Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

You said the Lake of Fire and Hell was only a Christian belief. I cite in my work non-christian Apocrypha.
One, that wasn't Useful. Two, to pull a you, who said only?

I never said I disliked it.

I said The Torah takes precedence. Psalms is not on equal footing with The Torah. The Torah is the law which sets the moral standard. The Psalms do not create new moral laws. The Psalms is to be understood in context of The Torah. You can't ADD to The Torah (which is a book).

These kind of pitfalls in your thinking. Says a lot about your moral inferiority.
Okay, so you are using the definition that the Torah equals the Pentateuch, then?

Facts to support your claim?
Your readings of various passages using made up definitions of words to arrive at the conclusion you like.

When have I ever filed a discrimination complaint on the basis of my religious and/or racial identity?
Look at that strawman, made entirely of straw that Melinda is fighting!

If none of the rules in the Torah apply to Goyim, why are you worried about a bunch of Goyim judging your habits and what you do with yourself? They aren't judges in the house of Israel, so surely you need not concern yourself with it.

Oh, no, you are all judges in the house of Israel. I decree it as a genuine and authorized pope. Infallibly and retroactively except where I don't want it to be.

Because we like to use her holy magical book as toilet paper and she has to defend its maiden honor. Her deity is a weakling.

Her god is incredibly weak and petty when you get right down to it.
 
Last edited:
We would have never known about Melinda's laughable book if she hadn't spent the first couple of hundred pages of this thread bragging about her upcoming book. You just never expected us to find the actual book.

And we thank you for it! It's hilarious in every single aspect. And it's all because you bragged incessantly about being a real! published! AUTHOR!
 
Your readings of various passages using made up definitions of
That's not a fact. That's still an opinion.

@TamarYaelBatYah No one here has ever asked yu about what you do with your vagina, ever. Human shitholes have always been the object of research. That OR porn we have experienced. Like the story I told of the porn shoot called Anal Lick Fest starring Amber Rayne. This bald porn actor named Christian anal fucks Amber while this blonde lady sucks Amber Rayne's butthole and she pushes it out and the director says "put your mouth on it SUCK. Put your mouth on it SUCK you fucking whore."
Do you watch tranny porn ever? I recently switched to the trans section of xnxx.com and have been watching a porn star called Natalie Mars. "It" can take 3 male dicks in its shitter at a time.
Thoughts?
The only porn that I think is not forbidden by The Torah is comic porn. I mentioned that before.

If none of the rules in the Torah apply to Goyim, why are you worried about a bunch of Goyim judging your habits and what you do with yourself? They aren't judges in the house of Israel, so surely you need not concern yourself with it.
That's what I've been saying.

Other than the debating on a purely philosophical level



The facts are that you clearly do not understand the words you claim to be reading and use definitions no other human on the planet would agree with. Also, you used "FACTS" in all capital letters, so you're clearly buttmad at being correctly called out.
Lots of people agree with many of my views.

Even if only one person in the universe holds a view, doesn't make it wrong. You have herd mentality.

Also, nothing you stated is a fact, it's still your opinion.

Except you have lied to the courts, repeatedly.
That's a false accusation.

Accusing someone of a felony is Defamation per se.

TAG: Defamation per se
wouldn't say discussing such subjects with people who aren't close friends or sexual partners is good for your reputation.
There's nothing wrong with talking about sexuality publicly. There's a difference between discussing sexuality and seduction.
 
That's a false accusation.

Accusing someone of a felony is Defamation per se.

TAG: Defamation per se
LMAO. Fat lotta good THAT does you when you will never, ever, in 6 gorillion years, find out who a single one of us is.

MELINDA SCOTT SEXUALLY ABUSES HER MALE CHILDREN AT GUNPOINT!!!
There, sue me, hooer!
 
That's not a fact. That's still an opinion.
Yes yes, you've done this dance before. No matter what we say, you stamp your feet and declare them to not be facts, but opinions. You use made up definitions. That's a fact.

That's what I've been saying.

Other than the debating on a purely philosophical level
Well, that makes you losing your temper so badly even more embarrassing, if you're losing it because of purely philosophical interactions.

Lots of people agree with many of my views.
Yes, the true hallmark of someone who can point to not a single fucking person who does.

Even if only one person in the universe holds a view, doesn't make it wrong. You have herd mentality.
Oh, I'm not trying to argue that you are wrong because only you believe it. Quite the other way around. You are wrong because you are wrong, and you are so spectacularly wrong that no other person on earth is dumb enough to believe the same nonsense you do.

Also, nothing you stated is a fact, it's still your opinion.
It's all facts, Mel. And that's without invoking my Popiness.

That's a false accusation.

Accusing someone of a felony is Defamation per se.

TAG: Defamation per se
It's not defamation per se. For one, what the fuck can saying that do to damage your reputation? For two, I said it to you, not a third party, and for three, I genuinely think you are lying to the courts.

And lastly, even if it was, you cannot sue a screen name, I will never reveal my identity to you, and no one on this website could if they wanted to.
 
