US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
Back to the Obama years, the old and usual. Conservacucks crying at old Joe and being hypocritical numpties. Trump's downplaying of the virus was very apparent, but that doesn't matter now huh? I would bet you money, that in an alternate timeline, Trump doesn't get the vaccines out in force until August.
 
Need we also forget that Washington D.C. is militarized, a barbed wire-laden wall has been erected around the U.S. Capitol, and the new Secretary of State has approved the NGs to be stationed there until May and possibly longer as time goes on? You don't need all of that if you're confident you have the people's backing. It's why I can not in good conscience shake that Biden and Harris are de-facto illegitimate, and the shadowy puppetmasters behind them are flooring it with the accelerationism tactics.

I really hope they don't cross the red line with this latest 2A gun-grab attempt set of bills. All it would take is one glowie-tier incident to finally push them through, and we've got the goddamn Floyd death trial happening right now. If riots do kick off after the verdict (and they will, let's face it), one single shooting of a nog by a white dude, be it vigilantism or pure self-defense, would be the perfect propaganda justification for them to ram those bills into law.
Ok for those who cannot be persuaded to keep their glow stick in their pants please think about the impact you will have.

For example. Anyone remember Nadler? The congressman who s h a t his pants on live television? Push that. Constantly talk about that. Once that image is stuck in the publics brain then that guy is done for. No one will listen to him. Everytime he tries to do something he'll have some heckler saying "aren't you the guy who shat his pants?". This (just like the dean scream) will end his career. Character ruination is just as good or better then tradition means

Any thing you do you can be done by a legal, non violent method that can't generate blowback.

If you can't be persuaded to don't do stupid at least be smart about doing stupid. Alright?

Another example. You can have your car fake breaking down on a bridge. This will cause a traffic jam and will cause just as much disruption as seeding said bridge with caltrops. The fake a car breaking down method is legal. It doesn't feed the media smear machine. It can be denied as a normal thing. You can talk and organize a mass "fake a break down" openly in public. Where the caltrops method you cannot. You can avoid backlash with fake break down. The caltrop method will result in you being made an example of and be used as a an excuse to crack down further.
 
Last edited:
1615536106079.png
 

The blatant gaslighting is what gets me. What's worse is knowing a full half of the country is going to believe it, and what's worse, they will actively seek to silence and ostracize anyone who doesn't, because the left has decided in the past 5 years or so that they have a monopoly on what EVERYONE is allowed to express, discuss, and even fucking believe.
 
Ok for those who cannot be persuaded to keep their glow stick in their pants please think about the impact you will have.

For example. Anyone remember Nadler? The congressman who s h a t his pants on live television? Push that. Constantly talk about that. Once that image is stuck in the publics brain then that guy is done for. No one will listen to him. Everytime he tries to do something he'll have some heckler saying "aren't you the guy who shat his pants?". This (just like the dean scream) will end his career. Character ruination is just as good or better then tradition means

Any thing you do you can be done by a legal, non violent method that can't generate blowback.

If you can't be persuaded to don't do stupid at least be smart about doing stupid. Alright?

Another example. You can have your car fake breaking down on a bridge. This will cause a traffic jam and will cause just as much disruption as seeding said bridge with caltrops. The fake a car breaking down method is legal. It doesn't feed the media smear machine. It can be denied as a normal thing. You can talk and organize a mass "fake a break down" openly in public. Where the caltrops method you cannot. You can avoid backlash with fake break down. The caltrop method will result in you being made an example of and be used as a an excuse to crack down further.
Not for nothing, but all of these sound highly silly and ineffective due to the whole "control of the mainstream media" thing.

For example, you literally forgot Fartgate, where Swallwell of "the military will nuke American citizens" fame let rip a huge one on live TV and the media for some reason buried it as hard as the Northam blackface scandal. The same would happen with Nadler.
 
So as I’ve said before, I’m not anti-gun, but I am strongly anti-irresponsible gun owner, which I say just so I don’t sound like I’m playing devil’s advocate, because I’m genuinely interested in the opposing viewpoint here.

wouldn’t reducing the number of guns in people‘s possession / inflicting stronger penalties on improper storage or use also lower the chances of them also winding up on the black market?

If you make it harder to buy and ‘disappear’ them, it’s harder for them to get to the kind of criminals and people who shouldn’t have them.

Problem is that it's too late for that to happen. There's too many guns already in circulation and a stronger gun culture in the USA.

Japan's gun ban in the 1970's was effective primarily because there were so few guns in civilian hands even before the ban. Same goes for a lot of the restrictions in European countries.

