- Joined
- Dec 8, 2016
That makes sense.No, I mean a biological male putting on a wig or having gender dysphoria isn't going to affect his place on the IQ distribution.
Random sample of a population of biological females vs trannies and you are going to get a many more trannies up in the multiple standard deviations above the norm. And that isn't just academic intelligence. But raw leadership abilities to analyze problems, organize and execute to solve those problems, or transform a population towards some large scale goal.
I think of Daniel Day-Lewis in There Will Be Blood but now in a wig let loose in any biologically female organization or power structure and he(or she) is going to mow down all who oppose him and rapidly come to the dominant position.
That is why every bit of tranny normalization that the S+ movement is fighting against out to have massive support from real females. Complete tranny normalization in society effectively means women become second class citizens.
I believe it is the belief that it is all sexism and the patriarchy that is the explanation for those very real biological differences that blinds a large part of the female population beyond the hapless radfems from realizing the danger they face from the tranny menace.
Instead most biological females see tranny normalization as just another form of acceptance that they are happy to support.
Still, trannies are mentally ill, terminally married to non-reality, and extremely self-conscious/emotionally fragile. Their entire existence revolves around their fetish. That offsets the value of any above-average IQ by a significant margin.
Any success a troon enjoys is undeniably affected by the fact that they are a protected class. If a woman ever tried to push back against a tranny, or even against the Religion of Trannidom without targeting a specific troon, she'd get canceled on the spot. This happens to TERFs all the time. The troons that inevitably replace them are seldom superior in ability or competence, not least of all because they generally tend to focus on activism first and their actual job second.
My guess is that most people hate troons, or would if they ever came into contact with one/had to compete with one, but can't be bothered to say so because doing so would just attract the wrongthink police. It's true that opposition without action doesn't mean much, but you can't really blame anybody for not doing anything when what they'd have to do in effect is push back against what is basically every major power structure in existence because they've all been moneyed into championing troonery.