Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Firstly, there's a lot more going on here than people simply expressing their opinion about me.

Secondly, the First Amendment does not grant anyone the right to post content on the internet about anyone unless they are "the press". KF is not "the press". Or do you claim to be journalists?

The First Amendment protects six things: (1) religious beliefs (2) religious practices (3) right to assemble (4) freedom of the press (printed words) (5) freedom of speech and (6) protesting the government's decisions

The internet is not "speech" because it's written, not audIo.

Melinda. I'm an American citizen. I'm a member of the press. I write for newspapers. Are you fucking seriously going to tell me that my articles, published in a newspaper and on the internet, are not protected by the first amendment? You are bat shït insane.
 
He's just trying to yank your chain, by the way. Feed your delusions and make you even more paranoid.

You're an idiot for even listening to him. Please, continue.
Really? I thought the Trolls on this thread were just "discussing"?
Also, your boasting ( in a Court filing, no less) " I'm a lawschool dropout" as if it somehowcasts you as an authority is as tragic as it is comedic. It's like going to court to fight a driving without a licence charge and saying " Your Honour, I failed the the roadtest 14 times, so I'm obviously a qualified driving instructor" Repeat after me, Mel "Failure is not success. Failure is failure. I am not successful, I am a failure"
👆👆👆Spiritual vomit and another person in search of narcissistic supply

Do you feel better about yourself now?

Clearly, spewing spiritual vomit out is the only way you can keep yourself in one piece. I know why that is.

Regardless of how you try to twist scripture, ethics, and the truth to justify doing it

I see that you're a newcomer here. I usually don't replicate debates on this thread but my favorite game to play with the Trolls here is "name that sin".

The other Trolls lost the game several times. I think somewhere about the 800 page mark I demonstrated that after 800 pages they have failed to demonstrate I am not TAMIYM [תָּמִים]

You've already rolled the dice and moved to your position on the board: "accuse Melinda/Tamar of being sinful."

Now I'll roll the dice.

Oh, look! The card I selected says: "ask your opponent."

QUESTION: Can you prove in less than 5 paragraphs that I am not TAMIYM [תָּמִים]?
She's in great company. You are more like us then you care to admit @TamarYaelBatYah

Well we all certainly have a sharp tongue here, now don't we?

I dare say we all here keep our sharp tongues contained as much as possible to the internet because we'd get into trouble in public if we didn't :cunningpepe:


True story!
 
Facts to support your claim?
The fact to support this claim is evidenced in your actual reply.
I made two main points in that post, one to inquiry about the incongruence of you banging a cousin when you've asserted you only bang people when in a relationship.
The other was to ask you not bother replying and pointing out you cherry pick things out of what you read.

You now proceed to ignore my first and truly main point and cherry pick just the second one to reply to, reading is hard but deflecting is easy.

You're amazing... And I don't mean that as a compliment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
The fact to support this claim is evidenced in your actual reply.
I made two main points in that post, one to inquiry about the incongruence of you banging a cousin when you've asserted you only bang people when in a relationship.
The other was to ask you not bother replying and pointing out you cherry pick things out of what you read.

You now proceed to ignore my first and truly main point and cherry pick just the second one to reply to, reading is hard but deflecting is easy.

You're amazing... And I don't mean that as a compliment.
Those aren't facts.


He's not discussing anything on this thread. He's banned. Probably for emailing you, because it's against the rules.

What's your point?
He's banned because he told on you.
 
According to who?


Why are you trying to lecture me as if we have any kind of intimate relationship that would cause me to care bout your advice or opinion?

NEWSFLASH: You're a Troll on the internet. Your opinions on life mean absolutely zero to me.

Worry about your own lack of morality in giving people unsolicited advice. TACKY to say the least.


My sources say otherwise


View attachment 1985306
View attachment 1985308View attachment 1985309

View attachment 1985310
What did I say awhile ago? "Melinda never met a conspiracy theory she didn't like." Because she was dangled an obvious conspiracy theory by someone who clearly just made it up and she gobbled it up hook line and sinker.