All the gun shit does make me uneasy but we should be somewhat fine for now. Manchin might be a retard but he isn't stupid enough to think he can vote for something like that and not get tarred and feathered in the streets of West "by God" Virginia. Which is probably why we've seen so much news in recent weeks about how the Democrats hate him.

In any case - Take my advice, buy a shiny new pew pew toy with your stimbux, and also most definitely certainly probably absolutely don't* take it on an extended boating trip with it sitting loosely on the side of your boat, an action that would almost certainly cause it to be lost* forever

Manchin will probably be the one thing that keeps gun control from going through since he knows he'll both lose his seat and the Dems will lose their majority if he does vote for it.

I could see Manchin possibly voting against it becuase of his state being a red state. You know speaking of Manchin he's probably loves being the decideded vote now.

Pretty much this. Manchin is to the Democrats what Roberts and Romney are to the Republicans and with Manchin, he's going to be a lot more likely to vote red both to keep his own seat and to keep the razor-thin majority the Democrats have in the Senate.

If just one Democrat senator loses in the midterms, the GOP gains majority control of the House in 2022.

And before you invoke "muh voting fraud", I highly doubt the DNC's political machines are strong in West Virginia, at least not anymore.
 
Not for nothing, but all of these sound highly silly and ineffective due to the whole "control of the mainstream media" thing.

For example, you literally forgot Fartgate, where Swallwell of "the military will nuke American citizens" fame let rip a huge one on live TV and the media for some reason buried it as hard as the Northam blackface scandal. The same would happen with Nadler.
I said if you are not going be talked out of doing something foolish then I will tell you how to do foolish thing without being stupid.

The fake your car breaking down thing. It achieves the same out come as a brick of chicken and Freddy's.

Which is deny use of the bridge to cause further degradation of systems ability to function and thus degrade it's ability enforce it's will on you.

One method has almost no risk and the other has way too much risk.

Like wise there's a world of difference between setting a police car on fire versus glueing the doors shut. Both methods lead to denial of resources (squad car) used to enforce the states will on the masses. One method will have a higher legal pentally if you're caught and higher value for the medias smear machine where the other has a lower pentally and less value for the smear machine.
 
Last edited:
Like wise there's a world of difference between setting a police car on fire versus glueing the doors shut. Both methods lead to denial of resources (squad car) used to enforce the states will on the masses. Just one will have a higher legal pentally if you're caught and higher value for the medias smear machine where the other has a lower pentally and less value for the smear machine.
You sure about that "higher legal penalty" bit?


I don't see how the smear machine wouldn't ruin you either way if they wanted for not having the correct politics.
 
You sure about that "higher legal penalty" bit?


I don't see how the smear machine wouldn't ruin you either way if they wanted for not having the correct politics.
If you're going play rebel youre going get burned.
If you're ok with getting burned then you're going have to figure out how do things that benefits you in a way that doesn't benefit your opposition.

One thing which benefits opposition is doing something overly dramatic. Like shooting people. That feeds the smear machine and makes the opposition s position stronger. Where if it's funny, underwhelming or can be denied as something else then the media can't use it.

.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
And before you invoke "muh voting fraud", I highly doubt the DNC's political machines are strong in West Virginia, at least not anymore.
Many didn't expect the DNC machine in Georgia to be as strong as it was considering the amount of supposed control the GOP had. Without competent local oversight any DNC machine seems to be enough. Hopefully the GOP in WV care more than the GOP in Georgia.
 
This is correct, I'm simply saying that your alternative suggestions would not actually insulate you. It is laughable to pretend in 2021 that standards and fairness in legal actions exist.
Doesnt matter. The example of faking a car breaking down vs using a brick of chicken and Freddy's to disable a bridge is to illustrate what tactics to use if you decide to play rebel.

I rather you not do something stupid. The problem is there going be someone willing do stupid
My goal is to talk them down and wrangle their tardation.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
Many didn't expect the DNC machine in Georgia to be as strong as it was considering the amount of supposed control the GOP had. Without competent local oversight any DNC machine seems to be enough. Hopefully the GOP in WV care more than the GOP in Georgia.

True, but Georgia also has Atlanta.

West Virginia doesn't have a massive blue city. Morgantown and Huntington are light blue and Charleston is purple, but none of them could field the kind of political machine that Atlanta can.
 
True, but Georgia also has Atlanta.

West Virginia doesn't have a massive blue city. Morgantown and Huntington are light blue and Charleston is purple, but none of them could field the kind of political machine that Atlanta can.
My understanding is that Atlanta is basically Austin II when it comes to expats from places like California.

That's the real issue, as always.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back