U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've said a couple of times in this thread if the Floyd incident didn't happen, the media would have selected another sainted victim to kick off the riots. They've been wanting this shit for years now.

We all should feel betrayed.
There was Jacob Blake and the guy that stole the cop's taser and tried to shoot him with it in Atlanta. They were pushing for the Arbery one to be it, but that one didn't pan out for them. They were pushing for just one. One to start riots and say that they will end you if you dare oppose them. They wanted you to kneel and they won't let some pesky, annoying thing like facts get in the way.
 
So I'm cracking open the autopsy for the first time this year and I had forgotten some of the particulars. (But Pepperidge Farms remembers.)

  • Recent history of coof
  • Tobacco and weed smoker
  • Sickle cell
  • Very narrowed arteries
  • Hypertension
  • Enlarged heart
  • Congested lungs
  • Fentanyl, morphine, meth, and weed
  • Nasty toenails
  • Tattoo that said "Floyd"

Preguntita, why was he wearing two pairs of pants? Is that common?


Also, the Wikipedia article has details that make me think Chauvin's attorney could throw some of this shit off on Thao, who was pinning Floyd's chest.

As Floyd continued to cry for help, Thao said to witnesses: "This is why you don't do drugs, kids."
 
Something interesting that I haven't heard brought up yet, when you're a drug addict and you use in the same place, you adapt to the cue of that location and your body begins creating preparatory protective measures to deal with the drug even before you ingest. That's why an addict can take the same dose in an unfamiliar location and suddenly, unexpectedly die from it, even though that same amount would not kill them if they took it at a location where they regularly use.

So yeah. His tolerance means fuck-all if he's taking drugs in an unfamiliar place, such as in this case.
 
Since this seems to be the Chauvin trial watch thread by default, I thought you guys might appreciate some more information. This attorney does pretty thorough recaps of the days events, and he does a pretty good job in my opinion. He's got a slight bias but it doesn't seem to really skew his coverage too much.


He does a pretty good job at explaining things to a lay person, I think you could do a lot worse for daily summaries.
 
I'd say it depends where they live.
Every latino I know including myself is no fan of the Fentanyl freak, and it's always good to remember that the Latin Kings and Dominicans in NY gave the joggers their ass on a platter to the point they're now Huwait Soopremaciss, and I'm sure some of them haven't forgotten the smears either.

But... Latinos are no fans of pigs either.
A dead nigger or a White cop. Tough choice tbh.
Well, if 1992 happens they'll have a lot of Call of Duty targets.
lol this shit has been on the agenda since May, 8, 1945
View attachment 1984548
Seems progressive utopia was in the cards for literal decades, and they may have even known back then that there was a chance that a massive resentment would be fostered so they'd have to crush any desire to resist with extreme prejudice.
 
"Police reform" is a bad faith argument that only morons who are totally ignorant and leftist liars use. The police are constantly "reforming" themselves, both they and the military poor tons of money into researching everything from the least leathal ways to subdue a suspect to the best methods of crowd control to studying what cracked out nigger in the ghetto is most likely to kill someone that day. The DOJ employees thousands of statisticians and research scientists to study what the best way to deal with violent people in diffrent situations are. The fact that in a country like America, where there are a lot of fire arms, a lot of drugs and crazies, and something like 3 million calls to police in a year yet only about 1500 people die at in police custody shows that this machine is about as finely tuned that is ever humanly going to get.

The fact of the matter is there is no 100% non leathal manner of restraining someone. The fact of the matter is there are sometimes bad cops, or good cops who make mistakes, because cops are humans. No human institution is ever perfect. There are doctors out there who purposefully mutilate their patients because they're sociopaths in a position of power and when you look into their cases their hospitals often had a hand in covering up their misdeeds at least for a while, there are tens of thousands of people who are infected with AIDs or one of the Heps or other bloodborn diseases because shitty nurses and doctors will use needles on themselves and they reuse them on patients, and were in the middle of setting a dramatic spike in medical malpractice cases because hospitals keep hiring unqualified minorities, but I never see anyone calling for "doctor reform".

I'm willing to believe there are a few forces, mostly in places like Philadelphia and Chicago, who have problems with corruption and covering up mistakes, and yes that isn't okay. But even then my sympathies are somewhat strangled because that's those cities entire governments, why in the fuck do you expect the police to be the one exception to standard?
 
I'm willing to believe there are a few forces, mostly in places like Philadelphia and Chicago, who have problems with corruption and covering up mistakes, and yes that isn't okay. But even then my sympathies are somewhat strangled because that's those cities entire governments, why in the fuck do you expect the police to be the one exception to standard?
They don't. They're just stupid and being pointed at an enemy to hate.

Police are an easy target because they generally don't do woke on racial issues, as a result of having to monitor difficult minority communities.
 
I posted the full autopsy report here back in July because it went missing from the Hennepin county coroner's site. Read the full thing for yourselves.
I went to direct someone to the official George Floyd autopsy, specifically the toxicology section, from the Hennepin County Medical Examiner site but it looks like it's no longer available. I already had it downloaded on my phone and am going to post it here in case anyone else wants to save it for future reference.

The link google gives me that used to work now shows this:
View attachment 1481246
Think they're trying to memory hole this?
 
I've said a couple of times in this thread if the Floyd incident didn't happen, the media would have selected another sainted victim to kick off the riots. They've been wanting this shit for years now.

We all should feel betrayed.
Absolutely.

They already tried it a month before with Ahmuad Arbery a month before, but that didn't catch on except for making "jogger" a slur.
 
Why is the defense not striking people with strong BLM support? Like, every member of the jury is pro-BLM despite the fact the lawyer could just strike these people. What a joke.

Because that would make sense, we can't have that.
Well, pack it in. Chauvin is guilty on all charges. Progressive utopia awaits us.
 
I've said a couple of times in this thread if the Floyd incident didn't happen, the media would have selected another sainted victim to kick off the riots. They've been wanting this shit for years now.

We all should feel betrayed.
Alex Jones speculated for a few minutes about whether or not the incident at Sandy Hook was real or if it was a coordinated piece of propaganda. As a result some of the parents of the children murdered at Sandy Hook were harassed, digitally and physically for a few weeks.

He was sued for millions of dollars and unpersoned.

The mainstream media speculated for months about how a man who died of a drug overdose was actually murdered in public view by a police force that loves to hunt and kill black people. As a result, several dozen people were murdered, thousands were hospitalized, hundreds of buildings were burned to the ground, just ruination on a scale never before seen outside of an actual war.

Well, the legal precedent has been set....
 
Again, they're railroading things to Hell.
They literally tried to get her on the "she's a pro white supremist, anti-mask lunatic", if I understood the prosecution right. Also, I love the concept of a LAWyer asking a citizen if they view breaking the LAW is a negative thing, like no shit her view on hard drugs isn't positive.
 
Why is the defense not striking people with strong BLM support? Like, every member of the jury is pro-BLM despite the fact the lawyer could just strike these people. What a joke.

I think there's a good chance either the defense has been gotten to by BLM/Antifa and compromised or there's some bullshit de facto thing that will more or less forbid the defense from striking down jurors.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back