I see that you're a newcomer here. I usually don't replicate debates on this thread but my favorite game to play with the Trolls here is "name that sin".

The other Trolls lost the game several times. I think somewhere about the 800 page mark I demonstrated that after 800 pages they have failed to demonstrate I am not TAMIYM [תָּמִים]
You've failed to understand it, you mean.

You've already rolled the dice and moved to your position on the board: "accuse Melinda/Tamar of being sinful."

Now I'll roll the dice.

Oh, look! The card I selected says: "ask your opponent."

QUESTION: Can you prove in less than 5 paragraphs that I am not TAMIYM [תָּמִים]?
Your god isn't real. You religion is made up. Tamiym is not a real thing. Even if it were real, you are clearly lacking in integrity, not in accord with truth or fact, not of sound or healthy mind, etc. etc. etc.
You could never in a million years demonstrate you are remotely tamiym. It's why you demand others disprove it.

Well we all certainly have a sharp tongue here, now don't we?

I dare say we all here keep our sharp tongues contained as much as possible to the internet because we'd get into trouble in public if we didn't :cunningpepe:

True story!
Yes. Crazy vexatious litigants with NPD who belong to fringe Christian cults would sue us if they knew who we were. Best keep anonymous as we speak truth to power. For safety's sake, of course.

Those aren't facts.
Just gonna say, I called this play hours ago. It's like clockwork.
 
Really? I thought the Trolls on this thread were just "discussing"?

👆👆👆Spiritual vomit and another person in search of narcissistic supply

Do you feel better about yourself now?

Clearly, spewing spiritual vomit out is the only way you can keep yourself in one piece. I know why that is.



I see that you're a newcomer here. I usually don't replicate debates on this thread but my favorite game to play with the Trolls here is "name that sin".

The other Trolls lost the game several times. I think somewhere about the 800 page mark I demonstrated that after 800 pages they have failed to demonstrate I am not TAMIYM [תָּמִים]

You've already rolled the dice and moved to your position on the board: "accuse Melinda/Tamar of being sinful."

Now I'll roll the dice.

Oh, look! The card I selected says: "ask your opponent."

QUESTION: Can you prove in less than 5 paragraphs that I am not TAMIYM [תָּמִים]?


Well we all certainly have a sharp tongue here, now don't we?

I dare say we all here keep our sharp tongues contained as much as possible to the internet because we'd get into trouble in public if we didn't :cunningpepe:


True story!
your "religion" is makebelieve, and your "Elohim" is the oldest and filthiest lie currently poisoning the world, so any authority you think you have about any spiritual or ethical matters is purely bullshit. I think deep down inside, even you know that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
Level with me here. If you believe this place aggregates perverted, Satan-worshiping trolls why do you show us how easy it is to gaslignt you into believing wildest claims?
Really? I thought the Trolls on this thread were just "discussing"?
Yes. By the rules of this fine club for gentlefolks:
No trolling plans.
I see that you're a newcomer here. I usually don't replicate debates on this thread but my favorite game to play with the Trolls here is "name that sin".
I'm an agnostic. I don't believe in the concept of sin. I can only show you when you contradict yourself in your claims about sin when you do and when you admit to doing things you previously claimed to be sinful.
If you want to be contemptuous, don't capitalize the "T" in "trolls" - it's a sing of respect, that's why we write names with a capital letter.
QUESTION: Can you prove in less than 5 paragraphs that I am not TAMIYM [תָּמִים]?
If you mean "without blemish" it shouldn't be that difficult to prove. If you mean something else by that word - explain it.
Well we all certainly have a sharp tongue here, now don't we?

I dare say we all here keep our sharp tongues contained as much as possible to the internet because we'd get into trouble in public if we didn't :cunningpepe:
Yes, being assholes and saying mean things is socially acceptable on this fine board, at least within reason. I exercise this right and so do you.
 
