someone we suspect might have died of asphyxia, I will frequently keep the entire neck block (the windpipe, blood vessels, and surrounding organs and structures of the throat) in a stock jar in the morgue, as evidence. I may even save large sections of the heart and brain for specialized testing. These materials would not be available to a private-practice pathologist hired to perform a second autopsy.

If Baden looked at Floyd's corpse after a thorough forensic autopsy, there would have been little left for him to examine. Keep in mind that he also does not have access to all the evidence in the case, such as the medical records, witness statements, body camera videos, or police reports.

Following a press conference on June 1 about the second autopsy, Baden admitted that portions of Floyd's organs were indeed missing, and that he didn't have access to the results from toxicology testing. Soon after, the Hennepin County Medical Examiner issued a press release, and subsequent to that, the full autopsy report, which indicated that the cause of death was "cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression," and that the manner of death was homicide. They listed arteriosclerotic and hypertensive heart disease, fentanyl intoxication, and recent methamphetamine use as other significant conditions contributing to death.

This means that Floyd stopped breathing and his heart stopped beating (cardiopulmonary arrest) because of the injury caused by his restraint in the custody of law enforcement officers, to include asphyxia from neck compression. Asphyxia means that there is a lack of oxygen going to the brain. It can happen from obstruction of the airway, restriction of breathing from compression of the neck or chest, or the prevention of blood flow to the brain by collapsing the blood vessels in the neck. It can also happen from the replacement of oxygen in the blood by carbon monoxide, or depletion of oxygen in the atmosphere, like in a fire. "Cardiopulmonary arrest" is not a heart attack. Online sources that imply that the medical examiner is covering up George Floyd's death by calling it a "heart attack" are wrong.

The death certificate's "other significant conditions" -- Floyd's natural heart disease and the presence of drugs of abuse in his tested blood -- do not excuse the officers, nor should they cause anyone to blame the victim. They are there on the death certificate because those findings, in the opinion of the medical examiner, would have made his death more likely. They are not the cause of death. The cause of death is police restraint.

At the end of their press release, the Hennepin County Medical Examiner adds the following important reminder: "Under Minnesota state law, the Medical Examiner is a neutral and independent office and is separate and distinct from any prosecutorial authority or law enforcement agency." Regardless of whether experts agree with their interpretation of the evidence, they were the first to collect it, and because they did their job, that evidence is now available for public scrutiny in a court of law.


I think the defense is going to say that Floyd was fucked up before Chauvin even got there and that the combination of drugs and underlying health problems combined with what I understand to be no visible trauma on the body means that he could have checked out on his own.

And remember, fronds, in the American justice system, in order to find the defendant guilty, the standard is BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.

The defense doesn't have to prove that Floyd up and died by himself. They don't have to prove anything. They just have to shit all over the prosecution's case.
 
I think the defense is going to say that Floyd was fucked up before Chauvin even got there and that the combination of drugs and underlying health problems combined with what I understand to be no visible trauma on the body means that he could have checked out on his own.

If the prosecution decides to parade the half dozen junkies and attempted murderers that want to cry about being 'choked by Chauvin' it's only going to strengthen the defense. How did all these lowlifes survive the apparently harmless restraint procedure when Floyd died? Did it have something to do with all the drugs he swallowed? If it wasn't the drugs, what's the explanation then - did Chauvin just decide that of all the times he had the chance to kill he choose the one where 19 cell phones are recording him?

It's completely unhinged.
 
actually there's a high probability that the jury is all black, theres no way chauvin walks free
There's no way they'd enpanel an all-black jury, the defense would make sure to strike at least one or two joggers. If they did and Chauvin was convicted then that would be absolutely Clown World hilarious since we've finally found the best way to atone for all those Jim Crow all-white juries.
 
Immediate grounds for appeal right there, so unlikely. But it would be hilarious.

All it takes it one juror and it ends in mistrial.
They might not allow a hung jury. It might be a case of "you can't leave until the verdict is in hand".
 
You're optimistic.

Maybe I am.

They might not allow a hung jury. It might be a case of "you can't leave until the verdict is in hand".

There is only so much the judge can do if the jury can't come back with a verdict. If he pushes too hard, that also becomes rich ground for appeal.

Weird as it sounds, mistrials and judicial delay is good for defendents, generally. The further away from the alleged crime, the less public interest and pressure, the less aggressive the prosecution, and the greater odds of success.

So the DA/judge going full ham and spiking this trial with over the top bullshit might ultimately benefit Chauvin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: queue-anon
Weird as it sounds, mistrials and judicial delay is good for defendents, generally. The further away from the alleged crime, the less public interest and pressure, the less aggressive the prosecution, and the greater odds of success
They've been rioting for almost literally a year.

The chimps aren't going to let this go.
 
They've been rioting for almost literally a year.

The chimps aren't going to let this go.
Riots have lost their shock value, and it's becoming increasingly clear that this is now the default state instead of an escalation in response to something. The only emotion they can elicit is the "It's all so tiresome" meme. Nobody gives a fuck about appeasement anymore.
 
The one hope for the Republican Party to preserve their values in a modern world is to denounce the alt right, particularly the "what are we conservating" types as Nick Fuentes or the conspiracy theories as Q.

Unfortunately, it's a losing battle with the scales being unfairly tipped over.
Every time Republicans denounce someone labeled "alt-right", the Left pounces and demands every Republican labeled a such. Republicans who play that game always lose (unless they're a grifter)

I'll use Romney as an example. When Romney ran against Obama, he was considered a lunatic for thinking Russia was doing anything nefarious, a sexist for having a binder with female candidates he'd appoint, and a racist for being Republican. Obama did the EPIC MIC DROP with "Romney, the 80s called, they want their foreign policy back". When Romney was against Trump and even crossed aisles to support impeachment, he was considered one of the few good Republicans. When Romney had his recent accident, it's "this is the least you deserve for being a Republican".

That's why people look towards the "what are we conserving" types.
 
1615321291448.png

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back