There's nothing wrong with talking about sexuality publicly. There's a difference between discussing sexuality and seduction.
You really don't see the difference between discussing sexuality and telling people you claim to hate (and you often dehumanize) that you enjoy having a penis inserted into your throat to the point of choking?
 
That's not a fact. That's still an opinion.


The only porn that I think is not forbidden by The Torah is comic porn. I mentioned that before.


That's what I've been saying.

Other than the debating on a purely philosophical level




Lots of people agree with many of my views.

Even if only one person in the universe holds a view, doesn't make it wrong. You have herd mentality.

Also, nothing you stated is a fact, it's still your opinion.


That's a false accusation.

Accusing someone of a felony is Defamation per se.

TAG: Defamation per se

There's nothing wrong with talking about sexuality publicly. There's a difference between discussing sexuality and seduction.
TAG: Fucking moron.
 
Rahab the Prostitute lied as was considered righteous enough to be spared, so you're just flat out wrong.

Secondly, you haven't posted "613 Commandments". Firstly, the notion of "613 Commandments" is a Rabbinical doctrine from the TALMUD, not The Torah. There are more than 613 commandments. Once again, you mistake The Talmud as The Torah.



You're assuming it was in my name.



"Bear false witness" means not lying in a courtroom. Doesn't say lying to Cyberstalkers is wrong.

STRIKE ONE



Half of what you posted is about false witness in a court.

Also look closely at Lev. 19:11. It's says "one another". I'm only forbidden from lying in relationships to other Israelites.
Trolls and CyberStalkers don't count.

So like I said before. I owe none of you Goyim the truth and I only tell the truth 100% in 2 situations: if I'm dealing with an Israelite or I'm dealing with law enforcement/courtrooms.

The rest of you evil Goyim can go duck yourself

Elohim hates you vile heathens and I'm on his side so I hate you with unlimited hatred too.

"Adonai, how I hate those who hate you!
I feel such disgust with those who defy you!I hate them with unlimited hatred!
They have become my enemies too." Ps. 139:21-22


May YHWH sweep you away like garbage into the Lake of Fire on the Day of Judgment



I already stated that on this thread. You learned to use the search feature, congrats

Funny I've never had someone who actually followed The Torah speak to me the way any of you have. Not a coincidence. The contents of your mouth are simply a symptom of your spiritual sickenesses

Not only that, I have never once called anyone a heretic in my life.
Dumb nigger cunt. Lmao.
 
You aren't "one another". Therefore, I do not owe you the societal benefits of The Torah.
Literally before that it said "Do not lie". Full stop. The quote says both 'do not lie', and 'do not deceive one another'. Please address the 'do not lie' bit.


You said the Lake of Fire and Hell was only a Christian belief.
I didn't say that. Another user did. And your own source seems to confirm it.
I cite in my work non-christian Apocrypha
Yes, that's all well and good, but that still doesn't defeat the citation proving you wrong taken from your own work.


I said The Torah takes precedence. Psalms is not on equal footing with The Torah. The Torah is the law which sets the moral standard. The Psalms do not create new moral laws. The Psalms is to be understood in context of The Torah. You can't ADD to The Torah (which is a book).
Source for any of that?

Also, no, Mel, Torah is not 'a' book. It's five books. Psalms is also a book, so, I'm not sure how your point should apply.

But, since I am nice, here's some citations from Torah saying to not lie:

"Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in meteyard, in weight, or in measure"

Leviticus 19:35

"Distance yourself from words of falsehood"
Exodus 23:7

Some other citations fron other books in Hebrew Bible that are crystal clear in their meaning:

“They make ready their tongue like a bow, to shoot lies; it is not by truth that they triumph in the land. They go from one sin to another; they do not acknowledge me,” declares the Lord."
Jeremiah 9:3

The Lord declares lying one of the sins. This is further supported by Jeremiah 9:5
"Friend deceives friend, and no one speaks the truth. They have taught their tongues to lie; they weary themselves with sinning."
Jeremiah 9:6-9 is the Lord declaring lying a sin, and thinking of how to punish said sinners.
Jeremiah 9:11, 15,16,22 is Lord's punishment for lying.
Jeremiah 9:13 confirms that the punishment is for forsaking his laws, context of which being lying.

"You will give truth to Jacob"

Micah 7:20

Time and time again, Hebrew Bible reinstates that lying is not okay. Why do you deny this?

The citations given are ones unused in my previous replies.


I never said I disliked it.
Yet you constantly ignore it's words as if it had no meaning.


These kind of pitfalls in your thinking. Says a lot about your moral inferiority.
Can you back up any of your assertions? Seeing as you can't, mayhaps it was your pitfall instead?
I see that lying is bad. You do not see it. Nearly all religions (including jewish one) says I am morally correct in this matter.

Facts to support your claim?
Preponderance of evidence from every single religious discussion you had here. Funny, though, that a woman who cannot support any of her accusations, accuses us of unthruthfulness.