In a way it's very sad that none of her lawsuits get far enough along for Melinda to display her 'evidence' of who we are and of our various sins and crimes. She must have hundreds of screenshots by now, it would have been a greatest hits of the thread. It could fuel things for months all by itself. After the lawsuit's dismissed, Melinda, promise me you'll put all of your evidence online.
 
She capitalises trolls because she thinks it som
ehow institutionalises her claims. She's really that dumb, believe it or not.

hey Melinda, if you believe what that Raf guy said, why didn't you amend your suit to include the "coal bosses" he claims are involved? Off ya go now, do some scribbles and mail your "facts" to the longsuffering Court Clerk.
 
Next Smelly Melly is going to tell us that she's gotten definite indications a dangerous individual called Samuel Whitcomb Hyde is conspiring against her.

We'll inevitably learn because she can't blur things properly that the email came from an A. Brunner with a hotmail address, and will be a totally real email from a real person and definitely not a joke.

Has an F. Sinatra or R. McNamara been emailing as well? Does they have an hot tips on the nefarious movements of Mr. Hyde by any chance?

Fucking amazing. :story:
 
Acts and Peter are not "The Gospels".

You have failed to demonstrate that Yahushua's Jewish disciples listed in The Gospels ever once called themselves "Christians".
It doesn't matter WHAT they called themselves. Greeks don't call themselves "Greeks" They call themselves Hellas. Doesn't make them any less Greek. Retard.
 
1. Well, you caught me! Guess I'll have to run away with my tail tucked under.

2. In re: your children and the story, I'm glad you agreed that YOU put your private life out on the Internet/KF. YOU engage daily with more private stories here than were ever displayed by the collective.

3. KF, according only to you, is the place for serial killers, et. al? You spend more time on this thread than anyone. You must feel right at home.


Questions:

1. Do you know who Martin Bryant is? I'm asking because you remind me a lot of him. No one suspected he would blow until he did, because everyone just thought he was a little off. Then one day...

2. An hour's worth of lurking here would've given you far more answers than the inaccurate ones that someone trolling you did through that protonmail account. Either they're trolling you, or they are another lolcow. Lapse in reason #3,497. Do you always accept exceptions over norms? The judge will be interested in that.
 
According to who?
By the Ten Commandments which are recognized by Jews, Christians, etc.
By the Hebrew bible.
It's also wrong according to law in pretty much every country.
By book of exodus.
According to Budhism (and really pretty much every religion ever except Islam)

Worry about your own lack of morality in giving people unsolicited advice.
Since when was it immoral to give advice?

My sources say otherwise


1615396813903.jpg

1615396724518.jpg
1615396688114.jpg


1615396671220.jpg
Lol, trusting anon emails. Honest advice, things like that is usually not considered Good Faith evidence by the courts.
Btw, on the last image, you forgot to censor the email address of your 'source'.
Spiritual vomit and another person in search of narcissistic supply
Source?
I know why that is.
And why is that?

I usually don't replicate debates on this thread
That's a lie. You replicate them frequently, you just tend to drop them as soon as you are proven wrong.

I dare say we all here keep our sharp tongues contained as much as possible to the internet because we'd get into trouble in public if we didn't
Says the women who at one point had a rage-fuelled rant calling everyone niggers.
He's banned because he told on you.
Proof?

Oh, btw, how did you manage to buy that house when you had to try and blackmail Kiwi's for money?

1615445063338.png
 

Attachments

  • 1615444958541.png
    1615444958541.png
    94.1 KB · Views: 74
  • 1615444971507.png
    1615444971507.png
    72.1 KB · Views: 69
Last edited:
According to Budhism (and really pretty much every religion ever except Islam)
Even Islam doesn't like liars that much:
Only they forge the lie who do not believe in the signs of Allah.” (Surah an-Nahl 16:105)

They of course have taqiya but it only applies in specific situations, most importantly: lying is allowed to save your life. Pretty reasonable if you ask me. And nothing like what Melinda is doing.
 
Back