Debate user "Null" on whether all women want kids and other MGTOW propaganda

Status
Not open for further replies.
Null said:
Sure. You could argue that Ethan Ralph is the World's Best Dad. He has indeed reproduced.

1. Is that child going to survive to adulthood, or be drowned by his mother in the bathtub?
2. Is that child going to enter adulthood with mental health that will allow it to have children of its own? If not, the Ralph is still technically a genetic dead end.
3. Is that child going to breed with niggers and make the genetic legacy of Ethan Ralph 56% mutt babies, therefore ruining his genetic legacy?

The reproduction game encourages an active, healthy, good parental figure to make sure that Generation 1 progresses into Generation 3.

The more you think about life as just a reproduction game, the more things make sense.
Click to expand...
By your logic, Ethan is more successful than you.

What is he doing that you aren't?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: caramori, not william stenchever, Skarlatvoros and 9 others
Josh is trying to convince trannies larping as women that we are here to reproduce. Any actual women who is not reproducing is drowning her sorrows into boxed wine, dwindling away her miserable days until one day paramedics find her corpse being consumed by her numerous cats.
 
  • DRINK!
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: longjohn, Nano50, Sundae and 13 others
Null said:
3. Is that child going to breed with niggers and make the genetic legacy of Ethan Ralph 56% mutt babies, therefore ruining his genetic legacy?
Click to expand...
But there's also a biological imperative to breed with racially diverse mates, to create stronger, healthier babies that avoid the kind of genetic stagnation that lead to the near-extinction of AmerIndians in the colombian exchange. By trying to safeguard recessive genetic markers in your offspring you're essentially denying the biological imperative to create strong and hardy mutt babies because you'd rather support the social and cultural legacy of the white race.

I'm not saying this is a bad thing. I'm just pointing out that, like most social animals, our biological imperative seems to be geared towards propagating the species and the community we find ourselves attached to, and not necessarily passing on our own genes as individuals.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: biozeminadae1, longjohn, Azafran90 and 23 others
Dyn said:
But there's also a biological imperative to breed with racially diverse mates, to create stronger, healthier babies that avoid the kind of genetic stagnation that lead to the near-extinction of AmerIndians in the colombian exchange. By trying to safeguard recessive genetic markers in your offspring you're essentially denying the biological imperative to create strong and hardy mutt babies because you'd rather support the social and cultural legacy of the white race.

I'm not saying this is a bad thing. I'm just pointing out that, like most social animals, our biological imperative seems to be geared towards propagating the species and the community we find ourselves attached to, and not necessarily passing on our own genes as individuals.
Click to expand...
Well, in any case, there are enough European peoples out there to breed with. Plenty of genetic diversity.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Azafran90 and The Sacred Chao
Null said:
No, I did not. "I want kids" vs. "I am glad I had kids."
Click to expand...
I don’t want to shit post any longer, but I was referring to this part of my post
Gaitlord said:
I don’t get why women def want kids no matter what, but men don’t def want kids?
Click to expand...
Which you replied to with
Null said:
Never said that. Women are biologically rigged to want kids. Men are different, they don't usually have a paternal alarm clock like women have. However, men are definitely only fully fulfilled with a family - which is shared with women.
Click to expand...
Which is what I said you said, but in more words.

This is too dumb now.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Ozma (ZeTrannyJanny), Bunny Tracks, GossipGirl and 9 others
It is baffling to me all the people in this thread somehow angry or surprised by the implicitly true statement that a person's biological imperative is to reproduce.

Literally all of us are only here because successive generations of your ancestors managed to reproduce, that includes all the failures, drunks etc. No matter how stupid they were, they managed to have a child and that's the only reason you are here.
In fact the societal virtue of having and raising kids serves an explicit civilizational purpose. Not only does it tie a sense of identity and purpose to the labor of those before you but it motivates people indirectly to think inter generationally as they now have physical collateral (their children) at stake beyond their own death.
Every great project, monumental effort or sacrifice whose fruits extended beyond the life of its creator are motivated, at least in part by the wellbeing of future generations, specifically YOUR future generations.
The imperative to reproduce is not only biological, it is an essential pillar of our civilization and it really confuses me when I see people mouth agape at this very assertion.

In any case, regardless of how fucked up things get, or how bad the collapse is, at least it will be my descendants who will have some small part in the future. When you don't have kids, your smug cost benefit analysis, vacuous name-calling or inauthentic appeals to social desirability will not change the fact that you are ceding the future to those with the basic faculties to complete the most basic biological purpose, and failing to do what even the worst of your ancestors could.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Bob Abooey, biozeminadae1, Fuddy duddy and 40 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back