When have I ever filed a discrimination complaint on the basis of my religious and/or racial identity?
Read again. You misunderstood what you are replying to.
What I do with my own damn vagina was detailed as one of the reasons I appeared on Kiwi Farms in the first place. Because even though what I do with my own damn vagina is first of all, "nonyabuziness",
And yet, you cannot stop yourself from explaining every bit of your alleged sex life.
and secondly, is legal,
Haven't you commited incest? It's illegal everywhere in US.
you and your comrade of Trolls thought you had some right to sit in judgment over me like you think you're the moral police of Elohim's Creation.
Cool. That still doesn't explain why you detail your sex life here.
My sex life also was brought up by others before I made statements putting it into context.

So if you never wanted to hear about my punani , then you never should have said shit in the first place!
You still made a choice to reveal all the personal details. Just because someone has brought it up first, does not absolve you of the responsibility of your own choices.


Most of we Apprentices of the Grand Architecht of the Universe are Setians.
Excuse you. I am far greater than a mere apprentice.
That's not a fact. That's still an opinion.
Hebrew Bible: Lying bad, kay?
Mel: Judaism says lying good, kay?
Also Mel: WHY DO YOU KEEP SAYING I AM LYING ABOUT MY RELIGION?
That's a false accusation.

Accusing someone of a felony is Defamation per se.
It's truth though, which is one of the reasons such suit by you would fail. You have lied to the courts. I can even recall 4 times of the top of my head without checking the record
 
@TamarYaelBatYah, what follows is an example of you lying to the court.

This is what @talk talk talk posted:

2_yUtBLJtATO.png

(https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/page-786#post-7976924)

1_rsQDdrLv5U.png

(https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/page-786#post-7977577)

What @talk talk talk posted is neither ambiguous nor vague, clearly (s)he is describing the likely behavior of court staff if you antagonise them. This is in the same family of advice as:
  • "Don't be rude to the waiter so he won't spit in our food";
  • "Be cooperative with a law enforcement officer if you want to minimise or avoid a fine"; and
  • "Be polite to the nurse if you want her to be as gentle as possible when she inserts the cannula"
This is what you submitted to the court:

1_ml29anDAv2.png


2_bWm07f6JsC.png


You blatantly lied to the court. User @talk talk talk said nothing about kiwifarms.net members interfering in your case or doing anything to you. It is absolutely clear and stated explicitly that @talk talk talk is referring to the court personnel. User @talk talk talk's above post are self-explanatory, no one that is a competent English speaker can derive from them "the KiwiFarms.net online anonymous user community could go so far as to do something illegal to hurt the Plaintiff's case". You fabricated that. You knowingly submitted a lie to the court.

Since you haven't answered I'll ask again.

This is what all users supply to register an account on this forum. You filled-in this form as did your fellow retard Marshall Casterson. You've seen this before.

4_ElGmkV2C6d.png


This is what you are asking for:

3_JnypbDOyJX.png


Do you see the problem?

Where in the account registration form do you enter telephone numbers, date of birth, "fictional names or aliases" (aside from the username), and "city, state, and country of residence information"? Can you explain where this information would come from if it is never collected? Does Null know your telephone numbers, date of birth, residential address and "fictional names or aliases" because you registered an account here?

You'll never reach this point but what if the users you are trying to sue use Tor or a VPN to access this site? If they do you will not have the IP address issued to them by their ISP. What will you do then? Stamp your feet and cry? Who specifically is going to take on the task of determining who owns a VPN account that was paid for using bitcoin that is based in Seychelles, Romania, Panama or some other nation-state that is not part of the Fourteen Eyes? What if the VPN provider operates diskless servers and consequently has no log files that indicate who did what and when? Several VPN providers do this and have third-party audit reports to prove that they keep no logs. What then? Given that you hadn't even heard the terms Tor or VPN until they were used by members here I am eager to read your brilliant plan how you will overcome this--entirely hypothetical because your case is going to get thrown out--hurdle? Wasn't Marshall's friend in military intelligence going to reveal our identities because he knew about "IP scramblers"?

mc_bjWyZrMzTJ.png

(https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/page-129#post-5879364)

It will never stop being hilarious that this absolute degenerate moron managed to find someone even stupider than himself to get a reproductive "free ride". A Noah of his era indeed.
 
NEW DOCS!

image-000001.png

image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png

image-000001.png

image-000001.png

TLDR: Judge is sexist. Raf is used as exhibits twice(of which I am part of).

Also, Mel lied to the court.

1615830741987.png


Reminder, that's not what she had said to the court previously.

1615830855836.png
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Lol, I'd forgotten all about Rafe's email trolling, and here it is, months later, forming the basis of Melinda's arguments for recusal. My only contribution was to suggest that Don Blankenship's involvement be weaved in there somewhere, because Don Blankenship is my favorite lunatic presidential candidate/robber baron.

"(these emails from rafe) are not enough to establish my lunatic freemason conspiracy theory as factual."

No kidding!
 
Back